The volatility is a crucial variable in evaluation of option prices and in conducting different hedging strategies. The aim of this paper is to provide some initial evidence of the empirical relevance of genetic programming to volatility's forecasting. By using real data from S&P500 index options, the genetic programming's ability to forecast Black and Scholes implied volatility is compared between time series samples and moneyness-time to maturity classes. Total and out-of-sample mean squared errors are used as forecasting's performance measures. Comparisons reveal that the time series model seems to be more accurate in forecasting implied volatility than moneyness-time to maturity models. Overall, results are strongly encouraging and suggest that the genetic programming approach works well in practice.
Biography Updated on 1 December 2008