New Aspects on Arterial Hypertension

Neumann, Johannes Tobias; Blankenberg, Stefan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/729850

Conference Papers in Science

On this page

Abstract Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Clinical Decisions in Acute Patients: ACS–POCT–Hypertension and Biomarkers

View this Special Issue

Conference Paper | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 729850 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/729850

New Aspects on Arterial Hypertension

Johannes Tobias Neumann¹and Stefan Blankenberg¹

Academic Editor: J. Searle, C. Hamm, A. Bellou, E. Giannitsis, M. Möckel

Received15 Jan 2013

Accepted01 Apr 2013

Published26 May 2013

Abstract

Besideestablished diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, several new approaches for the treatment of hypertension are emerging. Newer studies reveal the importance of individualized reference values for the treatment of high blood pressure. Several biomarkers have shown a predictive value for the development of hypertension, which in future might help to develop an individual risk score and therapeutic goals. In patients with therapy-resistant hypertension, renal denervation therapy offers a safe and effective therapeutic option. Follow-up studies reported a reduction of systolic blood pressure up to 32 mmHg after 24 months. A more invasive approach is the implantation of a baroreceptor stimulator, which as well was effective in treating high blood pressure. These new aspects on arterial hypertension are presented in this paper.

1. Epidemiology, Prevalence, and Diagnostic Tools

With a worldwide prevalence of 26%, arterial hypertension is a population disease of mayor medical and social-economic interest [1]. The prevalence shows important regional differences, varying from 3% in India to 60% in Germany. By lowering the blood pressure, it is possible to reduce the overall mortality and cardiovascular events [2, 3]. Classical diagnostic instruments, for example, office blood pressure and 24-hour blood pressure measurement are effective and are established in diagnosing arterial hypertension. Furthermore indirect echocardiographic parameters, for example, left-ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and dilatation of the ascending aorta are related to hypertension. Especially, diastolic dysfunction is strongly associated with arterial hypertension and is a predictor for mortality in older patients [4]. It is classified by echocardiographic measures of mitral-valve velocity and tissue Doppler into three grades.

2. Treatment Guidelines

Already today guidelines recommend individualized reference values for treating hypertension, especially for patients with cardiovascular disease, renal failure, and diabetes mellitus. In the general population, the aim of a reduction below 140/90 mmHg is well established. In patients with manifested coronary heart disease, a reduction of blood pressure below 120/70 mmHg showed an increase in mortality [5]. The HYVET Trial observed that the best outcome in older patients (>80 years) was obtained aiming for a blood pressure below 150 mmHg [6]. Reference values for patients with diabetes mellitus are not yet well evidence based, but the ACCORD study did not show a significant reduction of mortality when lowering the blood pressure below 133 mmHg [7]. Besides lifestyle changes, including physical exercise and weight loss, antihypertensive drugs are the basic therapeutic option. The first commonly used and well-tolerated medial therapy was introduced in 1957 [8]. Nowadays, there are many established antihypertensive drugs, while ACE inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin-renin blockers (ARBs), diuretics, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are the first choice. The recommendations on the choice of antihypertensive drugs are depending on the national guidelines and show some variation. The European Cardiac Society recommends a monotherapy in patients with moderate arterial hypertension and a low cardiovascular risk [9]. Otherwise, a combination of two drugs is recommended. In patients with special medical conditions, some drugs should be preferred (e.g., ACEI/ARB in subclinical organ damage or diuretics/CCB in elderly and blacks) [9]. A timetable of the milestones in the treatment of hypertension is shown in Figure 1.

3. Role of Biomarkers in Arterial Hypertension

The role of several biomarkers in arterial hypertension is still evaluated. In a large trial, which included 16.000 women, concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cholesterol were independently associated with the future development of hypertension [10, 11]. In a multibiomarker approach CRP, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) were significantly related to incident hypertension [12]. This prospective study included 1500 nonhypertensive individuals, which received a baseline measurement of CRP, fibrinogen, PAI-1, aldosterone, renin, homocysteine, natriuretic peptides, and the UACR. This panel of 9 biomarkers was associated with the development of hypertension, while CRP, PAI-1, and the UACR showed significant results alone. Various new biomarkers are emerging, and with the framework program “Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe” (BiomarCaRE), we can expect new insights into their predictive value for the development of hypertension.

4. New Directions

In patients with therapy-resistant arterial hypertension, renal denervation is a new therapeutic option. In 2009, the first-in-men study showed that denervation of renal sympathetic nerves was safe and effective in lowering the blood pressure [13]. Follow-up studies reported a reduction of systolic blood pressure up to 32 mmHg after 24 months [14, 15]. The effects on renal denervation therapy are not yet completely understood, but various effects on the cardiovascular system have been recently reported. For example, the glucose metabolism was improved, and arterial stiffness was reduced after renal denervation [16, 17]. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the recurrence rate was reduced after combined renal and cardiac ablation [18]. Several new devices are currently assessed in clinical trials and will widen the therapeutic options, such as “EnligHTN” by St. Jude Medical, “Vessix V2” by Vessix Vascular, “One Shot” by Covidien, and the ultrasound-based “PARADISE” device by ReCor Medical. Stimulating the baroreceptors at the carotid sinus by implantation of the Rheos device is an additional therapeutic option that was effective in reducing blood pressure in therapy-resistant hypertension [19]. A completely new approach offers the antibody CYT006-AngQb, which stimulates production of antibodies against angiotensin II [20]. In the first clinical trial it was effective in reducing blood pressure by 9 mmHg systolic in 83 individuals, but it is still in a very early stage of clinical research.

5. Conclusion

In summary, several new approaches for treatment of hypertension are emerging. It is more and more important to individualize reference values for blood pressure. Several biomarkers could be associated with hypertension. In the future, biomarkers might help to establish an individual risk score and to develop individual therapeutic goals. Renal denervation therapy offers a safe and effective therapeutic option in patients with therapy-resistant hypertension.

References

P. M. Kearney, M. Whelton, K. Reynolds, P. Muntner, P. K. Whelton, and J. He, “Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9455, pp. 217–223, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Greenberg, “MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results,” British Medical Journal, vol. 291, no. 6488, pp. 97–104, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Liu, Y. Zhang, G. Liu, W. Li, X. Zhang, and A. Zanchetti, “The Felodipine Event Reduction (FEVER) study: a randomized long-term placebo-controlled trial in Chinese hypertensive patients,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2157–2172, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, M. J. Roman et al., “Mitral ratio of peak early to late diastolic filling velocity as a predictor of mortality in middle-aged and elderly adults: the strong heart study,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 16, pp. 1928–1933, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hansson, A. Zanchetti, S. G. Carruthers et al., “Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9118, pp. 1755–1762, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Beckett, R. Peters, A. E. Fletcher et al., “Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 18, pp. 1887–1898, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
W. C. Cushman, G. W. Evans, R. P. Byington et al., “Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 17, pp. 1575–1585, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Novello and J. M. Sprague, “Benzothiadiazine dioxides as novel diuretics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2028–2029, 1957.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak et al., “2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),” European Heart Journal, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1462–1536, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
H. D. Sesso, J. E. Buring, M. J. Chown, P. M. Ridker, and J. M. Gaziano, “A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in women,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 20, pp. 2420–2427, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. D. Sesso, J. E. Buring, N. Rifai, G. J. Blake, J. M. Gaziano, and P. M. Ridker, “C-reactive protein and the risk of developing hypertension,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 290, no. 22, pp. 2945–2951, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Wang, P. Gona, M. G. Larson et al., “Multiple biomarkers and the risk of incident hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 432–438, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Krum, M. Schlaich, R. Whitbourn et al., “Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9671, pp. 1275–1281, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Krum, “Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months,” Hypertension, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 911–917, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Esler, H. Krum, P. A. Sobotka et al., “Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9756, pp. 1903–1909, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Mahfoud, M. Schlaich, I. Kindermann et al., “Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: a pilot study,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 18, pp. 1940–1946, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Brandt, S. Reda, F. Mahfoud, M. Lenski, M. Bohm, and U. C. Hoppe, “Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 19, pp. 1956–1965, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Pokushalov, A. Romanov, G. Corbucci et al., “A randomized comparison of pulmonary vein isolation with versus without concomitant renal artery denervation in patients with refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation and resistant hypertension,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 13, pp. 1163–1170, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. D. Bisognano, C. L. Kaufman, D. S. Bach, E. G. Lovett, and P. de Leeuw, “Improved cardiac structure and function with chronic treatment using an implantable device in resistant hypertension: results from European and United States trials of the Rheos system,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 57, no. 17, pp. 1787–1788, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Tissot, P. Maurer, J. Nussberger et al., “Effect of immunisation against angiotensin II with CYT006-AngQb on ambulatory blood pressure: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase IIa study,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9615, pp. 821–827, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Johannes Tobias Neumann and Stefan Blankenberg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

882

Downloads

623

Citations