Journal Menu
- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Submit a Manuscript
- Table of Contents
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 563085, 3 pages
doi:10.1155/2012/563085
Case Report
Twin Gestation in a Septate Bicornuate Uterus
Maternity Unit, Nisa Premier Hospital, Plot 115–117, Alex Ekwueme Street, P.O. Box 7320, Jabi, Abuja 900001, Nigeria
Received 18 October 2012; Accepted 11 November 2012
Academic Editors: P. De Franciscis and B. Piura
Copyright © 2012 Henry Osazuwa and David Ejenobo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Linked References
- M. Hua, A. O. Odibo, R. E. Longman, G. A. MacOnes, K. A. Roehl, and A. G. Cahill, “Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 205, no. 6, pp. 558.e1–558.e5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
- Y. Y. Chan, K. Jayaprakasan, J. Zamora, J. G. Thornton, N. Raine-Fenning, and A. Coomarasamy, “The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 761–771, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
- S. H. Saravelos, K. A. Cocksedge, and T. C. Li, “Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 415–429, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- P. C. Lin, K. P. Bhatnagar, G. S. Nettleton, and S. T. Nakajima, “Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 899–915, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- A. M. Vallerie and L. L. Breech, “Update in Mullerian anomalies: diagnosis, management, and outcomes,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 381–387, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- D. M. Lee, R. Osathanondh, and J. Yeh, “Localization of Bcl-2 in the human fetal mullerian tract,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 135–140, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- V. C. Buttram, V. Gomel, A. Siegler, A. DeCherney, W. Gibbons, and C. March, “The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 944–955, 1988. View at Scopus
- S. Y. Brucker, K. Rall, R. Campo, P. Oppelt, and K. Isaacson, “Treatment of congenital malformations,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- L. Leo, S. Arduino, G. Febo et al., “Cervical cerclage for malformed uterus,” Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 104–106, 1997. View at Scopus
- R. Wapner and A. H. Jobe, “Controversy: antenatal steroids,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 529–545, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar