Table 4:
Results on MR images in Figure
4
by three methods (SR = 38.56%,
𝑠
=
8
,
𝑝
=
2
).
Image no.
Method
Exp. result
SNR
Rel. err.
Iter
Figure
4(a)
CTVCS [
6
]
33.0915
0.32%
58
TVCMRI [
11
]
33.3962
0.31%
81
HQRCSparET
𝟒
𝟖
.
𝟖
𝟔
𝟖
𝟕
𝟎
.
𝟕
𝟐
62
Figure
4(b)
CTVCS [
6
]
36.5660
0.27%
56
TVCMRI [
11
]
38.5121
0.22%
84
HQRCSparET
𝟓
𝟑
.
𝟏
𝟔
𝟔
𝟕
𝟎
.
𝟓
𝟐
63
Figure
4(c)
CTVCS [
6
]
33.9407
0.40%
57
TVCMRI [
11
]
35.0528
0.36%
80
HQRCSparET
𝟓
𝟒
.
𝟑
𝟑
𝟏
𝟗
𝟎
.
𝟑
𝟕
62
Figure
4(d)
CTVCS [
6
]
33.7718
0.38%
58
TVCMRI [
11
]
34.3157
0.35%
79
HQRCSparET
𝟑
𝟕
.
𝟏
𝟑
𝟕
𝟕
𝟎
.
𝟐
𝟕
%
62
Figure
4(e)
CTVCS [
6
]
27.5838
0.91%
55
TVCMRI [
11
]
28.4253
0.79%
81
HQRCSparET
𝟐
𝟗
.
𝟖
𝟒
𝟏
𝟓
𝟎
.
𝟕
𝟖
%
64
Figure
4(f)
CTVCS [
6
]
30.8622
0.74%
54
TVCMRI [
11
]
32.5762
0.61%
76
HQRCSparET
𝟑
𝟓
.
𝟑
𝟑
𝟔
𝟕
𝟎
.
𝟓
𝟑
%
64