`ISRN Materials ScienceVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 863025, 18 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/863025`
Review Article

## Metastable Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage

Department of Sustainable Energy Technologies, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Received 3 October 2012; Accepted 29 October 2012

Academic Editors: G. C. Mather and A. O. Neto

Copyright © 2012 Jason Graetz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The possibility of using hydrogen as a reliable energy carrier for both stationary and mobile applications has gained renewed interest in recent years due to improvements in high temperature fuel cells and a reduction in hydrogen production costs. However, a number of challenges remain and new media are needed that are capable of safely storing hydrogen with high gravimetric and volumetric densities. Metal hydrides and complex metal hydrides offer some hope of overcoming these challenges; however, many of the high capacity “reversible” hydrides exhibit a large endothermic decomposition enthalpy making it difficult to release the hydrogen at low temperatures. On the other hand, the metastable hydrides are characterized by a low reaction enthalpy and a decomposition reaction that is thermodynamically favorable under ambient conditions. The rapid, low temperature hydrogen evolution rates that can be achieved with these materials offer much promise for mobile PEM fuel cell applications. However, a critical challenge exists to develop new methods to regenerate these hydrides directly from the reactants and hydrogen gas. This spotlight paper presents an overview of some of the metastable metal hydrides for hydrogen storage and a few new approaches being investigated to address the key challenges associated with these materials.

#### 1. Introduction

The doubling of the world’s energy consumption over the next fifty years [1] will require significant changes in the way we produce, distribute, store, and use energy. A crucial step in this process will be reducing our dependence on carbon-based fossil fuels. The rapidly growing global demand for oil will likely outpace production within a few decades (if it has not already). Although petroleum fuels can be produced from coal through a Fischer-Tropsch process, this method is costly and will likely result in greater greenhouse gas (e.g., CO2) emissions. Hydrogen is a versatile, clean energy carrier that can be produced from natural gas reforming and a variety of carbon free energy sources such as solar, wind, and nuclear energy through water electrolysis. Hydrogen can easily be converted into mechanical or electrical energy through a combustion reaction or fuel cell, respectively. In both cases the hydrogen reacts with oxygen to produce water and energy ( with a theoretical energy of theoretical energy density of 120 kJ/g).

Hydrogen storage remains one of the more challenging technological barriers to the advancement of hydrogen fuel cell technologies for mobile applications. Since hydrogen is a gas at standard pressure and temperature (SPT), it has a low volumetric density. Although one kilogram of H2 can replace about 3 kg or one gallon (3.79 L) of gasoline, on a volumetric scale more than 3500 gallons (1.3 × 104 L volume of a midsize car) of H2 gas is necessary to replace just one gallon (3.79 L) of gasoline at SPT.

There are a variety of ways to store hydrogen (as shown in Figure 1), and the more conventional methods include compressed gas (typically 350 or 700 bar) and liquefaction, where the hydrogen is cooled to below its boiling point (20 K). However, these options are costly and require extremely high pressures or low temperatures to achieve reasonable hydrogen densities. Solid-state hydrogen storage, where the hydrogen is either attached onto the surface (adsorption) or inserted into a host material, offers improved volumetric energy densities at moderate pressures and temperatures. In fact, many metal hydrides have a hydrogen density greater than that of liquid hydrogen (Figure 1). Most hydrogen storage materials can be divided into two categories, those that bind molecular hydrogen to surfaces via weak dipole (van der Waals) interactions (typically <10 kJ/mol H2) [2] in a process known as physisorption (e.g., activated carbons and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) and those that trap atomic hydrogen via a strong (typically >10 kJ/mol H2) chemical bond (e.g., metal hydrides, complex hydrides and chemical hydrides). There has been tremendous progress in the development of new physisorbents for hydrogen storage in recent years [38]; however, these materials typically exhibit appreciable storage capacities (e.g., >2 wt.%) only at low temperature (e.g., 77 K).

Figure 1: Volumetric hydrogen density (gH/L) of a variety of hydrogen storage methods including compressed gas (350 and 700 bar), physisorption in a metal organic framework (MOF), liquid hydrogen (LH2), ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), and a variety of metal and complex hydrides. The values present in this graph are only for the storage medium and do not take into account the full system volume (e.g., tank and fuel cell).

#### 2. Metal Hydrides and Complex Hydrides

Hydrogen storage materials that store atomic hydrogen through a chemical bond are often categorized by their “reversibility”, or their ability to be rehydrogenated under moderate temperature and pressure conditions. Recently, much attention has been focused on reversible complex metal hydrides, specifically sodium aluminum hydride (NaAlH4). During thermal decomposition of catalyzed NaAlH4 (typically 2–4 mol% Ti) approximately 4 wt.% of hydrogen is released at a temperature of around 160°C. Most importantly, the dehydrogenated material (NaH + Al) can be rehydrogenated under moderate conditions [9]. The demonstration of reversible hydrogen cycling in the complex metal hydrides was a breakthrough in solid-state hydrogen storage. Catalyzed sodium aluminum hydride is capable of cycling approximately twice the hydrogen (on a weight basis) of any of the conventional metal hydrides (e.g., FeTiHx). Since this discovery, hydrogen reversibility has been demonstrated in other complex hydrides including Na2LiAlH6, KAlH4, K3AlH6, K2LiAlH6, and K2NaAlH6 [911].

Despite the recent progress in the development of new reversible complex hydrides for hydrogen storage, systems based on these materials have an inherent heat problem, which poses a significant engineering challenge for on-board refueling. This problem is due to the large hydrogenation enthalpy (typically greater than 33 kJ/mol H2) characteristic of metal hydrides reversible at around 100°C. The large enthalpy is necessary to offset the large entropy change (110–130 J/K mol H2) during hydrogenation and achieve a near-zero free energy change. Based on a generic reversible hydride with a slightly positive free energy (so that H2 is released at pressures above 1 atm) and a 5 kg H2 tank, approximately 83 MJ of heat is released during hydrogenation. Although this is a lot of wasted energy, the real problem arises when we consider the rapid refueling rates necessary to complete the process in approximately 3 minutes (1.67 kg H2/min). The 83 MJ of heat generated during refueling will need to be dissipated at a rate of ~0.5 MW, which is an extremely challenging engineering problem that is not likely to be solved by moderate improvements in heat exchangers [12]. The large reaction enthalpy also presents a problem for the decomposition reaction since a substantial heat exchange system is required to provide the heat necessary to release the H2 at a rate to satisfy the fuel cell demand.

#### 3. Chemical Hydrides

Given the challenges associated with adsorbents (low gravimetric capacity at room temperature) and the reversible hydrides (low gravimetric capacity and large heats of reaction), there has been a growing interest in the chemical hydrides, which offer high capacity and rapid hydrogen rates at low temperature. However, these hydrides are not directly reversible under moderate hydrogenation conditions and typically require “off-board” chemical regeneration. Since the barrier to hydrogenation can be thermodynamic, kinetic, or both, these materials can have a range of decomposition enthalpies from weak (e.g., AlH3  ΔH = 7 kJ/mol H2) to strong (e.g., LiBH4  ΔH = 67 kJ/mol H2 for partial decomposition). For the more stable compounds, such as NaBH4, the hydrogen is typically generated through a low temperature hydrolysis reaction:

In this type of system, a large amount of hydrogen can be generated at rapid rates that easily meet the US Department of Energy’s fuel flow rate target 0.02 gs−1 kW−1. These types of reactions are useful for some applications, especially when water is easily accessible (e.g., marine applications), but there are also a number of limitations, namely, regeneration of the spent fuel. After hydrolysis the reactants are left in deep thermodynamic well that makes the regeneration (refueling) process economically and energetically costly.

On the other end of the spectrum, there is a class of weakly bound chemical hydrides that can release hydrogen at rapid rates through a low temperature thermolysis reaction; these are known as the metastable or kinetically stabilized hydrides. These materials have an equilibrium H2 pressure () much greater than 1 bar at room temperature, but do not decompose (or decompose very slowly) due to kinetic limitations. One of the more popular examples is ammonia borane (NH3BH3), which has a total gravimetric hydrogen capacity of nearly 20 wt.%. Although there are a number of high capacity hydrogen storage materials where the hydrogen is bound to a light main group element (e.g., C–H, B–H, N–H, or O–H), ammonia borane is somewhat unique in that it contains both protic (N–H) and hydridic (B–H) bonds and a strong B–N bond [13, 14]. Although ammonia borane can be prepared in a metastable state at room temperature, it is thermodynamically unstable and can, in an ideal reaction, decompose exothermically to yield aminoborane and H2 gas. Despite the strength of the B–N bond, the decomposition is often associated with the formation of a small amount of gaseous species such as ammonia (NH3) or diborane (B2H6). Even small quantities (a few parts-per-million) of these unwanted species is sufficient to poison a low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell. In recent years a number of new methods have been identified to limit these side reactions and efforts are underway to design systems equipped with scrubbers to trap these species before they reach the fuel cell. Further information on the latest developments on ammonia borane can be found in a few recent review articles [1416].

#### 4. Metastable Metal Hydrides

Similar to ammonia borane, the metastable metal hydrides offer high capacities and low temperature hydrogen release. However, unlike ammonia borane, thermal decomposition does not result in the formation of gaseous species that can degrade capacity and poison the fuel cell. Of particular interest are the aluminum-based metastable hydrides including aluminum hydride (AlH3), lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH4 and Li3AlH6), magnesium aluminum hydride (Mg(AlH4)2), among others. These materials exhibit a low decomposition enthalpy, which reduces the heat required to release the hydrogen at practical pressures. In addition, these materials exhibit rapid H2 evolution rates at low temperature (80–100°C), due to the large driving force for decomposition.

Many of the metastable aluminum-based hydrides are ideally suited for portable power systems where weight and volume are critical. This is because the energy density of a power source consisting of a metal hydride and a PEM fuel cell is substantially larger than even the best batteries currently available as shown in Table 1. The actual energy density of a system that utilizes AlH3 as the power source is not known (only a few small prototype systems currently exist), but based on similar systems it is reasonable to estimate a 50% penalty for weight of the tank, fuel cell, and additional hardware and an additional 50% penalty for the fuel cell conversion efficiency. This yields a system energy density that is 25% of the material energy density. Even under this rather conservative scenario, a hydrogen fuel cell using a metal hydride (e.g., AlH3) as an H2 source yields gravimetric and volumetric energy densities over four times greater than even the best performing lithium polymer batteries.

Table 1: Comparison of hydride—fuel cell system (AlH3 + 50 kW fuel cell operating at 50% efficiency and assuming an additional 50% energy reduction to account for the fuel cell system weight) with conventional battery systems showing the specific energy and energy density.

This spotlight paper reviews recent research efforts on the metastable metal hydrides and is specifically focused on metastable aluminum-based hydrides (alanes and alanates). This paper covers the synthesis procedures, crystal structures, thermodynamics and decomposition pathways, kinetics of hydrogen release, and regeneration efforts. A more general review on hydrogen storage, metal hydrides, and complex hydrides can be found elsewhere [4653].

#### 5. Synthesis

The earliest reports on the synthesis of aluminum hydride date back to the forties when Stecher and Wiberg [54] and later Finholt et al. [55] prepared alane amine and alane etherate adducts. Approximately ten years later Chizinsky et al. [56] prepared the first nonsolvated form of AlH3 using an ethereal reaction of AlCl3 with LiAlH4. In the sixties and seventies Brower et al. prepared a total of seven different polymorphs of AlH3, , , , , , , using a similar method [57]. The conventional synthesis method for the preparation of α-AlH3 is given below:

Importantly, excess LiAlH4, and in some cases excess LiBH4, is added to the alane-ether solution to reduce the time and temperature required to remove the ether [58, 59]. The desolvation step (reaction (3)) determines the polymorph type and particle size. In the final step, the excess LiAlH4 and LiBH4 is removed by a wash with diethyl ether (AlH3 is insoluble in Et2O) and, in some cases, a wash in dilute hydrochloric acid. Aluminum hydride (etherated or pure) can also be synthesized using any of the binary hydrides or tetrahydroaluminates (alanates) from the 1st and 2nd groups through a reaction with a Brønsted-Lewis acid (e.g., AlCl3) [58, 6067].

A variety of routes can be used to synthesize the complex aluminum hydrides. The most stable alanates (e.g., KAlH4, NaAlH4, and NaLiAlH4), also known as the reversible alanates, can be synthesized by direct hydrogenation of aluminum and the binary hydride [9, 6870]:

The metastable alanates are not easily formed by direct hydrogenation under reasonable pressures and are typically prepared through solution methods. Probably the most common method for the preparation of these materials is a reaction of a binary hydride with a metal halide to form an alanate, as shown below [32, 66, 71, 72]:

A similar approach involves a metathesis reaction of a metal halide (MgCl2) and an alanate (NaAlH4) to form the metastable alanate (Mg(AlH4)2) [35, 69, 73, 74]:

However, these procedures are energetically and economically costly since the expensive alkali metals (e.g., Na) form stable salt (e.g., NaCl) byproducts, which are difficult to separate. Interestingly, many alanates can be prepared directly from AlH3 and a binary metal hydride in a chemical or mechanochemical reaction [75, 76], such as:

#### 6. Crystal Structures

The thermodynamic stability of the hydride is determined by its structure and composition. The lightweight aluminum-based hydrides can exist as pure aluminum hydride (AlH3), a covalently bonded solid, or as a complex hydride consisting of a covalently bonded anion (e.g., or ) and a cation. Pure aluminum hydride comes in a variety of polymorphs (α, α′, β, γ), all of which are metastable at room temperature [1828]. The crystal structure of α-AlH3 is trigonal ( space group) and consists of corner connected AlH6 octahedra with each H bridging two octahedra as shown in Figure 2 (left). The complex aluminum hydrides tend to be more stable since the complex anion is stabilized by a cation, typically an alkali (e.g., Li, Na, K) [9, 2931, 33, 34, 36, 70], or alkaline earth metal (e.g., Mg, Ca) [35, 37, 38, 40, 74], or a transition metal (e.g., Ti, Fe) [32, 39, 77]. The complex aluminum hydrides typically appear in two forms, the tetrahydroaluminates (), where Al is tetrahedrally coordinated by H, and hexahydroaluminates (M3AlH6, MAlH5, M2AlH7), where Al is octahedrally coordinated by H. The crystal structure of Mg(AlH4)2, a tetrahydroaluminate, is shown in Figure 2 (right). Mg(AlH4)2 crystalizes in the Pm1 space group and consists of AlH4 tetrahedra forming a close-pack double layer separated by a layer of Mg atoms [44]. A list of some lightweight metastable aluminum hydrides is shown in Table 2 along with their theoretical hydrogen content and decomposition temperature. A more thorough review of these materials and their hydrogen storage properties can be found in a few recent review articles [28, 41, 78].

Table 2: A few examples of unstable and metastable aluminum-based hydrides showing hydrogen weight percent and the initial decomposition temperature (in many cases full hydrogen desorption occurs over multiple steps that occur at higher temperatures). It is also worth noting that the decomposition temperatures listed identify the temperature at which significant H2 evolution occurs and may be lower than the exothermic or endothermic peaks observed in calorimetric measurements.
Figure 2: Crystal structures of alpha aluminum hydride (α-AlH3), showing AlH6 octahedra, and magnesium alanate (Mg(AlH4)2) showing tetrahedra and Mg+ cation (yellow) viewed along the direction [18, 77].

#### 7. Thermodynamics and Decomposition Pathways

The decomposition thermodynamics, or more specifically, the free energy difference between the reactant and the product, determines the H2 equilibrium pressure at a given temperature. For binary hydrides (e.g., AlH3) the decomposition pathway is a single step (to the elements) and the decomposition enthalpy is the negative of the formation enthalpy. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) plots from α-, β-, and γ-AlH3 undergoing thermal decomposition (temperature ramp from 35 to 300°C) are shown in Figure 2. The DSC trace from α-AlH3 exhibits a single endothermic peak at around 170°C and is attributed to the decomposition of α-AlH3:

Although the endothermic peak occurs at 170°C, α-AlH3 will decompose slowly at lower temperatures (complete decomposition in ~10 hrs at 100°C) [19]. Experimentally determined (calorimetry) values for the formation enthalpy of α-AlH3 range from −6.0 to −7.6 kJ/mol H2 [20, 45, 79], with a formation entropy of 20 J/K mol H2 [44]. Based on these values the Gibbs formation energy for α-AlH3 at 300 K is approximately 31 kJ/mol H2 [20, 44]. The DSC plots from β-AlH3 and γ-AlH3 are also shown in Figure 3. In addition to the endothermic decomposition peak at 170°C, there are distinct exothermic peaks at approximately 100°C for both polymorphs. A similar exothermic peak was observed during decomposition of α′-AlH3 [80]. These peaks are due to a polymorphic transition (no H2 release) from the less stable phase (α′, β, γ) to the more stable α phase. The energies of the polymorph transitions are −1.1 kJ/mol H2 (), −1.0 kJ/mol H2 (β-AlH3α-AlH3), and −1.9 kJ/mol H2 (γ-AlH3α-AlH3) [20, 79]. Subsequent studies have shown that at higher temperature (>100°C) the decomposition of the less stable polymorphs occurs by a polymorphic transition to the α phase followed by H2 release [25, 28]. At lower temperatures the decomposition is more complex with a fraction of the material decomposing directly to the elements (e.g., γ-AlH3 → Al + 3/2H2) while the remaining material transforms to α-AlH3 before decomposing (e.g., γ-AlH3α-AlH3 → Al + 3/2H2).

Figure 3: DSC traces (10°C/min) from (a) α-AlH3, (b) β-AlH3, and (c) γ-AlH3 showing the exothermic polymorphic transition at ~100°C and the endothermic decomposition at ~170°C [20].

The decomposition pathways for the complex metal hydrides are not always as simple as those of the binary hydrides. For example, the group 1 tetrahydroaluminates (e.g., LiAlH4) typically decompose to a hexahydridoaluminate first, then to a binary hydride (and Al), and finally to the alloy (LiAl) [31, 43], as shown below:

Tomiyasu et al. recently showed that in the case of LiAlH4, the decomposition stems from a lattice instability attributed to the weak of binding of the complex anions in the lattice [81].

For the metastable hydrides, the decomposition can be exothermic or weakly endothermic. Figure 4 shows the DSC traces from three metastable hydrides (LiAlH4, Ca(AlH4)2, and Mg(AlH4)2) during thermal decomposition. At each stage of the reaction the material releases some hydrogen and undergoes a structural transition to a more stable phase. The Mg(AlH4)2 phase undergoes a slightly endothermic transition (ΔH = 1.7–5.5 kJ/mol) at ~110°C directly to the binary hydride (MgH2) and Al  [37, 42, 82]:

Figure 4: DSC traces (5°C/min) from (a) Mg(AlH4)2 [33], (b) Ca(AlH4)2 [33], and (c) LiAlH4 [27] showing exothermic (positive peaks) and endothermic (negative peaks) transitions.

The first decomposition step of Ca(AlH4)2 is exothermic and occurs at ~150°C [37, 38, 81, 83]:

The decomposition enthalpy of this step is −7.4 kJ/mol. Unlike Mg(AlH4)2, the Ca(AlH4)2 decomposes to a pentahydride phase, before undergoing a more endothermic transition to the binary hydride at higher temperatures.

The decomposition of LiAlH4 occurs by a three-step reaction first to the hexahydridoaluminate (Li3AlH6), then to LiH and Al, and finally to the elements Li and Al (reaction (10)). The DSC trace at the bottom of Figure 4 shows a slight exothermic peak at 150°C, which is attributed to a reaction with hydroxyl groups on the surface. The first endothermic minimum at ~170°C is due to melting [29, 33], which is immediately followed by the exothermic decomposition (175–220°C) of liquid LiAlH4 to the solid Li3AlH6. Although considerably more reactive in the liquid state, solid LiAlH4 is metastable and can spontaneously decompose slowly at room temperature [84]. LiAlH4 exhibits a large, negative formation enthalpy (−94 kJ/mol) [42], making it stable against decomposition to the elements; however, LiAlH4 is thermodynamically unstable against decomposition to the hexahydroaluminate phase (step 1 of reaction (10)) [33]. The higher temperature endotherm in the DSC trace (240°C) is attributed to the decomposition of Li3AlH6 to LiH and Al (step 2 of reaction (10)) [30, 33]. The final decomposition step is the endothermic hydrogen release from LiH (step 3 of reaction (10)), which occurs at much higher temperatures (>450°C).

A list of decomposition reactions, along with the amount of H2 released and the reaction enthalpy (ΔH), is shown in Table 3. A plot of the calculated equilibrium pressure as a function of temperature (van’t Hoff plot) for several metastable hydrides is shown in Figure 5 [20, 37, 43, 44, 85, 86]. It is important to note that the values used in Figure 5 correspond to H2 fugacities, not hydrogen pressures. If H2 is treated strictly as an ideal gas, a reasonable approximation at low pressures (<300 bar), then the hydrogen pressure is roughly equivalent to the hydrogen fugacity. However, at higher pressures the thermodynamic activity of H2 is considerably higher than what is expected from an ideal gas [87, 88]. The fugacity-to-pressure ratio for H2 gas is ~1 at 1 bar, ~2 at 1 kbar, and ~300 at 10 kbar. Therefore, in some cases, hydrogenation occurs at much lower pressures than what is predicted from the reaction isotherm equation. In the case of α-AlH3 at 300 K the predicted H2 fugacity is  bar, which is equivalent to a hydrogen pressure of 7 kbar [89], which is in reasonable agreement with high pressure hydrogenation experiments [9093].

Table 3: Decomposition reactions of a few metastable metal hydrides showing H2 content (wt.%) and enthalpy (kJ/mol H2). Negative enthalpy values indicate an exothermic decomposition reaction.
Figure 5: Approximate van’t Hoff plots for several reversible and nonreversible hydrides [20, 37, 43, 44, 83, 84]. The compounds in the lower left (shaded) region are stable while the compounds in the upper right are unstable or metastable at ambient pressure and temperature. The box represents the thermodynamic target for “on-board reversible” hydrides. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry [94].

#### 8. Kinetics and H Rates

The rate of H2 desorption from aluminum hydride and lithium aluminum hydride varies considerably with the properties of the material (e.g., structure, morphology/size, surface composition, and catalyst concentration). The isothermal decomposition curve typically has a similar sigmoidal shape (over a single reaction step) with three distinct regions as shown in Figure 6 for AlH3: (i) an induction period at the onset of the reaction, corresponding to a break-up of the surface layer and nucleation of aluminum; (ii) an acceleratory period, attributed to growth of the aluminum phase in two and three dimensions; (iii) a decay period, where the concentration of the hydride phase is limited and the growing aluminum particles begin to overlap [28].

Figure 6: Isothermal decomposition of α-AlH3 (prepared by Dow Chemical Co.) at 180°C showing (I) induction period, (II) acceleratory period, and (III) decay period [28].

Isothermal H2 evolution rates (based on 100 kg of material) for the metastable metal hydrides α-AlH3 and LiAlH4 (first step only) and catalyzed and uncatalyzed NaAlH4 (first step only) are shown in Figure 7 [19, 30, 95]. The high hydrogen evolution rates at low temperature are clearly evident in the plot. At 120°C the H2 evolution rate from LiAlH4 (first part of reaction (10)) is 100 times greater than that of NaAlH4 (uncatalyzed). The decomposition of Li3AlH6 in the second step (second part of reaction (10)) also occurs rapidly at low temperature (120–140°C) [30]. The activation energies for the two-step decomposition of LiAlH4 are 82 kJ/mol (first part of reaction (10)) and 90–100 kJ/mol (second part of reaction (10)) [30, 96]. The kinetic studies of Andreasen et al. suggest that the decomposition of the tetrahydride is limited by long-range metal transport [30], similar to the NaAlH4 system [93, 97].

Figure 7: Hydrogen evolution rates (based on 100 kg of material) for the metastable metal hydrides α-AlH3 and LiAlH4 (first step only) compared to catalyzed and uncatalyzed NaAlH4 (first step only) [19, 30, 93]. The dotted line shows the US Department of Energy (DOE) H2 rate target for a 50 kW fuel cell (1 gH2/s).

In the case of LiAlH4, low temperature (<250°C) dehydrogenation occurs over two distinct reaction steps (see reaction (10)). Over the past 10 years there has been considerable interest in identifying catalysts to enhance the low temperature desorption rates and/or decrease the desorption temperature. A significant reduction in decomposition temperature has been achieved using a variety of additives including TiF3 [98], TiCl3 [99], [100, 101], VCl3 [99, 102], LaCl3 [103], NbF5 [104], VBr3 [100], AlCl3 [100], NiCl2 [105], nanoscale Fe and Ni [80, 106], TiC , and carbon fibers [107]. As an example we can compare the activation energy for the first decomposition step (), which is typically around 102 kJ/mol for the uncatalyzed material [99, 105]. The activation energy is reduced to ~95 kJ/mol with the addition of 2 mol%   and 90 kJ/mol with the addition of 2 mol% VCl3 (activation energies determined from decomposition of LiAlD4) [99]. A more substantial decrease in desorption temperature was achieved with the addition of a few mole percent of TiC (shown in Figure 8), which lowered the activation energy to 86 kJ/mol [105]. Further reductions in the desorption temperature were recently demonstrated with the addition of 1 mol% NbF5, which lowered the activation energy to 67 kJ/mol [102], and nanoscale iron particles, which reduced the activation energy to 55–60 kJ/mol [80].

Figure 8: Thermal desorption profiles of as-received LiAlH4 and LiAlH4 catalyzed with 1–5 mol% TiC at a heating rate of 4°C/min up to 250°C. Reproduced by permission of Elsevier [105].

Similar to LiAlH4, the hydrogen evolution rates from AlH3 are rapid at low temperature. Early kinetic studies were performed by Herley and Christofferson [108] for the decomposition of the α-AlH3 (stabilized form prepared by Dow Chem. Co.) and more recently by Graetz and Reilly for α-, β-, and γ-AlH3 [19]. At 120°C the H2 evolution rate from α-AlH3 is ~2 gH2/s, based on 100 kg of material. This rate is more than 1000 times greater than that of NaAlH4 (uncatalyzed) and exceeds the full flow target of 1 gH2/s for a 50 kW fuel cell. The early studies by Rafi-Ud-Din et al. on a stabilized form of α-AlH3, prepared by the Dow Chemical Company, revealed an activation energy of ~150 kJ/mol [109]. However, more recent studies on freshly synthesized α-AlH3, without the stabilizing coating, gave an activation energy of ~102 kJ/mol for the same polymorph [19]. In both cases, the isothermal decomposition curves from both stabilized and unstabilized α-AlH3 were found to obey Avrami-Erofeev kinetics, suggesting that desorption rates are limited by nucleation and growth of the Al phase [19, 109].

At high temperatures (>100°C) all three AlH3 polymorphs exhibit similar decomposition rates. The less stable γ and β phases quickly transform to the α phase before decomposing to the elements [20] and the H2 evolution rates are essentially governed by the decomposition of the α phase. Below 100°C there is a clear splitting of the kinetic plot with much faster H2 rates occurring in the γ and β phases. As previously mentioned, at the lower temperatures the less stable polymorphs (α′, β and γ) undergo some direct decomposition to Al + 3/2H2 without transforming to the α phase. Therefore, these phases (α′, β and γ) will likely be too unstable for many applications (e.g., automotive) that require material stability at temperatures up to 50°C. However, there may be alternative applications for these materials, where a slow, steady hydrogen release is required at room temperature.

A suitable hydrogen storage material must not only exhibit rapid H2 rates at low temperature, but also a controllable decomposition. Isothermal and intermittent isothermal decomposition from α-AlH3 (Figure 9) shows the total H2 evolved (red circles) and the first derivative of the total H2 evolved (blue line), which corresponds to the H2 rate for 100 kg of material. Importantly, Figure 9(b) clearly demonstrates that the H2 evolution rates can be slowed and even stopped by reducing the reactor temperature. When the reactor is heated back to the decomposition temperature (120°C), the rate returns to the rate before the temperature was reduced. When the reactor is repeatedly heated and cooled, simulating a simple use or drive cycle, the general Lorentzian shape of the rate curves is similar. This suggests that the full spectrum of H2 evolution rates (e.g., 0.0-1.0 gH2/s) can likely be obtained using a metastable hydride with a variable temperature hydride bed.

Figure 9: (a) Isothermal and (b) “on/off” decomposition at 120°C showing the percent H2 evolved, the rate of H2 evolution based on 100 kg of AlH3, and the sample temperature. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry [92].

For the as-prepared α-AlH3, the decomposition reaction can be effectively turned “off” at approximately room temperature (Figure 9(b)). However, kinetic studies of AlH3 and other metastable hydrides have demonstrated that the stability and decomposition rates vary significantly with the material properties (e.g., crystallite size, surface coatings, and catalysts) [28, 30, 31]. The uncoated, fine crystallites (0.1 μm) of α-AlH3 exhibit a decomposition temperature below 60°C while the material composed of 50 μm crystallites with an organic coating decomposes at temperatures above 130°C with an H2 evolution rate more than two orders of magnitude slower (Figure 10). More recently it has been demonstrated that the surface coatings play the dominant role in determining the reaction rate, while the role of crystallite size is secondary (Huang et al., unpublished data). A better understanding of the role of size and morphology will be critical for the development of a kinetically stabilized hydrogen storage system.

Figure 10: Hydrogen evolution rates as a function of temperature from pure α-AlH3, α-AlH3 prepared by ATK (uncoated), α-AlH3 prepared by Dow Chemical (coated), and catalyzed α-AlH3.

#### 9. Tank Design

A hydrogen fuel cell system designed for a metastable metal hydride will be significantly different from conventional hydride beds. For example, systems configured for reversible metal hydrides are typically designed to operate at a constant temperature and the H2 release is controlled by pressure. As the fuel cell consumes hydrogen the pressure drops below the equilibrium pressure driving further decomposition. When the rate of H2 release exceeds the rate of consumption, the pressure rises until it reaches the equilibrium pressure. This is not the case for the metastable metal hydrides, since the equilibrium pressures are much too high to limit the decomposition. Therefore, the rate of H2 release must be kinetically controlled through the temperature. As demonstrated in Figure 9, the hydrogen release can be turned “on” and “off” thermally, but this poses a number of engineering challenges. First, many applications will require a material that is completely stable at 40°C (e.g., when a car is parked on a hot summer day), but that same material must also exhibit rapid H2 release rates at only 100°C. Currently there are no metastable metal hydrides that can meet these two extremes within such a narrow temperature window and there is considerable interest in engineering a hydride with a steep slope in Arrhenius plot (Figures 7 and 10) to meet this need.

A kinetically controlled tank must also have a rapid thermal response to keep up with the frequent stops and starts in many applications. This is especially difficult for larger systems, such as a 100 kg hydride bed for automotive applications, where the rapid heating and cooling of a large thermal mass is impractical. In this case, it would likely be better to decompose only a small portion of the material at a time by segmenting the tank or using a cartridge-type system. Another option is to use a pumpable powder or slurry, where the fuel could be pumped into a reactor and thermally decomposed. In this design, the reactor temperature is kept constant and the rate of H2 release is controlled by the rate of the slurry supplied to the reactor. In addition to the rapid thermal response of a small reactor, this method would also allow the tank to be partitioned. A separate volume for the unreacted fuel (e.g., AlH3) and the spent fuel (e.g., Al metal) is essential for off-board refueling. With this type of tank configuration only the used portion of the fuel is replaced during off-board refueling.

#### 10. Regeneration

Despite their high capacity and rapid low temperature kinetics, the metastable metal hydrides are currently not practical storage media for most applications since they cannot be rehydrogenated at reasonable pressures and temperatures. The primary barrier to using metastable metal hydrides as a hydrogen source for mobile fuel cell applications is the cost associated with making the material. Although these materials are easily synthesized through a variety of chemical routes (see reactions (2)–(8)), the cost of the precursors is generally unacceptably high for large-scale commercial applications. For this reason (along with environmental reasons), there is much interest in identifying a closed-loop regeneration procedure where all of the materials (except for the hydrogen) are reused to reform the hydride. Unfortunately, the byproducts formed during the chemical synthesis of most metastable hydrides are stable compounds (e.g., LiCl) that are energetically costly to separate or recycle. A recent study on AlH3 revealed that even under optimal conditions, a perfectly efficient recycling reaction for AlH3 would still require an energy input of 167 kJ/mol H2, which is equivalent to approximately 70% of the fuel energy contained within AlH3 [92]. In a more realistic, industrial-scale process this method would likely require a much greater energy input, many time greater than the energy contained within the material.

Given the high cost associated with the direct chemical synthesis, it is reasonable to consider alternative routes of reforming the hydride from the spent (hydrogen depleted) material. Due to their low stability, the metastable metal hydrides are not easily rehydrogenated under moderate pressure and temperature conditions. In recent years there has been considerable effort focused on identifying low energy regeneration pathways to prepare the hydride from the dehydrogenated material (e.g., spent fuel). Baranowski succeeded in forming AlH3 by direct hydrogenation of Al metal at high pressures (3 × 104 bar at 573 K) [88]. A number of other high pressure [87, 8991] and thermodynamic studies [20, 44, 45] on the Al–H system have also been performed, which have recently been compiled into a pressure-temperature phase diagram, shown in Figure 11 [28]. The problem is clearly evident in this plot—the direct hydrogenation of aluminum requires pressures >7 kbar (almost 7000 atmospheres) at room temperature, much too high to be practical for large-scale commercial applications. Other metastable hydrides have proven to be even more difficult to rehydrogenate and most of them (e.g., LiAlH4, Mg(AlH4)2, Ca(AlH4)2) have never been formed by direct hydrogenation at any pressure.

Figure 11: Pressure-temperature phase diagram of the Al–H system showing a solid line representing the calculated equilibrium for AlH3    Al + 3/2H2. The markers represent experimental results over a variety of pressure and temperature conditions, with the solid stars indicating the formation of α-AlH3 and the open stars indicating no reaction [28].
##### 10.1. Electrochemical Regeneration

Given the high cost of the direct chemical synthesis and the high pressures required for direct hydrogenation, there are currently a number of efforts focused on regeneration of the metastable metal hydrides. In one method, the hydrogenation is performed electrochemically. In the most direct approach, an electrolytic potential is used to increase the hydrogen activity and drive the hydrogen into the host material. The electrolytic potential () is related to the hydrogen pressure () through the Nernst equation: where is the universal gas constant, is the temperature, and is the Faraday constant. Since the potential scales as the natural log of the pressure, this equation indicates that the thermodynamic barrier to hydrogenation can be overcome by a relatively low voltage. Investigations of electrochemical hydrogenation of aluminum date back to the early 1960s when Clasen used an aluminum anode and an iron/mercury cathode with an electrolyte of NaAlH4 in THF [110]. In the late 1990s, Birnbaum et al. used aqueous solutions of H2SO4 and HCl along with a recombination poison (NaAsO4) to achieve high hydrogen fugacities for cathodic charging of aluminum [111]. They demonstrated that hydrogen enters vacancies in the Al structure and achieved concentrations of >1000 ppm, but no transformation to α-AlH3 was observed. More recently, Zidan et al. [112, 113] have investigated the possibility of electrochemically charging Al with H using a cell similar to that of Clasen. In this case the electrochemical cell consisted of a pure Al anode and a platinum (foil or wire) cathode using THF with dissolved NaAlH4 as the electrolyte. In this reaction three ions (from NaAlH4) combine with one Al3+ ion (from anode) to generate four moles of solvated AlH3 at the anode as shown for the (anode) reaction below:

The AlH3-nTHF adduct is a white solid, and it is typically difficult to remove the AlH3 intact. The desolvation requires high temperatures to break the Al–O bond and once the THF is removed the hydride begins decomposing, leading to a final product consisting of a mixture of Al and AlH3. Improvements in yield and efficiency were achieved by the use of additives, such as the introduction of LiAlH4 to the THF, along with the addition of LiCl, which acts as an electrocatalytic additive (ECA). The use of LiCl enhances the electrochemical process, leading to a higher cell efficiency and better overall yields [111]. Similar regeneration reactions can be envisioned for other metastable metal hydrides, such as LiAlH4 or Mg(AlH4)2.

In this particular procedure three-quarters of the AlH3 come from splitting the alanate (NaAlH4) and one-quarter is due to Al hydrogenation (consumption of the anode). It is worth noting that reaction (14) is similar to the conventional chemical synthesis of AlH3 (reaction (2)) where the Al- ions from AlCl3 are replaced by Al- ions from the anode. Removing the chloride from the reaction is an important step towards achieving a low energy regeneration process since it eliminates the need to break up the salt (e.g., LiCl).

Although the above reaction is an improvement over the conventional synthesis, this procedure still requires a costly precursor, NaAlH4, which is consumed during the reaction. Importantly, however, the NaAlH4 can also be reformed along with the spent fuel and the byproducts of the electrochemical reaction using the well-known hydrogenation process of Bogdanović and Schwickardi [9]. After the alane is formed, sodium from the electrolyte is deposited on the platinum electrode, either in the form a metallic sodium or, if hydrogen gas is present, in the form of sodium hydride. In the latter case, the NaH (recovered from the cathode) can be reacted with the spent material (e.g., Al metal) and H2 gas to reform NaAlH4 [9]. This last step, the formation of NaAlH4 from NaH and Al, requires a catalyst, typically a transition metal such as titanium. When all steps are combined, electrochemical synthesis of alane along with the reformation of NaAlH4 by direct hydrogenation, this procedure yields a complete, closed-loop regeneration pathway for AlH3 where the only thing added and consumed during the cycle is hydrogen gas.

##### 10.2. Chemical Regeneration

Another promising approach to the regeneration of metastable metal hydrides involves a multistep, chemical process for hydride formation. In its simplest form, this is a two-step process involving hydride stabilization through the formation of a hydride adduct followed by separation and hydride recovery. Although the formation of metastable hydrides by direct hydrogenation typically requires extremely high pressures, this barrier can be substantially reduced by the addition of a stabilizing agent that forms an adduct with the hydride. Since these metastable hydride (e.g., AlH3) can be generally classified as Lewis acids, the appropriate stabilizing agents are Lewis bases, such as ethers or amines. For example, in the presence of an amine, aluminum powder can be readily hydrogenated at pressures of a few bar, considerably lower than the 30 kbar required to hydrogenate aluminum (at 300°C) in the absence of a stabilizing amine [114118]. Once the hydride is formed, the second step involves the removal of the stabilizing ligand and the recovery of the pure AlH3. Generic examples of the regeneration procedure for AlH3 and MAlH4 are given below:

This method can be used to regenerate a variety of metastable metal hydrides (AlH3, LiAlH4, Mg(AlH4)2, and Ca(AlH4)2), which cannot be formed by direct hydrogenation. One of the best examples is LiAlH4, which cannot be reformed from LiH and Al powder directly, but in the presence of tetrahydrofuran will form the adduct LiAlH4-THF at H2 pressures of ~350 bar [69, 119, 120]. A more recent study demonstrated that the addition of a Ti catalyst lowered the hydrogenation pressure to just a few bar at room temperature [121]. Once the adduct is formed it can decomposed at low temperature (60–70°C) under partial vacuum to remove the THF and recover the AlH3 [119]. The full regeneration procedure for LiAlH4 is given below: where Al* represents titanium-catalyzed aluminum. The hydrogenation reaction (first step in reaction (16)) is reversible and the thermodynamics were investigated by measuring pressure-composition isotherms. The free energy was found to be small and slightly negative (ΔG = −1.1 kJ/mol H2), suggesting an equilibrium hydrogen pressure of just under 1 bar at room temperature [119]. More recently, a similar approach was adopted using dimethyl ether (DME = Me2O), rather than THF, as the stabilizing ligand, as shown below [122]:

In this process the use of DME over THF may be more convenient since the DME is a gas at room temperature and it is easily removed after hydrogenation by simply venting the reactor. In the full regeneration procedure the dehydrogenated product (LiH + Al*) is dissolved in Me2O at a hydrogen pressure of 100 bar. After 24 hours at room temperature, the gases H2 and Me2O are released and the remaining solid material in the reactor is catalyzed LiAlH4. Cycling studies of LiAlH4 (Ti catalyzed) produced by this method (reaction (17)) showed a hydrogen release of 7 wt.% (80–180°C) over 5 regeneration cycles [123].

A similar type of regeneration procedure (consisting of a stabilization step followed by separation) is also being pursued for aluminum hydride. Early studies of Ashby demonstrated hydrogenation of Al powder at moderate pressures in the presence of triethylenediamine (TEDA) [112]. More recently, the hydrogenation pressure required for this reaction was further reduced by the use of a transition metal catalysts (e.g., Ti). The hydrogenation of catalyzed Al* and an amine (NR3), to form an alane amine adduct, is shown below:

In this reversible reaction, the catalyzed Al powder (Al*) is stirred into a solution with the amine and a solvent (e.g., tetrahydrofuran). The application of moderate hydrogen pressures (1–100 bar) at low temperature (23–80°C) results in the formation of xNR3–AlH3, where is typically 1 or 2. Figure 12 shows the drop in hydrogen pressure associated with the hydrogenation of Al and triethylenediamine (TEDA) in THF to form TEDA-AlH3 at room temperature. In this particular case, the TEDA (solid) was dissolved in THF and added to the catalyzed Al* powder in the reactor. There is initially no reaction with the application of hydrogen (~35 bar) until the solution is agitated (stirrer activated), at which point there is an immediate pressure drop due to dissolution of H2 into the solution. In the case of the Ti-catalyzed Al, the hydrogenation reaction proceeds slowly and is complete after ~3 days. The product, TEDA-AlH3 is insoluble in THF (and most solvents) and precipitates out of solution as a white solid. It is interesting to note that the same experiment performed with uncatalyzed Al powder does not react, clearly indicating that a small amount of a transition metal catalyst (<2 mol%) is necessary to perform these hydrogenation reactions at low pressures [113].

Figure 12: Uptake of hydrogen in a TEDA/THF solution with Al powder in suspension showing the pressure change for Ti-catalyzed (lower trace) and uncatalyzed (upper trace) slurries at room temperature. The rapid drop in pressure within the first few minutes is due to the dissolution of H2 in the solvent [113].

More recent studies focused on alane adduct formation by direct hydrogenation have demonstrated that a number of other tertiary amines are also effective at stabilizing AlH3 including trimethylamine (TMA), quinuclidine, hexamine, and dimethylethylamine (DMEA). These compounds typically form 1 : 1 or 2 : 1 adducts (NR3 : AlH3) depending upon the concentration. The molecular structures for a few different amine alane adducts are shown in Figure 13 (type of adduct shown (e.g., 2 : 1 or 1 : 1) is not necessarily the most stable).

Figure 13: Adducts of AlH3 formed by direct hydrogenation showing (a) dimethylethylamine (DMEA) alane, (b) triethylenediamine (TEDA) alane, (c) trimethylamine (TMA) alane, (d) quinuclidine alane, and (e) hexamine alane. It is important to note that amine alane adducts can form different complexes (e.g., mono, bis, and dimer) depending upon conditions (e.g., concentration). The structures shown are not necessarily the most stable configurations.

The formation of alane adducts by direct hydrogenation of Al is a relatively simple reaction that works under mild condition with a variety of amines. However, in order to recover AlH3 from the adduct, the stabilizing molecule (amine) must be removed without decomposing the hydride. This has proven to be the primary obstacle for alane regeneration since all of the amine alane adducts shown in Figure 13 are very stable. Unlike alane etherates, which have a relatively weak Al–O bond and can be separated at low temperature (60–70°C), the Al in the alane amines is more tightly bound to the N, making the direct separation of NR3–AlH3 more difficult. Typically, the separation, or desolvation, of most alane amines occurs at temperatures well above 100°C where the AlH3 is unstable. Once the amine is removed, the alane rapidly releases H2 and decomposes to Al metal.

The challenges associated with separating alane amines have led to a search for less stable adducts and to date, there is only one known amine that can be separated from AlH3 at low temperature (70°C), triethylamine (TEA). However, despite numerous attempts, TEA-AH3 is not easily formed by direct hydrogenation (reaction (18)). In this case, the Al–N bond is weaker than most other alane amines and the large ethyl groups may also sterically hinder adduct formation. Currently, the search is underway for the “Goldilocks” compound, which forms a bond strong enough to stabilize the hydride, but weak enough so that the adduct can be separated at low temperature.

One way of circumventing this issue may be to simply use two different amines for the regeneration, one that forms a strong Al–N bond for the hydrogenation, and a second that forms a weak Al–N bond for the separation. In this case an amine exchange reaction, also known as transamination, is necessary to transform one adduct into the other. Although the transamination is energetically uphill, this type of reaction can be driven by exploiting the law of mass action. In this case, a solution is prepared where the second amine (which forms the less stable adduct) is maintained at a high concentration and the first amine (which forms the more stable adduct) is preferentially removed. This type of reaction places restrictions on the choice of amines, since the first amine must form a more stable adduct and should have a higher vapor pressure than the second amine or the adduct. It was recently demonstrated that the amines in DMEA-AlH3 and TMA-AlH3 could be exchanged with TEA to form TEA-AlH3 under mild conditions, as shown below [114, 116]:

The progress of the transamination reaction can be followed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy since the positions of the Al–H stretch peaks for TMA-AlH3 (Al–H peak at 1710 cm−1) and TEA-AlH3 (Al–H stretch at 1777 cm−1) are separated by 67 cm−1. Figure 14 shows the FTIR spectra from the initial hydrogenation product (TMA-AlH3) on the bottom and a spectrum from a standard sample of TEA-AlH3 on the top. Triethylamine was added to the TMA-AlH3 in diethyl ether and stirred for several hours at 55°C under a sweep of nitrogen gas. The formation of triethylamine alane is indicated by the growth of a new peak at 1777 cm−1 (middle spectrum), which is complete after approximately 3 hrs.

Figure 14: FTIR spectra from the TEA-AlH3 standard (top), TMA-AlH3 (bottom), and the reaction product after transamination, identified as TEA-AlH3 (middle) [116].

The final step in the regeneration process involves the separation of TEA-AlH3 into TEA and AlH3. Although this can be accomplished a few different ways, the most common method involves heating the TEA-AlH3 to 75°C under a nitrogen sweep or partial vacuum for ~4 hours, as shown below:

The TEA is removed as a gas (recovered in a trap) and the remaining solid is crystalline α-AlH3. X-ray diffraction patterns of the material recovered from TEA-AlH3 showed primarily α-AlH3 (~90 mol%), with a small amount of Al (~10 mol%).

The complete low energy regeneration procedure for α-AlH3 is summarized in Figure 15. In this particular example DMEA is used to stabilize the alane during hydrogenation in step 1 (TMA could also be used for this step). Step 2 involves exchanging TEA for DMEA (transamination) to form TEA-AlH3, which is separated in step 3 to recover AlH3. Although each of the steps necessary to regenerate AlH3 (reactions (18)–(20)) has been independently verified, the integration of all three steps remains a significant challenge. More work is needed to improve the product yields at each stage of the procedure and incorporate and simplify the three steps (hydrogenation, transamination, and separation) into a single process.

Figure 15: Regeneration pathway for AlH3 showing hydrogenation of Al and dimethylethylamine (C4H11N) to form DMEA-AlH3 (step 1), followed by transamination to form TEA-AlH3 (step 2), and separation to recover AlH3 (step 3) [114].

One of the primary concerns with the regeneration of metastable metal hydrides is the energy required to execute this process. In 2011 an independent analysis of AlH3 regeneration described above (using TMA) was conducted by Hua and Ahluwalia assuming 100% conversion during hydrogenation, 75% yields in the transamination step, and 75% in the TEA-AlH3 separation step [124]. They found that the production of 10 kg of AlH3 (1 kg of H2) required ~511 MJ of energy (natural gas and electricity). This energy consumption includes regeneration energy (~341 MJ) and the energy it takes to make the 1 kg of hydrogen in the first place from natural gas (~170 MJ). Given that 10 kg of AlH3 contains 121 MJ of energy (based on the lower heating value of H2), the well-to-tank (WTT) efficiency is ~24%. Since the temperatures for all regeneration steps in Figure 15 are typically low (<80°C), improvements in efficiency can be achieved by using industrial waste heat rather than natural gas for the heating requirements. In this case the WTT efficiencies were estimated to be 37% [122]. More recently, the WTT efficiencies for AlH3 regeneration were raised to 41–54%, based upon improvements in the regeneration procedure [125]. Although these values still fall short of the US Department of Energy target of 60%, the efficiency of alane regeneration is estimated to be greater than other off-board hydrides, such as ammonia borane, which is estimated to have WTT efficiencies of 12–37%.

#### 11. Where Do We Go from Here?

There is currently a growing need for innovative energy storage systems to supply power at all scales, from small microelectronics to the electrical grid. Although metastable metal hydrides are clearly unsuitable for many of these applications, they exhibit a few important properties that could prove especially useful for mobile applications: (i) low pressure hydrogen storage, (ii) high volumetric and gravimetric hydrogen density, and (iii) low temperature hydrogen release. Recently, two metastable metal hydrides, AlH3 and LiAlH4, were identified as two of only a few “near term materials” for vehicular hydrogen storage [126]. Despite many of the advantages of using a metastable hydride for automotive applications, two key challenges need to be overcome. The first is regeneration; although a few different pathways have been identified, the cost will need to come down (WTT efficiencies need to increase to 60% or more). The second challenge is the system engineering; current designs are focused on using hydride slurries to move the material into an external reactor, but that introduces a number of new challenges such as keeping the slurry flowing before and after decomposition.

In the near term, the metastable metal hydrides are ideally suited for a variety of other applications. These compounds (e.g., AlH3, LiAlH4), along with their amine adducts, are valuable chemical reductants that can be used (and is some cases are currently being used) to synthesize a variety of chemical compounds. For hydrogen storage applications, these materials are well suited to high value portable electronics that require lightweight and compact energy storage systems. Increasing demand for power systems built into backpacks, jackets, and clothing for military, industrial, and recreational use has generated much interest in AlH3 in recent years. In addition, these materials may also be ideally suited to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). It is also worth noting that these hydrides can be tailored to release hydrogen on demand, either through low temperature thermolysis, hydrolysis, or both. When reacted with water (hydrolysis), hydrogen is released from the hydride and from the water increasing the total H2 yield. This type of system may be especially useful for marine application (e.g., unmanned submersibles) where the water is available and does not need to be carried onboard. In many of these applications the amount of hydride used is relatively small so the cost is expected to be low relative to the cost of the device (e.g., UAV). In these cases the hydride would likely be prepared through the conventional synthesis procedure (rather than regenerated), which would allow the spent fuel to be discarded after use.

#### 12. Summary

The kinetically stabilized metal hydrides offer a new approach to hydrogen storage. The low heat of decomposition and rapid low temperature kinetics make these hydrides promising candidates for high value portable electronics in the near term and possibly automotive applications in the long term. For larger-scale applications a number of key challenges need to be overcome. These materials are not reversible at practical H2 pressures and the conventional organometallic synthesis routes are costly. The utility of these materials will require new cost-effective and energetically efficient methods to regenerate or recycle the hydride from the spent fuel and reaction products. In addition, new hydrogen storage systems will need to be designed, specifically for the metastable metal hydrides, that enable a controllable hydrogen release within a narrow temperature window.

#### Acknowledgments

This paper has been authored by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract no. DE-AC02-98CH1-886 with the US Department of Energy.

#### References

1. “Basic research needs for electrical energy storage,” Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Electrical Energy Storage, US Department of Energy, 2007.
2. M. Hirscher and B. Panella, “Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 809–812, 2007.
3. A. G. Wong-Foy, A. J. Matzger, and O. M. Yaghi, “Exceptional H2 saturation uptake in microporous metal-organic frameworks,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 11, pp. 3494–3495, 2006.
4. A. Dailly, J. J. Vajo, and C. C. Ahn, “Saturation of hydrogen sorption in Zn benzenedicarboxylate and Zn naphthalenedicarboxylate,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1099–1101, 2006.
5. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, H. Pütter, and U. Müller, “Hydrogen adsorption in metal-organic frameworks: Cu-MOFs and Zn-MOFs compared,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 520–524, 2006.
6. R. Chahine and T. K. Bose, “Low-pressure adsorption storage of hydrogen,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 161–164, 1994.
7. B. Panella, M. Hirscher, and S. Roth, “Hydrogen adsorption in different carbon nanostructures,” Carbon, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2209–2214, 2005.
8. X. Lin, J. Jia, X. Zhao et al., “High H2 adsorption by coordination-framework materials,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 45, no. 44, pp. 7358–7364, 2006.
9. B. Bogdanović and M. Schwickardi, “Ti-doped alkali metal aluminium hydrides as potential novel reversible hydrogen storage materials,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 253-254, pp. 1–9, 1997.
10. J. Graetz, Y. Lee, J. J. Reilly, S. Park, and T. Vogt, “Structures and thermodynamics of the mixed alkali alanates,” Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 18, Article ID 184115, 2005.
11. L. M. Arnbjerg and T. R. Jensen, “New compounds in the potassium-aluminium-hydrogen system observed during release and uptake of hydrogen,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 345–356, 2012.
12. G. Sandrock, J. Reilly, J. Graetz, W. M. Zhou, J. Johnson, and J. Wegrzyn, “Accelerated thermal decomposition of AlH3 for hydrogen-fueled vehicles,” Applied Physics A, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 687–690, 2005.
13. E. Fakioǧlu, Y. Yürüm, and T. N. Veziroǧlu, “A review of hydrogen storage systems based on boron and its compounds,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 1371–1376, 2004.
14. F. H. Stephens, V. Pons, and R. T. Baker, “Ammonia-borane: the hydrogen source par excellence?” Dalton Transactions, no. 25, pp. 2613–2626, 2007.
15. A. Staubitz, A. P. M. Robertson, and I. Manners, “Ammonia-Borane and related compounds as dihydrogen sources,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 4079–4124, 2010.
16. N. C. Smythe and J. C. Gordon, “Ammonia borane as a hydrogen carrier: dehydrogenation and regeneration,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 2010.
17. T. Hua, R. Ahluwalia, J. -K Peng et al., “Technical assessment of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications,” U.S. Department of Energy Report prepare by Argonne National Laboratory, 2010, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/compressedtank_storage.pdf/.
18. J. W. Turley and H. W. Rinn, “The crystal structure of aluminum hydride,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 1969.
19. J. Graetz and J. J. Reilly, “Decomposition kinetics of the AlH3 polymorphs,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 47, pp. 22181–22185, 2005.
20. J. Graetz and J. J. Reilly, “Thermodynamics of the α, β and γ polymorphs of AlH3,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 424, no. 1-2, pp. 262–265, 2006.
21. H. W. Brinks, A. Istad-Lem, and B. C. Hauback, “Mechanochemical synthesis and crystal structure of ${\alpha }^{\prime }$-AlD3 and α-AlD3,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 51, pp. 25833–25837, 2006.
22. H. W. Brinks, W. Langley, C. M. Jensen, J. Graetz, J. J. Reilly, and B. C. Hauback, “Synthesis and crystal structure of β-AlD3,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 433, no. 1-2, pp. 180–183, 2007.
23. V. A. Yartys, R. V. Denys, J. P. Maehlen et al., “Double-bridge bonding of aluminium and hydrogen in the crystal structure of γ-AlH3,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1051–1055, 2007.
24. H. W. Brinks, C. Brown, C. M. Jensen, J. Graetz, J. J. Reilly, and B. C. Hauback, “The crystal structure of γ-AlD3,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 441, no. 1-2, pp. 364–367, 2007.
25. J. Graetz, J. J. Reilly, J. G. Kulleck, and R. C. Bowman, “Kinetics and thermodynamics of the aluminum hydride polymorphs,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 446-447, pp. 271–275, 2007.
26. S.-J. Hwang, R. C. Bowman, J. Graetz, J. J. Reilly, W. Langley, and C. M. Jensen, “NMR studies of the aluminum hydride phases and their stabilities,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 446, pp. 290–295, 2007.
27. M. Tkacz, T. Palasyuk, J. Graetz, and S. Saxena, “High-pressure Raman spectroscopy study of α and γ polymorphs of AlH3,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 922–927, 2008.
28. J. Graetz, J. J. Reilly, V. A. Yartys et al., “Aluminum hydride as a hydrogen and energy storage material: past, present and future,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 2, supplement, pp. S517–S528, 2011.
29. D. Blanchard, H. W. Brinks, B. C. Hauback, P. Norby, and J. Muller, “Isothermal decomposition of LiAlD4 with and without additives,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 404-406, pp. 743–747, 2005.
30. A. Andreasen, T. Vegge, and A. S. Pedersen, “Dehydrogenation kinetics of as-received and ball-milled LiAlH4,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 178, no. 12, pp. 3672–3678, 2005.
31. A. Andreasen, “Effect of Ti-doping on the dehydrogenation kinetic parameters of lithium aluminum hydride,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 419, no. 1-2, pp. 40–44, 2006.
32. K. M. Mackay, Hydrogen Compounds of the Metallic Elements, Spon, London, UK, 1966.
33. T. N. Dymova, D. P. Aleksandrov, V. N. Konoplev, T. A. Silina, and A. S. Sizareva, “Spontaneous and thermal-decomposition of lithium tetrahydroaluminate LiAlH4—the promoting effect of mechanochemical action on the process,” Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 279–285, 1994.
34. T. N. Dymova, D. P. Aleksandrov, V. N. Konoplev, and T. A. Silina, “Novel view of the nature of the chemical-composition and phase-composition modifications in lithium hydridoaluminates LiAlH4 and LiAlH6 on heating,” Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 175–182, 1995.
35. M. Fichtner and O. Fuhr, “Synthesis and structures of magnesium alanate and two solvent adducts,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 345, no. 1-2, pp. 286–296, 2002.
36. O. M. Løvvik, S. M. Opalka, H. W. Brinks, and B. C. Hauback, “Crystal structure and thermodynamic stability of the lithium alanates LiAlH4 and Li3AlH6,” Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 13, Article ID 134117, 9 pages, 2004.
37. M. Fichtner, O. Fuhr, and O. Kircher, “Magnesium alanate—a material for reversible hydrogen storage?” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 356, pp. 418–422, 2003.
38. M. Mamatha, B. Bogdanović, M. Felderhoff et al., “Mechanochemical preparation and investigation of properties of magnesium, calcium and lithium-magnesium alanates,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 407, no. 1-2, pp. 78–86, 2006.
39. E. Wiberg and R. U. Lacal, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 6, p. 392, 1951.
40. D. M. Liu, Z. X. Qian, T. Z. Si, and Q. A. Zhang, “Synthesis, crystal structure and thermal decomposition of LiCa(AlH4)3,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 520, pp. 202–206, 2012.
41. S. I. Orimo, Y. Nakamori, J. R. Eliseo, A. Züttel, and C. M. Jensen, “Complex hydrides for hydrogen storage,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 4111–4132, 2007.
42. M. Mamatha, C. Weidenthaler, A. Pommerin, M. Felderhoff, and F. Schüth, “Comparative studies of the decomposition of alanates followed by in situ XRD and DSC methods,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 416, no. 1-2, pp. 303–314, 2006.
43. R. A. Varin and R. Parviz, “The effects of the micrometric and nanometric iron (Fe) additives on the mechanical and thermal dehydrogenation of lithium alanate (LiAlH4), its self-discharge at low temperatures and rehydrogenation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, pp. 9088–9102, 2012.
44. M. J. Van Setten, G. A. De Wijs, V. A. Popa, and G. Brocks, “Ab initio study of Mg (AlH4)4,” Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 7, Article ID 073107, 2005.
45. G. C. Sinke, L. C. Walker, F. L. Oetting, and D. R. Stull, “Thermodynamic properties of aluminum hydride,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 2759–2761, 1967.
46. L. Schlapbach, “Hydrogen as a fuel and its storage for mobility and transport,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 675–676, 2002.
47. R. S. Irani, “Hydrogen storage: high-pressure gas containment,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 680–682, 2002.
48. J. Wolf, “Liquid-hydrogen technology for vehicles,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 684–687, 2002.
49. R. C. Bowman Jr. and B. Fultz, “Metallic hydrides I: hydrogen storage and other gas-phase applications,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 688–693, 2002.
50. J. M. Joubert, M. Latroche, and A. Percheron-Guégan, “Metallic hydrides II: materials for electrochemical storage,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 694–698, 2002.
51. E. Akiba and M. Okada, “Metallic hydrides III: body-centered-cubic solid-solution alloys,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 699–703, 2002.
52. A. Züttel and S. I. Orimo, “Hydrogen in nanostructured, carbon-related, and metallic materials,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 705–711, 2002.
53. B. Bogdanović and G. Sandrock, “Catalyzed complex metal hydrides,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 712–716, 2002.
54. O. Stecher and E. Wiberg, “A non-volatile, polymer aluminium hydrogen (AlH3)x and several volatile compounds of monomeric AlH3,” Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, vol. 75, pp. 2003–2012, 1942.
55. A. E. Finholt, A. C. Bond, and H. I. Schlesinger, “Lithium aluminum hydride, aluminum hydride and lithium gallium hydride, and some of their applications in organic and inorganic chemistry,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1199–1203, 1947.
56. G. Chizinsky, G. G. Evans, T. R. P. Gibb, and M. J. Rice, “Non-solvated aluminum hydride,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 3164–3165, 1955.
57. F. M. Brower, N. E. Matzek, P. F. Reigler et al., “Preparation and properties of aluminum hydride,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 2450–2453, 1976.
58. H. Nöth and E. Wiberg, Forschr Und Forsch, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 344, 1966.
59. B. M. Bulychev, A. G. Burlakova, and P. A. Storozhenko, “Complex compounds of aluminum hydride ethoxide with mixed aluminum and boron hydrides with lithium and magnesium: compositions, physicochemical properties, and synthesis of unsolvated aluminum hydride,” Zhurnal Neorganicheskoj Khimii, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 829–836, 1998.
60. H. C. Brown and N. M. Yoon, “Selective reductions. X. Reaction of aluminum hydride with selected organic compounds containing representative functional groups. Comparison of the reducing characteristics of lithium aluminum hydride and its derivatives,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1464–1472, 1966.
61. C. W. Heitsch, C. E. Nordman, and R. W. Parry, “The crystal structure and dipole moment in solution of the compound AlH3·2n(CH3)3,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 508–512, 1963.
62. F. Dallacker, K. W. Glombitza, and M. Lipp, “Derivate des methylendioxybenzols, III. Darstellung des 45-methylendioxy-phthalaldehyds,” Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, vol. 643, no. 1–3, pp. 67–82, 1961.
63. L. W. Trevoy and W. G. Brown, “Mechanism of lithium aluminum hydride reactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1675–1678, 1949.
64. E. C. Ashby, J. R. Sanders, P. Claudy, and R. Schwartz, “Diethyl ether soluble aluminum hydride,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 95, no. 19, pp. 6485–6486, 1973.
65. A. E. Finholt, G. D. Barbaras, G. K. Barbaras, G. Urry, T. Wartik, and H. I. Schlesinger, “The preparation of sodium and calcium aluminium hydrides,” Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 4-5, pp. 317–325, 1955.
66. W. Schwab and K. Wintersberger, “Uber darstellung und eigenschaften von calcium-aluminiumhydrid Ca(AlH4)4,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 690–691, 1953.
67. B. M. Bulychev, A. V. Golubeva, P. A. Storozhenko, and K. N. Semenenko, “Synthesis of aluminum hydride compounds from sodium hydride and aluminum trichloride in diethyl ether,” Zhurnal Neorganicheskoj Khimii, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1242–1245, 1998.
68. E. C. Ashby, “A direct route to complex metal hydrides,” Chemistry & Industry, vol. 5, pp. 208–209, 1962.
69. E. C. Ashby, G. J. Brendel, and H. E. Redman, “Direct synthesis of complex metal hydrides,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 499–504, 1963.
70. B. Bogdanović, R. A. Brand, A. Marjanović, M. Schwickardi, and J. Tölle, “Metal-doped sodium aluminium hydrides as potential new hydrogen storage materials,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 302, no. 1-2, pp. 36–58, 2000.
71. A. E. Finholt, A. C. Bond, and H. I. Schlesinger, “Lithium aluminum hydride, aluminum hydride and lithium gallium hydride, and some of their applications in organic and inorganic chemistry,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1199–1203, 1947.
72. M. Fichtner, C. Frommen, and O. Fuhr, “Synthesis and properties of calcium alanate and two solvent adducts,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3479–3484, 2005.
73. E. Wiberg and R. Bauer, “Neues zur kenntnis des magnesium-aluminium-wasserstoffs Mg(AlH4)2,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 131–132, 1952.
74. M. Fichtner, C. Frommen, and O. Fuhr, “Synthesis and properties of calcium alanate and two solvent adducts,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3479–3484, 2005.
75. T. N. Dymova, V. N. Konoplev, A. S. Sizareva, and D. P. Aleksandrov, “Magnesium tetrahydroaluminate: solid-phase formation with mechanochemical activation of a mixture of aluminum and magnesium hydrides,” Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 312–315, 1999.
76. H. Kabbour, C. C. Ahn, S. J. Hwang, R. C. Bowman Jr., and J. Graetz, “Direct synthesis and NMR characterization of calcium alanate,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 446, pp. 264–266, 2007.
77. G. W. Schaeffer, J. S. Roscoe, and A. C. Stewart, “The reduction of iron (III) chloride with lithium aluminohydride and lithium borohydride: iron (II) borohydride,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 729–733, 1956.
78. W. Grochala and P. P. Edwards, “Thermal decomposition of the non-interstitial hydrides for the storage and production of hydrogen,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 1283–1315, 2004.
79. S. Orimo, Y. Nakamori, T. Kato, C. Brown, and C. M. Jensen, “Intrinsic and mechanically modified thermal stabilities of α-, β- and γ-aluminum trihydrides AlH3,” Applied Physics A, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2006.
80. S. Sartori, S. M. Opalka, O. M. Løvvik, M. N. Guzik, X. Tang, and B. C. Hauback, “Experimental studies of α-AlD3 and α′-AlD3 versus first-principles modelling of the alane isomorphs,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 2361–2370, 2008.
81. K. Tomiyasu, T. Sato, K. Horigane, S. Orimo, and K. Yamada, “Hydrogen release from Li alanates originates in molecular lattice instability emerging at ~100 K,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, Article ID 193901, 3 pages, 2012.
82. P. Claudy, B. Bonnetot, and J. M. Letoffe, “Preparation and physicochemical properties of magnesium alanate,” Journal of Thermal Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 1979.
83. N. N. Mal'tseva, A. I. Golovanova, T. N. Dymova, and D. P. Aleksandrov, “Solid-phase formation of calcium hydridoaluminates Ca(AlH4)2 and CaHAlH4 upon mechanochemical activation or heating of mixtures of calcium hydride with aluminum chloride,” Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1793–1797, 2001.
84. T. N. Dymova, D. P. Aleksandrov, V. N. Konoplev, T. A. Silina, and N. T. Kuznetsov, “Solid-phase reactions of aluminum (AlH3)x crystalline hydride—formation of alkali-metal tetrahydroaluminates and hexahydroaluminates,” Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 529–534, 1993.
85. B. Bogdanović, R. A. Brand, A. Marjanović, M. Schwickardi, and J. Tölle, “Metal-doped sodium aluminium hydrides as potential new hydrogen storage materials,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 302, no. 1-2, pp. 36–58, 2000.
86. G. S. Sandrock, L. Suda, and L. Schlapbach, “Applications,” in Hydrogen in Intermetallic Compounds II, L. Schlapbach, Ed., pp. 197–258, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
87. W. de Graff, [Ph.D. thesis], University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1960.
88. B. Baranowski, “Thermodynamics of metal-hydrogen systems at high-pressures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 714–724, 1972.
89. J. Graetz, S. Chaudhuri, Y. Lee, T. Vogt, J. T. Muckerman, and J. J. Reilly, “Pressure-induced structural and electronic changes in α-AlH3,” Physical Review B, vol. 74, no. 21, Article ID 214114, 7 pages, 2006.
90. M. Tkacz, S. Filipek, and B. Baranowski, “High-pressure synthesis of aluminum-hydride from the elements,” Polish Journal of Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 4–6, pp. 651–653, 1983.
91. B. Baranowski and M. Z. Tkacz, “The equilibrium between solid aluminum-hydride and gaseous-hydrogen,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 135, pp. 27–38, 1983.
92. S. K. Konovalov and B. M. Bulychev, “The P,T-state diagram and solid phase synthesis of aluminium hydride,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 172–175, 1995.
93. H. Saitoh, A. MacHida, Y. Katayama, and K. Aoki, “Formation and decomposition of AlH3 in the aluminum-hydrogen system,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 15, Article ID 151918, 3 pages, 2008.
94. J. Graetz, “New approaches to hydrogen storage,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2009.
95. G. Sandrock, K. Gross, and G. Thomas, “Effect of Ti-catalyst content on the reversible hydrogen storage properties of the sodium alanates,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 339, no. 1-2, pp. 299–308, 2002.
96. M. McCarty Jr., J. N. Maycock, and V. R. Pai Verneker, “Thermal decomposition of LiAlH4,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 4009–4014, 1968.
97. G. Sandrock, K. Gross, G. Thomas, C. Jensen, D. Meeker, and S. Takara, “Engineering considerations in the use of catalyzed sodium alanates for hydrogen storage,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 330, pp. 696–701, 2002.
98. S.-S. Liu, L.-X. Sun, Y. Zhang et al., “Effect of ball milling time on the hydrogen storage properties of TiF3-doped LiAlH4,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 8079–8085, 2009.
99. Y. Kojima, Y. Kawai, M. Matsumoto, and T. Haga, “Hydrogen release of catalyzed lithium aluminum hydride by a mechanochemical reaction,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 462, no. 1-2, pp. 275–278, 2008.
100. J. Chen, N. Kuriyama, Q. Xu, H. T. Takeshita, and T. Sakai, “Reversible hydrogen storage via titanium-catalyzed LiAlH4 and Li3AlH6,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 45, pp. 11214–11220, 2001.
101. D. Blanchard, H. W. Brinks, B. C. Hauback, P. Norby, and J. Muller, “Isothermal decomposition of LiAlD4 with and without additives,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 404–406, pp. 743–747, 2005.
102. J. R. A. Fernandez, F. Aguey-Zinsou, M. Elsaesser et al., “Mechanical and thermal decomposition of LiAlH4 with metal halides,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1033–1040, 2007.
103. Z. Xueping and L. Shenglin, “Study on hydrogen storage properties of LiAlH4,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 481, no. 1-2, pp. 761–763, 2009.
104. M. Ismail, Y. Zhao, X. B. Yu, and S. X. Dou, “Effects of NbF5 addition on the hydrogen storage properties of LiAlH4,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2361–2367, 2010.
105. T. Sun, C. K. Huang, H. Wang, L. X. Sun, and M. Zhu, “The effect of doping NiCl2 on the dehydrogenation properties of LiAlH4,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 21, pp. 6216–6221, 2008.
106. R. A. Varin, L. Zbroniec, T. Czujko, and Z. S. Wronski, “The effects of nanonickel additive on the decomposition of complex metal hydride LiAlH4 (lithium alanate),” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1167–1176, 2011.
107. L. Hima Kumar, B. Viswanathan, and S. Srinivasa Murthy, “Dehydriding behaviour of LiAlH4—the catalytic role of carbon nanofibres,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 366–373, 2008.
108. P. J. Herley and O. Christofferson, “Decomposition of α-aluminum hydride powder. 3. Simultaneous photolytic-thermal decomposition,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 13, pp. 1887–1892, 1981.
109. Rafi-Ud-Din, L. Zhang, L. Ping, and Q. Xuanhui, “Catalytic effects of nano-sized TiC additions on the hydrogen storage properties of LiAlH4,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 508, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2010.
110. H. Clasen, Germany Patent, 1141, 623, 1962.
111. H. K. Birnbaum, C. Buckley, F. Zeides et al., “Hydrogen in aluminum,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 253-254, pp. 260–264, 1997.
112. R. Zidan, B. L. Garcia-Diaz, C. S. Fewox, A. C. Stowe, J. R. Gray, and A. G. Harter, “Aluminium hydride: a reversible material for hydrogen storage,” Chemical Communications, no. 25, pp. 3717–3719, 2009.
113. M. J. Martinez-Rodriguez, B. L. Garcia-Diaz, J. A. Teprovich, D. A. Knight, and R. Zidan, “Advances in the electrochemical regeneration of aluminum hydride,” Applied Physics A, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 545–550, 2012.
114. E. C. Ashby, “The direct synthesis of amine alanes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 1882–1883, 1964.
115. J. Graetz, S. Chaudhuri, J. Wegrzyn et al., “Direct and reversible synthesis of AlH3-triethylenediamine from Al and H2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 51, pp. 19148–19152, 2007.
116. D. Lacina, J. Wegrzyn, J. Reilly, Y. Celebi, and J. Graetz, “Regeneration of aluminium hydride using dimethylethylamine,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1099–1105, 2010.
117. D. Lacina, J. Reilly, J. Johnson, J. Wegrzyn, and J. Graetz, “The reversible synthesis of bis(quinuclidine) alane,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 2, pp. S654–S657, 2011.
118. D. Lacina, J. Reilly, Y. Celebi, J. Wegrzyn, J. Johnson, and J. Graetz, “Regeneration of aluminum hydride using trimethylamine,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 3789–3793, 2011.
119. H. Clasen, “Alanat-synthese aus den elementen und ihre bedeutung,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 322–331, 1961.
120. J. Wang, A. D. Ebner, and J. A. Ritter, “Physiochemical pathway for cyclic dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation of LiAlH4,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 17, pp. 5949–5954, 2006.
121. J. Graetz, J. Wegrzyn, and J. J. Reilly, “Regeneration of lithium aluminum hydride,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 52, pp. 17790–17794, 2008.
122. X. Liu, G. S. McGrady, H. W. Langmi, and C. M. Jensen, “Facile cycling of Ti-doped LiAlH4 for high performance hydrogen storage,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 14, pp. 5032–5033, 2009.
123. X. F. Liu, H. W. Langmi, S. D. Beattie, F. F. Azenwi, G. S. McGrady, and C. M. Jensen, “Ti-Doped LiAlH4 for hydrogen storage: synthesis, catalyst loading and cycling performance,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 39, pp. 15593–15597, 2011.
124. T. Q. Hua and R. K. Ahluwalia, “Alane hydrogen storage for automotive fuel cells—off-board regeneration processes and efficiencies,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, no. 23, pp. 15259–15265, 2011.
125. R. K. Ahluwalia, T. Q. Hua, and J. K. Peng, “On-board and Off-board performance of hydrogen storage options for light-duty vehicles,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 2891–2910, 2012.
126. L. Klebanoff, “5-year review of Metal Hydride Center of Excellence,” Presentation at DOE H2 Program Annual Merritt Review, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.