About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Astronomy
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 486750, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/486750
Review Article

Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Sgr A*

Physics Department, University of Arizona, 1118 E. 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Received 16 May 2011; Accepted 5 July 2011

Academic Editor: Francesco Shankar

Copyright © 2012 Tim Johannsen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The no-hair theorem characterizes the fundamental nature of black holes in general relativity. This theorem can be tested observationally by measuring the mass and spin of a black hole as well as its quadrupole moment, which may deviate from the expected Kerr value. Sgr A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is a prime candidate for such tests thanks to its large angular size, high brightness, and rich population of nearby stars. In this paper, I discuss a new theoretical framework for a test of the no-hair theorem that is ideal for imaging observations of Sgr A* with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). The approach is formulated in terms of a Kerr-like spacetime that depends on a free parameter and is regular everywhere outside of the event horizon. Together with the results from astrometric and timing observations, VLBI imaging of Sgr A* may lead to a secure test of the no-hair theorem.

1. Introduction

According to the no-hair theorem, black holes are uniquely characterized by their masses and spins and are described by the Kerr metric [16]. Mass and spin are the first two multipole moments of the Kerr spacetime, and all higher-order moments can be expressed in terms of these two [7, 8]. The no-hair theorem, then, naturally leads to the expectation that all astrophysical black holes are Kerr black holes. To date, however, a definite proof for the existence of such black holes is still lacking despite a wealth of observational evidence (see discussion in, e.g., [9]).

Tests of the no-hair theorem have been suggested using observations in either the gravitational-wave [1021] or the electromagnetic spectrum [2231]. Both approaches are based on parametric frameworks that contain one or more free parameters in addition to mass and spin which measure potential deviations from the Kerr metric [1820, 3234]. If no deviation is detected, then the compact object is indeed a Kerr black hole. However, since such deviations can have a significant impact on the observed signals, the no-hair theorem may be tested in a twofold manner: if a deviation is measured to be nonzero and if general relativity is assumed, the object cannot be a black hole [18, 35]. Alternatively, if the object is otherwise known to possess an event horizon, it is a black hole, but different from a Kerr black hole. In the latter case, the no-hair theorem would be falsified [22].

Sgr A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is a prime target for testing strong-field gravity and the no-hair theorem with electromagnetic observations (see [36] for a review). Monitoring the orbits of stars around this compact object for more than a decade has led to precise mass and distance measurements making Sgr A* the black hole with the largest angular size in the sky [37, 38]. In addition, very long baseline interferometric observations have resolved Sgr A* on event horizon scales [39]. On the theoretical side, there have been significant advances recently in the development of a framework within which the search for violations of the no-hair theorem can be carried out.

In this paper, I review this framework as well as the prospects for an observational test of the no-hair theorem with Sgr A*.

2. An Ideal Framework for Testing the No-Hair Theorem

Spacetimes of rotating stellar objects in general relativity have been studied for several decades. Due to the nonlinearity of Einstein field equations, the construction of such metrics is plagued with sometimes incredible technical challenges. Following the discovery of the Schwarzschild [40] and Kerr metrics [41] in 1916 and 1963, respectively, Hartle and Thorne [42, 43] constructed a metric for slowly rotating neutron stars that is appropriate up to the quadrupole order. Tomimatsu and Sato [44, 45] found a discrete family of spacetimes in 1972 that contain the Kerr metric as a special case. After a full decade of research, Manko and Novikov [32] found two classes of metrics in 1992 that are characterized by an arbitrary set of multipole moments.

Many exact solutions of the Einstein field equations are now known [46]. Of particular interest is the subclass of stationary, axisymmetric, vacuum (SAV) solutions of the Einstein equations, and especially those metrics within this class that are also asymptotically flat. Once an explicit SAV has been found, all SAVs can in principle be generated by a series of HKX-transformations ([47, 48] and references therein), which form an infinite-dimensional Lie group [49, 50]. Each SAV is fully and uniquely specified by a set of scalar multipole moments [51, 52] and can also be generated from a given set of multipole moments [53, 54]. These solutions, however, are generally very complicated and often unphysical. For some astrophysical applications, such as the study of neutron stars, it is oftentimes more convenient to resort to a numerical solution of the field equations [5559].

To date, there exist seven different approaches that model parametric deviations from the Kerr metric. Ryan [1012] studied the motion of test particles in the equatorial plane of compact objects with a general expansion in Geroch-Hansen multipoles. Collins and Hughes [18], Vigeland and Hughes [19], and Vigeland et al. [33] constructed Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics with perturbations in the form of Weyl sector bumps. Glampedakis and Babak [20] designed a metric starting from the Hartle-Thorne metric [42, 43] that deviates from the Kerr metric by an independent quadrupole moment. Gair et al. [21] applied a similar technique to the Manko-Novikov metric [32] affecting the quadrupole as well as higher-order moments. Sopuerta and Yunes [60] found a metric for a slowly rotating black hole that violates parity. Vigeland et al. [33] designed parametric deviations from the Kerr metric that possess four integrals of the motion and, hence, allow for the full separability of the Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Finally, Johannsen and Psaltis constructed a metric of a rapidly rotating Kerr-like black hole [34]. Other metrics of static black holes in alternative theories of gravity have also been found (e.g., [6164]).

Due to the no-hair theorem, the Kerr metric is the only asymptotically flat SAV in general relativity with an event horizon but no closed timelike loops [16]. Consequently, any parametric deviation within general relativity has to violate at least one of these prerequisites and introduces either singularities or regions with closed timelike loops outside of the event horizon, which usually occur very near to the central object at radii  M [65]. Otherwise, these metrics would render the no-hair theorem false. The relevance of this kind of pathologies depends on the astrophysical application. They play no role for tests of the no-hair theorem that only involve the orbits of objects at large distances from the horizon, as is the case for extreme mass-ratio inspirals or the motion of stars or pulsars around a black hole. They are, however, critical for the study of accretion flows around black holes [34], because the electromagnetic radiation originates predominantly from the immediate vicinity of the event horizon.

For this reason, the emission from accretion flows around black holes is most interesting for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem with observations across the electromagnetic spectrum ranging from X-ray observations of quasiperiodic variability, fluorescent iron lines, or continuum disk spectra [22, 24] to sub-mm imaging of supermassive black holes with VLBI [22, 23]. All of these observation techniques critically depend on the location of either the circular photon orbit or the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), because these orbits dominate the characteristics of the received signals.

These strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem require a very careful modeling of the inner region of the spacetime of black holes. Due to the pathologies of previously known parametric deviations, it has been necessary to impose an artificial cutoff at some radius outside of the event horizon that encloses all of the above pathologies and, thereby, shields them from the observer. Therefore, the application of parametric frameworks to such tests of the no-hair theorem in the electromagnetic spectrum has, so far, been limited to only slowly to moderately spinning black holes, for which the circular photon orbit and ISCO are still located outside of the cutoff radius [34, 65].

Recently [34], we constructed a black hole metric that is regular everywhere outside of the event horizon for all values of the spin within the allowable range and that depends on a set of free parameters in addition to mass and spin. In the case when all parameters vanish, our metric reduces smoothly to the Kerr metric. Our metric is a vacuum solution of a more general set of field equations, but otherwise fulfills all of the prerequisites of the no-hair theorem and, therefore, preserves these essential properties even if the deviation parameters from the Kerr metric are nonzero. At present, our metric constitutes the only known black hole spacetime of this kind and serves as an ideal framework for the study of the signatures of a possible violation of the no-hair theorem from astrophysical phenomena near the event horizon of a black hole and, in particular, of Sgr A*. For the case of one additional parameter , our metric in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates is given by the expression [34] where and is the spin parameter.

In [34], we analyzed several of the key properties of our black hole metric as a function of the mass , the spin , and the parameter . The left panel in Figure 1 shows the range of the spin and the parameter , for which our metric describes a black hole. The shaded region marks the part of the parameter space where the event horizon is no longer closed, and the black hole becomes a naked singularity. The right panel of Figure 1 shows the gravitational lensing experienced by photons on an orbit in the equatorial plane that approach the black hole closely for several values of the deviation parameter .

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Values of the parameter versus the spin , for which the central object is a black hole. The shaded region marks the excluded part of the parameter space where this object is a naked singularity. The dashed line corresponds to a Kerr black hole [34]. (b) Trajectories of photons lensed by a black hole with a (counterclockwise) spin  M for several values of the parameter . The shaded region corresponds to the event horizon of a Kerr black hole of equal spin.

In Figure 2, we plot the radius of the ISCO and of the circular photon orbit, respectively, as a function of the spin for several values of the parameter . The location of both orbits decreases with increasing values of the spin and of the parameter . In Figure 3, we plot contours of constant ISCO radius as a function of the spin and the parameter . The location of these orbits depends significantly on the value of the deviation parameter .

fig2
Figure 2: Radius of (a) the ISCO and of (b) the circular photon orbit as a function of the spin for several values of the parameter . The radius of the ISCO and the circular photon orbit decrease with increasing values of the parameter . The shaded region marks the excluded part of the parameter space [34].
486750.fig.003
Figure 3: Contours of constant radius of the ISCO for values of the spin and of the parameter . The radius of the ISCO decreases for increasing values of the spin and the parameter . The shaded region marks the excluded part of the parameter space. The dashed line corresponds to the parameter space for a Kerr black hole [34].

3. Testing the No-Hair Theorem with VLBI Imaging of Sgr A*

In [23], we explored in detail the effects of a violation of the no-hair theorem for VLBI imaging using a quasi-Kerr metric [20]. This metric can be used to accurately describe Kerr-like black holes up to a spin of about  M. For Sgr A*, this spin range might already be sufficient ( M; [66, 67]).

The location of the circular photon orbit determines the size of the shadow of Sgr A* (see [68, 69]). VLBI observations are expected to image the shadow of Sgr A* and to measure the mass, spin, and inclination of this black hole (e.g., [6973]). In addition to these parameters, the shape of the shadow also depends uniquely on the value of the deviation parameter [23]. In practice, however, these measurements will be model dependent (e.g., [74]) and affected by finite telescope resolution (e.g., [69, 75]). Therefore, VLBI imaging may have to be complemented by additional observations such as a multiwavelength study of polarization ([73]; see also [76, 77]).

In an optically thin accretion flow such as the one around Sgr A* at sub-mm wavelengths (e.g., [66]), photons can orbit around the black hole several times before they are detected by a distant observer. This produces an image of a ring that can be significantly brighter than the underlying flow thanks to the long optical path of the contributing photons (e.g., [78]). In [23], we showed that the shape and location of this “ring of light” depends directly on the mass, spin, inclination, and the deviation parameter of the black hole (see Figure 4).

fig4
Figure 4: Images of rings of light of (a) a Kerr and (b) a quasi-Kerr black hole at an inclination . Increasing values of the spin cause a displacement of the ring in the image plane, but the ring remains (nearly) circular for values of the spin  M (a). Nonzero values of the deviation parameter (b) lead to an asymmetric ring image [23].

The diameter of the ring of light as observed by a distant observer depends predominantly on the mass of the black hole and is nearly constant for all values of the spin and disk inclination as well as for small values of the deviation parameter. For nonzero values of the spin of the black hole, the ring is displaced off center in the image plane. In all cases, the ring of a Kerr black hole remains nearly circular except for very large values of the spin  M. However, if Sgr A* is not a Kerr black hole, the ring becomes asymmetric in the image plane. This asymmetry is a direct measure for a violation of the no-hair theorem (see Figure 5).

fig5
Figure 5: (a) The ring diameter versus spin for inclinations for a Kerr black hole (solid lines) and for a quasi-Kerr black hole with a value of the deviation parameter (dashed lines). The diameter is practically independent of the spin, inclination, and deviation parameter with a constant value of  M for a Kerr black hole. (b) The displacement of the ring of light as a function of for various values of the parameter . The displacement depends only weakly on the parameter . (c) The ring asymmetry versus for various inclinations and . The asymmetry is nearly independent of the spin and hence provides a direct measure of a violation of the no-hair theorem [23].

4. Combining Strong-Field with Weak-Field Tests of the No-Hair Theorem

In addition to a strong-field test of the no-hair theorem with VLBI imaging of Sgr A*, there exist two other promising possibilities for performing such a test in the weak-field regime. The presence of a nonzero spin and quadrupole moment independently leads to a precession of the orbit of stars around Sgr A* at two different frequencies, which can be studied with parameterized post-Newtonian dynamics [29, 79]. Merritt et al. [30] showed that the effect of the quadrupole moment on the orbit of such stars is masked by the effect of the spin for the group of stars known to orbit Sgr A*. However, if a star can be detected within ~1000 Schwarzschild radii of Sgr A* and if it can be monitored over a sufficiently long period of time, this technique may also measure the spin (see Figure 6; [30]) and even the quadrupole moment [30, 80] together with the already obtained mass [37, 38]. Future instruments, such as GRAVITY [81], may be able to resolve the orbits of such stars providing an independent test of the no-hair theorem.

fig6
Figure 6: Evolution of the orbital angular momenta of stars around Sgr A* due to frame-dragging (dashed lines) and stellar perturbations (dotted lines) as measured by the angle as a function of the orbital semimajor axis . The three panels correspond to a Kerr black hole with a spin (a) , (b)  M, and (c) [30].

Yet another weak-field test can be performed by the observation of a radio pulsar on an orbit around Sgr A*. If present, timing observations may resolve characteristic spin-orbit residuals that are induced by the quadrupole moment and infer its magnitude (see Figure 7; [31]). Recent surveys set an upper limit for the existence of up to 90 pulsars within the central parsec of the galaxy [82] making this technique a promising third approach for testing the no-hair theorem with Sgr A*.

486750.fig.007
Figure 7: Typical timing residuals for a radio pulsar in an orbit around a black hole with a mass of due to the presence of a nonvanishing quadrupole moment [31]. For Sgr A*, such residuals will have a similar shape but with a larger amplitude.

The fundamental properties of the black hole in the center of our galaxy can be probed with three different techniques. The combination of the results of all three approaches will lead to a secure test of the no-hair theorem with Sgr A*.

References

  1. W. Israel, “Event horizons in static vacuum space-times,” Physical Review, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 1776–1779, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Israel, “Event horizons in static electrovac space-times,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 245–260, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. B. Carter, “Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 331–333, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in general relativity,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 25, p. 152, 1972.
  5. B. Carter, Black Holes, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA, 1973.
  6. D. C. Robinson, “Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 905–906, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Geroch, “Multipole moments. II. Curved space,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2580–2588, 1970. View at Scopus
  8. R. O. Hansen, “Multipole moments of stationary spacetimes,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Psaltis, Compact Stellar X-Ray Sources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2006.
  10. F. D. Ryan, “Gravitational waves from the inspiral of a compact object into a massive, axisymmetric body with arbitrary multipole moments,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 5707–5718, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. F. D. Ryan, “Accuracy of estimating the multipole moments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1845–1855, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. F. D. Ryan, “Scalar waves produced by a scalar charge orbiting a massive body with arbitrary multipole moments,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 7732–7739, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. L. Barack and C. Cutler, “LISA capture sources: approximate waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, and parameter estimation accuracy,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 8, Article ID 082005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Barack and C. Cutler, “Using LISA extreme-mass-ratio inspiral sources to test off-Kerr deviations in the geometry of massive black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 4, Article ID 042003, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Brink, “Spacetime encodings. I. A spacetime reconstruction problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 102001, 8 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Li and G. Lovelace, “Generalization of Ryan's theorem: probing tidal coupling with gravitational waves from nearly circular, nearly equatorial, extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, Article ID 064022, 10 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. A. Apostolatos, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and G. Contopoulos, “How to observe a non-kerr spacetime using gravitational waves,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 11, Article ID 111101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. N. A. Collins and S. A. Hughes, “Towards a formalism for mapping the spacetimes of massive compact objects: bumpy black holes and their orbits,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 124022, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. J. Vigeland and S. A. Hughes, “Spacetime and orbits of bumpy black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 024030, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. K. Glampedakis and S. Babak, “Mapping spacetimes with LISA: inspiral of a test body in a “quasi-Kerr” field,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 12, article 013, pp. 4167–4188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J. R. Gair, C. Li, and I. Mandel, “Observable properties of orbits in exact bumpy spacetimes,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 2, Article ID 024035, 23 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum. I. Properties of a Quasi-Kerr spacetime,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 187–197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum. II. Black hole images,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 718, no. 1, p. 446, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum. III. Quasi-periodic variability,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 726, no. 1, p. 11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Testing the no-hair theorem with observations of black holes in the electromagnetic spectrum,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 47, p. 528, 2011.
  26. D. Psaltis and T. Johannsen, “A ray-tracing algorithm for spinning compact object spacetimes with arbitrary quadrupole moments. I. Quasi-kerr black holes,” Astrophysical Journal. In press.
  27. C. Bambi and E. Barausse, “Constraining the quadrupole moment of stellar-mass black hole candidates with the continuum fitting method,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 731, p. 121, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C. Bambi, “Constraint on the quadrupole moment of super-massive black hole candidates from the estimate of the mean radiative efficiency of AGN,” Physical Review D, vol. D 83, Article ID 103003, 4 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. M. Will, “Testing the general relativistic “no-hair” theorems using the galactic center black hole Sgr A*,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 674, p. L25, 2008.
  30. D. Merritt, T. Alexander, S. Mikkola, and C. M. Will, “Testing properties of the Galactic center black hole using stellar orbits,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 6, Article ID 062002, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. N. Wex and S. M. Kopeikin, “Frame dragging and other precessional effects in black hole pulsar binaries,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 514, no. 1, pp. 388–401, 1999. View at Scopus
  32. V. S. Manko and I. D. Novikov, “Generalizations of the Kerr and Kerr-Newman metrics possessing an arbitrary set of mass-multipole moments,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 9, no. 11, article 013, pp. 2477–2487, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. J. Vigeland, N. Yunes, and L. C. Stein, “Bumpy black holes in alternative theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 104027, 16 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Metric for rapidly spinning black holes suitable for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 124015, 16 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. A. Hughes, “(Sort of) testing relativity with extreme mass ratio inspirals,” in Proceedings of the AIP Conference, vol. 873, pp. 233–240, November 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. D. Psaltis and T. Johannsen, “Sgr A*: the optimal testbed of strong-field gravity,” Journal of Physics, vol. 283, Article ID 102030, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. M. Ghez, S. Salim, N. N. Weinberg et al., “Measuring distance and properties of the milky way's central supermassive black hole with stellar orbits,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 689, no. 2, pp. 1044–1062, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe, et al., “Monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the galactic center,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 692, p. 1075, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. S. Doeleman, J. Weintroub, A. E. E. Rogers et al., “Event-horizon-scale structure in the supermassive black hole candidate at the Galactic Centre,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7209, pp. 78–80, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. K. Schwarzschild, “Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 1, pp. 189–196, 1916.
  41. R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 237–238, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. J. B. Hartle, “Slowly Rotating Relativistic Stars. I. Equations of Structure,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 150, p. 1005, 1967.
  43. J. B. Hartle and K. S. Thorne, “Slowly Rotating Relativistic Stars. II. Models for Neutron Stars and Supermassive Stars,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 153, p. 807, 1968.
  44. A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, “New exact solution for the gravitational field of a spinning mass,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 1344–1345, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, “New series of exact solutions for gravitational fields of spinning masses,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2003.
  47. I. Hauser and F. J. Ernst, “Proof of a Geroch conjecture,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1051–1063, 1981. View at Scopus
  48. C. Hoenselaers, W. Kinnersley, and B. C. Xanthopoulos, “Symmetries of the stationary Einstein–Maxwell equations. VI. Transformations which generate asymptotically flat spacetimes with arbitrary multipole moments,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 20, no. 8, p. 2530, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. R. Geroch, “A method for generating solutions of Einstein's equations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 918–924, 1971. View at Scopus
  50. R. Geroch, “A method for generating new solutions of Einstein's equation. II,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 394–404, 1972. View at Scopus
  51. R. Beig and W. Simon, “Proof of a multipole conjecture due to Geroch,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 78, p. 75, 1980.
  52. R. Beig and W. Simon, “On the multipole expansion for stationary space-times,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 376, pp. 333–341, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. N. R. Sibgatullin, Oscillations and Waves in Strong Gravitational and Electromagnetic Fields, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991.
  54. V. S. Manko and N. R. Sibgatullin, “Construction of exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations corresponding to a given behaviour of the Ernst potentials on the symmetry axis,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 10, no. 7, article 014, pp. 1383–1404, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. M. Butterworth and J. R. Ipser, “On the structure and stability of rapidly rotating fluid bodies in general relativity. I - The numerical method for computing structure and its application to uniformly rotating homogeneous bodies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 204, pp. 200–223, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. N. Stergioulas and J. L. Friedman, “Comparing models of rapidly rotating relativistic stars constructed by two numerical methods,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 444, no. 1, pp. 306–311, 1995. View at Scopus
  57. W. G. Laarakkers and E. Poisson, “Quadrupole moments of rotating neutron stars,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 512, no. 1, pp. 282–287, 1999. View at Scopus
  58. E. Berti, F. White, A. Maniopoulou, and M. Bruni, “Rotating neutron stars: an invariant comparison of approximate and numerical space-time models,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 358, no. 3, pp. 923–938, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Cadeau, S. M. Morsink, D. Leaky, and S. S. Campbell, “Light curves for rapidly rotating neutron stars,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 654, no. 1 I, pp. 458–469, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. F. Sopuerta and N. Yunes, “Extreme- and intermediate-mass ratio inspirals in dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 6, Article ID 064006, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. D.-C. Dai and D. Stojkovic, “Analytic solution for a static black hole in RSII model,” submitted to General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology.
  62. N. Yunes and L. C. Stein, “Effective gravitational wave stress-energy tensor in alternative theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, p. 4002, 2011.
  63. E. Barausse, T. Jacobson, and T. P. Sotiriou, “Black holes in Einstein-aether and Horava-Lifshitz gravity,” General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, vol. 83, Article ID 124043, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. P. Figueras and T. Wiseman, “Gravity and large black holes in Randall-Sundrum II braneworlds,” submitted to High Energy Physics.
  65. T. Johannsen, et al., in preparation.
  66. A. E. Broderick, V. L. Fish, S. S. Doeleman, and A. Loeb, “Estimating the parameters of sagittarius A*'s accretion flow via millimeter vlbi,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 697, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. E. Broderick, V. L. Fish, S. S. Doeleman, and A. Loeb, “Evidence for low black hole spin and physically motivated accretion models from millimeter-VLBI observations of sagittarius A*,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 735, p. 110, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. J. M. Bardeen, Black Holes, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA, 1973.
  69. H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, “Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the Galactic center,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 528, no. 1, pp. L13–L16, 2000. View at Scopus
  70. A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, “Imaging bright-spots in the accretion flow near the black hole horizon of Sgr A*,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 363, no. 2, pp. 353–362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, “Imaging optically-thin hotspots near the black hole horizon of Sgr A* at radio and near-infrared wavelengths,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 367, no. 3, pp. 905–916, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. V. L. Fish and S. S. Doeleman, IAU Symp. 261, Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
  73. A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, “Imaging optically-thin hotspots near the black hole horizon of Sgr A* at radio and near-infrared wavelengths,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 367, no. 3, pp. 905–916, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb, “Imaging the black hole silhouette of M87: implications for jet formation and black hole spin,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 697, no. 2, pp. 1164–1179, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. R. Takahashi, “Shapes and positions of black hole shadows in accretion disks and spin parameters of black holes,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 611, no. 2, pp. 996–1004, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. D. Schnittman and J. H. Krolik, “X-ray polarization from accreting black holes: the thermal state,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 701, no. 2, pp. 1175–1187, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. D. Schnittman and J. H. Krolik, “X-ray polarization from accreting black holes: coronal emission,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 712, no. 2, pp. 908–924, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. Beckwith and C. Done, “Extreme gravitational lensing near rotating black holes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 359, no. 4, pp. 1217–1228, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1993.
  80. L. Sadeghian and C. M. Will, “Testing the black hole no-hair theorem at the galactic center: perturbing effects of stars in the surrounding cluster,” submitted to General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology.
  81. H. Bartko, G. Perrin, W. Brandner et al., “GRAVITY: astrometry on the galactic center and beyond,” New Astronomy Reviews, vol. 53, no. 11-12, pp. 301–306, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J.-P. MacQuart, N. Kanekar, D. A. Frail, and S. M. Ransom, “A high-frequency search for pulsars within the central parsec of Sgr A*,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 715, no. 2, pp. 939–946, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus