Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 415847, 15 pages
doi:10.1155/2009/415847
Research Article

On Two-Parameter Regularized Semigroups and the Cauchy Problem

Department of Mathematics, Sabzevar Tarbiat Moallem University, P.O. Box 397, Sabzevar, Iran

Received 13 December 2008; Revised 16 March 2009; Accepted 15 June 2009

Academic Editor: Stephen Clark

Copyright © 2009 Mohammad Janfada. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Suppose that 𝑋 is a Banach space and 𝐶 is an injective operator in 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) , the space of all bounded linear operators on 𝑋 . In this note, a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup (regularized semigroup) of operators is introduced, and some of its properties are discussed. As an application we show that the existence and uniqueness of solution of the 2-abstract Cauchy problem ( 𝜕 / ( 𝜕 𝑡 𝑖 ) ) 𝑢 ( 𝑡 1 , 𝑡 2 ) = 𝐻 𝑖 𝑢 ( 𝑡 1 , 𝑡 2 ) , 𝑖 = 1 , 2 , 𝑡 𝑖 > 0 , 𝑢 ( 0 , 0 ) = 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝐶 ( 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) ) is closely related to the two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups of operators.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Suppose that 𝑋 is a Banach space and 𝐴 is a linear operator in 𝑋 with domain 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) and range 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ) . For a given 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , the abstract Cauchy problem for 𝐴 with the initial value 𝑥 consists of finding a solution 𝑢 ( 𝑡 ) to the initial value problem A C P ( 𝐴 ; 𝑥 ) 𝑑 𝑢 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑑 𝑡 = 𝐴 𝑢 ( 𝑡 ) , 𝑡 + , 𝑢 ( 0 ) = 𝑥 , ( 1 . 1 ) where by a solution we mean a function 𝑢 + 𝑋 , which is continuous for 𝑡 0 , continuously differentiable for 𝑡 > 0 , 𝑢 ( 𝑡 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) for 𝑡 + , and 𝐴 𝐶 𝑃 ( 𝐴 ; 𝑥 ) is satisfied.

If 𝐶 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) , the space of all bounded linear operators on X, is injective, then a one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup (regularized semigroup) of operators is a family { 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) } 𝑡 + 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) for which 𝑇 ( 0 ) = 𝐶 , 𝑇 ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝐶 = 𝑇 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) , and for each 𝑥 𝑋 , the mapping 𝑡 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 is continuous. An operator 𝐴 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 with 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) = 𝑥 𝑋 l i m 𝑡 0 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 e x i s t s i n t h e r a n g e o f 𝐶 , ( 1 . 2 ) and where, for 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐶 1 l i m 𝑡 0 ( ( 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 ) / 𝑡 ) is called the infinitesimal generator of 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) .

Regularized semigroups and their connection with the 𝐴 𝐶 𝑃 ( 𝐴 ; 𝑥 ) have been studied in [16] and some other papers. Also the concept of local 𝐶 -semigroups and their relation with the 𝐴 𝐶 𝑃 ( 𝐴 ; 𝑥 ) have been considered in [710].

In Section 2, we introduce the concept of two-parameter regularized semigroups of operators and their generator. Some basic properties of two-parameter regularized semigroups and their relation with the generators are studied in this section.

In Section 3, two-parameter abstract Cauchy problems are considered. It is proved that the existence and uniqueness of its solutions is closely related with two-parameter regularized semigroups of operators.

2. Two-Parameter Regularized Semigroups

In this section we introduce two-parameter regularized semigroup and its generator on Banach spaces. Then some properties of two-parameter regularized semigroups are studied.

Definition 2.1. Suppose that 𝑋 is a Banach space and 𝐶 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) is an injective operator. A family { 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) } 𝑠 , 𝑡 + 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) is called a two-parameter regularized semigroup (or two parameter 𝐶 -semigroup) if(i) 𝑊 ( 0 , 0 ) = 𝐶 ,(ii) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 + 𝑠 , 𝑡 + 𝑡 ) 𝐶 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) , for all 𝑠 , 𝑠 , 𝑡 , 𝑡 + ,(iii) l i m ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 , for all 𝑥 𝑋 .It is called exponentially bounded if 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑀 𝑒 ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝜔 , for some 𝑀 , 𝜔 > 0 .

Suppose that { 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) } 𝑠 , 𝑡 + is a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup. Put 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) and 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) = 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) , then it is easy to see that these families are two commuting one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups such that 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐶 = 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) . Also 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) and 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) commute with 𝐶 . If 𝐻 1 and 𝐻 2 are their generators, respectively, then we will think of ( 𝐻 1 , 𝐻 2 ) as the generator of 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) .

From the one-parameter case (see [8]), one can prove that 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) , and 𝐶 1 𝐻 𝑖 𝐶 = 𝐻 𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1 , 2 .

Also if { 𝑈 ( 𝑠 ) } 𝑠 + and { 𝑉 ( 𝑡 ) } 𝑡 + are two commuting one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups, then one can see that 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) = 𝑈 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑉 ( 𝑡 ) is a two-parameter 𝐶 2 -semigroup of operators.

The following is an example of a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup which is not exponentially bounded.

Example 2.2. Let 𝑋 = 𝐿 2 ( ) , and [ 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑓 ] ( 𝑧 ) = 𝑒 | 𝑧 | 2 + ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝑧 𝑓 ( 𝑧 ) , ( 𝐶 𝑓 ) ( 𝑧 ) = 𝑒 | 𝑧 | 2 𝑓 ( 𝑧 ) , then 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) is a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup which is not exponentially bounded.

In the following theorem we can see some elementary properties of a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup.

Theorem 2.3. Suppose that 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) is a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup with the infinitesimal generator ( 𝐻 1 , 𝐻 2 ) . Then, one has the following. (i)For each 𝑥 𝑋 and for every 𝑠 , 𝑡 0 , 𝑡 0 𝑠 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 , is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) . Also l i m ( , 𝑘 ) ( 0 , 0 ) 1 𝑘 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑠 𝑠 + 𝑘 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 ) (ii)For each 𝑥 𝑋 , and for every 𝑠 , 𝑡 + , 𝑠 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) and 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜈 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) ; furthermore 𝐻 1 𝑠 0 𝐻 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 , 2 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜈 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 ) (iii) 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) and 𝐻 1 and 𝐻 2 are closed.(iv)For any 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) , and each 𝑠 , 𝑡 > 0 , 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑥 and 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 are in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) . Also for this 𝑥 , and 𝑖 = 1 , 2 , 𝜕 𝜕 𝑡 𝑖 𝑊 𝑡 1 , 𝑡 2 𝑥 = 𝐻 𝑖 𝑊 𝑡 1 , 𝑡 2 𝑡 𝑥 = 𝑊 1 , 𝑡 2 𝐻 𝑖 𝑥 . ( 2 . 3 ) (v)For any 𝑎 , 𝑏 > 0 , 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) = 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑎 , 𝑡 𝑏 ) is a one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup whose generator is an extension of 𝑎 𝐻 1 + 𝑏 𝐻 2 .

Proof. To prove (i), suppose 𝑥 𝑋 . First we note that for any 𝜈 0 , l i m 0 1 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 = 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) l i m 0 1 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 = 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑡 , 0 ) 𝑥 = 𝑊 ( 𝑡 , 𝜈 ) 𝐶 𝑥 . ( 2 . 4 ) Thus 1 𝑊 ( , 0 ) 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 𝐶 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 = 1 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 𝐶 𝑠 0 𝑡 + 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 = 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 𝑠 0 1 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 , ( 2 . 5 ) which tends to 𝐶 𝑠 0 ( 𝑊 ( 𝑡 , 𝜈 ) 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜈 as 0 . This implies that 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) and 𝐻 1 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = 𝑠 0 ( 𝑊 ( 𝑡 , 𝜈 ) 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜈 . ( 2 . 6 ) A similar argument implies that it is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) and 𝐻 2 𝑠 0 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = 𝑡 0 ( 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝑠 ) 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 0 ) ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜈 . ( 2 . 7 ) For the second part, from the continuity of 𝐶 we have 𝐶 l i m ( , 𝑘 ) ( 0 , 0 ) 1 𝑘 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑠 𝑠 + 𝑘 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = l i m ( , 𝑘 ) ( 0 , 0 ) 1 𝑘 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑠 𝑠 + 𝑘 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = l i m ( , 𝑘 ) ( 0 , 0 ) 1 𝑡 𝑡 + 1 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) 𝑘 𝑠 𝑠 + 𝑘 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = l i m 0 1 𝑡 𝑡 + 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝜈 ) l i m 𝑘 0 1 𝑘 𝑠 𝑠 + 𝑘 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 = 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑥 . ( 2 . 8 ) Now the fact that 𝐶 is injective completes the proof of this part.
The proof of (ii) has a process similar to the first part of (i).
To prove (iii), we first note that 𝐻 1 and 𝐻 2 are closed as a trivial consequence of the one-parameter case (see [2]). For any 𝑥 𝑋 we saw that 1 0 0 𝑊 𝐻 ( 𝜇 , 𝜈 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 𝜈 𝐷 1 𝐻 𝐷 2 , ( 2 . 9 ) which tends to 𝑊 ( 0 , 0 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑥 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) , as 0 . This implies that 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) .
To prove (iv), we let 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) . If 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) and 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) , there is 𝑦 𝑋 such that l i m 𝑠 0 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑠 = 𝐶 𝑦 . ( 2 . 1 0 ) Hence l i m 𝑠 0 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑠 = 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑦 = 𝐶 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑦 , ( 2 . 1 1 ) which is in the 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) , and this implies that 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) , similarly it is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) .
Now from [2, Theorem  2.4(b)], for 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) , from the fact that 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 is in 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) , 𝜕 𝑑 𝜕 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑑 𝑠 ( 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) ( 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 ) ) = 𝐻 1 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) ( 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 ) = 𝐻 1 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝐻 1 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 2 ) On the other hand from the part (ii) and closedness of 𝐻 1 , 𝑠 0 𝐻 1 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 = 𝐻 1 𝑠 0 𝑊 ( 𝜇 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝜇 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 , ( 2 . 1 3 ) which implies that ( 𝜕 / 𝜕 𝑠 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 exists. Hence from the continuity of 𝐶 𝐶 𝜕 𝜕 𝜕 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝜕 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝐻 1 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 4 ) But 𝐶 is injective so 𝜕 𝜕 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝐻 1 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝐻 1 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 5 ) The second one is similar.
To prove (v), first we note that 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) is a one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup. Now if 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝑎 𝐻 1 + 𝑏 𝐻 2 ) = 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 2 ) , 𝐶 l i m 𝑡 0 + 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 = l i m 𝑡 0 + 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑎 , 0 ) 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 𝑏 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑎 , 0 ) 𝐶 𝑥 + 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑎 , 0 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝐶 2 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑏 l i m 𝑡 0 + 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑎 , 0 ) 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 𝑏 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑏 𝑡 + 𝑎 l i m 𝑡 0 + 𝑊 ( 𝑎 𝑡 , 0 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝐶 2 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑏 𝐶 2 𝐻 2 𝑥 + 𝑎 𝐻 1 𝐶 2 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 6 ) Now the fact that 𝐶 is injective implies that 𝐶 1 l i m 𝑡 0 + 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑎 𝐻 1 𝑥 + 𝑏 𝐻 2 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 7 )

For an exponentially bounded one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) with the generator 𝐴 , from [1] the existence of 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 = 0 𝑒 𝜆 𝑡 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝑡 is guaranteed for sufficiently large 𝜆 . Now we have the following lemma for one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups of operators which is similar to the Yosida-approximation theorem for strongly continuous semigroups. This will be applied in our study of two-parameter regularized semigroups.

Lemma 2.4. Let { 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) } 𝑡 + be a one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup satisfying the condition 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑀 𝑒 𝜔 𝑡 , for some 𝜔 > 0 and 𝑀 > 0 , with the generator 𝐴 . If for 𝜆 > 𝜔 , 𝐴 𝜆 = 𝜆 𝐴 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) , then one has the following. (i)For any 𝑥 𝑋 , 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 ( 𝑀 / ( 𝜆 𝜔 ) ) 𝑥 , 𝐴 𝜆 = 𝜆 2 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝜆 𝐶 , and so 𝐴 𝜆 is bounded. Also 𝑆 ( 𝑡 ) = 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜆 is a one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup which is exponentially bounded.(ii)For any 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , l i m 𝜆 𝜆 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑥 and for all 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , l i m 𝜆 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝐴 𝑥 . Also if 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) is dense in 𝑋 , then the first equality holds on 𝑋 .(iii)For any 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = l i m 𝜆 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 .

Proof. The first inequality of (i) is trivial. From [2, Lemma  2.8], we know that for any 𝑥 𝑋 , ( 𝜆 𝐴 ) 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑥 ; thus, 𝜆 ( 𝜆 𝐴 ) 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 = 𝜆 𝐶 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 8 ) This implies our desired equality.
For the second part, first we show that 𝐶 𝐴 𝜆 = 𝐴 𝜆 𝐶 . For this we note that 𝐶 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) = 𝐶 0 𝑒 𝜆 𝑡 = 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝑥 0 𝐶 𝑒 𝜆 𝑡 = 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝑥 0 𝑒 𝜆 𝑡 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑑 𝑥 = 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝐶 𝑥 . ( 2 . 1 9 ) This and the first part imply that 𝐶 𝐴 𝜆 = 𝐴 𝜆 𝐶 . Now we prove the 𝐶 -semigroup properties of 𝑆 ( 𝑡 ) . Trivially 𝑆 ( 0 ) = 𝐶 . Also from the last equality, 𝑆 ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝐶 = 𝐶 𝑒 ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝐴 𝜆 𝐶 = 𝐶 𝑒 𝑠 𝐴 𝜆 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜆 = 𝑆 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑆 ( 𝑡 ) . ( 2 . 2 0 ) The fact that 𝐴 𝜆 , 𝜆 > 𝜔 , is a bounded operator trivially implies that 𝑆 ( ) is exponentially bounded. Now the continuity of the mapping 𝑡 𝑆 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 at zero implies the strongly continuity of 𝑆 ( 𝑡 ) .
To prove (ii), for 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , from (i) and the fact that 𝐴 is closed, we have 𝜆 𝐿 𝜆 = ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝐴 𝐿 𝜆 = 𝐿 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 𝜆 𝐿 ( 𝐴 ) 𝐴 𝑥 𝜆 𝑀 ( 𝐴 ) 𝐴 𝑥 ( 𝜆 𝜔 ) 𝐴 𝑥 0 a s 𝜆 . ( 2 . 2 1 ) The continuity of 𝐶 and 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) implies that for any 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , l i m 𝜆 𝜆 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝑥 .
Now for 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , l i m 𝜆 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 = l i m 𝜆 𝜆 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐴 ) 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐴 𝐶 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 2 ) For the last part of (ii), if 𝐶 has a dense range, then by [8, Lemma  1.1.3], 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , and so 𝑋 = 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 , which means that 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) = 𝑋 .
To prove (iii), for any 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) , we have 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜇 𝑥 = 1 0 𝑑 𝑑 𝑠 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝑠 𝐴 𝜆 𝑒 𝑡 ( 1 𝑠 𝐴 𝜇 ) 𝑥 1 0 𝑡 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝑠 𝐴 𝜆 𝑒 𝑡 ( 1 𝑠 𝐴 𝜇 ) 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 𝐴 𝜇 𝑥 𝐴 𝑑 𝑠 𝑡 𝐶 𝜆 𝑥 𝐴 𝜇 𝑥 𝐴 𝑡 𝐶 𝜆 + 𝑥 𝐴 𝐶 𝑥 𝐴 𝐶 𝑥 𝐴 𝜇 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 3 ) This and the previous part prove the existence of l i m 𝜆 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐴 𝜆 𝑥 .

Using this theorem we may find the following approximation theorem for two-parameter regularized semigroups.

Corollary 2.5. Suppose that ( 𝐻 , 𝐾 ) is the infinitesimal generator of an exponentially bounded two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) , then for each 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) , 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 + 𝑡 𝐾 𝜆 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 4 )

For exponentially bounded 𝐶 -semigroup 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) satisfying 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑀 𝑒 ( 𝑠 + 𝑡 ) 𝜔 , with the infinitesimal generator ( 𝐻 , 𝐾 ) , define 𝐿 𝜆 1 ( 𝐻 ) 𝑥 = 0 𝑒 𝜆 1 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝑠 and 𝐿 𝜆 2 ( 𝐾 ) 𝑥 = 0 𝑒 𝜆 2 𝑡 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑑 𝑡 , where R e ( 𝜆 𝑖 ) > 𝜔 . From the previous Lemma 𝐿 𝜆 1 ( 𝐻 ) and 𝐿 𝜆 2 ( 𝐾 ) are bounded operators.

Theorem 2.6. (i) Let ( 𝐻 , 𝐾 ) be the generator of an exponentially bounded two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup, then for large enough 𝜆 1 , 𝜆 2 𝐿 𝜆 1 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐿 𝜆 2 ( 𝐾 ) = 𝐿 𝜆 2 ( 𝐾 ) 𝐿 𝜆 1 ( 𝐻 ) . ( 2 . 2 5 ) (ii)Let ( 𝐻 , 𝐾 ) be the generator of an exponentially bounded two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup, then 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 𝐾 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 𝐻 ) , and for 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 𝐾 ) , 𝐻 𝐾 𝑥 = 𝐾 𝐻 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 6 ) (iii)Suppose that 𝐻 and 𝐾 are the generators of two exponentially bounded one-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups { 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) } 𝑠 + and { 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) } 𝑡 + , respectively. If their resolvents commute and 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) is dense in 𝑋 , then 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) = 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) is a two-parameter 𝐶 2 -semigroup.

Proof. The proof of (i) follows trivially from the properties of two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroups.
To prove (ii), we let 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐻 𝐾 ) ; from the strongly continuity of 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) and the fact that 𝐾 is closed, we have 𝐶 2 𝐻 𝐾 𝑥 = 𝐶 l i m 𝑠 0 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝐾 𝑥 𝐶 𝐾 𝑥 𝑠 = l i m 𝑠 0 1 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) l i m 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 l i m 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 = l i m 𝑠 0 l i m 𝑡 0 1 𝑠 𝑡 ( 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 + 𝐶 𝑥 ) = l i m 𝑠 0 l i m 𝑡 0 1 𝑠 𝑡 ( 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝐶 𝑥 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑥 + 𝐶 𝑥 ) = l i m 𝑠 0 l i m 𝑡 0 1 𝑡 𝑊 ( 0 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑠 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑠 = 𝐶 l i m 𝑠 0 𝐾 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑠 = 𝐶 2 𝐾 𝐻 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 7 ) However, 𝐶 is injective, and this completes the proof of (i).
To prove (iii), from our hypothesis, for sufficiently large 𝜆 , 𝜆 , we know that 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐾 ) = 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐾 ) 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐻 ) . ( 2 . 2 8 ) By Lemma 2.4, 𝐻 𝜆 = 𝜆 2 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐻 ) 𝜆 𝐶 and 𝐾 𝜆 = 𝜆 2 𝐿 𝜆 ( 𝐻 ) 𝜆 𝐶 , thus 𝐻 𝜆 𝐾 𝜆 = 𝐾 𝜆 𝐻 𝜆 . From (iii) of Lemma 2.4, for each 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) , 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑥 = l i m 𝜆 𝐶 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 𝑥 , 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) = l i m 𝜆 𝐶 𝑒 𝑡 𝐾 𝜆 𝑥 . ( 2 . 2 9 ) So 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝐶 2 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑡 𝐾 𝜆 𝑥 , 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 i s c o n t i n u o u s = 𝐶 2 l i m 𝜆 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 𝑒 𝑡 𝐾 𝜆 𝑥 = 𝐶 2 l i m 𝜆 l i m 𝜆 𝑒 𝑡 𝐾 𝜆 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 𝑥 = 𝐶 l i m 𝜆 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑒 𝑠 𝐻 𝜆 𝑥 = 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑥 . ( 2 . 3 0 ) Now the continuity of 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) and 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) and the fact that 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) = 𝑅 ( 𝐶 ) = 𝑋 imply that for each 𝑥 𝑋 , 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑥 = 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑥 . Thus 𝑊 𝑠 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) 𝑊 , 𝑡 𝑠 = 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑢 𝑣 𝑡 𝑠 = 𝑢 ( 𝑠 ) 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 ( 𝑡 ) 𝑣 = 𝐶 𝑢 𝑠 + 𝑠 𝐶 𝑣 𝑡 + 𝑡 = 𝑊 𝑠 + 𝑠 , 𝑡 + 𝑡 𝐶 2 . ( 2 . 3 1 ) On the other hand 𝑊 ( 0 , 0 ) = 𝐶 2 , which completes the proof.

If 𝐻 and 𝐾 are two closed operators on 𝑋 , then 𝑋 1 = 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) with 𝑥 1 = 𝑥 + 𝐻 𝑥 + 𝐾 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝑋 1 , is a Banach space.

Proposition 2.7. Suppose that 𝐶 𝐵 ( 𝑋 ) is injective and { 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) } is a two-parameter 𝐶 -semigroup with the generator ( 𝐻 , 𝐾 ) . Then 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) | 𝑋 1 defines a two-parameter 𝐶 1 -semigroup, with the generator ( 𝐻 1 , 𝐾 1 ) , where 𝐶 1 = 𝐶 | 𝑋 1 , and 𝐻 1 , 𝐾 1 are the part of 𝐻 and 𝐾 on 𝑋 1 , respectively.

Proof. The 𝐶 1 -semigroup properties of 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) are obvious. Let ( 𝐴 , 𝐵 ) be the generator of 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 𝑡 ) ; we show that 𝐴 = 𝐻 1 and 𝐵 = 𝐻 2 . First we note that 𝐷 𝐻 1 = 𝑥 𝑋 1 𝐻 𝑥 𝑋 1 = 𝐻 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 ) 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) 𝑥 𝐷 2 𝐻 𝐷 ( 𝐾 𝐻 ) = 𝐷 ( 𝐾 ) 𝐷 2 𝐷 ( 𝐾 𝐻 ) . ( 2 . 3 2 ) Let 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐻 1 ) . So we have 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 1 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 𝐶 𝐻 𝑥 = 𝐶 1 𝐻 1 𝐻 𝑊 𝑥 , 1 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 1 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝐻 𝑥 𝐶 𝐻 𝑥 𝑡 𝐶 𝐻 2 𝑥 = 𝐻 𝐶 1 𝐻 1 𝐾 𝑊 𝑥 , 1 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 1 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝐾 𝑥 𝐶 𝐾 𝑥 𝑡 𝐶 𝐻 𝐾 𝑥 = 𝐾 𝐶 𝐻 𝑥 = 𝐾 𝐶 1 𝐻 1 𝑥 . ( 2 . 3 3 ) These show that ( 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 1 𝑥 ) / 𝑡 𝐶 1 𝐻 1 𝑥 in 1 , that is, 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) and 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐻 1 𝑥 . Hence 𝐻 1 𝐴 . Conversely, if 𝑥 𝐷 ( 𝐴 ) 𝑋 1 , then 1 l i m 𝑡 0 𝑊 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 𝑥 𝑡 = 1 l i m 𝑡 0 𝑊 1 ( 𝑠 , 0 ) 𝑥 𝐶 1 𝑥 𝑡 = 𝐶 1 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐶 𝐴 𝑥 , ( 2