Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 757964, 8 pages
doi:10.1155/2009/757964
Research Article

The Numerical Range of Toeplitz Operator on the Polydisk

Department of Mathematics, JiaYing University, Meizhou 514015, GuangDong, China

Received 22 May 2009; Accepted 1 July 2009

Academic Editor: Stevo Stević

Copyright © 2009 Dinggui Gu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The numerical range and normality of Toeplitz operator acting on the Bergman space and pluriharmonic Bergman space on the polydisk is investigated in this paper.

1. Introduction

Let 𝐻 be a Hilbert space with an inner product, and let 𝑇 be a bounded linear operator on 𝐻 . The numerical range 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) of 𝑇 is the subset of the complex plane defined by 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) = { 𝑇 𝑥 , 𝑥 𝑥 𝐻 , 𝑥 , 𝑥 = 1 } . ( 1 . 1 ) It is well known that 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) is a convex set whose closure contains the spectrum of 𝑇 , which denoted by 𝜎 ( 𝑇 ) . If 𝑇 is a normal operator, then the closure of 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) is the convex hull of 𝜎 ( 𝑇 ) . Moreover, it is also well known that each extreme point of 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) is an eigenvalue of 𝑇 . See [1, 2] for more information of the numerical range of a operator.

Brown and Halmos in [3] and Klein in [4] studied the numerical range of arbitrary Toeplitz operator on the Hardy space of the unit disk. Thukral studied the numerical range of Toeplitz operator with harmonic symbol on the Bergman space of the unit disk in [2]. On the Bergman space and pluriharmonic Bergman space of the unit ball, the numerical range and normality of Toeplitz operator was described in [5].

In this paper, we consider the same problem on the Bergman space and pluriharmonic Bergman space of the polydisk. We first study some relations between the numerical range and normality of the Toeplitz operator with 𝑛 -harmonic function symbols acting on the Bergman space on the polydisk. Next, we consider the same problem on the pluriharmonic Bergman space of the polydisk. Our results show that as case of the ball hold on the polydisk.

2. Toeplitz Operators on the Bergman Space of the Polydisk

Let 𝐷 be the unit disk in the complex plane. For a fixed integer 𝑛 , the unit polydisk 𝐷 𝑛 is the cartesian product of 𝑛 copies of 𝐷 . Let 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) denote the usual Lebesgue space with respect to the volume measure 𝑉 = 𝑉 𝑛 on 𝐷 𝑛 normalized to have total mass 1 . The Bergman space 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is the closed subspace of 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) consisting of all holomorphic functions on 𝐷 𝑛 . Some information on Bergman-type spaces on the polydisk (including Bergman projections) can be found, for example, in [610] (see also the reference therein).

Let 𝑃 be the orthogonal projection from 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) onto 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . The Toeplitz operator 𝑇 𝑢 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) with symbol 𝑢 𝐿 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is the linear operator defined by 𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 = 𝑃 ( 𝑢 𝑓 ) ( 2 . 1 ) for functions 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) .

A function 𝑢 𝐶 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is called 𝑛 -harmonic if 𝑢 is harmonic in each variable separately. More explicitly, 𝑢 is 𝑛 -harmonic if 𝜕 𝑗 𝜕 𝑗 𝑢 = 0 , 𝑗 = 1 , 2 , , 𝑛 . ( 2 . 2 ) Here 𝜕 𝑗 denotes the complex partial differentiation with respect to the 𝑗 th variable.

Recall that a complex-valued function 𝑓 𝐶 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is said to be pluriharmonic if 𝜕 𝑗 𝜕 𝑘 𝑓 = 0 , 𝑗 , 𝑘 = 1 , 2 , , 𝑛 . ( 2 . 3 ) Note that each pluriharmonic function is 𝑛 -harmonic function.

In this section, we give characterizations of Toeplitz operator with symbols 𝑛 -harmonic acting on the Bergman space on the polydisk. For this purpose, we need the following result (see [11]).

Lemma 2.1. Let 𝑢 𝐿 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . Then 𝑢 is an 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 if and only if 𝐷 𝑛 𝑢 𝜑 𝑎 𝑑 𝑉 = 𝑢 ( 𝑎 ) ( 2 . 4 ) for every 𝑎 𝐷 𝑛 .

Theorem 2.2. Let 𝑢 be a bounded 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) .

Proof. For each 𝑎 𝐷 𝑛 , let 𝑘 𝑎 denote the normalized kernel, namely, 𝑘 𝑎 𝐾 ( 𝑧 ) = 𝑎 ( 𝑧 ) 𝐾 𝑎 = ( 𝑎 ) 𝑛 𝑗 = 1 | | 𝑎 1 𝑗 | | 2 1 𝑎 𝑗 𝑧 𝑗 2 . ( 2 . 5 ) It is obvious that 𝑘 𝑎 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) and 𝑘 𝑎 , 𝑘 𝑎 = 𝐷 𝑛 | | 𝑘 𝑎 | | 2 𝑑 𝑉 = 1 ( 2 . 6 ) for every 𝑎 𝐷 𝑛 .
For each 𝑎 = ( 𝑎 1 , 𝑎 2 , , 𝑎 𝑛 ) 𝐷 𝑛 , we let 𝜑 𝑎 = ( 𝜑 𝑎 1 , 𝜑 𝑎 2 , , 𝜑 𝑎 𝑛 ) , where each 𝜑 𝑎 𝑖 is the usual M ̈ o bius map on 𝐷 given by
𝜑 𝑎 𝑖 𝑧 𝑖 = 𝑎 𝑖 𝑧 𝑖 1 𝑎 𝑖 𝑧 𝑖 , ( 2 . 7 ) then 𝜑 𝑎 is an automorphism of 𝐷 𝑛 , and 𝜑 𝑎 𝜑 𝑎 is the identity on 𝐷 𝑛 . Since the real Jacobian of 𝜑 𝑎 is given by | 𝑘 𝑎 ( 𝑧 ) | 2 , we have 𝐷 𝑛 𝜑 𝑎 𝑑 𝑉 = 𝐷 𝑛 | | 𝑘 𝑎 | | ( 𝑧 ) 2 𝑑 𝑉 ( 2 . 8 ) whenever the integrals make sense. In particular, by Lemma 2.1, we obtain 𝐷 𝑛 𝜑 𝑎 𝑑 𝑉 = ( 𝑎 ) ( 2 . 9 ) for function integrable and holomorphic on 𝐷 𝑛 . Hence 𝑇 𝑢 𝑘 𝑎 , 𝑘 𝑎 = 𝑃 𝑢 𝑘 𝑎 , 𝑘 𝑎 = 𝑢 𝑘 𝑎 , 𝑘 𝑎 = 𝐷 𝑛 𝑢 | | 𝑘 𝑎 | | 2 = 𝑑 𝑉 𝐷 𝑛 𝑢 𝜑 𝑎 𝑑 𝑉 = 𝑢 ( 𝑎 ) ( 2 . 1 0 ) for every 𝑎 𝐷 𝑛 . Therefore 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) .

Recall that 𝑇 𝑢 0 means 𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 0 for every 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . Using Theorem 2.2, we obtain the following result.

Theorem 2.3. Let 𝑢 be a bounded 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑇 𝑢 0 if and only if 𝑢 0 .

Proof. First we assume that 𝑇 𝑢 0 . By the definition of 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) , we have 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) [ 0 , ) . By Theorem 2.2, we see that 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 𝑇 ) 𝑊 𝑢 [ 0 , ) , ( 2 . 1 1 ) that is, 𝑢 0 .
Conversely, suppose that 𝑢 0 . For every 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) , we have
𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 = 𝑃 ( 𝑢 𝑓 ) , 𝑓 = 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 = 𝐷 𝑛 𝑢 | | 𝑓 | | 2 𝑑 𝑉 0 . ( 2 . 1 2 ) Hence 𝑇 𝑢 0 by the arbitrary of 𝑓 . The proof of the theorem is completed.

Theorem 2.4. Let 𝑢 be a bounded 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) lies in the upper half-plane and contains 0 , then 𝑇 𝑢 must be self-adjoint.

Proof. We modify the proof of Theorem 3 in [5]. From the assumption, we have I m 𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 0 for every 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . In addition, I m 𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 = I m 𝑃 ( 𝑢 𝑓 ) , 𝑓 = I m 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 = 𝐷 𝑛 ( | | 𝑓 | | I m 𝑢 ) 2 𝑑 𝑉 = 𝑇 I m 𝑢 𝑓 , 𝑓 ( 2 . 1 3 ) for every 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . Hence 𝑇 I m 𝑢 0 by the arbitrary of 𝑓 . By Theorem 2.3, we have I m 𝑢 0 .
On the other hand, since 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) contains 0 , there exist some 𝑔 𝐴 2 with 𝑔 , 𝑔 = 1 such that 𝑇 𝑢 𝑔 , 𝑔 = 0 . Therefore,
0 = I m 𝑇 𝑢 𝑔 , 𝑔 = I m 𝐷 𝑛 𝑢 | | 𝑔 | | 2 𝑑 𝑉 = 𝐷 𝑛 ( | | 𝑔 | | I m 𝑢 ) 2 𝑑 𝑉 . ( 2 . 1 4 ) We obtain ( I m 𝑢 ) | 𝑔 | 2 = 0 by the fact that I m 𝑢 0 . Because 𝑔 0 , we see that I m 𝑢 = 0 . It follows that 𝑢 is real and 𝑇 𝑢 is self-adjoint.

Theorem 2.5. Let 𝑢 be a bounded 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) is not open in , then 𝑇 𝑢 is normal on 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) .

Proof. The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 4 of [5]. We omit the details.

Since an open convex set is the interior of its closure, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 2.6. Let 𝑢 be a bounded 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑇 𝑢 is not normal on 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) , then 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) is the interior of its closure.

Lemma 2.7 (See [1]). If 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) is a line segment, then 𝑇 is normal.

We will consider the problem of when the converse of this fact is also true. First, we prove the following three results.

Proposition 2.8. Let 𝑢 be bounded real n-harmonic on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑢 is nonconstant, then 𝑚 , 𝑀 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) , where 𝑚 = i n f 𝑢 and 𝑀 = s u p 𝑢 .

Proof. If 𝑚 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) , then 𝑚 is an extreme point of 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) and hence is an eigenvalue of 𝑇 𝑢 . Therefore, there exists a nonzero 𝑓 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) such that 𝑇 𝑢 𝑓 = 𝑚 𝑓 , that is, 𝑃 ( 𝑢 𝑓 𝑚 𝑓 ) = 0 . We obtain 0 = 𝑃 ( 𝑢 𝑓 𝑚 𝑓 ) , 𝑓 = ( 𝑢 𝑚 ) 𝑓 , 𝑓 = 𝐷 𝑛 ( | | 𝑓 | | 𝑢 𝑚 ) 2 𝑑 𝑉 . ( 2 . 1 5 ) Since 𝑢 𝑚 0 on 𝐷 𝑛 , we get ( 𝑢 𝑚 ) | 𝑓 | 2 = 0 . Because 𝑓 is nonzero, we obtain 𝑢 = 𝑚 . Therefore 𝑢 is a constant, which is a contradiction. So 𝑚 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) .
Similarly to the above proof we get 𝑀 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) .

Theorem 2.9. Let 𝑢 be a bounded real function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝜎 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) [ 𝑚 , 𝑀 ] , where 𝑚 = i n f 𝑢 and 𝑀 = s u p 𝑢 .

Proof. Suppose that 𝜆 [ 𝑚 , 𝑀 ] , then either 𝑢 𝜆 > 0 or 𝑢 𝜆 < 0 on 𝐷 𝑛 . First we assume that 𝑢 𝜆 > 0 and choose 𝜖 > 0 such that s u p 𝑧 𝐷 𝑛 | | | | 𝜖 ( 𝑢 ( 𝑧 ) 𝜆 ) 1 < 1 . ( 2 . 1 6 ) We obtain 𝑇 𝜖 ( 𝑢 𝜆 ) 𝐼 = 𝑇 𝜖 ( 𝑢 𝜆 ) 1 𝜖 ( 𝑢 𝜆 ) 1 < 1 . ( 2 . 1 7 ) It follows from the last inequality that 𝑇 𝜖 ( 𝑢 ( 𝑧 ) 𝜆 ) and 𝑇 𝑢 𝜆 are invertible. Because 𝑇 𝑢 𝜆 = 𝑇 𝑢 𝜆 , we get 𝜆 𝜎 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) .
Now we assume that 𝑢 𝜆 < 0 on 𝐷 𝑛 . From the above proof and the facts that 𝑢 + 𝜆 > 0 and
𝑇 𝑢 𝜆 = 𝑇 𝑢 𝜆 = 𝑇 𝑢 + 𝜆 , ( 2 . 1 8 ) we get the desired result.

Theorem 2.10. Let 𝑢 be a bounded nonconstant real 𝑛 -harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑊 𝑇 𝑢 = ( 𝑚 , 𝑀 ) , w h e r e 𝑚 = i n f 𝑢 , 𝑀 = s u p 𝑢 . ( 2 . 1 9 )

Proof. Using Proposition 2.8, Theorems 2.2 and 2.9, similarly to the proof of Theorem 8 of [5], we get the desired result. We omit the details.

Lemma 2.11. Let 𝑢 be a bounded pluriharmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑇 𝑢 is normal on 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) if and only if 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is a part of a line in .

Proof. The proof is similar to [12, Proposition 1 3 ]. We omit the details.

Theorem 2.12. Let 𝑢 be a bounded nonconstant pluriharmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑇 𝑢 is normal on 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) , then 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) is an open line segment.

Proof. By Lemma 2.11, 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is a part of a line in when 𝑇 𝑢 is normal. Therefore, there exist constants 𝑠 , 𝑡 and a nonconstant bounded real pluriharmonic function 𝑣 such that 𝑢 = 𝑠 𝑣 + 𝑡 on 𝐷 𝑛 . Since each pluriharmonic function is 𝑛 -harmonic function, by Theorem 2.10, we have 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑣 ) = ( 𝑚 , 𝑀 ) , where 𝑚 = i n f 𝑣 and 𝑀 = s u p 𝑣 . For a given bounded linear operator T on a Hilbert space, we note that 𝑊 ( 𝛼 𝑇 + 𝛽 ) = 𝛼 𝑊 ( 𝑇 ) + 𝛽 , 𝛼 , 𝛽 . ( 2 . 2 0 ) It follows from 𝑇 𝑢 = 𝑠 𝑇 𝑣 + 𝑡 that 𝑊 𝑇 𝑢 𝑇 = 𝑠 𝑊 𝑣 + 𝑡 = ( 𝑠 𝑚 + 𝑡 , 𝑠 𝑀 + 𝑡 ) . ( 2 . 2 1 ) Therefore 𝑊 ( 𝑇 𝑢 ) is an open line segment.

3. Toeplitz Operators on the Pluriharmonic Bergman Space

In this section, we consider the same problem for Toeplitz operators acting on the pluriharmnoic Bergman space in the polydisk. The pluriharmonic Bergman space 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is the space of all pluriharmonic functions in 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . It is well known that 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is a closed subspace of 𝐿 2 and hence is a Hilbert space. Hence, for each 𝑧 𝐷 𝑛 , there exists a unique function 𝑅 𝑧 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) called the pluriharmonic Bergman kernel, which has the following reproducing property: 𝑓 ( 𝑧 ) = 𝐷 𝑛 𝑓 ( 𝑤 ) 𝑅 𝑧 ( 𝑤 ) 𝑑 𝑉 ( 𝑤 ) ( 3 . 1 ) for every 𝑓 𝑏 2 . From this reproducing formula, it follows that the orthogonal projection 𝑄 from 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) onto 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is realized as an integral operator 𝑄 ( 𝜑 ) ( 𝑧 ) = 𝐷 𝑛 𝜑 ( 𝑤 ) 𝑅 𝑧 ( 𝑤 ) 𝑑 𝑉 𝑛 ( 𝑤 ) , 𝑧 𝐷 𝑛 ( 3 . 2 ) for 𝜑 𝐿 2 .

It is well known that a function 𝑓 𝐶 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is pluriharmonic if and only if it admits a decomposition 𝑓 = 𝑔 + , where 𝑔 and are holomorphic. Furthermore, if 𝑓 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) , then it is not hard to see 𝑔 , 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . Hence 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) = 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) + 𝐴 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . ( 3 . 3 ) Therefore 𝑅 𝑧 = 𝐾 𝑧 + 𝐾 𝑧 1 , ( 3 . 4 ) where 𝐾 𝑧 is the well-known holomorphic Bergman kernel. By (3.2) and (3.4), we see that 𝑄 admits the following integral representation: 𝑄 ( 𝜑 ) ( 𝑧 ) = 𝐷 𝑛 𝜑 ( 𝑤 ) 𝐾 𝑧 ( 𝑤 ) + 𝐾 𝑧 ( 𝑤 ) 1 𝑑 𝑉 ( 𝑤 ) , 𝑧 𝐷 𝑛 ( 3 . 5 ) for 𝜑 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) .

Let 𝑢 𝐿 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . The Toeplitz operator 𝑡 𝑢 with symbol 𝑢 is defined by 𝑡 𝑢 𝑓 = 𝑄 ( 𝑢 𝑓 ) ( 3 . 6 ) for 𝑓 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . The operator 𝑡 𝑢 is densely defined. In fact, we have 𝑄 ( 𝑢 𝑓 ) 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) for any 𝑓 𝐻 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . Using the the same arguments as the Section 2, we have the following results.

Theorem 3.1. Let 𝑢 be a bounded n-harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑢 ) .

Theorem 3.2. Let 𝑢 be bounded n-harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑡 𝑢 0 if and only if 𝑢 0 .

Theorem 3.3. Let 𝑢 be bounded n-harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑢 ) lies in the upper half-plane and contains 0, then 𝑡 𝑢 must be self-adjoint.

Theorem 3.4. Let 𝑢 be bounded n-harmonic function in 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) . If 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑢 ) is not open in , then 𝑡 𝑢 is normal on 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) .

Theorem 3.5. Let 𝑢 be nonconstant real n-harmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then one has 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑢 ) = ( 𝑚 , 𝑀 ) where 𝑚 = i n f 𝑢 and 𝑀 = s u p 𝑢 .

We also need a corresponding result of Lemma 2.11 (see [13, Theorem 1 . 2 ]).

Lemma 3.6. Let 𝑢 be a bounded pluriharmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . Then 𝑡 𝑢 is normal on 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) if and only if 𝑢 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) is a part of a line in .

Theorem 3.7. Let 𝑢 be bounded nonconstant pluriharmonic function on 𝐷 𝑛 . If 𝑇 𝑢 is normal on 𝑏 2 ( 𝐷 𝑛 ) , then 𝑊 ( 𝑡 𝑢 ) is an open line segment.

References

  1. K. E. Gustafson and D. K. M. Rao, Numerical Range: The Field of Values of Linear Operators and Matrices, Universitext, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  2. J. K. Thukral, “The numerical range of a Toeplitz operator with harmonic symbol,” Journal of Operator Theory, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 213–216, 1995.
  3. A. Brown and P. R. Halmos, “Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators,” Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 213, pp. 89–102, 1963.
  4. E. M. Klein, “The numerical range of a Toeplitz operator,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 35, pp. 101–103, 1972.
  5. B. R. Choe and Y. J. Lee, “The numerical range and normality of Toeplitz operators,” Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, pp. 71–80, 2001.
  6. S. Stević, “Weighted integrals of holomorphic functions on the polydisc. II,” Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 775–782, 2004.
  7. S. Stević, “A note on a theorem of Zhu on weighted Bergman projections on the polydisc,” Houston Journal of Mathematics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1233–1241, 2008.
  8. S. Stević, “Holomorphic functions on the mixed norm spaces on the polydisc,” Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 63–78, 2008.
  9. K. H. Zhu, “The Bergman spaces, the Bloch space, and Gleason's problem,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 309, no. 1, pp. 253–268, 1988.
  10. K. H. Zhu, “Weighted Bergman projections on the polydisc,” Houston Journal of Mathematics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 275–292, 1994.
  11. J. Lee, “An invariant mean value property in the polydisc,” Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 406–419, 1998.
  12. Y. J. Lee and K. Zhu, “Some differential and integral equations with applications to Toeplitz operators,” Integral Equations and Operator Theory, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 466–479, 2002.
  13. B. R. Choe and K. S. Nam, “Note on commuting Toeplitz operators on the pluriharmonic Bergman space,” Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 259–269, 2006.