`Abstract and Applied AnalysisVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 121795, 11 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/121795`
Research Article

## A Set of Mathematical Constants Arising Naturally in the Theory of the Multiple Gamma Functions

Department of Mathematics, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 780-714, Republic of Korea

Received 7 August 2012; Accepted 10 September 2012

Copyright © 2012 Junesang Choi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We introduce a set of mathematical constants which is involved naturally in the theory of multiple Gamma functions. Then we present general asymptotic inequalities for these constants whose special cases are seen to contain all results very recently given in Chen 2011.

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The double Gamma function and the multiple Gamma functions were defined and studied systematically by Barnes [14] in about 1900. Before their investigation by Barnes, these functions had been introduced in a different form by, for example, Hölder [5], Alexeiewsky [6] and Kinkelin [7]. In about the middle of the 1980s, these functions were revived in the study of the determinants of the Laplacians on the -dimensional unit sphere (see [813]). Since then the multiple Gamma functions have attracted many authors' concern and have been used in various ways. It is seen that a set of constants given in (1.11) involves naturally in the theory of the multiple Gamma functions (see [1420] and references therein). For example, for sufficiently large real and , we have the Stirling formula for the -function (see [1]; see also [21, page 26, equation (7)]): where is the Glaisher-Kinkelin constant (see [7, 2224]) given in (1.16) below. The Glaisher-Kinkelin constant , the constants and below introduced by Choi and Srivastava have been used, among other things, in the closed-form evaluation of certain series involving zeta functions and in calculation of some integrals of multiple Gamma functions. So trying to give asymptotic formulas for these constants , , and are significant. Very recently Chen [25] presented nice asymptotic inequalities for these constants , , and by mainly using the Euler-Maclaurin summation formulas. Here, we aim at presenting asymptotic inequalities for a set of the mathematical constants    given in (1.11) some of whose special cases are seen to yield all results in [25].

For this purpose, we begin by summarizing some differential and integral formulas of the function in (1.2).

Lemma 1.1. Differentiating the function times, we obtain where is a polynomial of degree in satisfying the following recurrence relation: In fact, by mathematical induction on , we can give an explicit expression for as follows: Setting in (1.3) and (1.5), respectively, we get where are the harmonic numbers defined by Differentiating in (1.6) times, we obtain Integrating the function in (1.2) from to , we get

For each , define a sequence by where are Bernoulli numbers given in (1.12), are given in (1.5), and denotes (as usual) the greatest integer ≦. Define a set of mathematical constants by The Bernoulli numbers are defined by the generating function (see [21, Section 1.6]; see also, [26, Section 1.7]): We introduce a well-known formula (see [21, Section 2.3]): where is the Riemann Zeta function defined by It is easy to observe from (1.13) that

Remark 1.2. We find that the constants , and correspond with the Glaisher-Kinkelin constant , the constants and introduced by Choi and Srivastava, respectively: where denotes the Glaisher-Kinkelin constant whose numerical value is Here and are constants whose approximate numerical values are given by The constants and were considered recently by Choi and Srivastava [16, 18]. See also Adamchik [27, page 199]. Bendersky [28] presented a set of constants including and .

#### 2. Euler-Maclaurin Summation Formula

We begin by recalling the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (cf. Hardy ([29, 30], page 318)): where is an arbitrary constant to be determined in each special case and are the Bernoulli numbers given in (1.12). For another useful summation formula, see Edwards [31, page 117].

Let be a function of class , and let the interval be partitioned into subintervals of the same length . Then we have another useful form of the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (see, e.g., [32]): There exists such that where . Under the same conditions in (2.2), setting , , , and in (2.2), we obtain a simple summation formula (see [25]): where, for convenience, the remainder term is given by which is seen to be bounded by

Zhu and Yang [33] established some useful formulas originated from the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (2.1) (see also [25]) asserted by the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1. Let and let have its first derivatives on an interval such that and (or and ) and . Then the following results hold true: (i)The sequence converges. Let . (ii)For and , we have For and , we have (iii)There exists such that

#### 3. Asymptotic Formulas and Inequalities for

Applying the function in (1.2) to the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula (2.1) with and using the results presented in Lemma 1.1, we obtain an asymptotic formula for the sequence as in the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1. The following asymptotic formulas for the constants and hold true: where 's are constants dependent on each and an empty sum is understood (as usual) to be nil. And

Proof. We only note that(i)(ii)

Applying the function in (1.2) to the formula (2.9) with , and using the results presented in Lemma 1.1, we get two sided inequalities for the difference of and asserted by Theorem 3.2.

Theorem 3.2. The following inequalities hold true:

Proof. Setting the function in (1.2) in the formula (2.9) with , and using the results presented in Lemma 1.1, we get for some .
Replacing by and in (3.6), respectively, we obtain In view of (1.15), we find the following inequalities: Finally it is easily seen that the two-sided inequalities can be expressed in a single form (3.5).

Remark 3.3. The special cases of (3.5) when , , and are easily seen to correspond with Equations , , and in Chen's work [25], respectively.

Applying the function in (1.2) to the formula (2.3) and using the results presented in Lemma 1.1, we get two-sided inequalities for the asserted by Theorem 3.4.

Theorem 3.4. The following inequalities hold true: where, for convenience,

Proof. Setting the function in (1.2) in the formula (2.3), and using the results presented in Lemma 1.1, we have, for some , Replacing by and in (3.12), respectively, we obtain In view of (1.15), we find from that Now, taking the limit on each side of the inequalities in as , we obtain the results in Theorem 3.4.

Remark 3.5. It is easily seen that the specialized inequalities of (3.9) when and and (3.10) when correspond with those inequalities of Equations , , and in Chen's work [25], respectively.

#### Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0002957).

#### References

1. E. W. Barnes, “The theory of the G-function,” Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, vol. 31, pp. 264–314, 1899.
2. E. W. Barnes, “The genesis of the double gamma functions,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 358–381, 1899.
3. E. W. Barnes, “The theory of the double Gamma function,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 196, pp. 265–388, 1901.
4. E. W. Barnes, “On the theory of the multiple Gamma functions,” Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 19, pp. 374–439, 1904.
5. O. Hölder, Uber Eine Transcendente Funktion, vol. 1886, Dieterichsche, Göttingen, Germany, 1886.
6. W. P. Alexeiewsky, Uber Eine Classe von Funktionen, die der Gammafunktion Analog Sind, vol. 46, Leipzig Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1894.
7. V. H. Kinkelin, “Uber eine mit der Gamma Funktion verwandte transcendente und deren Anwendung auf die integralrechnung,” Journal für Die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 57, pp. 122–158, 1860.
8. J. Choi, “Determinant of Laplacian on ${S}^{3}$,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 155–166, 1994.
9. H. Kumagai, “The determinant of the Laplacian on the $n$-sphere,” Acta Arithmetica, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 199–208, 1999.
10. B. Osgood, R. Phillips, and P. Sarnak, “Extremals of determinants of Laplacians,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 148–211, 1988.
11. J. R. Quine and J. Choi, “Zeta regularized products and functional determinants on spheres,” The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 719–729, 1996.
12. I. Vardi, “Determinants of Laplacians and multiple gamma functions,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 493–507, 1988.
13. A. Voros, “Spectral functions, special functions and the Selberg zeta function,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 439–465, 1987.
14. J. Choi, “Some mathematical constants,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 122–140, 2007.
15. J. Choi, Y. J. Cho, and H. M. Srivastava, “Series involving the zeta function and multiple gamma functions,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 509–537, 2004.
16. J. Choi and H. M. Srivastava, “Certain classes of series involving the zeta function,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 91–117, 1999.
17. J. Choi and H. M. Srivastava, “An application of the theory of the double gamma function,” Kyushu Journal of Mathematics, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 209–222, 1999.
18. J. Choi and H. M. Srivastava, “Certain classes of series associated with the zeta function and multiple gamma functions,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 87–109, 2000, Higher transcendental functions and their applications.
19. J. Choi, H. M. Srivastava, and V. S. Adamchik, “Multiple gamma and related functions,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 134, no. 2-3, pp. 515–533, 2003.
20. J. Choi, H. M. Srivastava, and J. R. Quine, “Some series involving the zeta function,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 383–393, 1995.
21. H. M. Srivastava and J. Choi, Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
22. J. W. L. Glaisher, “On the product ${1}^{1}$${2}^{2}\cdots {n}^{n}$,” Messenger of Mathematics, vol. 7, pp. 43–47, 1877.
23. J. W. L. Glaisher, “On the constant which occurs in the formula for ${1}^{1}$${2}^{2}\cdots {n}^{n}$,” Messenger of Mathematics, vol. 24, pp. 1–16, 1894.
24. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Glaisher-KinkelinConstant.html.
25. C.-P. Chen, “Glaisher-Kinkelin constant,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, IFirst, pp. 1–8, 2011.
26. H. M. Srivastava and J. Choi, Zeta and Q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.
27. V. S. Adamchik, “Polygamma functions of negative order,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 1998.
28. L. Bendersky, “Sur la fonction gamma généralisée,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 263–322, 1933.
29. G. H. Hardy, Divergent Series, Clarendon Press , Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1949.
30. G. H. Hardy, Divergent Series, Chelsea PublishingCompany, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
31. J. Edwards, A Treatise on the Integral Calculus with Applications: Examples and Problems, vol. 1-2, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA, 1954.
32. R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, and O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.
33. Y.-H. Zhu and B.-C. Yang, “Accurate inequalities for partial sums of a type of divergent series,” Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 33–37, 1998.