- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 172939, 30 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/172939

## Positive Solutions of a Second-Order Nonlinear Neutral Delay Difference Equation

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Liaoning Normal University, Liaoning, Dalian 116029, China^{2}Department of Mathematics, Changwon National University, Changwon 641-773, Republic of Korea^{3}Department of Mathematics and RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea

Received 15 August 2012; Accepted 6 November 2012

Academic Editor: Norio Yoshida

Copyright © 2012 Zeqing Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study solvability of the second-order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation . By making use of the Rothe fixed point theorem, Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative theorem, Krasnoselskill fixed point theorem, and some new techniques, we obtain some sufficient conditions which ensure the existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions for the above equation. Five nontrivial examples are given to illustrate that the results presented in this paper are more effective than the existing ones in the literature.

#### 1. Introduction

It is well known that the oscillation, nonoscillation, asymptotic behavior, and existence of solutions for second-order difference equations with delays have been widely studied in many papers over the last 20 years, see, for example, [1–9] and the references cited therein.

Recently, Cheng [5] considered the second-order neutral delay linear difference equation with positive and negative coefficients and investigated the existence of a nonoscillatory solution of (1.1) under the condition by using the Banach fixed point theorem. M. Migda and J. Migda [9] and Luo and Bainov [8] discussed the asymptotic behaviors of nonoscillatory solutions for the second-order neutral difference equation with maxima and the second-order neutral difference equation Cheng and Chu [2] got sufficient and necessary conditions of the oscillatory solutions for the second-order difference equation Li and Yeh [6] established some oscillation criteria of the second-order delay difference equation Using the Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative theorem, Agarwal et al. [1] studied the existence of nonoscillatory solutions for the discrete equation under the condition . Very recently, Liu et al. [7] utilized the Banach contraction principle to establish the global existence and multiplicity of bounded nonoscillatory solutions for the second-order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation

Motivated by the results in [1–9], in this paper, we discuss the solvability of the second-order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation where , , , , , and It is clear that (1.1)–(1.7) are special cases of (1.8). By utilizing the Rothe fixed point theorem, Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative theorem, Krasnoselskill fixed point theorem, and a few new techniques, we prove the existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions of (1.8). Five examples are constructed to illuminate our results which extend essentially the corresponding results in [1, 7].

#### 2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we assume that is the forward difference operator defined by , , , , and stand for the sets of all integers, positive integers, and nonnegative integers, respectively, denotes the Banach space of all bounded sequences with the norm For any , put It is easy to see that is a closed convex subset of , is a bounded open subset of and is a bounded open convex subset of and is a bounded closed and convex subset of .

By a solution of (1.8), we mean a sequence with a positive integer such that (1.8) is satisfied for all .

The following Lemmas play important roles in this paper.

Lemma 2.1 (Discrete Arzela-Ascoli’s Theorem [3]). *A bounded, uniformly Cauchy subset of is relatively compact. *

Lemma 2.2 (Rothe Fixed Point Theorem [10]). *Let be a bounded convex open subset of a Banach space and be a continuous, condensing mapping, and . Then has a fixed point in . *

Lemma 2.3 (Leray-Schauder Nonlinear Alternative Theorem [1]). *Let be an open subset of a closed convex set in a Banach space with . Let be a continuous, condensing mapping with bounded. Then either*(a)*has a fixed point in ; or*(b)*there exist an and a such that . *

Lemma 2.4 (Krasnoselskill Fixed Point Theorem [5]). *Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a Banach space and be mappings from into such that for every pair . If is a contraction mapping and is completely continuous, then the equation has at least one solution in . *

#### 3. Main Results

Now we use the Rothe fixed point theorem to show the existence and multiplicity of bounded positive solutions of (1.8).

Theorem 3.1. *Assume that there exist two constants and with and two positive sequences and satisfying
**
Then (1.8) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in . *

*Proof. *Let . First of all, we show that there exists a mapping with such that has a fixed point , which is also a bounded positive solution of (1.8).

It follows from (3.2) and (3.3) that there exists satisfying
Define a mapping as follows:
for each . On account of (3.1), (3.5), and (3.6), we conclude that for every and
which means that
that is, .

Now we assert that is a continuous and condensing mapping in . Let for each and with . Let . It follows from (3.2) and the continuity of and that there exist with and satisfying
In view of (3.1) and (3.6)–(3.10), we deduce that for any
which gives that , that is, is continuous in .

In light of (3.1), (3.5), and (3.6), we get that for any
which implies that is uniformly bounded.

Given . Clearly (3.2) ensures that there exists satisfying
which together with (3.1) and (3.6) implies that for all and
which yields that is uniformly Cauchy. Thus Lemma 2.1 means that is relatively compact. Consequently is condensing in .

It follows from Lemma 2.2 that has a fixed point , that is,
which yields that
which together with (3.3) implies that
that is, (1.8) has a bounded positive solution .

Next we show that (1.8) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in . Let and . For every , we infer similarly that there exist a constant and a mapping satisfying (3.4)–(3.6), where , , and are replaced by , and , respectively, and the mapping has a fixed point , which is a bounded positive solution of (1.8) in , that is,
Equation (3.2) ensures that there exists satisfying
In order to show that the set of bounded positive solutions of (1.8) is uncountable, it is sufficient to prove that . It follows from (3.1), (3.18), and (3.19) that for all
that is, . This completes the proof.

Theorem 3.2. *Assume that there exist two constants and with and two positive sequences and satisfying (3.1) and
**
Then (1.8) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions. *

*Proof. *Let . Firstly, we show that there exists a mapping with such that has a fixed point , which is also a bounded positive solution of (1.8). In view of (3.21) and (3.22), we choose a sufficiently large integer such that
Define a mapping as follows:
for each . It follows from (3.1), (3.24), and (3.25) that for every and
which means that
that is, .

Now we prove that is a continuous and condensing mapping in . Put for each and with . Let . Using (3.21) and the continuity of and , we conclude that there exist four positive integers , , , and with , satisfying
By virtue of (3.1) and (3.25)–(3.29), we infer that for each
which implies that , that is, is continuous in .

From (3.1), (3.24), and (3.25), we infer that for any
which implies that is uniformly bounded.

Let . It follows from (3.21) that there exists satisfying
which together with (3.1) and (3.25) yields that for all and
which gives that is uniformly Cauchy. Hence Lemma 2.1implies that is relatively compact, that is, is condensing in .

It is clear that Lemma 2.2 means that possesses a fixed point , that is,
which lead to
which together with (3.23) yields that
that is, (1.8) has a bounded positive solution in .

Next we show that (1.8) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in . Let and . Similarly we infer that for each , there exist a constant and a mapping satisfying (3.23)–(3.25), where , and are replaced by , and , respectively, and the mapping has a fixed point , which is a bounded positive solution of (1.8) in , that is,
It follows from (3.21) that there exists such that
In order to show that the set of bounded positive solutions of (1.8) is uncountable, it is sufficient to prove that . By means of (3.1), (3.37) and (3.38), we infer that for each
that is, . This completes the proof.

Next we use the Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative theorem to show the existence and multiplicity of bounded positive solutions of (1.8).

Theorem 3.3. *Assume that there exist four constants , , , and and two positive sequences and satisfying (3.1), (3.2) and
**
Then (1.8) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in .*

*Proof. *Let . Now we prove that there exists a mapping such that it has a fixed point , which is also a bounded positive solution of (1.8). It follows from (3.2), (3.40) and that there exists a sufficiently large number satisfying
Put , where is enough small and
Obviously, . Define a mapping