About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 274985, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/274985
Research Article

Generalized k-Uniformly Close-to-Convex Functions Associated with Conic Regions

Department of Mathematics, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan

Received 24 January 2012; Accepted 31 January 2012

Academic Editor: Muhammad Aslam Noor

Copyright © 2012 Khalida Inayat Noor. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Kanas, “Techniques of the differential subordination for domains bounded by conic sections,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, no. 38, pp. 2389–2400, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. K. I. Noor, M. Arif, and W. Ul-Haq, “On k-uniformly close-to-convex functions of complex order,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 629–635, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. M. Flett, “The dual of an inequality of Hardy and Littlewood and some related inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 38, pp. 746–765, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. I. B. Jung, Y. C. Kim, and H. M. Srivastava, “The Hardy space of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 138–147, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. K. I. Noor, “On a generalization of uniformly convex and related functions,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 117–125, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. B. Pinchuk, “Functions of bounded boundary rotation,” Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, pp. 6–16, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. H. M. Srivastava and A. A. Attiya, “An integral operator associated with the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function and differential subordination,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 207–216, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. J. L. Li, “Some properties of two integral operators,” Soochow Journal of Mathematics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 1999. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. J. K. Prajapat and S. P. Goyal, “Applications of Srivastava-Attiya operator to the classes of strongly starlike and strongly convex functions,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 129–137, 2009. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. J. H. Choi, M. Saigo, and H. M. Srivastava, “Some inclusion properties of a certain family of integral operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 432–445, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. Owa and H. M. Srivastava, “Some applications of the generalized Libera integral operator,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy A, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 125–128, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  12. J. Patel and A. K. Mishra, “On certain subclasses of multivalent functions associated with an extended fractional differintegral operator,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 109–122, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. W. Goodman, Univalent Functions. Vol. I, Mariner Publishing, Tampa, Fla, USA, 1983.
  14. A. W. Goodman, Univalent Functions. Vol. II, Mariner Publishing, Tampa, Fla, USA, 1983.
  15. N. E. Cho and J. A. Kim, “Inclusion properties of certain subclasses of analytic functions defined by a multiplier transformation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 323–330, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. S. Kanas and A. Wisniowska, “Conic regions and k-uniform convexity,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 105, no. 1-2, pp. 327–336, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. K. I. Noor, “On a generalization of close-to-convexity,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 327–333, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential Subordinations: Theory and Applications, vol. 225 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  19. St. Ruscheweyh and T. Sheil-Small, “Hadamard products of Schlicht functions and the Pólya-Schoenberg conjecture,” Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, vol. 48, pp. 119–135, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. K. I. Noor, “Higher order close-to-convex functions,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1992. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  21. W. Rogosinski, “On the coefficients of subordinate functions,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Second Series, vol. 48, pp. 48–82, 1943. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  22. W. Kaplan, “Close-to-convex schlicht functions,” The Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 1, pp. 169–185, 1952. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  23. G. Golusin, “On distortion theorems and coefficients of univalent functions,” vol. 19(61), pp. 183–202, 1946. View at Zentralblatt MATH