`Abstract and Applied AnalysisVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 302635, 9 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/302635`
Research Article

## Optimal Bounds for Neuman-Sándor Mean in Terms of the Convex Combinations of Harmonic, Geometric, Quadratic, and Contraharmonic Means

1Department of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 313036, China
2School of Mathematics and Computation Sciences, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China
3School of Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received 15 October 2012; Accepted 5 December 2012

Copyright © 2012 Tie-Hong Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We present the best possible lower and upper bounds for the Neuman-Sándor mean in terms of the convex combinations of either the harmonic and quadratic means or the geometric and quadratic means or the harmonic and contraharmonic means.

#### 1. Introduction

For with , the Neuman-Sándor mean [1] is defined by where is the inverse hyperbolic sine function.

Recently, the theory of bivariate means have been the subject of intensive research [217]. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for the Neuman-Sándor mean can be found in the literature [1, 1820].

Let , , , , , , and be the harmonic, geometric, logarithmic, first Seiffert, arithmetic, second Seiffert, quadratic, and contraharmonic means of and , respectively. Then it is well known that the inequalities hold for all with .

In [1, 18], Neuman and Sándor proved that the double inequalities hold for all with .

Let , with , and . Then the following Ky Fan inequalities were presented in [1].

The double inequality for all with was established by Li et al. in [19], where (), and is the th generalized logarithmic mean of and , and is the unique solution of the equation .

Neuman [20] proved that the double inequalities hold for all with if and only if , , and .

The main purpose of this paper is to find the least values , , , and the greatest values , , , such that the double inequalities hold true for all with .

Our main results are presented in Theorems 1.11.3.

Theorem 1.1. The double inequality holds for all with if and only if and .

Theorem 1.2. The double inequality holds for all with if and only if and .

Theorem 1.3. The double inequality holds for all with if and only if and .

#### 2. Lemmas

In order to prove our main results we need two Lemmas, which we present in this section.

Lemma 2.1 (see [21, Lemma 1.1]). Suppose that the power series and have the radius of convergence and for all . Let , then the following statements are true.(1)If the sequence is (strictly) increasing (decreasing), then is also (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on .(2)If the sequence is (strictly) increasing (decreasing) for and (strictly) decreasing (increasing) for , then there exists such that is (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on and (strictly) decreasing (increasing) on .

Lemma 2.2. Let , and Then and for all .

Proof. From (2.1), one has where
We divide the proof into two cases.
Case 1. (). Then (2.5) leads to where We clearly see that the function is strictly decreasing in . Then from (2.8), we get for .
Therefore, for all follows easily from (2.2), (2.4), (2.6), (2.7), and (2.9).
Case 2. (). Then (2.3) and (2.5) yield where We divide the discussion of this case into two subcases, and all computations are carried out using MATHEMATICA software.
Subcase A. . Then from (2.12) and the fact that we know that
for .
Subcase B. . Then from (2.12), one has where We conclude that for all . Indeed, if , then (2.17) follows from (2.16) and the inequality If , then (2.17) follows from (2.16) and the inequalities From (2.15) together with (2.17) we clearly see that there exists such that for and for .
Subcases A and B lead to the conclusion that for and for . Thus from (2.11), we know that is strictly increasing in and strictly decreasing in .
It follows from (2.4) and (2.10) together with the piecewise monotonicity of that there exists such that is strictly increasing in and strictly decreasing in .
Therefore, for follows from (2.2) and (2.10) together with the piecewise monotonicity of .

#### 3. Proof of Theorems 1.1–1.3

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Since , and are symmetric and homogeneous of degree 1. Hence, without loss of generality, we assume that . Let and . Then , , , , and
Making use of power series and , we can express (3.1) as follows: Let and Then . Moreover, by a simple calculation, we see that for .
Equations (3.1) and (3.2) together with inequality (3.3) and Lemma 2.1 lead to the conclusion that is strictly decreasing in . This in turn implies that
Therefore, Theorem 1.1 follows from (3.1) and (3.4) together with the monotonicity of .

Proof of Theorem 1.2. Since , and are symmetric and homogeneous of degree 1. Hence, without loss of generality, we assume that . Let , and . Then making use of gives Moreover, we obtain
We take the difference between the additive convex combination of , , and as follows: where is defined as in Lemma 2.2.
Therefore, for all with follows from (3.8) and Lemma 2.2. This conjunction with the following statement gives the asserted result. (i)If , then (3.5) and (3.6) imply that there exists such that for all with .(ii)If , then (3.5) and (3.7) imply that there exists such that for all with .

Proof of Theorem 1.3. We will follow, to some extent, lines in the proof of Theorem 1.1. First we rearrange terms of (1.9) to obtain Use of followed by a substitution gives where
Since the function is an even function, it suffices to investigate its behavior on the interval .
Using power series of and , then (3.11) can be rewritten as
Let and . Then It follows from (3.13) that the sequence is strictly increasing for .
Equations (3.12) and (3.13) together with Lemma 2.1 and the monotonicity of lead to the conclusion that is strictly increasing in . Moreover,
Making use of (3.14) and (3.10) together with the monotonicity of gives the asserted result.

#### Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11071069 and 11271105, and Innovation Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province under Grant T200924.

#### References

1. E. Neuman and J. Sándor, “On the Schwab-Borchardt mean,” Mathematica Pannonica, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 253–266, 2003.
2. Y.-M. Chu and M.-K. Wang, “Inequalities between arithmetic-geometric, Gini, and Toader means,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 830585, 11 pages, 2012.
3. E. Neuman, “On one-parameter family of bivariate means,” Aequationes Mathematicae, vol. 83, no. 1-2, pp. 191–197, 2012.
4. M.-K. Wang, Z.-K. Wang, and Y.-M. Chu, “An optimal double inequality between geometric and identric means,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 471–475, 2012.
5. W.-D. Jiang, “Some sharp inequalities involving reciprocals of the Seiffert and other means,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 593–599, 2012.
6. E. Neuman, “Inequalities for the Schwab-Borchardt mean and their applications,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 601–609, 2011.
7. E. Neuman and J. Sándor, “Companion inequalities for certain bivariate means,” Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2009.
8. L. Zhu, “Some new inequalities for means in two variables,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 443–448, 2008.
9. L. Zhu, “New inequalities for means in two variables,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 2008.
10. E. Neuman and J. Sándor, “Inequalities for the ratios of certain bivariate means,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 383–396, 2008.
11. H. Alzer and S.-L. Qiu, “Inequalities for means in two variables,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 201–215, 2003.
12. J. Sándor, “On certain inequalities for means III,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2001.
13. J. Sándor, “On certain inequalities for means II,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 629–635, 1996.
14. J. Sándor, “On certain inequalities for means,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 602–606, 1995.
15. M. K. Vamanamurthy and M. Vuorinen, “Inequalities for means,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 155–166, 1994.
16. J. Sándor, “A note on some inequalities for means,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 471–473, 1991.
17. P. S. Bullen, D. S. Mitrinović, and P. M. Vasić, Means and Their Inequalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
18. E. Neuman and J. Sándor, “On the Schwab-Borchardt mean. II,” Mathematica Pannonica, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2006.
19. Y.-M. Li, B.-Y. Long, and Y.-M. Chu, “Sharp bounds for the Neuman-Sándor mean in terms of generalized logarithmic mean,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 567–577, 2012.
20. E. Neuman, “A note on certain bivariate mean,” Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 637–643, 2012.
21. S. Simić and M. Vuorinen, “Landen inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 932061, 11 pages, 2012.