- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

VolumeΒ 2012Β (2012), Article IDΒ 389530, 15 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/389530

## Multiple Solutions for a Class of Multipoint Boundary Value Systems Driven by a One-Dimensional -Laplacian Operator

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshash 67149, Iran

Received 20 November 2011; Accepted 11 December 2011

Academic Editor: KanishkaΒ Perera

Copyright Β© 2012 Shapour Heidarkhani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Employing a recent three critical points theorem due to Bonanno and Marano (2010), the existence of at least three solutions for the following multipoint boundary value system in , , for , is established.

#### 1. Introduction

In this work, we consider the following multipoint boundary value system for , where for , , , is a function such that is continuous in for all , is in for every and for all , for and , and denotes the partial derivative of with respect to for .

The study of multiplicity of solutions is an important mathematical subject which is also interesting from the practical point of view because the physical processes described by boundary value problems for differential equations exhibit, generally, more than one solution. In [1β3], Ricceri proposed and developed an innovative minimal method for the study of nonlinear eigenvalue problems. Following that, Bonanno [4] gave an application of the method to the two-point problem Bonanno also gave more precise versions of the three critical points of Ricceri in [5, 6]. In particular, in [5], an upper bound of the interval of parameters for which the functional has three critical points is established. Candito [7] extended the main result of [4] to the nonautonomous case In [8], He and Ge extended the main results of [4, 7] to the quasilinear differential equation In [9], the authors extended the main results of [4, 7, 9] to the quasilinear differential equation with Sturm-Liouville boundary conditions where is a constant, is a positive parameter, . In particular, in [10], the authors motivated by these works, established some criteria for the existence of three classical solutions of the system (1.1), while in [11], based on Ricceriβs three critical points theorem [3], the existence of at least three classical solutions to doubly eigenvalue multipoint boundary value systems was established.

In the present paper, based on a three critical points theorem due to Bonanno and Marano [12], we ensure the existence of least three classical solutions for the system (1.1).

Several results are known concerning the existence of multiple solutions for multipoint boundary value problems, and we refer the reader to the papers [13β16] and the references cited therein.

Here and in the sequel, will denote the Cartesian product of space for , that is, equipped with the norm where for .

We say that is a weak solution to (1.1) if and

for every .

A special case of our main result is the following theorem.

Theorem 1.1. *Let be two positive continuous functions such that the differential 1-form is integrable, and let be a primitive of such that . Fix , , and assume that
**
then there is such that for each , the problem
**
admits at least two positive classical solutions.*

The main aim of the present paper is to obtain further applications of [12, Theorem 2.6] (see Theorem 2.1 in the next section) to the system (1.1), and the obtained results are strictly comparable with those of [9β11], and here we wil give the exact collocation of the interval of positive parameters.

For other basic notations and definitions, we refer the reader to [17β26]. We note that some of the ideas used here were motivated by corresponding ones in [10].

#### 2. Main Results

Our main tool is a three critical points theorem obtained in [12] (see also [1, 2, 5, 27] for related results), which is a more precise version of Theorem 3.2 of [28], to transfer the existence of three solutions of the system (1.1) into the existence of critical points of the Euler functional. We recall it here in a convenient form (see [23]).

Theorem 2.1 (see [12, Theorem 2.6]). *Let be a reflexive real Banach space, be a coercive continuously GΓ’teaux differentiable and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous functional whose GΓ’teaux derivative admits a continuous inverse on , be a continuously GΓ’teaux differentiable functional whose GΓ’teaux derivative is compact such that . Assume that there exist and , with such that**,
** for each , the functional is coercive.**
then, for each , the functional has at least three distinct critical points in .*

Put Since for , and the embedding is compact, one has . Moreover, from [10, ], one has

Put for . Let denotes the inverse of for . then, where . It is clear that is increasing on ,

Lemma 2.2 (see [10, Lemma 3.3]). *For fixed and , define by
**
then the equation
**has a unique solution .*

Direct computations show the following.

Lemma 2.3 (see [10, ]). *The function is a solution of the system (1.1) if and only if is a solution of the equation
**
for , where is the unique solution of (2.5).*

Lemma 2.4. *A weak solution to the systems (1.1) coincides with classical solution one. **Proof. *Suppose that is a weak solution to (1.1), so
for every . Note that, in one dimension, any weakly differentiable function is absolutely continuous, so that its classical derivative exists almost everywhere, and that the classical derivative coincides with the weak derivative. Now, using integration by part, from (2.7), we obtain
and so for ,
for almost every . Then, by Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3, we observe
for , where is the unique solution of (2.5). Hence, and for , namely is a classical solution to the system (1.1).

For all , we denote by the set Now, we formulate our main result as follows.

Theorem 2.5. *Assume that there exist constants for with and , a positive constant and a function such that *(A1) *,
*(A2)*where (see (2.11)),*(A3)* uniformly with respect to **Then, for each , the system (1.1) admits at least three distinct classical solutions in .**Proof. *In order to apply Theorem 2.1 to our problem, we introduce the functionals for each , as follows:
Since for , is compactly embedded in and it is well known that and are well defined and continuously differentiable functionals whose derivatives at the point are the functionals , , given by
for every , respectively, as well as is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous. Furthermore, Lemma 2.6 of [11] gives that admits a continuous inverse on , and since is monotone, we obtain that is sequentially weakly lower semiacontinuous (see [29, Proposition 25.20]). Moreover, is a compact operator. From assumption (A1), we get . Since from (2.1) for each ,
for , we have
for each , and so using (2.15), we observe
and it follows that
Therefore, owing to assumption (A2), we have
Furthermore, from (A3), there exist two constants with
such that
Fix , Then
So, for any fixed , from (2.15) and (2.21), we have
and thus,
which means that the functional is coercive. So, all assumptions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Hence, from Theorem 2.1 with , taking into account that the weak solutions of the system (1.1) are exactly the solutions of the equation and using Lemma 2.4, we have the conclusion.

Now we want to present a verifiable consequence of the main result where the test function is specified.

Put

Define where , then we have the following consequence of Theorem 2.5.

Corollary 2.6. *Assume that there exist constants for with and and two positive constants and with such that *(B1)* for each and ,*(B2)*ββ, where is given by (2.24) and (see (2.11));*(B3)*ββ uniformly with respect to .**then, for each the systems (1.1) admits at least three distinct classical solutions.*

*Proof. *Set such that for ,
and . It is easy to see that , and, in particular, one has
for , which, employing the condition , gives
Since for ,
the condition (B1) ensures that
Therefore, owing to assumption (B2), we have
where . Moreover, from assumption (B3) it follows that assumption (A3) is fulfilled. Hence, taking into account that
using Theorem 2.5, we have the desired conclusion.

Let us present an application of Corollary 2.6.

*Example 2.7. **Let * be the function defined as
for each . In fact, by choosing and , by a simple calculation, we obtain that and , and so with and , we observe that the assumptions (B1) and (B3) in Corollary 2.6 are satisfied. For (B2),
So, for every
Corollary 2.6 is applicable to the system
where .

Here is a remarkable consequence of Corollary 2.6.

Corollary 2.8. *Let be a function in such that . Assume that there exist constants for with and and two positive constants and with such that *(C1)* for each ,*(C2)*where is given by (2.24),*(C3)*,**Then, for each , the systems
**
for , admits at least three distinct classical solutions.*

*Proof. *Set for all and for . From the hypotheses, we see that all assumptions of Corollary 2.6 are satisfied. So, we have the conclusion by using Corollary 2.6.

*Example 2.9. *Let and , . Consider the system
Clearly, (H1) and (H2) hold. A simple calculation shows that and . So, by choosing and , we observe that the assumptions (C1) and (C3) in Corollary 2.8 hold. For (C3), since for every , we have
Note that . We see that for every
Corollary 2.8 is applicable to the system (2.38).

Finally, we prove the theorem in the introduction.

*Proof of Theorem 1.1. *Since and are positive, then is nonnegative in . Fix for some . Note that , and there is such that and
In fact, one has , where . Hence, there is such that
and .

from Corollary 2.8, with follows the conclusion.

#### Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Professor Juan J. Nieto for valuable suggestions and reading this paper carefully.

#### References

- B. Ricceri, βExistence of three solutions for a class of elliptic eigenvalue problems,β
*Mathematical and Computer Modelling*, vol. 32, no. 11–13, pp. 1485β1494, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - B. Ricceri, βOn a three critical points theorem,β
*Archiv der Mathematik*, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 220β226, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - B. Ricceri, βA three critical points theorem revisited,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 3084β3089, 2009. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Bonannao, βExistence of three solutions for a two point boundary value problem,β
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 53β57, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - G. Bonanno, βSome remarks on a three critical points theorem,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 651β665, 2003. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - G. Bonanno, βA critical points theorem and nonlinear differential problems,β
*Journal of Global Optimization*, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 249β258, 2004. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - P. Candito, βExistence of three solutions for a nonautonomous two point boundary value problem,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 252, no. 2, pp. 532β537, 2000. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - X. He and W. Ge, βExistence of three solutions for a quasilinear two-point boundary value problem,β
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 45, no. 4-5, pp. 765β769, 2003. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - Z. Du, X. Lin, and C. C. Tisdell, βA multiplicity result for
*p*-Lapacian boundary value problems via critical points theorem,β*Applied Mathematics and Computation*, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 231β237, 2008. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - Z. Du and L. Kong, βExistence of three solutions for systems of multi-point boundary value problems,β
*Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations*, no. 10, article 17, 2009. View at Google Scholar - J. R. Graef, S. Heidarkhani, and L. Kong, βA critical points approach to multiplicity results for multi-point boundary value problems,β
*Applicable Analysis*, vol. 90, pp. 1909β1925, 2011. View at Google Scholar - G. Bonanno and S. A. Marano, βOn the structure of the critical set of non-differentiable functions with a weak compactness condition,β
*Applicable Analysis*, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1β10, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - J. R. Graef and L. Kong, βExistence of solutions for nonlinear boundary value problems,β
*Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39β60, 2007. View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - J. R. Graef, L. Kong, and Q. Kong, βHigher order multi-point boundary value problems,β
*Mathematische Nachrichten*, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. 39β52, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - J. R. Graef and B. Yang, βMultiple positive solutions to a three point third order boundary value problem,β
*Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series A*, supplement, pp. 337β344, 2005. View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - J. Henderson, βSolutions of multipoint boundary value problems for second order equations,β
*Dynamic Systems and Applications*, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 111β117, 2006. View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. A. Afrouzi and S. Heidarkhani, βThree solutions for a quasilinear boundary value problem,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 3330β3336, 2008. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Bonanno, S. Heidarkhani, and D. O'Regan, βMultiple solutions for a class of Dirichlet quasilinear elliptic systems driven by a $(p,q)$-Laplacian operator,β
*Dynamic Systems and Applications*, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 89β99, 2011. View at Google Scholar - G. Bonanno and G. Molica Bisci, βThree weak solutions for elliptic Dirichlet problems,β
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 382, no. 1, pp. 1β8, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, and D. O'Regan, βInfinitely many weak solutions for a class of quasilinear elliptic systems,β
*Mathematical and Computer Modelling*, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 152β160, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, and V. Rădulescu, βExistence of three solutions for a non-homogeneous Neumann problem through Orlicz-Sobolev spaces,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 74, no. 14, pp. 4785β4795, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, and V. Rădulescu, βMultiple solutions of generalized Yamabe equations on Riemannian manifolds and applications to Emden-Fowler problems,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2656β2665, 2011. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar - G. Bonanno and G. Riccobono, βMultiplicity results for Sturm-Liouville boundary value problems,β
*Applied Mathematics and Computation*, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 294β297, 2009. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Heidarkhani and D. Motreanu, βMultiplicity results for a two-point boundary value problem,β
*Panamerican Mathematical Journal*, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 69β78, 2009. View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Heidarkhani and Y. Tian, βMultiplicity results for a class of gradient systems depending on two parameters,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 547β554, 2010. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. Livrea, βExistence of three solutions for a quasilinear two point boundary value problem,β
*Archiv der Mathematik*, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 288β298, 2002. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - S. A. Marano and D. Motreanu, βOn a three critical points theorem for non-differentiable functions and applications to nonlinear boundary value problems,β
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 48, pp. 37β52, 2002. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - G. Bonanno and P. Candito, βNon-differentiable functionals and applications to elliptic problems with discontinuous nonlinearities,β
*Journal of Differential Equations*, vol. 244, no. 12, pp. 3031β3059, 2008. View at Publisher Β· View at Google Scholar Β· View at Zentralblatt MATH Β· View at MathSciNet - E. Zeidler,
*Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications*, vol. 1–3, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1985.