- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 636217, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/636217

## On Asymptotically Quasi--Nonexpansive Mappings in the Intermediate Sense

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China^{2}College of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China

Received 1 September 2012; Accepted 9 October 2012

Academic Editor: Yongfu Su

Copyright © 2012 Xiaolong Qin and Lin Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A projection iterative process is investigated for the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense. Strong convergence theorems of common fixed points of a family of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense are established in the framework of Banach spaces.

#### 1. Introduction

Fixed point theory as an important branch of nonlinear analysis theory has been applied in many disciplines, including economics, image recovery, mechanics, quantum physics, and control theory; see, for example, [1–4]. The theory itself is a beautiful mixture of analysis, topology, and geometry. During the four decades, many famous existence theorems of fixed points were established; see, for example, [5–13]. However, from the standpoint of real world applications it is not only to know the existence of fixed points of nonlinear mappings but also to be able to construct an iterative algorithm to approximate their fixed points. The computation of fixed points is important in the study of many real world problems, including inverse problems; for instance, it is not hard to show that the split feasibility problem and the convex feasibility problem in signal processing and image reconstruction can both be formulated as a problem of finding fixed points of certain operators, respectively; see [14–16] for more details and the reference therein. Iterative methods play an important role in the computation of fixed points of nonlinear mappings. Indeed, many well-known problems can be studied by using algorithms which are iterative in their nature.

In this paper, we introduced a new class of nonlinear mappings: asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense and considered the problem of approximating a common fixed point of a family of the mappings based on a projection iterative process.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we provide some necessary preliminaries. In Section 3, strong convergence of a projection iterative algorithm is obtained in a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space such that both and enjoy Kadec-Klee property. Some corollaries as the immediate results of main results are given.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Let be a real Hilbert space, a nonempty subset of , and a mapping. The symbol stands for the fixed point set of . Recall the following. is said to be *nonexpansive* if and only if

is said to be *quasi-nonexpansive* if and only if , and

We remark here that a nonexpansive mapping with a nonempty fixed point set is quasi-nonexpansive: however, the inverse may be not true. See the following example [17].

*Example 2.1. *Let and define a mapping by by
Then is quasi-nonexpansive but not nonexpansive.

is said to be *asymptotically nonexpansive* if and only if there exists a sequence with as such that
It is easy to see that a nonexpansive mapping is an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with the sequence . The class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings was introduced by Goebel and Kirk [7]. Since 1972, a host of authors have studied the convergence of iterative algorithms for such a class of mappings.

is said to be *asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive* if and only if , and there exists a sequence with as such that
It is easy to see that a quasi-nonexpansive mapping is an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with the sequence .

is said to be *asymptotically nonexpansive in the intermediate sense* if and only if it is continuous, and the following inequality holds:

is said to be *asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive in the intermediate sense* if and only if and the following inequality holds:

The class of mappings which are asymptotically nonexpansive in the intermediate sense was considered by Bruck et al. [18]. It is worth mentioning that the class of mappings which are asymptotically nonexpansive in the intermediate sense may not be Lipschitz continuous. However, asymptotically nonexpansive mappings are Lipschitz continuous.

In what follows, we always assume that is a Banach space with the dual space . Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of . We use the symbol to stand for the *normalized duality mapping* from to defined by
where denotes the generalized duality pairing of elements between and . It is well known that if is strictly convex, then is single valued; if is reflexive and smooth, then is single valued and demicontinuous; see [19] for more details and the references therein.

It is also well known that if is a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space , and is the metric projection from onto , then is nonexpansive. This fact actually characterizes Hilbert spaces and consequently, it is not available in more general Banach spaces. In this connection, Alber [20] introduced a generalized projection operator in Banach spaces which is an analogue of the metric projection in Hilbert spaces.

Recall that a Banach space is said to be *strictly convex* if for all with , and . It is said to be *uniformly convex* if for any two sequences and in such that and . Let be the unit sphere of . Then the Banach space is said to be *smooth* provided exists for all . It is also said to be *uniformly smooth* if the limit is attained uniformly for all .

Recall that a Banach space enjoys *Kadec-Klee property* if for any sequence and with , and , then as . For more details on Kadec-Klee property, the readers can refer to [19, 21] and the references therein. It is well known that if is a uniformly convex Banach spaces, then enjoys Kadec-Klee property.

Let be a smooth Banach space. Consider the functional defined by
Notice that, in a Hilbert space , (2.9) is reduced to for all . The *generalized projection * is a mapping that assigns to an arbitrary point , the minimum point of the functional ; that is, , where is the solution to the following minimization problem:
The existence and uniqueness of the operator follow from the properties of the functional and the strict monotonicity of the mapping ; see, for example, [19, 20]. In Hilbert spaces, . It is obvious from the definition of the function that

*Remark 2.2. *If is a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space, then, for all , if and only if . It is sufficient to show that if , then . From (2.11), we have . This implies that . From the definition of , we see that . It follows that ; see [20] for more details.

Next, we recall the following.

(1) A point in is said to be an *asymptotic fixed point* of [22] if and only if contains a sequence which converges weakly to such that . The set of asymptotic fixed points of will be denoted by .

(2) is said to be *relatively nonexpansive* if and only if
The asymptotic behavior of relatively nonexpansive mappings was studied in [23, 24].

(3) is said to be *relatively asymptotically nonexpansive* if and only if
where is a sequence such that as .

*Remark 2.3. *The class of relatively asymptotically nonexpansive mappings was first considered in Su and Qin [25]; see also, Agarwal et al. [26], and Qin et al. [27].

(4) is said to be *quasi*--*nonexpansive* if and only if

(5) is said to be *asymptotically quasi*--*nonexpansive* if and only if there exists a sequence with as such that

*Remark 2.4. *The class of quasi--nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings were first considered in Zhou et al. [28]; see also Qin et al. [29], Qin, and Agarwal [30], Qin et al. [31], Qin et al. [32], and Qin et al. [33].

*Remark 2.5. *The class of quasi--nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings are more general than the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings and the class of relatively asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Quasi--nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive do not require .

*Remark 2.6. *The class of quasi--nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings are generalizations of the class of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.

In this paper, based on asymptotically (quasi-) nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense which was first considered by Bruck et al. [18], we introduce and consider the following new nonlinear mapping: asymptotically (quasi-) -nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense.

(6) is said to be an *asymptotically **-nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense* if and only if

(7) is said to be an *asymptotically quasi*-*-nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense* if and only if , and

*Remark 2.7. *The class of asymptotically (quasi-) -nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense is a generalization of the class of asymptotically (quasi-) nonexpansive mappings in the intermediate sense in the framework of Banach spaces.

Let and . Define the following mapping by
Then is an asymptotically -nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense with the fixed point set . We also have the following:
where . Hence, we have
(8) The mapping is said to be *asymptotically regular* on if and only if

In order to prove our main results, we also need the following lemmas.

Lemma 2.8 (see [20]). *Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a smooth Banach space , and . Then if and only if
*

Lemma 2.9 (see [20]). *Let be a reflexive, strictly, convex, and smooth Banach space, a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of , and . Then
*

#### 3. Main Results

Theorem 3.1. *Let be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space such that both and have Kadec-Klee property. Let be a nonempty, bounded closed, and convex subset of . Let be an index set, and a closed asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense, for every . Assume that is nonempty, and is asymptotically regular, for every . Let be a sequence generated in the following manner:
**
where . Then converges strongly to , where stands for the generalized projection from onto . *

*Proof. *The proof is split into the following 5 steps.*Step *1. It show that is closed and convex.

Since is closed, we can easily conclude that is closed. The proof that is closed. We only prove that is convex. Let and , where , for every . We see that . Indeed, we see from the definition of that
In view of (2.12), we obtain (3.2) that
Multiplying and on the both sides of (3.3), respectively, yields that . This implies that
In light of (2.11), we arrive at
It follows that
Since is reflexive, we may, without loss of generality, assume that . In view of the reflexivity of , we have . This shows that there exists an element such that . It follows that
Taking on the both sides of the equality above, we obtain that
This implies that , that is, . It follows that . In view of Kadec-Klee property of , we obtain from (3.6) that . Since is demicontinuous, we see that . By virtue of Kadec-Klee property of , we see from (3.5) that as . Hence , as . In view of the closedness of , we can obtain that , for every . This shows, for every , that is convex. This proves that is convex. This completes Step 1.*Step *2. It show that is closed and convex, .

It suffices to show, for any fixed but arbitrary , that is closed and convex, for every . This can be proved by induction on . It is obvious that is closed and convex. Assume that is closed and convex for some . We next prove that is closed and convex for the same . This completes the proof that is closed and convex. The closedness of is clear. We only prove the convexness. Indeed, , we see that , and
In view of (3.9), we find that
where , . It follows that is convex. This in turn implies that is closed, and convex. This completes Step 2.*Step *3. It show that , .

It is obvious that . Suppose that for some . For any , we see that
On the other hand, we obtain from (2.12) that
Combining (3.11) with (3.12), we arrive at
which implies that . This proves that , . This completes Step 3.*Step* 4. It show that , where , as .

Since is bounded and the space is reflexive, we may assume that . Since is closed and convex, we see that . On the other hand, we see from the weakly lower semicontinuity of the norm that
which implies that as . Hence, as . In view of Kadec-Klee property of , we see that as . On the other hand, we see from that . It follows that
from which it follows that as . In view of (2.11), we see that as . This in turn implies that as . Hence, as . This shows that is bounded. Since is reflexive, we see that is also reflexive. We may, without loss of generality, assume that . In view of the reflexivity of , we have . This shows that there exists an element such that . It follows that
Taking on the both sides of the equality above, we obtain that
This implies that , that is, . It follows that . In view of Kadec-Klee property of , we obtain that . Since is demicontinuous, we see that . In the light of Kadec-Klee property of , we see that , , as . On the other hand, we have
It follows from the asymptotic regularity of that as . That is, . From the closedness of , we obtain that . This implies that .*Step *5. It show that .

In view of , we see from Lemma 2.8 that
Since , we arrive at
Letting in the above, we arrive at
It follows from Lemma 2.8 that . This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1.

*Remark 3.2. *The space in Theorem 3.1 can be applicable to , . Since the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings includes the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings as a special case, we see that Theorem 3.1 still holds for the class of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mappings.

For a single mapping, we can easily conclude the following.

Corollary 3.3. *Let be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space such that both and have Kadec-Klee property. Let be a nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex subset of . Let be a closed asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense. Assume that is nonempty, and is asymptotically regular. Let be a sequence generated in the following manner:
**
where . Then converges strongly to , where stands for the generalized projection from onto . *

In the framework of Hilbert spaces, Theorem 3.1 is reduced to the following.

Corollary 3.4. *Let be a nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let be an index set, and a closed asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense, for every . Assume that is nonempty, and is asymptotically regular, for every . Let be a sequence generated in the following manner:
**
where . Then converges strongly to , where stands for the metric projection from onto . *

For a single mapping, we can easily conclude the following.

Corollary 3.5. *Let be a nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let be a closed asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense. Assume that is nonempty, and is asymptotically regular. Let be a sequence generated in the following manner:
**
where . Then converges strongly to , where stands for the metric projection from onto . *

#### References

- P. L. Combettes, “The convex feasibility problem in image recovery,” in
*Advanced in Imaging and Electron Physcis*, P. Hawkes, Ed., vol. 95, pp. 155–270, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar - R. Dautray and J. L. Lions,
*Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology*, vol. 1–6, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1988–1993. - H. O. Fattorini,
*Infinite-Dimensional Optimization and Control Theory*, vol. 62 of*Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999. View at Zentralblatt MATH - M. A. Khan and N. C. Yannelis,
*Equilibrium Theory in Infinite Dimensional Spaces*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991. - F. E. Browder, “Nonexpansive nonlinear operators in a Banach space,”
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, vol. 54, pp. 1041–1044, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for mappings which do not increase distances,”
*The American Mathematical Monthly*, vol. 72, pp. 1004–1006, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - K. Goebel and W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,”
*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*, vol. 35, pp. 171–174, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - H. K. Xu, “Existence and convergence for fixed points of mappings of asymptotically nonexpansive type,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1139–1146, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - L. E. J. Brouwer, “Über Abbildung von Mannigfaltigkeiten,”
*Mathematische Annalen*, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 97–115, 1912. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - J. Schauder, “Der Fixpunktsatz in Funktionalraumen,”
*Studia Mathematica*, vol. 2, pp. 171–180, 1930. View at Google Scholar - A. Tychonoff, “Ein Fixpunktsatz,”
*Mathematische Annalen*, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 767–776, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - E. Casini and E. Maluta, “Fixed points of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in spaces with uniformly normal structure,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications*, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - K. Deimling, “Zeros of accretive operators,”
*Manuscripta Mathematica*, vol. 13, pp. 365–374, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - A. Vanderluge,
*Optical Signal Processing*, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1992. - H. H. Bauschke and J. M. Borwein, “On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems,”
*SIAM Review*, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 367–426, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - C. Byrne, “A unified treatment of some iterative algorithms in signal processing and image reconstruction,”
*Inverse Problems*, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. G. Dotson, Jr., “Fixed points of quasi-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Australian Mathematical Society A*, vol. 13, pp. 167–170, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. Bruck, T. Kuczumow, and S. Reich, “Convergence of iterates of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property,”
*Colloquium Mathematicum*, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169–179, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - I. Cioranescu,
*Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problems*, vol. 62 of*Mathematics and its Applications*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - Y. I. Alber, “Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and applications,” in
*Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type*, vol. 178 of*Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics*, pp. 15–50, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - H. Hudzik, W. Kowalewski, and G. Lewicki, “Approximate compactness and full rotundity in Musielak-Orlicz spaces and Lorentz-Orlicz spaces,”
*Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen*, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 163–192, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - S. Reich, “A weak convergence theorem for the alternating method with Bregman distances,” in
*Theory and Applicationsof Nonlinear Operatorsof Accretive and Monotone Type*, vol. 178 of*Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics*, pp. 313–318, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - D. Butnariu, S. Reich, and A. J. Zaslavski, “Asymptotic behavior of relatively nonexpansive operators in Banach spaces,”
*Journal of Applied Analysis*, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 151–174, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - D. Butnariu, S. Reich, and A. J. Zaslavski, “Weak convergence of orbits of nonlinear operators in reflexive Banach spaces,”
*Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization*, vol. 24, no. 5-6, pp. 489–508, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - Y. Su and X. Qin, “Strong convergence of modified Ishikawa iterations for nonlinear mappings,”
*Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science*, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 97–107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. P. Agarwal, Y. J. Cho, and X. Qin, “Generalized projection algorithms for nonlinear operators,”
*Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization*, vol. 28, no. 11-12, pp. 1197–1215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - X. Qin, Y. Su, C. Wu, and K. Liu, “Strong convergence theorems for nonlinear operators in Banach spaces,”
*Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 35–50, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - H. Zhou, G. Gao, and B. Tan, “Convergence theorems of a modified hybrid algorithm for a family of quasi-$\phi $-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing*, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 453–464, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - X. Qin, S. Y. Cho, and S. M. Kang, “On hybrid projection methods for asymptotically quasi-$\phi $-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Applied Mathematics and Computation*, vol. 215, no. 11, pp. 3874–3883, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - X. Qin and R. P. Agarwal, “Shrinking projection methods for a pair of asymptotically quasi-$\phi $-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization*, vol. 31, no. 7-9, pp. 1072–1089, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - X. Qin, S. Huang, and T. Wang, “On the convergence of hybrid projection algorithms for asymptotically quasi-$\phi $-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 851–859, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - X. Qin, Y. J. Cho, and S. M. Kang, “Convergence theorems of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces,”
*Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - X. Qin, Y. J. Cho, S. M. Kang, and H. Zhou, “Convergence of a modified Halpern-type iteration algorithm for quasi-$\phi $-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1051–1055, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar