- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

VolumeÂ 2012Â (2012), Article IDÂ 653508, 9 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/653508

## Some Generalizations of Ulam-Hyers Stability Functional Equations to Riesz Algebras

Department of Mathematics, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey

Received 7 June 2011; Revised 6 October 2011; Accepted 18 October 2011

Academic Editor: Jean MichelÂ Combes

Copyright Â© 2012 Faruk Polat. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Badora (2002) proved the following stability result. Let and be nonnegative real numbers, then for every mapping of a ring onto a Banach algebra satisfying and for all , there exists a unique ring homomorphism such that . Moreover, , for all and all from the algebra generated by . In this paper, we generalize Badora's stability result above on ring homomorphisms for Riesz algebras with extended norms.

#### 1. Introduction

The approximation of solution of the Cauchy's equation lying near to some solution has received a lot of attention from mathematicians in the areas of modern analysis and applied mathematics. Any solution of this equation is called an * additive function*. Let and be Banach spaces, and let be a positive number. A function of into is called *-additive* if for all . In the 1940s, Ulam [1] proposed the following * stability problem* of this equation. Does there exist for each a such that, to each -additive function of into there, corresponds an additive function of into satisfying the inequality for each ? In 1941, Hyers [2] answered this question in the affirmative way and showed that may be taken equal to . The answer of Hyers is presented in a great number of articles and books. There are several definitions and critics of the notion of this stability in the literature (see, e.g., [3, 4]). In 1949, Bourgin [5] generalized Hyers' results to the ring homomorphisms and proved the following.

Theorem 1.1. *Let and be nonnegative real numbers. Then every mapping of a Banach algebra with an identity element onto a Banach algebra with an identity element satisfying
**
for all , is a ring homomorphism of onto , that is, and for all .*

Finally, Badora [6] proved the following theorem on the Bourgin's result related to stability problem (Theorem 1.1) without additional assumptions.

Theorem 1.2. *Let be a ring, let be a Banach algebra, and let and be nonnegative real numbers. Assume that satisfies (1.1) for all . Then there exists a unique ring homomorphism such that
**
Moreover,
**
for all and all from the algebra generated by .*

The present paper is in essence a revised and extended compilation of Hyers' result and Theorem 1.2 to the Riesz algebras with extended norms. After outlining the basic information on Riesz space theory, we present the main definitions and facts concerning approximate Riesz algebra (with an extended norm)-valued ring homomorphisms.

#### 2. Preliminaries

A real Banach space endowed with a (partial) order â‰¤ is called a * Banach lattice* whenever(1)the order â‰¤ agrees with the linear operations, that is, for all and ;(2)the order â‰¤ makes a lattice, that is, for all , the supremum and infimum exist in (hence, the modulus exists for each );(3)the norm is monotonous with respect to the order â‰¤, that is, for all , implies (hence, for all ).

Recall that a (partially) ordered vector space satisfying (1) and (2) above is called a * Riesz space*. the spaces of real valued continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space , -spaces, the spaces of convergent sequences, and the spaces of sequences converging to zero are natural examples of Riesz spaces under the pointwise ordering. A Riesz space is called * Archimedean* if , and for each imply . Throughout the present paper, all the Riesz spaces are assumed to be Archimedean. A subset in a Riesz space is said to be * solid* if it follows from in and that . A solid linear subspace of a Riesz space is called an * ideal*. Every subset of a Riesz space is included in a smallest ideal , called * ideal generated by *. A * principal ideal* of a Riesz space is any ideal generated by a singleton . This ideal will be denoted by . It is easy to see that

We assume that is a fixed positive element in the Riesz space . First of all, we present the following definition.

*Definition 2.1. *(1) It is said that the sequence in converges -uniformly to the element whenever, for every , there exists such that holds for each .

(2) It is said that the sequence in converges * relatively uniformly* to whenever converges -uniformly to for some .

When dealing with relative uniform convergence in an Archimedean Riesz space , it is natural to associate with every positive element an extended norm in by the formula

Note that if and only if , the ideal generated by . Also if and only if .

The sequence in is called an extended -normed Cauchy sequence, if for every there exists such that for all . If every extended -normed Cauchy sequence is convergent in , then is called an extended -normed Banach lattice.

A Riesz space is called a * Riesz algebra* or a * lattice-ordered algebra* if there exists in an associative multiplication with the usual algebra properties such that for all .

For more detailed information about Riesz spaces, the reader can consult the book â€ś*Riesz Spaces*â€ť by Luxemburg and Zaanen [7].

#### 3. Main Results

We begin with the following theorem concerning stability of the functional equation . For a function , let us denote by for , the composition of by itself and in general let for .

The theorem can easily be obtained from [8] or [9]. We give the proof here for the benefit of the reader.

Theorem 3.1. *Let be a complete metric space, a nonempty set and such that and are two given functions. Assume that is a function satisfying
**
for each and for some function . If the function satisfies the inequality
**
and the series
**
is convergent for each , then for each integer , one has**(1)
**(2) is a Cauchy sequence. exists for every , and is the unique function satisfying and the inequality
*

*Proof. *(1) Replacing by in (3.1), we get
Then by (3.2), we obtain
The proof follows by induction.

(2) Let , then
thus is a Cauchy sequence for each and it is convergent as is complete. Let for each .

By using (3.4), we get
taking the limit as goes to infinity, then we obtain (3.5). By continuity of , we have
Suppose that another function satisfies and (3.5). By induction it is easy to show that and . Hence for ,
Since for every , with , this completes the proof.

Let be a linear space over either complex or real numbers. The operation of addition of elements will be denoted, as usual, by . The operation of multiplication of an element by a scalar will be denoted by . Suppose that in the linear space , we are given a metric . The space is called a * metric linear space* if the operations of addition and multiplication by numbers are continuous with respect to the metric . A metric linear space is called * complete* if every Cauchy sequence converges to an element , that is, .

We now give the following corollary in [9] which will be useful in the sequel.

Corollary 3.2. *Let a complete metric linear space and be a linear space. Suppose that there exists such that ,
**
where . Let satisfy
**
Then there is a unique solution of with
*

*Proof. *From (3.12) and (3.14), we get
for . By using Theorem 3.1 with , , and , the limit function exists for each and

As and for every , we get
Next, by (3.14), for every we have
for , so letting we obtain .

Suppose is also a solution of and
Then , whence, by Theorem 3.1, we have which implies the uniqueness of .

The following theorem is an extended application of Hyers' result to the Riesz spaces.

Theorem 3.3. *Let a linear space, be a Riesz space equipped with an extended norm such that the space () is complete. If, for some , a map is -additive, then limit exists for each . is the unique additive function satisfying the inequality for all .*

Now, if is a Banach space or extended -normed Banach lattice, then we can take or , , , and . We may obtain the classical Hyers' result [2] and Theorem 3.3 with such , and by using Corollary 3.2.

Finally, we give the following theorem which is an extended application of Badora's result (Theorem 1.2) to Riesz algebras with extended norms. For a proof, we use Theorem 3.3 and the similar techniques of Badora [6] with suitable modifications.

Theorem 3.4. *Let be a linear algebra, and let be a Riesz algebra with an extended norm such that is complete. Also, let be another extended norm in weaker than such that whenever*(1)* and in , then ;*(2)* and in , then .**Let and be nonnegative real numbers. Assume that a map satisfies
**
for all . Then there exists a unique ring homomorphism such that , . Moreover,
**
for all and all from the algebra generated by .*

*Proof. *From Theorem 3.3, it follows that there exists a unique additive function such that
Hence, it is enough to show that is a multiplicative function. Using the additivity of , it follows that
which means that
with respect to norm.

Let
Then using inequality (3.22), we get
with respect to norm.

Applying (3.26) and (3.28), we have
for all , since is weaker than . Hence, we get the following functional equation:
From this equation and the additivity of , we have
Therefore,
Sending to infinity, by (3.26), we see that
Combining this equation with (3.30), we see that is a multiplicative function.

Moreover, from (3.22) we get
with respect to norm.

Thus, by (3.26) and the fact that is weaker than , we get that
for all . Hence, by (3.33),
so that
which completes the proof.

#### References

- S. M. Ulam,
*A Collection of Mathematical Problems*, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, no. 8, Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1960. - D. H. Hyers, â€śOn the stability of the linear functional equation,â€ť
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, vol. 27, pp. 222â€“224, 1941. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - Z. Moszner, â€śOn the stability of functional equations,â€ť
*Aequationes Mathematicae*, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 33â€“88, 2009. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - B. Paneah, â€śA new approach to the stability of linear functional operators,â€ť
*Aequationes Mathematicae*, vol. 78, no. 1-2, pp. 45â€“61, 2009. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - D. G. Bourgin, â€śApproximately isometric and multiplicative transformations on continuous function rings,â€ť
*Duke Mathematical Journal*, vol. 16, pp. 385â€“397, 1949. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - R. Badora, â€śOn approximate ring homomorphisms,â€ť
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 276, no. 2, pp. 589â€“597, 2002. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - W. A. J. Luxemburg and A. C. Zaanen,
*Riesz Spaces*, vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1971. - G.-L. Forti, â€śComments on the core of the direct method for proving Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations,â€ť
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 127â€“133, 2004. View at Publisher Â· View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH Â· View at MathSciNet - J. Brzdęk, â€śOn a method of proving the Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations on restricted domains,â€ť
*The Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 6, pp. 1â€“10, 2009. View at Google Scholar Â· View at Zentralblatt MATH