About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 151374, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/151374
Research Article

State-Feedback Stabilization for a Class of Stochastic Feedforward Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems

1College of Engineering, Bohai University, Liaoning 121013, China
2College of Information Science, Bohai University, Liaoning 121013, China
3Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Agder, 4898 Grimstad, Norway

Received 18 October 2013; Accepted 18 November 2013

Academic Editor: Ming Liu

Copyright © 2013 Liang Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We investigate the state-feedback stabilization problem for a class of stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems. By using the homogeneous domination approach and choosing an appropriate Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, the delay-independent state-feedback controller is explicitly constructed such that the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable in probability. A simulation example is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design method.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the study on stochastic lower-triangular nonlinear systems has received considerable attention from both theoretical and practical point of views see, for instance, [119] and the references therein. This paper will further consider the following stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems described by where and are the system state and input signal, respectively, , is the time-delayed state vector, and is the time-varying delay. is an -dimensional standard Wiener process defined on the complete probability space with being a sample space, being a -field, being a filtration, and being a probability measure. and are assumed to be locally Lipschitz with and , , .

Feedforward (also called upper-triangular) system is another important class of nonlinear systems. Firstly, from a theoretical point of view, since they are not feedback linearizable and maybe not stabilized by applying the conventional backstepping method, the stabilization problem of these systems is more difficult than that of lower-triangular systems. Secondly, many physical devices, such as the cart-pendulum system in [20] and the ball-beam system with a friction term in [21], can be described by equations with the feedforward structure. In the recent papers, the stabilization problems for feedforward nonlinear (or time-delay) systems have achieved remarkable development; see, for example, [2229] and the references therein.

However, all these above-mentioned results are limited to deterministic systems. There are fewer results on stochastic feedforward nonlinear systems until now, due to the special characteristics of this system. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, [30] is the only paper to consider this kind of stochastic feedforward nonlinear systems, but the assumptions on the nonlinearities are restrictive.

The purpose of this paper is to further weaken the assumptions on the drift and diffusion terms of system (1) and solve the state-feedback stabilization problem. By using the homogeneous domination approach in [26] and choosing an appropriate Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, a delay-independent state-feedback controller is explicitly constructed such that the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable in probability.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides some preliminary results. The design and analysis of state-feedback controller are given in Sections 3 and 4, respectively, following a simulation example in Section 5. Section 6 concludes this paper.

2. Preliminary Results

The following notations, definitions, and lemmas are to be used throughout the paper.

denotes the set of all nonnegative real numbers, and denotes the real -dimensional space. For a given vector or matrix , denotes its transpose, denotes its trace when is square, and is the Euclidean norm of a vector . denotes the space of continuous -value functions on endowed with the norm defined by for ; denotes the family of all -measurable bounded -valued random variables . denotes the set of all functions with continuous th partial derivatives; denotes the family of all nonnegative functions on which are in and in ; denotes the family of all functions which are in the first argument and in the second argument. denotes the set of all functions , which are continuous, strictly increasing, and vanishing at zero; denotes the set of all functions which are of class and unbounded; is the set of all functions : , which are of for each fixed and decrease to zero as for each fixed .

Consider the following stochastic time-delay system: with initial data , where is a Borel measurable function, is an -dimensional standard Wiener process defined on the complete probability space , and and are locally Lipschitz in (, ) uniformly in with and .

Definition 1 (see [6]). For any given associated with system (2), the differential operator is defined as

Definition 2 (see [6]). The equilibrium of system (2) is said to be globally asymptotically stable (GAS) in probability if for any there exists a function such that for any , , where .

Definition 3 (see [26]). For fixed coordinates and real numbers , , one has the following.(i)The dilation is defined by for any ; are called as the weights of the coordinates. For simplicity, we define dilation weight .(ii)A function is said to be homogeneous of degree if there is a real number such that for any , .(iii)A vector field is said to be homogeneous of degree if there is a real number such that for any , , .(iv)A homogeneous -norm is defined as for any , where is a constant. For simplicity, in this paper, one chooses and writes for .

Lemma 4 (see [6]). For system (2), if there exist a function , two class functions , , and a class function such that then there exists a unique solution on for (2), the equilibrium is GAS in probability, and .

Lemma 5 (see [26]). Given a dilation weight , suppose that and are homogeneous functions of degrees and , respectively. Then is also homogeneous with respect to the same dilation weight . Moreover, the homogeneous degree of is .

Lemma 6 (see [26]). Suppose that is a homogeneous function of degree with respect to the dilation weight ; then (i) is homogeneous of degree with being the homogeneous weight of ; (ii) there is a constant such that . Moreover, if is positive definite, then , where is a positive constant.

Lemma 7 (see [5]). Let and be positive constants. For any positive number , then .

3. Design of State-Feedback Controller

The objective of this paper is to design a state-feedback controller for system (1) such that the equilibrium of the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable in probability.

3.1. Assumptions

For system (1), we need the following assumptions.

Assumption 8. For , there exist positive constants and such that where .

Assumption 9. The time-varying delay satisfies for a constant .

Remark 10. When in diffusion term , Assumption 8 reduces to the same form as in [30], from which one can see that system (1) is more general than [30]. The significance and reasonability of Assumption 8 are illustrated in that paper.
Firstly, we introduce the following coordinate transformation: where is a scalar to be designed. By (6), (1) can be expressed as where , , , .

3.2. State-Feedback Controller Design

We construct a state-feedback controller for system (7).

Step 1. Introducing and choosing , from (3) and (7), it follows that
The first virtual controller leads to .

Step i (). In this step, we can get the following lemma.

Lemma 11. Suppose that at step , there is a set of virtual controllers defined by such that the th Lyapunov function satisfies where , , , are positive constants. Then there exists a virtual control law such that where .

Proof. See the Appendix.

At step , choosing and with the help of (3), (12), and (13), one obtains where , , , , , , are positive constants. The system (7) and (13) can be written as where , , and and are defined as in (14). Introducing the dilation weight , by (10) and , one has from which and Definition 3, we know that is homogeneous of degree 4.

4. Stability Analysis

We state the main result in this paper.

Theorem 12. If Assumptions 8 and 9 hold for the stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay system (1), under the state-feedback controller and (13), then(i)the closed-loop system has a unique solution on ;(ii)the equilibrium at the origin of the closed-loop system is GAS in probability.

Proof. We prove Theorem 12 by four steps.
Step  1. Since , , , are assumed to be locally Lipschitz, so the system consisting of (13) and (15) satisfies the locally Lipschitz condition.
Step  2. We consider the following entire Lyapunov function for system (15): where and are positive parameters to be determined. It is easy to verify that is on . Since is continuous, positive definite, and radially unbounded, by Lemma 4.3 in [31], there exist two class functions and such that
By Lemma 4.3 in [31] and Lemma 6, there exist positive constants and , class functions and , and a positive definite function whose homogeneous degree is such that
From and (19), it follows that where , are positive constants and is a class function. Since , . Defining , by (17), (18), and (20), one gets
Step  3. By Lemma 6 and (14), there exists a positive constant such that
By Assumption 8, (6), and , one has where is a positive constant. Using Lemmas 57 and (23), one gets where , , and are positive constants. Similar to (23), there is a positive constant such that from which and Lemmas 57, one gets where , , and are positive constants. With the help of (3), (15), (17), (22), (24), (26), and Assumption 9, one has
Since is a constant independent of , , , , and , by choosing
Equation (27) becomes , where is a positive constant. By (19), one obtains
By Steps 1–3 and Lemma 4, the system consisting of (13) and (15) has a unique solution on , is GAS in probability, and .
Step  4. Since (6) is an equivalent transformation, so the closed-loop system consisting of (1), , and (13) has the same properties as the system (13) and (15). Theorem 12 holds.

Remark 13. In this paper, the homogeneous domination idea is generalized to stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems (1). The underlying philosophy of this approach is that the state-feedback controller is first constructed for system (7) without considering the drift and diffusion terms, and then a low gain in (6) (whose the value range is (28)) is introduced to state-feedback controller to dominate the drift and diffusion terms.

Remark 14. Due to the special upper-triangular structure and the appearance of time-varying delay, there is no efficient method to solve the stabilization problem of system (1). By combining the homogeneous domination approach with stochastic nonlinear time-delay system criterion, the state-feedback stabilization of system (1) was perfectly solved in this paper.

Remark 15. One of the main obstacles in the stability analysis is how to deal with the effect of time-varying delay. In this paper, by constructing an appropriate Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (17), this problem was effectively solved.

Remark 16. It is worth pointing out that the rigorous proof of Theorem 12 is not an easy job.

5. A Simulation Example

Consider the following stochastic nonlinear system: where . It is easy to verify that Assumptions 8 and 9 are satisfied with , , and .

Design of Controller. Introducing the following coordinate transformation: system (30) becomes where . Choosing and , we obtain , where . By and , a direct calculation leads to

By Lemma 7, one has

Choosing and substituting (34) into (33), one gets

By (31) and (35), one obtains the actual controller

The Choice of  . Defining and choosing by (3), (36), and , one obtains from which we get the critical value ; that is, .

In simulation, we choose the initial values , , and . Figure 1 demonstrates the effectiveness of the state-feedback controller.

fig1
Figure 1: (a) The response of the closed-loop system (30) and (b) the response of the controller (37).

6. A Concluding Remark

By using the homogeneous domination approach, this paper further studied the state-feedback stabilization problem for a class of stochastic feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems (1). The delay-independent state-feedback controller is explicitly constructed such that the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable in probability.

There still exist some problems to be investigated. One is to consider the output-feedback control of switched stochastic system (1) by using average dwell time method in [32]. Another is to find a practical example (similar to [3335]) for system (1). The last is to generalize the networked control systems (such as [3641]) to stochastic feedforward networked systems.

Appendix

Proof of Lemma 11. According to (3), (7), (10), and (11), one has We concentrate on the last two terms on the right-hand side of (A.1).
Using (10) and Lemma 7, one obtains where , , , and are positive constants, .
Choosing and substituting (A.2)-(A.3) into (A.1), one gets the desired result.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to editor and reviewers for their helpful suggestions in improving the quality of this paper. This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61304002, 61304003, 61203123, and 61304054), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (no. 11CX04044A), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. ZR2012FQ019), and the Polish-Norwegian Research Programme operated by the National Center for Research and 24 Development under the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 in the frame of Project Contract (no. Pol-Nor/200957/47/2013).

References

  1. N. Duan and X.-J. Xie, “Further results on output-feedback stabilization for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1208–1213, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. M. Krstić and H. Deng, Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  3. S. Kuang, Y. Peng, F. Deng, and W. Gao, “Exponential stability and numerical methods of stochastic recurrent neural networks with delays,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 761237, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. W.-Q. Li and X.-J. Xie, “Inverse optimal stabilization for stochastic nonlinear systems whose linearizations are not stabilizable,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 498–503, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. L. Liu and X.-J. Xie, “Output-feedback stabilization for stochastic high-order nonlinear systems with time-varying delay,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2772–2779, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. S.-J. Liu, S. S. Ge, and J.-F. Zhang, “Adaptive output-feedback control for a class of uncertain stochastic non-linear systems with time delays,” International Journal of Control, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1210–1220, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. S.-J. Liu, J.-F. Zhang, and Z.-P. Jiang, “Decentralized adaptive output-feedback stabilization for large-scale stochastic nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 238–251, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. Y.-G. Liu and J.-F. Zhang, “Practical output-feedback risk-sensitive control for stochastic nonlinear systems with stable zero-dynamics,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 885–926, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. L. Wu, P. Shi, and H. Gao, “State estimation and sliding-mode control of Markovian jump singular systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1213–1219, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. Z.-J. Wu, X.-J. Xie, and S.-Y. Zhang, “Adaptive backstepping controller design using stochastic small-gain theorem,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 608–620, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. Z.-J. Wu, X.-J. Xie, P. Shi, and Y.-Q. Xia, “Backstepping controller design for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems with Markovian switching,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 997–1004, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. X.-J. Xie and N. Duan, “Output tracking of high-order stochastic nonlinear systems with application to benchmark mechanical system,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1197–1202, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. X.-J. Xie and L. Liu, “Further results on output feedback stabilization for stochastic high-order nonlinear systems with time-varying delay,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2577–2586, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. X.-J. Xie and L. Liu, “A homogeneous domination approach to state feedback of stochastic high-order nonlinear systems with time-varying delay,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 494–499, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. X.-J. Xie and J. Tian, “Adaptive state-feedback stabilization of high-order stochastic systems with nonlinear parameterization,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. S. Yin, S. X. Ding, A. H. A. Sari, and H. Hao, “Data-driven monitoring for stochastic systems and its application on batch process,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1366–1376, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. X. Yu and X.-J. Xie, “Output feedback regulation of stochastic nonlinear systems with stochastic iISS inverse dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 304–320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. X. Zhao, M. Ling, and Q. Zeng, “Delay-dependent robust control for uncertain stochastic systems with Markovian switching and multiple delays,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 287–295, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. Zhou, Y. Ren, and S. Zhong, “BIBO stabilization of discrete-time stochastic control systems with mixed delays and nonlinear perturbations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 916357, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. F. Mazenc and S. Bowong, “Tracking trajectories of the cart-pendulum system,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 677–684, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. R. Sepulchre, M. Janković, and P. V. Kokotović, Constructive Nonlinear Control, Springer, London, UK, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. N. Bekiaris-Liberis and M. Krstić, “Delay-adaptive feedback for linear feedforward systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 277–283, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. S. Ding, C. Qian, S. Li, and Q. Li, “Global stabilization of a class of upper-triangular systems with unbounded or uncontrollable linearizations,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 271–294, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer, London, UK, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. M. Krstić, “Input delay compensation for forward complete and strict-feedforward nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 287–302, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. C. Qian and J. Li, “Global output feedback stabilization of upper-triangular nonlinear systems using a homogeneous domination approach,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 441–463, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. X. Ye, “Adaptive stabilization of time-delay feedforward nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 950–955, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. X. Zhang, L. Baron, Q. Liu, and E.-K. Boukas, “Design of stabilizing controllers with a dynamic gain for feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 692–697, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. X. Zhang, Q. Liu, L. Baron, and E.-K. Boukas, “Feedback stabilization for high order feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 962–967, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. L. Liu and X.-J. Xie, “State feedback stabilization for stochastic feedforward nonlinear systems with time-varying delay,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 936–942, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.
  32. L. Zhang and H. Gao, “Asynchronously switched control of switched linear systems with average dwell time,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 953–958, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. H. L. Dong, Z. D. Wang, and H. J. Gao, “Distributed H filtering for a class of markovian jump nonlinear time-delay systems over lossy sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 4665–4672, 2013.
  34. X. C. Xie, S. Yin, H. J. Gao, and O. Kaynak, “Asymptotic stability and stabilisation of uncertain delta operator systems with time-varying delays,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1071–1078, 2013.
  35. S. Yin, S. X. Ding, and H. Luo, “Real-time implementation of fault tolerant control system with performance optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2402–2411, 2014.
  36. H. Gao and T. Chen, “H estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2070–2084, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. H. Gao, T. Chen, and J. Lam, “A new delay system approach to network-based control,” Automatica, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. H. Gao and T. Chen, “Network-based H output tracking control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655–667, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. H. Gao, X. Meng, and T. Chen, “Stabilization of networked control systems with a new delay characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2142–2148, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. H. Li, H. Gao, and P. Shi, “New passivity analysis for neural networks with discrete and distributed delays,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1842–1847, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Qiu, G. Feng, and H. Gao, “Fuzzy-model-based piecewise H static-output-feedback controller design for networked nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 919–934, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus