- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 374938, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/374938

## Complete Controllability of Impulsive Fractional Linear Time-Invariant Systems with Delay

School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China

Received 27 February 2013; Accepted 23 June 2013

Academic Editor: G. M. N'Guérékata

Copyright © 2013 Xian-Feng Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Some flaws on impulsive fractional differential equations (systems) have been found. This paper is concerned with the complete controllability of impulsive fractional linear time-invariant dynamical systems with delay. The criteria on the controllability of the system, which is sufficient and necessary, are established by constructing suitable control inputs. Two examples are provided to illustrate the obtained results.

#### 1. Introduction

Recently, a variety of problems such as the existence, uniqueness of mild solution for the initial value problem, periodic boundary value problems, antiperiodic boundary value problems, and Ulam stability for impulsive fractional differential equations have been considered due to their important role in modeling natural phenomena such as medicine, biology, and optimal control; see the paper [1–16].

The concept of controllability plays an important role in the analysis and design of control systems. With the developments of theories of impulsive fractional differential equations, there have been a few papers devoted to the controllability of impulsive fractional differential systems; see [17–20]. In [17], the author discussed the controllability of impulsive fractional linear time-invariant systems through constructing a suitable control input in time domain. By fixed point theorem, the controllability of integrodifferential systems was investigated in [18–20]. It should be mentioned that the controllability for linear fractional dynamical systems has been investigated by several scholars [21–26] while the theory of controllability for impulsive fractional linear time-invariant systems is still in the initial stage [17].

The impulsive fractional differential equations (systems) which had been investigated earlier often have the form or and so forth, where is the Caputo fractional derivative of order with lower limit zero, , is jointly continuous, , satisfies , , and represent, respectively, the right and the left limits of at , , , , are the known constant matrices, , , are vectors with appropriate dimensions.

However, the function defined on is continuous everywhere except for finite number of points , , at which the limits and exist with . If there exists some such that , , and , then does not exist since is meaningless at the impulsive moment . That is to say is meaningless. As a result, investigating (1)–(6) is meaningless.

Motivated by this fact, this paper is concerned with the complete controllability of the impulsive fractional linear time-invariant system with delay in -dimensional Euclidean space, where , , denotes the Caputo’s derivative of order with the lower limit , , , , , , , , are known constant matrices with appropriate dimensions, the state variable , the initial function , the delay , , the control input , the output , , .

In this paper, the methods used is to construct a suitable control input function in time domain. The results obtained is sufficient and necessary, which are convenient for computation.

#### 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we begin with some notations, definitions, and lemmas. Throughout this paper, or denotes the Caputo’s derivative of order with the lower limit for the function , or denotes integral of order with lower limit for the function , denotes the Laplace transform of the function , and “” denotes the norm of the matrix “,” “” denotes the transpose of the matrix “”. Let be the Banach space of all continuous functions from into with the norm . Let the Banach space be and the norm .

*Definition 1 (see [27]). * The fractional integral of order with the lower limit for a function is defined as
Provided that the right-hand side is pointwise defined on , where is the Gamma function.

*Definition 2 (see [27]). * The Caputo’s derivative of order with the lower limit for a function can be written as
Particularly, when , it holds

The Laplace transform of is where is the Laplace transform of .

In particular, for , it holds

*Definition 3 (see [27]). * The two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function is defined as

The Laplace transform of Mittag-Leffler function is
where denotes the real parts of .

In addition, the Laplace transform of is

Lemma 4 (see [28]). * Let . If , then
**
where denotes the set of continuous functions on .*

#### 3. Main Results

*Definition 5 (complete controllability). * The system (8)–(12) is said to be completely controllable on the interval if, for any (), , and , there exists an admissible control input such that the state variable of the system (8)–(12) satisfies .

Using the Laplace transform method, we can easily obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 6. * The movement orbit of the state variable of the system (8)−(12) can be written as
*

Theorem 7. * The system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on if and only if the controllability matrices
**
are nonsingular, . *

*Proof. **Sufficiency*. Suppose that is nonsingular; then is well defined, .

For , it follows from the formula (23) that
For all , choosing
and inserting (26) into (25) yields . Thus, the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .

Similarly, for , it follows from the formula (23) that

Since the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , there exists a control input such that . By (27), it follows that

For all , choosing
together with (28) yields . Thus, the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .

By similar arguments, we can prove that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , .

Consequently, the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .*Necessity*. Suppose that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .

If is singular, then there exists a nonzero vector such that
That is
Then we have
on . By the assumption that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , . There exist control inputs and such that
By (34), we have
Inserting (35) into (33) yields
Multiplying on both side of (36) yields
By (32) and (37), we have . Thus, . This is a contradiction.

If is singular for some , then there exists a nonzero vector such that
That is
Then, it follows that
on . By formula (23) and the assumption that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable, there exist control inputs and such that and

Similarly, there exists a control input such that
By (42), we have
Inserting (43) into (41) yields
Multiplying on both side of (44) yields
Combining (45) with (40) yields . Thus, . This is a contradiction.

Thus, is nonsingular for . This completes the proof.

Theorem 8. * The system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on if and only if
*

*Proof. **Necessity*. Suppose that system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on . Then, the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on . Then, for any , there exists a control input such that . By the formula (23), it follows that
By Cayley-Hamilton theorem, we have
where are functions in , . Combining the formula (48) and the equality (47), we have
where , . For arbitrary state and initial function , the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on if and only if there exists a control input such that (47) or (49) holds. Obviously, for arbitrary initial function and , the sufficient and necessary condition to have a control input satisfying (49) is that
*Sufficiency*. Suppose that . In order to prove that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , it is sufficient to prove that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , , respectively.

The formula (23) together with (48) yields (49). By the assumption that , the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .

Now we prove that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on . The complete controllability of the system (8)–(12) on implies that there exists a control input such that . Inserting into the formula (23), we have, for ,
Thus, it follows
By (48) it follows taht
where , . Similar to the previous arguments, we can conclude that system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on .

Repeating the process on , respectively, we can prove that the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on , . In conclusion, the system (8)–(12) is completely controllable on . This completes the proof.

*Remark 9. * From Theorem 8, we can conclude that the complete controllability of the system (8)–(12) is unrelated to the matrix and initial function . The matrices determine if the the system (8)–(12) possesses complete controllability.

#### 4. Examples

*Example 1. * Consider the system (8)–(12). Choose , , , , , , , . Now, we employ Theorems 7 and 8 to prove if that the system (8)–(10) is completely controllable, respectively.

By computation, we have
By the formula (24)
we have
It is obvious that and are nonsingular. By Theorem 7, the system is completely controllable.

On the other hand, By Theorem 8, the system is completely controllable.

*Example 2. *Consider the time-invariant system (8)–(12). Choose

By computation, we have
By Theorem 8, the system is completely controllable.

#### Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referee for his or her valuable comments, which help us to improve the quality of the paper. This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11071001), Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Educational Ministry of China (20103401120002 and 20123401120001), Program of Natural Science Research in Anhui Universities (KJ2011A020 and KJ2013A032), Scientific Research Starting Fund for Dr. of Anhui University (023033190001, 023033190181), and the 211 Project of Anhui University (KJQN1001, 023033050055).

#### References

- K. Balachandran, S. Kiruthika, and J. J. Trujillo, “Remark on the existence results for fractional impulsive integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2244–2247, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - M. Benchohra and F. Berhoun, “Impulsive fractional differential equations with variable times,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1245–1252, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. Cao and H. Chen, “Impulsive fractional differential equations with nonlinear boundary conditions,”
*Mathematical and Computer Modelling*, vol. 55, no. 3-4, pp. 303–311, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - Y.-K. Chang, A. Anguraj, and K. Karthikeyan, “Existence for impulsive neutral integrodifferential inclusions with nonlocal initial conditions via fractional operators,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications. An International Multidisciplinary Journal. Series A: Theory and Methods*, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 4377–4386, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - Y.-K. Chang, V. Kavitha, and M. M. Arjunan, “Existence results for impulsive neutral differential and integrodifferential equations with nonlocal conditions via fractional operators,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Hybrid Systems. An International Multidisciplinary Journal*, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - T. L. Guo and W. Jiang, “Impulsive fractional functional differential equations,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3414–3424, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - G. M. Mophou, “Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to impulsive fractional differential equations,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications. An International Multidisciplinary Journal. Series A: Theory and Methods*, vol. 72, no. 3-4, pp. 1604–1615, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - M. H. M. Rashid and A. Al-Omari, “Local and global existence of mild solutions for impulsive fractional semilinear integro-differential equation,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 3493–3503, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - X.-B. Shu, Y. Lai, and Y. Chen, “The existence of mild solutions for impulsive fractional partial differential equations,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications. An International Multidisciplinary Journal. Series A: Theory and Methods*, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 2003–2011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - G. Wang, B. Ahmad, and L. Zhang, “Impulsive anti-periodic boundary value problem for nonlinear differential equations of fractional order,”
- J. R. Wang, Y. Zhou, and M. Fečkan, “Nonlinear impulsive problems for fractional differential equations and Ulam stability,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3389–3405, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - J. R. Wang, X. Li, and W. Wei, “On the natural solution of an impulsive fractional differential equation of order $q\in \left(\mathrm{1,2}\right)$,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 4384–4394, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - X. Zhang, X. Huang, and Z. Liu, “The existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for impulsive fractional equations with nonlocal conditions and infinite delay,”
*Nonlinear Analysis. Hybrid Systems. An International Multidisciplinary Journal*, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 775–781, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - Z. Yan, “Existence of solutions for nonlocal impulsive partial functional integrodifferential equations via fractional operators,”
*Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*, vol. 235, no. 8, pp. 2252–2262, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. R. Wang, Y. Zhou, and M. Fečkan, “On recent developments in the theory of boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3008–3020, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - J. R. Wang, M. Fečkan, and Y. Zhou, “On the new concept of solutions and existence results for impulsive fractional evolution equations,”
*Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations*, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 345–361, 2011. View at MathSciNet - T. L. Guo, “Controllability and observability of impulsive fractional linear time-invariant system,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3171–3182, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - Z. Tai and S. Lun, “On controllability of fractional impulsive neutral infinite delay evolution integrodifferential systems in Banach spaces,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 104–110, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - Z. Tai, “Controllability of fractional impulsive neutral integrodifferential systems with a nonlocal Cauchy condition in Banach spaces,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2158–2161, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - A. Debbouche and D. Baleanu, “Controllability of fractional evolution nonlocal impulsive quasilinear delay integro-differential systems,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1442–1450, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - X.-F. Zhou, J. Wei, and L.-G. Hu, “Controllability of a fractional linear time-invariant neutral dynamical system,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 418–424, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - T. Kaczorek,
*Selected Problems of Fractional Systems Theory*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - Y. Q. Chen, H. S. Ahn, and D. Xue, “Robust controllability of interval fractional order linear
time invariant systems,”
*Signal Process*, vol. 86, pp. 2794–2802, 2006. - J. Wei, “The controllability of fractional control systems with control delay,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3153–3159, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - A. B. Shamardan and M. R. A. Moubarak, “Controllability and observability for fractional control systems,”
*Journal of Fractional Calculus*, vol. 15, pp. 25–34, 1999. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. L. Adams and T. F. Hartley, “Finite time controllability of fractional order systems,”
*Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics*, vol. 3, no. 2, Article ID 021402, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - I. Podlubny,
*Fractional Differential Equations*, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at MathSciNet - A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo,
*Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations*, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. View at MathSciNet