About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 408168, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/408168
Research Article

Commuting Quasihomogeneous Toeplitz Operator and Hankel Operator on Weighted Bergman Space

Department of Mathematics, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China

Received 26 January 2013; Accepted 1 July 2013

Academic Editor: Giovanni P. Galdi

Copyright © 2013 Jun Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We characterize the commuting Toeplitz operator and Hankel operator with quasihomogeneous symbols. Also, we use it to show the necessary and sufficient conditions for commuting Toeplitz operator and Hankel operator with ordinary functions.

1. Introduction

Let denote Lebesgue area measure on the unit disk , normalized so that the measure of equals 1. For , we denote by the measure . For , the space is a Banach space. The weighted Bergman space is the closed subspace of analytic functions in the Hilbert space . For each , the application is continuous and can be represented as , where This means that, if is the orthogonal projection from onto , then can be defined by For a function , we define the Toeplitz operator with symbol by It is well known that

Let be the unitary operator defined by , where belongs to . Let be in ; we define a bounded linear operator on as follows: Then we can define the small Hankel operator as follows: as .

The study of commuting Toeplitz operators on the Bergman and Hardy spaces over various domains and related operator algebras has a long lasting history. On the Hardy space of the unit disk, Brown and Halmos [1] first showed that two Toeplitz operators are commuting if and only if either both symbols of these operators are analytic, or both symbols of these operators are coanalytic or a nontrivial linear combination of the symbols of these operators is constant. On the Bergman space, the situation is more complicated. Axler and Čučković obtained the analogous result for Toeplitz operators with bounded harmonic symbols on the Bergman space of the unit disk [2]. The problem of characterizing commuting Toeplitz operators with arbitrary bounded symbols seems quite challenging and is not fully understood until now. In [3], Čučković and Rao used the Mellin transform to characterize all Toeplitz operators on which commute with for . Later in [4] Louhichi and Zakariasy gave a partial characterization of commuting Toeplitz operators on with quasihomogeneous symbols. Recently, Lu and Zhang [5, 6] characterized the commuting Toeplitz operators and Hankel operators with quasihomogeneous symbols. There are also many other important results [713]. Motivated by those works, we study commuting Toeplitz operator and Hankel operator on the weighted Bergman space. In this paper, we obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions for commuting Toeplitz operator and Hankel operator.

An operator that will arise in our study of Toeplitz operators is the Mellin transform, defined for any function ; from the formula, is the Mellin transform as follows: which is a bounded holomorphic function in the half plane .

Let be a radial function; that is, suppose that , . In fact, if we define the function on by , then a direct calculation shows that so that if , Thus, is a diagonal operator on with coefficient sequence as follows: This makes it relatively simple to work with the product of two operators with such radial symbols.

Now, we define the “radialization” of a function by the following: It is clear that a function is a radial if and only if .

Let be the space of weighted square integrable radial functions on . By using that, trigonometric polynomials are dense in and that, for , is orthogonal to , we see that is

Definition 1. Let be a function in which is of the form , where is a radial function. Then one says that is a quasihomogeneous function of quasihomogeneous degree .
A direct calculation gives the following lemmas which we will use often.

Lemma 2. Let and let be an integrable radial function. Then,

Lemma 3. Let be an integrable radial function. Then, for , and for ,

2. Commuting of Toeplitz Operator and Hankel Operator

Theorem 4. Let be a bounded function of quasihomogeneous degree and . Then if and only if the following conditions holds(1), if and ;(2), if and .

Proof. For , If , then we have which is equivalent to that is, From the aforementioned we get the following.
Case 1. For and , Case 2. For and , As a special case of Theorem 4, we can have the following corollary.

Corollary 5. Let be a bounded radial function and . Then if and only if for and .

Theorem 6. Let be a bounded function of quasihomogeneous degree and . Then if and only if the following conditions holds(1), if and ;(2), if and .

Proof. For , we have
Then one has the following.
Case 1. For ,
Case 2. For , If , then we have the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For , That is one has the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For ,

Theorem 7. Let be a bounded function of quasihomogeneous degree and . Then if and only if or (1), if and ;(2), if and ;(3), if and .

Proof. For , we have the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For , Applying , we have the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For , If , then the equation holds.
Otherwise , we have the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For , that is one has the following.
Case 1. For , Case 2. For , Then we get the following.
Case 1. For , , .
Case 2. For , Case 3. For ,.

Corollary 8. Let be a bounded radial function and . Then if and only if (1);(2) and , for .

Finally, we will investigate the situation that both functions are ordinary functions.

Theorem 9. Let and . Then if and only if for and .

Proof. For , we have From the aforementioned we get, for and , If , then we get for and .
The converse is easy to get.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the paper. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11126061), Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (no. 13YZ090) and the Science & Technology Program of Shanghai Maritime University (no. 20120098).

References

  1. A. Brown and P. R. Halmos, “Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators,” Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 213, pp. 89–102, 1963/1964. View at MathSciNet
  2. S. Axler and Ž. Čučković, “Commuting Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols,” Integral Equations and Operator Theory, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. Ž. Čučković and N. V. Rao, “Mellin transform, monomial symbols, and commuting Toeplitz operators,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 195–214, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. I. Louhichi and L. Zakariasy, “On Toeplitz operators with quasihomogeneous symbols,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 248–257, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. Y. F. Lu and B. Zhang, “Commuting Hankel and Toeplitz operators on the Bergman space,” Chinese Annals of Mathematics A, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 519–530, 2011. View at MathSciNet
  6. B. Zhang, Y. Shi, and Y. Lu, “Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators on the polydisk,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2011, Article ID 962313, 18 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. B. Zhang and Y. Lu, “Toeplitz operators with quasihomogeneous symbols on the Bergman space of the unit ball,” Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 2012, Article ID 414201, 16 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. X. Dong and Z. Zhou, “Commuting quasihomogeneous Toeplitz operators on the harmonic Bergman space,” Complex Analysis and Operator Theory, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. B. R. Choe, H. Koo, and Y. J. Lee, “Commuting Toeplitz operators on the polydisk,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 356, no. 5, pp. 1727–1749, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. Y. J. Lee, “Commuting Toeplitz operators on the Hardy space of the polydisk,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 189–197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. J. Yang, L. Liu, and Y. Lu, “Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators on the pluriharmonic Bergman space,” Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 2013, Article ID 578436, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. N. L. Vasilevski, “Bergman space structure, commutative algebras of Toeplitz operators, and hyperbolic geometry,” Integral Equations and Operator Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 235–251, 2003. View at MathSciNet
  13. N. L. Vasilevski, Commutative Algebras of Toeplitz Operators on the Bergman Space, vol. 185 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 2008. View at MathSciNet