About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 465183, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/465183
Research Article

Periodic Orbits for a Three-Dimensional Biological Differential Systems

1Departamento de Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7, No. 43-82, Bogotá, Colombia
2Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia

Received 3 June 2013; Accepted 7 June 2013

Academic Editor: Luca Guerrini

Copyright © 2013 Renato Colucci and Daniel Nuñez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Bolker, M. Holyoak, V. Křivan, L. Rowe, and O. Schmitz, “Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions,” Ecology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1101–1114, 2003. View at Scopus
  2. D. Cariveau, R. E. Irwin, A. K. Brody, L. S. Garcia-Mayeya, and A. Von Der Ohe, “Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits,” Oikos, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. A. Menge, “Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 21–74, 1995. View at Scopus
  4. W. E. Snyder and A. R. Ives, “Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid,” Ecology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 705–716, 2001. View at Scopus
  5. J. T. Wootton, “Indirect effects, prey susceptibility, and habitat selection: impacts of birds on limpets and algae,” Ecology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 981–991, 1992. View at Scopus
  6. M. R. Walsh and D.N. Reznick, “Interactions between the direct and indirect effects of predators determine life history evolution in a killifish,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 594–599.
  7. D. O. Hessen, T. Andersen, P. Brettum, and B. A. Faafeng, “Phytoplankton contribution to sestonic mass and elemental ratios in lakes: implications for zooplankton nutrition,” Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 48, no. 3, 2003.
  8. J. Estes, K. Crooks, and R. Holt, Ecological Role of Predators, vol. 4 of Enciclopedia of Biodiversity, Academic Press, 2001.
  9. V. Lundgren and E. Granéli, “Grazer-induced defense in Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae): influence of different nutrient conditions,” Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 55, no. 5, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. F. Carusela, F. R. Momo, and L. Romanelli, “Competition, predation and coexistence in a three trophic system,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 220, no. 19, pp. 2349–2352, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Indirect effects affects ecosystem dynamics, 2011, http://www.ictp-saifr.org/.
  12. R. Margalef, “Life forms of Phytoplanktos as survival alternative in an unstable environment,” Oceanologica Acta, vol. 134, 1978.
  13. O. Sarnelle, “Daphnia as keystone predators: effects on phytoplankton diversity and grazing resistance,” Journal of Plankton Research, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1229–1238, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Colucci, “Coexistence in a one-predator, two-prey system with indirect effects,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 625391, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. H. L. Smith and H. R. Thieme, Dynamical Systems and Population Persistence, American Mathematical Society, 2011. View at MathSciNet
  16. G. Butler, H. I. Freedman, and P. Waltman, “Uniformly persistent systems,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 425–430, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. S. M. Shahruz and D. A. Kalkin, “Limit cycle behavior in three- or higher-dimensional non-linear systems: the Lotka-Volterra example,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 379–386, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. P. Van Den Driessche and M. L. Zeeman, “Three-dimensional competitive Lotka-Volterra systems with no periodic orbits,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 227–234, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Springer, 1998. View at MathSciNet
  20. J. Hulsman and F. J. Weissing, “Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos,” Nature, vol. 402, pp. 407–410, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J.-M. Ginoux, B. Rossetto, and J.-L. Jamet, “Chaos in a three-dimensional Volterra-Gause model of predator-prey type,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1689–1708, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. A. Klebanoff and A. Hastings, “Chaos in one-predator, two-prey models: general results from bifurcation theory,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 221–233, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet