About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 476094, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/476094
Research Article

Energy-Optimal Trajectory Planning for Planar Underactuated RR Robot Manipulators in the Absence of Gravity

1Department of Mathematics, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
2Department of Signal and Communication Theory, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Fuenlabrada 28943, Madrid, Spain

Received 30 January 2013; Revised 19 April 2013; Accepted 22 April 2013

Academic Editor: Qun Lin

Copyright © 2013 John Gregory et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. De Luca, S. Iannitti, R. Mattone, and G. Oriolo, “Underactuated manipulators: control properties and techniques,” Machine Intelligence and Robotic Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–125, 2002.
  2. G. A. Bliss, Lectures on the Calculus of Variations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1946. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. J. Gregory and C. Lin, Constrained Optimization in the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control theory, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
  4. W.-S. Koon and J. E. Marsden, “Optimal control for holonomic and nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetry and Lagrangian reduction,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 901–929, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. I. I. Hussein and A. M. Bloch, “Optimal control of underactuated nonholonomic mechanical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 668–682, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. X. Z. Lai, J. H. She, S. X. Yang, and M. Wu, “Comprehensive unified control strategy for underactuated two-link manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 389–398, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. P. Ordaz-Oliver, O. J. Santos-Sánchez, and V. López-Morales, “Toward a generalized sub-optimal control method of underactuated systems,” Optimal Control Applications & Methods, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 338–351, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. R. Seifried, “Two approaches for feedforward control and optimal design of underactuated multibody systems,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 75–93, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. M. Buss, O. von Stryk, R. Bulirsch, and G. Schmidt, “Towards hybrid optimal control,” at—Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 448–459, 2000.
  11. M. Buss, M. Glocker, M. Hardt, O. von Stryk, R. Bulirsch, and G. Schmidt, “Nonlinear hybrid dynamical systems: modeling, optimal control, and applications,” in Modelling, Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems, S. Engell, G. Frehse, and E. Schnieder, Eds., vol. 279 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, pp. 331–335, Springer, 2002.
  12. G. Oriolo and Y. Nakamura, “Control of mechanical systems with second-order nonholonomic constraints: underactuated manipulators,” in Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2398–2403, December 1991. View at Scopus
  13. T. J. Tarn, M. Zhang, and A. Serrani, “New integrability conditions for differential constraints,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 335–345, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. J. Sussmann, “A general theorem on local controllability,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 158–194, 1987. View at Scopus
  15. F. Bullo, A. D. Lewis, and K. M. Lynch, “Controllable kinematic reductions for mechanical systems: concepts, computational tools, and examples,” in Proceedings of International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, 2002.
  16. F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, “Low-order controllability and kinematic reductions for affine connection control systems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 885–908, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. D. Lewis and R. M. Murray, “Configuration controllability of simple mechanical control systems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 766–790, 1997.
  18. F. Bullo and K. M. Lynch, “Kinematic controllability for decoupled trajectory planning in underactuated mechanical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 402–412, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. R. Hestenes, Calculus of Variations and Optimcl Control Theory, John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
  20. J. Gregory, “A new systematic method for efficiently solving holonomic (and nonholonomic) constraint problems,” Analysis and Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Gregory and R. S. Wang, “Discrete variable methods for the m-dependent variable, nonlinear extremal problem in the calculus of variations,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 470–487, 1990. View at Scopus
  22. Wolfram Research, 2012.
  23. J. J. More and D. J. Thuente, “Line search algorithms with guaranteed sufficient decrease,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 286–307, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus