A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers

<table>Impact of <svg height="16.9" id="M208" style="vertical-align:-4.0404pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.0625 16.9" width="16.0625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.812)"><path d="M542 242q0 -106 -80 -176.5t-192 -72.5l-55 -251l-6 -3q-18 7 -28 38t1 91l23 124q-85 16 -133.5 72.5t-48.5 137.5q0 95 62.5 159.5t166.5 97.5l14 -31q-77 -32 -115 -82.5t-38 -128.5q0 -63 31.5 -107t74.5 -59l125 597l56 43l16 -10l-40 -168q-9 -40 3 -45
q77 -33 120 -85.5t43 -140.5zM469 232q0 67 -37 115t-77 62l-76 -370q89 -4 139.5 52.5t50.5 140.5z" id="x1D719"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.663,16.837)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> on the bullwhip effect for different <svg height="11.825" id="M209" style="vertical-align:-3.276pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.112499 11.825" width="16.112499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M545 106q-67 -118 -134 -118q-24 0 -40 37.5t-30 129.5h-2q-47 -72 -103 -119.5t-108 -47.5q-47 0 -76 45.5t-29 119.5q0 113 85 204t174 91q47 0 70 -33.5t43 -119.5h3q32 47 80 140l55 13l10 -9q-47 -80 -138 -201q17 -99 27.5 -136t22.5 -37q23 0 69 61zM333 204
q-14 98 -31 149.5t-50 51.5q-49 0 -94 -70t-45 -164q0 -55 15.5 -86t40.5 -31q70 0 164 150z" id="x1D6FC"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.712,11.762)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> under the ES.</table>

Abstract and Applied Analysis

fig10

Figure 10

Figure 10: A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers 