A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers

<table>Impact of <svg height="16.3125" id="M134" style="vertical-align:-3.276pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 14.925 16.3125" width="14.925" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M475 507q0 -83 -20 -172t-56 -167.5t-93.5 -129t-125.5 -50.5q-157 0 -157 227q0 78 21.5 164t59 161t96.5 123.5t126 48.5q79 0 114 -58t35 -147zM391 522q0 155 -81 155q-62 0 -111 -82.5t-73 -200.5h253q12 81 12 128zM373 346h-255q-12 -91 -12 -150q0 -72 20 -123
t63 -51q34 0 64 28.5t52.5 77t39 103t28.5 115.5z" id="x1D703"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,8.525,16.25)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> on bullwhip effect for different <svg height="15.25" id="M135" style="vertical-align:-3.276pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.1625 15.25" width="16.1625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M559 163q-23 -66 -68 -163h-474l6 26q62 4 79.5 19.5t28.5 75.5l78 409q7 35 8.5 49t-8 25t-24 13t-51.5 5l5 28h266l-6 -28q-65 -5 -79.5 -18t-25.5 -74l-76 -406q-10 -57 14 -75q12 -13 96 -13q93 0 126 29q41 40 76 109z" id="x1D43F"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.763,15.187)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> under the MMSE.</table>

Abstract and Applied Analysis

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers 