A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers

<table>Impact of <svg height="12.175" id="M136" style="vertical-align:-3.56265pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.6374998 12.175" width="8.6374998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M478 372q0 -39 -31 -97t-61 -98t-78 -98q-45 -55 -73 -102q-13 -79 -13 -197q-11 -11 -43.5 -25.5t-53.5 -15.5l-15 17q5 35 26 101.5t47 123.5q8 72 -1.5 174.5t-37.5 178.5q-14 37 -29 37q-20 0 -67 -65l-25 21q37 60 73 90.5t63 30.5q47 0 72 -112q13 -56 17.5 -141.5
t0.5 -143.5h2q155 193 155 297q0 26 -12 47q-5 8 -5 15q0 16 12.5 27t29.5 11q21 0 34 -21t13 -55z" id="x1D6FE"></path></g>
</svg> on bullwhip effect for different <svg height="13.225" id="M137" style="vertical-align:-3.56265pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 11.2375 13.225" width="11.2375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,8.737)"><path d="M642 419q-50 -36 -71 -94q-28 -78 -68 -170q-39 -89 -114 -135q-34 -21 -83 -31l-45 -219l-31 -31q-8 7 -15 29.5t-2 45.5l35 172q-153 10 -153 169q0 28 6 84q7 68 7 88q0 48 -27 48q-18 0 -51 -28l-7 26q62 75 118 75q49 0 49 -90q0 -47 -5 -81q-10 -72 -10 -108
q0 -117 82 -133l87 455l62 19l7 -2l-99 -478q91 12 131 120q34 93 51 154q20 73 36 88q42 40 103 56z" id="x1D713"></path></g>
</svg> under the MMSE.</table>

Abstract and Applied Analysis

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers 