Malmquist Productivity Index by Extended VIKOR Method Using Interval Numbers

Table 9

Interval decision matrix in the second-time period (year of 2005).

	𝐶1	𝐶2	𝐶3	𝐶4	𝐶5	𝐶6
𝐵1	[7251, 8051]	[44563.8, 54563.8]	[4935, 6335]	[752, 852]	[8, 12]	[2352, 3352]
𝐵2	[1484, 2284]	[33516, 43516]	[2499, 3899]	[421, 521]	[11, 15]	[1225, 2225]
𝐵3	[3658, 4458]	[53125.99, 63125.99]	[1302, 2702]	[417, 517]	[11, 15]	[1113, 2113]
𝐵4	[130793, 131593]	[480171.2, 580171.2]	[19520, 20920]	[1269, 1369]	[9, 13]	[3664, 2664]
𝐵5	[7622, 8422]	[37934.05, 47934.05]	[8248, 9648]	[628, 738]	[9, 13]	[1223, 2223]
𝐵6	[1759, 2559]	[16936.4, 26936.4]	[1629, 3029]	[435, 535]	[5, 9]	[823, 1823]
𝐵7	[3108, 3908]	[31132.3, 41132.3]	[2213, 3613]	[254, 354]	[9, 13]	[1073, 2073]
𝐵8	[54207, 55007]	[890215.2, 900215]	[29595, 30995]	[532, 632]	[11, 15]	[5677, 4677]
𝐵9	[6219, 7019]	[58297.2, 68297.2]	[4277, 5677]	[387, 487]	[5, 9]	[1167, 2167]
𝐵10	[655, 1455]	[23010.35, 33010.35]	[2634, 4034]	[221, 321]	[7, 11]	[1151, 2151]