- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 238036, 29 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/238036

## On Positive Solutions of a Fourth Order Nonlinear Neutral Delay Difference Equation

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning 116029, China^{2}Department of Mathematics and RINS, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea^{3}Department of Mathematics, Dong-A University, Pusan 614-714, Republic of Korea

Received 19 August 2013; Accepted 17 December 2013; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editor: Adem Kılıçman

Copyright © 2014 Zeqing Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The existence results of uncountably many bounded positive solutions for a fourth order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation are proved by means of the Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem and Schauder’s fixed point theorem. A few examples are included.

#### 1. Introduction

In the past few decades, the researchers [1–31] and others studied oscillation, asymptotic behavior, and solvability for a lot of second and third order nonlinear difference equations, some of which are as follows:

By employing a few famous tools in nonlinear analysis including the nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type, Banach's fixed point theorem, Schauder's fixed point theorem, Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem, coincidence degree theory and critical point theory, the authors [3, 4, 9, 13–16, 18, 25, 27, 28] and others proved the existence of nonoscillatory solutions, uncountably many bounded nonoscillatory solutions and periodic solutions for the difference equations above, where Lipschitz conditions were used in [14, 16]. Recently, the authors [32] used the Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem to obtain -asymptotic stability results about the zero solution for a very general first order nonlinear neutral differential equation with functional delay.

However, to our knowledge, no one studied the following fourth order nonlinear neutral delay difference equation: where , , and are real sequences with for and with The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap in the literature and to study solvability of (2). Under certain conditions, we prove the existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions of (2) by means of the Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem and Schauder's fixed point theorem, respectively. Nine examples are included.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present some notations, definitions, and lemmas. In Section 3 we establish nine sufficient conditions which guarantee the existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions of (2) by using fixed point theorems and new techniques. In Section 4 we give nine examples to illustrate the effectiveness and applications of the results presented in Section 3.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we assume that and stand for the sets of all integers, positive integers, and nonnegative integers, respectively: denotes the forward different operator defined by and for . Let denote the Banach space of all bounded sequences on with norm: Obviously, , , and , are closed bounded and convex subsets of for any .

By a solution of (2), we mean a real sequence with a positive integer such that (2) is satisfied for all .

*Definition 1 (see [5]). *A subset of is said to be uniformly Cauchy (or equi-Cauchy) if for every there exists a positive integer such that
whenever for any .

Lemma 2 (see [5]). *Each bounded and uniformly Cauchy subset of is relatively compact.*

Lemma 3 (Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem). *Let be a Banach space, let be a bounded closed convex subset of , and let be mappings from into such that for every pair . If is a contraction and is completely continuous, then the equation
**
has a solution in .*

Lemma 4 (Schauder's fixed point theorem). *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach space , continuous, and relatively compact. Then has at least one fixed point in .*

Lemma 5. *Let , , , , and be nonnegative sequences. If
**
then
**
where denotes the integer part of number .*

*Proof. *Notice that
That is, (9) holds. This completes the proof.

#### 3. Existence of Uncountably Many Bounded Positive Solutions

Now we study the existence of uncountably many bounded positive solutions for (2) by using the Krasnoselskii's fixed point theorem and Schauder's fixed point theorem, respectively.

Theorem 6. *Assume that there exist constants , , , and with and and nonnegative sequences , , , and satisfying
**
Then (2) possesses uncountably many bounded positive solutions in .*

*Proof. *Set . It follows from (13) that there exists sufficiently large such that
Define two mappings and : by
for each .

Now we prove that
In view of (11), (12), and (14)–(16), we conclude that for any , , and ,
which yield that (17) hold

In order to prove that is completely continuous in , we have to show that is continuous in and is relatively compact. Suppose that is an arbitrary sequence in and with , where for each and . With the help of (12), (13), , and the continuity of , and , we know that for given , there exist , and with satisfying
where
By virtue of (16), (19), and (20), we get that
which means that is continuous in .

Next we prove that is uniformly Cauchy. It follows from (13) that for given , there exists satisfying
Using (16) and (22), we know that for any and ,
which yields that is uniformly Cauchy. It follows from Lemma 2 that is relatively compact. Consequently Lemma 3 guarantees that there exists satisfying , which together with (15) and (16) gives that
which yields that
which means that
that is, is a bounded positive solution of (2) in .

Finally we prove that (2) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in . Let and . For each , we conclude similarly that there exist a positive integer and two mappings and satisfying (14)–(16), where and are replaced by and , respectively, and has a fixed point , which is a bounded positive solution (2) in ; that is,

Equation (13) ensures that there exists some satisfying
Combining (11), (12), (28), and (29), we deduce that for any ,
which implies that
That is, . Thus (2) has uncountably many bounded positive solutions in . This completes the proof.

Theorem 7. *Assume that there exist constants , , , and with and and nonnegative sequences , , , and satisfying (12), (13), and
**
Then (2) possesses uncountably many bounded positive solutions in .*

*Proof. *Let . It follows from (13) that there exists sufficiently large such that
Let the mappings and be defined by (15) and (16), respectively. By means of (12), (15), (16), (32), and (33), we infer that for any , , and ,
that is, for any . The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 6 and is omitted. This completes the proof.

Theorem 8. *Assume that there exist constants , , , and with and and four nonnegative sequences , , , and satisfying (12), (13), and
**
Then (2) possesses uncountably many bounded positive solutions in .*

*Proof. *Let . It follows from (13) that there exists sufficiently large such that
Let the mappings and be defined by (15) and (16), respectively. Making use of (12), (15), (16), (35), and (36), we derive that for any , and ,
that is, for any . The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 6 and is omitted. This completes the proof.

Theorem 9. *Assume that there exist constants , , , and with and and nonnegative sequences , , , and satisfying (13):
**
Then (2) possesses uncountably many bounded positive solutions in .*

*Proof. *Let . It follows from (13) that there exists an integer satisfying
Define two mappings and by
for each . By means of (13) and (39)–(42), we get that for any , , and ,