About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 547683, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/547683
Research Article

Positive Periodic Solutions of Third-Order Ordinary Differential Equations with Delays

Department of Mathematics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received 24 October 2013; Accepted 30 December 2013; Published 20 February 2014

Academic Editor: Zhanbing Bai

Copyright © 2014 Yongxiang Li and Qiang Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The existence results of positive -periodic solutions are obtained for the third-order ordinary differential equation with delays where is -periodic function and is a continuous function which is -periodic in are positive constants. The discussion is based on the fixed-point index theory in cones.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we discuss the existence of positive -periodic solutions for the third-order ordinary differential equation with delays where is a -periodic function, is a continuous function, and is -periodic in , and are positive constants.

In recent years, the existence of periodic solutions for first-order and second-order delay differential equations has been researched by many authors; see [15] for the first-order equations and see [612] for the second-order ones. In some practice models, only positive periodic solutions are significant. In [3, 8, 9, 11, 12], the authors obtained the existence of positive periodic solutions for some first-order and second-order delay differential equations by using Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem of cone mapping. But, few people consider the existence of positive periodic solutions for third-order delay differential equations.

The third-order delay differential equations have their important physical contexts, for example, which can be formulated from the problem of the wave solution of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation with time delay. Recently, Zhao and Xu [13] pointed out that the KdV equation with time delay has more actual significance and they considered the solitary wave solution of the following KdV equation with time delay: where is a given constant and means the backward diffusion with time delay. They looked for a wave solution with and from (2) obtained the following third-order delay ordinary differential equation of the profile : Equation (3) is a special form of (1). If we look for a periodic wave solution of (2), we need to discuss the existence of the periodic solution of the delay ordinary differential equation (3). Hence, the existence problem of periodic solutions of the general third-order delay differential equation (1) is a significant topic.

For the third-order ordinary differential equations without delays, the existence of periodic solutions has been considered by several authors; see [1423] and references therein. Some theorems and methods of nonlinear functional analysis have been applied to research on this problem, such as the methods of topological degree and Leray-Schauder fixed-point theorem [14, 19], the upper and lower solutions method and monotone iterative technique [1517], the implicit function theorem [18], and Mawhin coincidence degree theory [20]. Especially, in recent years, the fixed-point theorem of Krasnoselskii’s cone expansion or compression type has been availably applied to some special third-order periodic boundary problems of ordinary differential equations, and some results of existence and multiplicity of positive periodic solutions have been obtained; see [21, 22]. In [21], Chu and Zhou considered the periodic boundary value problem for the third-order equation where is a constant and . Using the Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem in cones, they obtained the existence results of positive solutions. Their results extended the one obtained by the Schauder fixed-point theorem in [19]. In [22], by the Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem in cones, Feng established some existence and multiplicity results of positive periodic solutions for the third-order equation where and are positive constants and satisfy certain conditions. In [23], the present author extended and improved the results in [9, 10] to the general third-order equation that nonlinearity explicitly contains derivative terms and . However, all of these works are on the third-order equations without delays and the argument methods are not applicable to the delay equation (1).

Motivated by the facts mentioned above, we research the existence of positive periodic solutions of the third-order delay equation (1). We will use the fixed-point index theory in cones in a meticulous way to obtain the essential conditions on the existence of positive periodic solutions of (1). Our main results will be given in Section 3. Some preliminaries to discuss (1) are presented in Section 2.

2. Preliminaries

Let denote the Banach space of all continuous -periodic function with norm . Generally, for , we use to denote the Banach space of all th-order continuous differentiable -periodic function with the norm . Let denote the cone of all nonnegative functions in .

Let be a constant. For , we consider the existence of -periodic solution of the linear third-order differential equation It is easy to verify that the linear third-order boundary value problem has a unique solution. We denote the solution by  . By [16, Lemma 2.1], the -periodic solution of (7) can be expressed by . By [16, Lemma 2.1] or a direct calculation, we easily obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 1. Let . Then, for every , the linear equation (7) has a unique -periodic solution which is given by Moreover, is a completely continuous linear operator.

Lemma 2. Let . Then, the solution of the linear third-order boundary value (8) is positive on .

Proof. Let . It is easy to prove that the linear second-order boundary value problem has a unique solution which is given by and the linear first-order boundary value problem has a unique solution given by By a direct calculation, we can verify that is the unique solution of the linear third-order boundary value (8). When , and, by (11), on . Since on , from (14), we see that for every .

Let . Then, the solution of (8) for every . If and , by (9), the -periodic solution of (7) is positive. We will show that the -periodic solution has stronger positivity. Let where . Choose a cone in by We have the following lemma.

Lemma 3. Let . Then, for every , the -periodic solution of (7) .

Proof. Let and let . For every , from (9), it follows that and, therefore, Using (9) again, we obtain that For every , since we have Hence, .

Now, we consider the periodic solution problem of the linear third-order differential equation with variable coefficient Let be a positive -periodic function and satisfy the assumption and set Then, , and the conclusion of Lemma 3 holds. For (22), we have the following lemma:

Lemma 4. Let satisfy the assumption . Then, for every , the linear equation (22) has a unique -periodic solution . Moreover, is a completely continuous linear operator and .

Proof. Let and be the positive constants defined by (24) and let be the -periodic solution operator of (7) given by (9). By Lemma 3, , and is a positive linear bounded operator. We rewrite (22) into the form of Then, it is easy to see that the -periodic solution problem of (22) is equivalent to the operator equation in Banach space where is the identity operator in and is the product operator defined by which is a positive linear bounded operator. We prove that the norm of in satisfies .
For every and , by definition (9) of and the positivity of , we have Therefore, . By the arbitrariness of , we have .
Thus, has a bounded inverse operator given by the series Consequently, (26), equivalently (22), has a unique -periodic solution where By this and (29), we have Hence, can be expressed in the form of where which is a linear bounded operator from into . By Lemma 1, is completely continuous. Thus, from (33), we see that is a completely continuous linear operator.
By the positivity of and , from the expression (34) of , we see that is a positive linear operator. Hence, for every , . By (33) and Lemma 3, . Thus, .
The proof of Lemma 4 is completed.

Let be a continuous function. For every , set Then, is continuous. Now, we define a mapping by where is the periodic solution operator of (22). By Lemma 4, we have the following lemma.

Lemma 5. Let satisfy the assumption . Then, the operator defined by (36) is completely continuous.

By the definition of operator and Lemma 4, the positive -periodic solution of (1) is equivalent to the nonzero fixed point of . We will find the nonzero fixed point of by using the fixed-point index theory in cones.

We recall some concepts and conclusions on the fixed-point index in [15, 16]. Let be a Banach space and be a closed convex cone in . Assume is a bounded open subset of with boundary and . Let be a completely continuous mapping. If for any , then the fixed-point index has definition. One important fact is that if , then has a fixed point in . The following two lemmas in [24, 25] are needed in our argument.

Lemma 6. Let be a bounded open subset of with , and let be a completely continuous mapping. If for every and , then .

Lemma 7. Let be a bounded open subset of and let be a completely continuous mapping. If there exists an such that for every and , then .

In next section, we will use Lemma 6 and Lemma 7 to discuss the existence of positive -periodic solutions of (1).

3. Main Results

We consider the the existence of positive -periodic solutions of the third-order delay equation (1). Let satisfy the assumption and let be the positive constants defined by (24). Let , and be -periodic in . Let and be the constants defined by (15) and let . To be convenient, we introduce the notations Our main results are as follows.

Theorem 8. Let satisfy the assumption , let be continuous, and let be -periodic in . If satisfies the condition then (1) has at least one positive -periodic solution.

Theorem 9. Let satisfy the assumption , let be continuous, and let be -periodic in . If satisfies the condition then (1) has at least one positive -periodic solution.

In Theorem 8, the condition allows that is superlinear growth on , and . For the application, see Example 10. In Theorem 9, the condition allows sublinear growth on , and . See Example 11.

Proof of Theorem 8. Choose working space . Let be the cone in defined by (16) and let be the completely continuous operator defined by (36). Then, the positive -periodic solution of (1) is equivalent to nontrivial fixed point of . Let and set We show that the operator has a fixed point in when is small enough and is large enough.
By the assumption of and the definition of , there exist and , such that Let . We now prove that satisfies the condition of Lemma 6 in ; namely, for every and . In fact, if there exist and such that , since , by Lemma 4 and the definition of and , satisfies the delay differential equation Since , by the definitions of and , we have Hence, from (41), it follows that By this inequality and (42), we have Integrating both sides of this inequality from to and using the periodicity of , we have Hence, we obtain that Since , from (47), it follows that , which is a contradiction. Hence, satisfies the condition of Lemma 6 in . By Lemma 6, we have
On the other hand, since , by the definition of , there exist and such that Choose and . Clearly, . We show that satisfies the condition of Lemma 7 in ; namely, for every and . In fact, if there exist and such that , since , by Lemma 4 and the definition of and , satisfies the differential equation Since , by the definition of and , we have By the latter inequalities of (51), we have These inequalities mean that Hence, we obtain that By (54) and the former inequality of (51), we have From this, the latter inequalities of (51) and (49), it follows that By this inequality and (50), we have Integrating this inequality on and using the periodicity of , we have Hence, we obtain that Since , from (59), it follows that , which is a contradiction. This means that satisfies the condition of Lemma 7 in . By Lemma 7,
Now, by the additivity of fixed-point index, (48), and (60), we have Hence, has a fixed point in , which is a positive -periodic solution of (1).

Proof of Theorem 9. Let be defined by (40). We prove that the operator defined by (36) has a fixed point in if is small enough and is large enough.
By the assumption of and the definition of , there exist and , such that Let and let . We prove that satisfies the condition of Lemma 7 in ; namely, for every and . In fact, if there exist and such that , since , by Lemma 4 and the definition of and satisfies the differential equation Since , by the definitions of and , satisfies (43). From (43) and (62), we see that From this and (63), it follows that Integrating this inequality on and using the periodicity of , we have Consequently, Since , from (67), it follows that , which is a contradiction. Hence, satisfies the condition of Lemma 7 in . By Lemma 7, we have
Since , by the definition of , there exist and such that Choosing , we show that satisfies the condition of Lemma 6 in ; namely, for every and . In fact, if there exist and such that , since , by Lemma 4 and the definition of and satisfies the differential equation Since , by the definition of satisfies (51). By (51) we can show that satisfies (54). By (51) and (54), we have, Since satisfies (51) and (71), from (69), it follows that By this and (70), we have Integrating this inequality on and using the periodicity of , we obtain that Hence, we have Since , from (75), it follows that , which is a contradiction. This means that satisfies the condition of Lemma 6 in . By Lemma 6,
Now, from (68) and (76), it follows that Hence, has a fixed point in , which is a positive -periodic solution of (1).

Example 10. Consider the superlinear third-order delay differential equation where , , and satisfy the conditions It is easy to verify that satisfies the assumption for and satisfies the assumption with and . Hence, by Theorem 8, (78) has at least one positive -periodic solution.

Example 11. Consider the third-order delay differential equation where ,  , and are positive -periodic functions. It is easy to verify that satisfies the assumption for . Let Then, and . Hence, satisfies the assumption . By Theorem 9, (81) has at least one positive -periodic solution.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by NNSFs of China (11261053, 11061031) and the NSF of Gansu Province (1208RJZA129).

References

  1. H. I. Freedman and J. H. Wu, “Periodic solutions of single-species models with periodic delay,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 689–701, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. L. Hatvani and T. Krisztin, “On the existence of periodic solutions for linear inhomogeneous and quasilinear functional-differential equations,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. A. Wan, D. Jiang, and X. Xu, “A new existence theory for positive periodic solutions to functional differential equations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 47, no. 8-9, pp. 1257–1262, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. S. Kang and G. Zhang, “Existence of nontrivial periodic solutions for first order functional differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. Y. Luo, W. Wang, and J. Shen, “Existence of positive periodic solutions for two kinds of neutral functional differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 581–587, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. J.-W. Li and S. S. Cheng, “Periodic solutions of a second order forced sublinear differential equation with delay,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1373–1380, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. Y. Wang, H. Lian, and W. Ge, “Periodic solutions for a second order nonlinear functional differential equation,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. J. Wu and Z. Wang, “Two periodic solutions of second-order neutral functional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 329, no. 1, pp. 677–689, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. Y. Wu, “Existence nonexistence and multiplicity of periodic solutions for a kind of functional differential equation with parameter,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 433–443, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. C. Guo and Z. Guo, “Existence of multiple periodic solutions for a class of second-order delay differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Real World Applications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 3285–3297, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. W.-S. Cheung, J. Ren, and W. Han, “Positive periodic solution of second-order neutral functional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 3948–3955, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. Y. Li, “Positive periodic solutions of second-order differential equations with delays,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 829783, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. Z. Zhao and Y. Xu, “Solitary waves for Korteweg-de Vries equation with small delay,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 368, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. A. R. Aftabizadeh, J.-M. Xu, and C. P. Gupta, “Periodic boundary value problems for third order ordinary differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. P. Omari and M. Trombetta, “Remarks on the lower and upper solutions method for second- and third-order periodic boundary value problems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. A. Cabada, “The method of lower and upper solutions for second, third, fourth, and higher order boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 302–320, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. A. Cabada, “The method of lower and upper solutions for third-order periodic boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 568–589, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. B. Mehri and M. Niksirat, “On the existence of periodic solutions for the quasi-linear third-order differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 159–167, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. L. Kong, S. Wang, and J. Wang, “Positive solution of a singular nonlinear third-order periodic boundary value problem,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 247–253, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. P. Amster, P. De Nápoli, and M. C. Mariani, “Periodic solutions of a resonant third-order equation,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 399–410, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. J. Chu and Z. Zhou, “Positive solutions for singular non-linear third-order periodic boundary value problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1528–1542, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. Y. Feng, “On the existence and multiplicity of positive periodic solutions of a nonlinear third-order equation,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1220–1224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. Y. Li, “Positive periodic solutions for fully third-order ordinary differential equations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 3464–3471, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. K. Deimling, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1985. View at MathSciNet
  25. D. J. Guo and V. Lakshmikantham, Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1988. View at MathSciNet