Wind Power Assessment Based on a WRF Wind Simulation with Developed Power Curve Modeling Methods

Table 2

Performance comparison between the WRF-SLFN and the four pdf-SLFN methods.

		RE of wind power assessment
		0–10 MW	10–20 MW	20–30 MW	30–40 MW	40–50 MW	Total
Site 1	Weibull-SLFN	0.22	0.35	0.73	1.06	−0.41	−0.28
	Rayleigh-SLFN	0.38	0.71	0.75	0.61	−0.66	−0.23
	Gamma-SLFN	0.54	0.49	0.46	0.32	−0.53	−0.15
	Lognormal-SLFN	0.04	0.66	1.51	1.36	−0.19	−0.56
	WRF-SLFN	0.40	0.99	0.56	0.05	−0.86	−0.09
		0–20 MW	20–40 MW	40–60 MW	60–80 MW	80–100 MW	Total
Site 2	Weibull-SLFN	0.40	0.50	0.32	1.27	−1.00	−0.19
	Rayleigh-SLFN	0.40	0.81	0.59	0.71	−1.00	−0.19
	Gamma-SLFN	0.71	0.65	0.23	0.41	−0.70	−0.14
	Lognormal-SLFN	0.13	0.70	0.86	1.30	−0.81	−0.37
	WRF-SLFN	0.44	1.07	0.46	−0.03	−0.85	−0.10
		0–10 MW	10–20 MW	20–30 MW	30–40 MW	40–50 MW	Total
Site 3	Weibull-SLFN	0.62	0.34	1.15	0.99	−1.00	−0.20
	Rayleigh-SLFN	0.72	0.63	1.40	0.42	−1.00	−0.18
	Gamma-SLFN	0.77	0.54	1.29	0.37	−1.00	−0.14
	Lognormal-SLFN	0.29	0.56	2.10	1.07	−0.89	−0.40
	WRF-SLFN	0.76	1.02	0.60	0.57	−0.85	−0.20