Revisiting Blasius Flow by Fixed Point Method

Table 3

Comparison of 𝑓^′ between FPM (𝜆=1/5) and Howarth.

𝜂	𝑓^′
	FPM			Howarth; [21]
	𝑛=50	𝑛=200	𝑛=800
0	0.	0.	0.	0
0.2	0.06644347995228	0.06640775477474	0.06640779209625	0.06641
0.4	0.1328378289536	0.1327640864649	0.1327641607610	0.13277
0.6	0.1990509318305	0.1989371417431	0.1989372524222	0.19894
0.8	0.2648643497350	0.2647089925007	0.2647091387231	0.26471
1.0	0.3299775414929	0.3297798506391	0.3297800312497	0.32979
1.2	0.3940157297864	0.3937758909492	0.3937761044339	0.39378
1.4	0.4565422496657	0.4562615202332	0.4562617647051	0.45627
1.6	0.5170757864638	0.5167565112060	0.5167567844226	0.51676
1.8	0.5751123265865	0.5747578444754	0.5747581438894	0.57477
2	0.6301509546266	0.6297654136655	0.6297657365024	0.62977
3	0.8465117311855	0.8460440464746	0.8460444436580	0.84605
4	0.9559675373580	0.9555178143322	0.9555182298107	0.95552
5	0.9919283302451	0.9915414951870	0.9915419001644	0.99155
6	0.9993091537696	0.9989724827440	0.9989728724358	0.99898
7	1.000215077512	0.9999212208137	0.9999216041479	0.99992
8	1.000195058002	0.9999958903313	0.9999962745353	1.00000
10	1.000231913519	0.9999996129000	0.9999999980154	/
15	1.000224523350	0.9999996133026	1.000000000000	/
20	0.9997789079310	0.9999996166005	1.000000000000	/