About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Artificial Neural Systems
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 453169, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/453169
Research Article

Early FDI Based on Residuals Design According to the Analysis of Models of Faults: Application to DAMADICS

1Department of Control Engineering, University of Mohamed Khider, Biskra 07000, Algeria
2Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control Research Group (GREAH), University of Le Havre, 25 rue Philippe Lebon, 76058 Le Havre, France
3Department of Electronics, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba 23000, Algeria

Received 10 May 2011; Revised 29 June 2011; Accepted 19 July 2011

Academic Editor: Paolo Gastaldo

Copyright © 2011 Yahia Kourd et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Korbicz, J. M. Koscielny, Z. Kowalczuk, and W. Cholewa, Fault Diagnosis. Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  2. R. J. Patton and J. Chen, “On eigenstructure assignment for robust fault diagnosis,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 1193–1208, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. R. Scola, R. Nikoukah, and F. Delebecque, “Test signal design for failure detection: a linear programming approach,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 515–526, 2003.
  4. M. Witczak, Modeling and Estimation Strategies for Fault Diagnosis of Non-Linear Systems. From Analytical to Soft Computing Approaches, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007.
  5. E. Delaleau, J. P. Louis, and R. Ortega, “Modeling and control of induction motors,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105–129, 2001.
  6. T. Soderstrom, et al., System Identification, Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK, 1989.
  7. T. Bouthiba, “Fault location in ehv transmission lines using artificial neural networks,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2004.
  8. M. Mrugalski, M. Witczak, and J. Korbicz, “Confidence estimation of the multi-layer perceptron and its application in fault detection systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 895–906, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. M. Gupta, Static and Dynamic Neural Networks, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.
  10. O. Nelles, Non-Linear Systems Identification. From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
  11. S. C. Tan, C. P. Lim, and M. V. C. Rao, “A hybrid neural network model for rule generation and its application to process fault detection and diagnosis,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. V. Uraikul, C. W. Chan, and P. Tontiwachwuthikul, “Artificial intelligence for monitoring and supervisory control of process systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–131, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Vieira, F. M. Dias, and A. Mota, “Artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy systems for modelling and controlling real systems: a comparative study,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 265–273, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Michal, R. Patton, M. Syfert, S. de las Heras, and J. Quevedo, “Introduction to the DAMADICS actuator FDI benchmark study,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 577–596, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Isermann, “Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis—status and applications,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Isermann, Fault-Diagnosis Systems. An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  17. J. C. Yang and D. W. Clarke, “The self-validating actuator,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 249–260, 1999. View at Scopus
  18. M. Henry, “Plant asset management via intelligent sensors digital, distributed and for free,” Computing and Control Engineering Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 211–213, 2000. View at Scopus
  19. M. Tombs, “Intelligent and self-validating sensors and actuators,” Computing and Control Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 218–220, 2002.
  20. J. B. Gomm, D. L. Yu, and D. Williams, “Sensor fault diagnosis in a chemical process via RBF neural networks,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 1999. View at Scopus
  21. L. Yaguol, H. Zhengjia, and Z. Yahyang, “A new approach to intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1593–1600, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. T. Mok and C. W. Chan, “Online fault detection and isolation of nonlinear systems based on neurofuzzy networks,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–181, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Zhao, J. Huang, and W. Sun, “On-line early fault detection and diagnosis of municipal solid waste incinerators,” Waste Management, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2406–2414, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. H. Hjalmarsson, A. Juditsky, J. Sjöberg et al., “Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview,” Automatica, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1691–1724, 1995.
  25. Y. Kourd, N. Guersi, and D. Lefebvre, “A two stages diagnosis method with neuronal networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering Design and Technologies (ICEEDT '08), Hammamet, Tunisie, 2008.
  26. Y. Kourd, N. Guersi, and D. Lefebvre, “A two stages diagnosis method with Neuro-fuzzy approach,” in Proceedings of the 6th Conférence Internationale Francophone d'Automatique, Nancy, France, 2010.
  27. Y. Kourd, N. Guersi, and D. Lefebvre, “Neuro-fuzzy approach for fault diagnosis: application to the DAMADICS,” in Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO '10), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 2010.
  28. M. Blanke, M. Kinnaert, J. Lunze, and M. Staroswiecki, Diagnosis and Fault Tolerant Control, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  29. D. Lefebvre, H. Chafouk, and M. Lebbal, Modélisation et Diagnostic des Systèmes. Une Approche Hybride, Éditions universitaires européennes, 2010.
  30. K. Patan and T. Parisini, “Identification of neural dynamic models for fault detection and isolation: the case of a real sugar evaporation process,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. M. Kościelny, M. Bartyś, P. Rzepiejewski, and J. Sá da Costa, “Actuator fault distinguishability study for the DAMADICS benchmark problem,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 645–652, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. DAMADICS, 2002, http://diag.mchtr.pw.edu.pl/damadics/.