190359.fig.001a
(a) Paradigm state t-test
190359.fig.001b
(b) SPM t-test
190359.fig.001c
(c) 2-state HMM Viterbi path t-test
190359.fig.001d
(d) Paradigm state KLD map
190359.fig.001e
(e) SPM F-test map
190359.fig.001f
(f) 2-state HMM Viterbi path KLD
Figure 1: (a), (b), and (c) are t-test map for paradigm-defined state, SPM method, and 2-state HMM Viterbi path map respectively; (d), (e), and (f) are KLD map for paradigm defined state, SPM F-test, and 2-state HMM Viterbi path KLD map, respectively. The HMM Viterbi path methods (c) and (f) produce more compact and clearly highlighted regions than paradigm state estimation (a) and (d); HMM Viterbi path methods perform similarly to SPM with some minor differences.