About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Bioinformatics
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 457578, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/457578
Research Article

Computational Design of a DNA- and Fc-Binding Fusion Protein

1Department of Bioinformatics, Center for Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraβe 1-5, 45117 Essen, Germany
2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Piazza d'Armi, 09123 Cagliari, Italy

Received 29 April 2011; Revised 16 June 2011; Accepted 22 June 2011

Academic Editor: Shandar Ahmad

Copyright © 2011 Jonas Winkler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Surez and A. Jaramillo, “Challenges in the computational design of proteins,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 6, supplement 4, pp. S477–S491, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. A. Alexander, Y. He, Y. Chen, J. Orban, and P. N. Bryan, “The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 29, pp. 11963–11968, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. A. Koppensteiner, P. Lackner, M. Wiederstein, et al., “Characterization of novel proteins based on known protein structures,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 296, no. 4, pp. 1139–1152, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Gronwald, T. Hohm, and D. Hoffmann, “Evolutionary Pareto-optimization of stably folding peptides,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 9, article 109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Suarez, P. Tortosa, M. M. Garcia-Mira et al., “Using multi-objective computational design to extend protein promiscuity,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 147, no. 1-2, pp. 13–19, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Chen, A. L. Devries, and C. H. Cheng, “Convergent evolution of antifreeze glycoproteins in Antarctic notothenioid fish and Arctic cod,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 3817–3822, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. B. G. Moorhead, V. De Wever, G. Templeton, et al., “Evolution of protein phosphatases in plants and animals,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 417, no. 2, pp. 401–409, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Schilling, C. Wasternack, and H. U. Demuth, “Glutaminyl cyclases from animals and plants: a case of functionally convergent protein evolution,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 389, no. 8, pp. 983–991, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. McKnight, D. S. Doering, P. T. Matsudaira, and P. S. Kim, “A thermostable 35-residue subdomain within villin headpiece,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 260, no. 2, pp. 126–134, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. A. K. Ong, H. H. Lin, Y. Z. Chen, et al., “Efficacy of different protein descriptors in predicting protein functional families,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 8, article 300, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Heider, J. Appelmann, T. Bayro et al., “A computational approach for the identification of small GTpases based on preprocessed amino acid sequences,” Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 333–341, 2009. View at Scopus
  12. D. Heider, S. Hauke, M. Pyka, et al., “Insights into the classification of small GTPases,” Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry, vol. 3, pp. 15–24, 2010.
  13. J. N. Dybowski, D. Heider, and D. Hoffmann, “Prediction of co-receptor usage of HIV-1 from genotype,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e1000743, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Heider, J. Verheyen, and D. Hoffmann, “Predicting Bevirimat resistance of HIV-1 from genotype,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, article 37, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Graille, E. A. Stura, A. L. Corper et al., “Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein A domain complexed with the Fab fragment of a human IgM antibody: Structural basis for recognition of B-cell receptors and superantigen activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 5399–5404, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Högbom, M. Eklund, P. Nygren, et al., “Structural basis for recognition by an in vitro evolved affibody,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 3191–3196, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. C. Ma, M. A. Rould, H. Weintraub, et al., “Crystal structure of MyoD bHLH domain-DNA complex: perspectives on DNA recognition and implications for transcriptional activation,” Cell, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 451–459, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Yin, F. Ding, and N. V. Dokholyan, “Modeling backbone exibility improves protein stability estimation,” Structure, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1567–1576, 2007.
  19. G. Armano, F. Ledda, and E. Vargiu, “Sum-linear blosum: a novel protein encoding method for secondary structure prediction,” Communications of SIWN, vol. 6, pp. 71–77, 2009.
  20. D. T. Jones, “Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. The UniProt Consortium, “The universal protein resource (UniProt) in 2010,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, pp. D142–D148, 2010.
  22. T. F. Smith and M. S. Waterman, “Identification of common molecular subsequences,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 195–197, 1981. View at Scopus
  23. J. Kyte and R. F. Doolittle, “A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 105–132, 1982. View at Scopus
  24. B. Hess, C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, et al., “GRGMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 435–447, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. A. Case, T. A. Darden, T. E. Cheatham, et al., AMBER 10, University of California, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2008.
  26. S. H. Northrup, S. A. Allison, and J. A. McCammon, “Brownian dynamics simulation of diffusion-influenced bimolecular reactions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1517–1524, 1984. View at Scopus
  27. N. M. Luscombe, R. A. Laskowski, and J. M. Thornton, “Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2860–2874, 2001. View at Scopus