Table 2: Comparison of hybrid HPSO-SA algorithm with TL-PSO approach [8].

Mean Best Worst

𝐹 𝑢 𝑛 𝑐 𝑡 𝑖 𝑜 𝑛 TL-PSOHPSO-SA TL-PSOHPSO-SA TL-PSOHPSO-SA
𝑅 𝑎 𝑠 𝑡 𝑟 𝑖 𝑔 𝑖 𝑛 8 . 7 1 6 1 𝟓 . 𝟐 𝟑 𝟎 𝟑 𝟒 𝐞 𝟎 𝟓 4 . 0 5 8 9 𝟒 . 𝟑 𝟓 𝟗 𝟗 𝟒 𝐞 𝟎 𝟗 1 7 . 0 5 3 𝟖 . 𝟏 𝟓 𝟖 𝟑 𝟓 𝐞 𝟎 𝟒
𝑆 𝑐 𝑤 𝑒 𝑓 𝑒 𝑙 4 4 5 . 8 8 3 0 𝟐 𝟎 𝟔 . 𝟔 𝟗 𝟑 𝟐 𝟓 𝟓 0 . 6 7 4 8 𝟎 8 2 9 . 4 4 3 1 𝟑 𝟓 𝟓 . 𝟑 𝟏 𝟖
𝐺 𝑟 𝑖 𝑒 𝑤 𝑎 𝑛 𝑘 0 . 0 2 2 8 𝟏 . 𝟏 𝟖 𝟐 𝟗 𝟒 𝐞 𝟎 𝟑 1 . 0 5 0 7 𝑒 5 𝟏 . 𝟐 𝟐 𝟗 𝟗 𝐞 𝟏 𝟓 0 . 0 7 3 9 𝟎 . 𝟎 𝟏 𝟕 𝟐 𝟐 𝟔 𝟑
𝑅 𝑜 𝑠 𝑒 𝑛 𝑏 𝑟 𝑜 𝑐 𝑘 1 9 . 5 5 8 0 𝟎 . 𝟓 𝟖 𝟑 𝟓 𝟗 𝟕 𝟒 𝟐 0 . 1 3 3 1 𝟎 . 𝟎 𝟒 𝟒 𝟐 𝟔 𝟐 𝟓 7 1 . 5 4 3 9 𝟏 . 𝟑 𝟔 𝟏 𝟕 𝟏