A New Self-Assessment “TQM Hybrid MCDM Fuzzy Model” For Enhancing the KPIs in Mega Universities

Table 1

Survey of some of the advanced MCDM hybrid methods and objectives.

Method	Objective	References
VIKOR-fuzzy AHP	Selecting the best marketing strategy	Mohaghar et al. [24]
Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS	Developing personnel prioritization	Malik [42]
FDEMATEL-ANP-AHP in the strategic model SWOT	Developing and prioritizing medical tourism development strategies in the metropolitan area	Taghvaei and Goodarzi [25]
FMCGDSS three ranking methods	Selecting the best information system manager	Chen, and Cheng [26]
Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS	Evaluating the e-service quality of internet-based banking alternatives to obtain the best-qualified alternative	Ozdagoglu and Guler [27]
Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS	Selecting the best supplier	Jain et al. [28]
Delphi and fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS	Weighting criteria and prioritizing heat stress indices in surface mining	Asghari, et al. [29]
Fuzzy DEMATEL-AHP-VIKOR	Selecting the best strategy for investing	Mobini and Yazdani [30]
Fuzzy ANP-DEMATEL-VIKOR-TOPSIS	Ranking hospitals	Ali Mohammadian and Shafiei [31]
Hybridized DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS model modified by using the interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS)	Selecting the air traffic control (ATC) radar position that provides a successfully fulfilled role of radar in air traffic management	Petrovic and Kankaras [32]
F-DEMATEL-FAHP-FVIKOR	Selecting the best hospital nurses of the year regarding to some qualitative and quantitative criteria	Taati and Esmaili Dooki [33]
AHP—ELECTRE	Ranking departments based on performance	Şenel, Rouyendegh & Demir [34]
AHP—DEA—AHCA	Categorizing and ranking departments in terms of success groups created by clustering analyses	Şene, Rouyendegh & Tekin, [35]
FAHP-FDEMATEL-FVIKOR	Selecting and prioritizing the best TQM-KPIs in MU	Present study