About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 164916, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/164916
Review Article

Spin-Lattice Coupling and Superconductivity in Fe Pnictides

1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Joint Institute for Neutron Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
3Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
4Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany

Received 19 July 2009; Revised 25 October 2009; Accepted 22 December 2009

Academic Editor: Igor Mazin

Copyright © 2010 T. Egami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We consider strong spin-lattice and spin-phonon coupling in iron pnictides and discuss its implications on superconductivity. Strong magneto-volume effect in iron compounds has long been known as the Invar effect. Fe pnictides also exhibit this effect, reflected in particular on the dependence of the magnetic moment on the atomic volume of Fe defined by the positions of the nearest neighbor atoms. Through the phenomenological Landau theory, developed on the basis of the calculations by the density functional theory (DFT) and the experimental results, we quantify the strength of the spin-lattice interaction as it relates to the Stoner criterion for the onset of magnetism. We suggest that the coupling between electrons and phonons through the spin channel may be sufficiently strong to be an important part of the superconductivity mechanism in Fe pnictides.

1. Introduction

Recent discovery of superconductivity in Fe pnictides [1] with the critical temperature up to 55 K [2] caused enormous excitement in the field, for various reasons. First, this is the first noncuprate family of superconductors with above 40 K. Second, superconductivity appears when the antiferromagnetic (AFM) order is suppressed by doping [3], just as in the cuprates. Third, unlike the cuprates, strong electron correlations are not observed by spectroscopy [4], suggesting that the Mott physics may not be a necessary ingredient for the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. Finally, there is a large family of similar compounds that show superconductivity, making experimental research less restricted by chemical or materials issues. The field is making surprisingly fast development, partly because of the accumulated experience of working on the cuprates. It is possible that the origin of thesuperconductivity in this family of compounds may be easier to identify than for the cuprates, and the success of solving this problem hopefully will facilitate understanding of the cuprate problem.

Even though the AFM order is suppressed by doping, spins are active in the doped Fe pnictide superconductors. Again, just as in the cuprates strong magnetic excitations, including the so-called resonance peak, are observed by inelastic neutron scattering [58]. Core level spectroscopy is consistent with the local Fe moment of about [4]. Interestingly, the density functional theory (DFT) calculations always predict the magnetic ground state (AFM or incommensurate order) for the experimental lattice constants [912]. The phonon dispersions observed by inelastic X-ray scattering are consistent with the DFT calculations only when the magnetic ground state is assumed [13]. Only in the collapsed phase of , in which the -axis lattice constant is reduced by as much as 10% compared to the magnetic state, does the material become truly spin-degenerate [14]. All these observations strongly suggest that the superconducting samples are locally and dynamically spin-polarized, and show strong dynamic Fe spin fluctuations. Although we do not have precise knowledge of their spin dynamics, judged from the absence of strong quasielastic scattering in neutron scattering with energy resolution of 1 meV, the time-scale of fluctuation must not be slower than 1 ps. This result supports the view that spins are involved in the mechanism of superconductivity, for instance though the spin-fluctuation mechanism [1517].

However, there are many puzzling, important questions that need to be answered before addressing the question of the mechanism: the first puzzle is the effect of doping. In the cuprates, doping is necessary for introducing mobile charge carriers, since the parent compounds are Mott-Hubbard insulators. In Fe pnictides, on the other hand, the parent compounds are already metallic, and doping does not appear to change the charge carrier density very much [9]. Rather, the main effect of doping is to suppress the AFM ground state. In the pnictide parent compounds strongly two-dimensional spin fluctuations are observed above [18], just as in the superconducting Fe pnictides [6, 8]. However, whereas the LaFeAsO type compounds are strongly two-dimensional [10], type compounds are much more three-dimensional [19]. The second curious behavior is that the observed magnetic moment on the AFM phase varies from a compound to compound, but is always significantly smaller than predicted by the DFT calculations [1012]. Third, there is an interesting interplay between both the lattice and magnetism [20], and the lattice and superconductivity [21, 22]. In this article, we focus on the third point, that of the lattice effect. For the purpose of highlighting the essence of the effect, we use simple approximations, namely the Landau theory and the Stoner theory, using the results of the LDA calculations as a guide. We argue that through the spin-lattice coupling effect the lattice may play a much larger role than generally acknowledged in determining the properties of Fe pnictides, possibly including even the superconductivity.

2. Magneto-Volume Effect in Fe Pnictides

2.1. Dependence of Fe Moment on the Structure

It has long been known that the magnetic moment of transition metals depends on volume [23]. Because of the Pauli exclusion principle, the electron kinetic energy of the spin-polarized state is higher for parallel spins if the volume is the same, and volume expansion relaxes the kinetic energy. In some iron alloys, thermal volume expansion due to lattice anharmonicity cancels the decrease in volume associated in the decrease in spin-splitting, resulting in zero thermal expansion, widely known as the Invar behavior. The negative or zero thermal expansion is indeed observed for PrFeAsO [24]. The collapsed phase of is a dramatic case of such a magneto-volume effect. This compound shows AFM order below 140 K, but with the pressure of 0.4 GPa it undergoes the first-order phase transition into a nonmagnetic phase with the reduction in volume of 5% [14].

In Fe pnictides, layers of Fe atoms are sandwiched by layers of pnictide such as As or P [1]. Thus if the layer-layer distance of pnictide is changed, the magnetic moment of Fe is strongly affected. This coupling of the Fe moment to the pnictide position in the lattice was recognized early by the DFT calculations [9, 20]. Figure 1 shows the calculated dependence of the Fe moment in on the separation between the As layer and the Fe layer . The calculations were done within virtual crystal approximation (VCA) and local density approximation (LDA) with general potential linearized augmented plane-wave (LAPW) method [25], including local orbitals [26]. LAPW sphere radii of , where is Bohr radius, were used for Ba, Fe, and As, respectively. To account for Co doping, an electron number of 26.08 was used for Fe. We used the experimentally reported tetragonal lattice parameters (a = 3.9625 Å, c = 13.0168 Å) [27]. In the calculated result, clearly there is a quantum critical point (QCP) for magnetism near as shown in Figure 1. The local exchange interaction is strong enough to spin-split the band by overcoming the kinetic energy cost only for . We obtain similar results from the calculation on undoped . Compared also with other data [12, 20], the relation between and Fe moment M appears to be rather insensitive to compositions, and the relation shown in Figure 1 appears to be a nearly universal property of the FeAs triple layer. This must be because the in-plane lattice constant, thus the Fe-Fe distance, is very similar within ±1% among many Fe pnictide compounds. Thus the parameter , the As-Fe layer separation, is a good common measure of the magneto-volume effect. For instance, in the collapsed phase of the value of is [14], close to the value of in Figure 1.

164916.fig.001
Figure 1: The magnetic moment, , as a function of the Fe-As layer separation, , calculated for . The solid curve is a fit by (3).
2.2. Landau Theory

Let us develop a Landau-type theory to describe the dependence of the local magnetic moment, M, on the As-Fe layer separation, . We may write the magnetic free energy as

where is the spin-lattice interaction energy expanded by , where is negative only for . We retain only the terms with even powers of M because of the symmetry. We set so that is the critical point. By minimizing with respect to M we obtain, The dashed line in Figure 1 gives the fit of this equation to the calculated moment. From this fit we obtain , and . In the QCP is hidden because the nature of the transition is strongly first order. In the vicinity of the moment is proportional to .

Recently, the magnetic moment was experimentally determined for the series of compounds, [28]. Because As and P are isovalent, the replacement of As by P does not dope carriers to the system, but merely change the Fe(As/P) layer separation. Indeed (3) fits the results nicely as shown in Figure 2 [29]. Since the range of is relatively, small was neglected. The fit to the data gave . Theoretical calculations for the CeFe(As,P)O system are in progress. Note that in the calculation presented in Figure 1, the lattice is assumed to be static. In reality, however, the zero-point phonons are present, with the amplitude of the order of 0.1 Å. This should shift the critical point upward, in better agreement with the data in Figure 2.

164916.fig.002
Figure 2: Dependence of the experimentally determined magnetic moment on the Fe-As layer separation for CeFe(As,P)O (open circles) [28], and the fit by (3) (solid curve).
2.3. Phonon Softening

We now add the lattice elastic energy in order to consider the phonon softening due to the magneto-volume effect. The phonon to be considered here is the As Raman mode, in which As layers move against each other along the -axis, either toward or away from the Fe layer. The magneto-elastic free energy is By minimizing with respect to we obtain the As position, , Then by taking the second derivative we obtain the elastic stiffness renormalized by the spin-lattice interaction, As shown in Figure 3, allowing spin polarization softens the As Raman phonon frequency by 15% at . This effect was noted earlier [12], and agrees with the experimental observations [13]. Note that the energy minimum of the DFT calculation systematically underestimates the lattice constant. Thus we obtain, , , and . The value of is in good agreement with the LDA calculation after correcting for the systematic underestimation), proving the internal consistency. Thus this theory elucidates how the magneto-volume interaction, (2) can induce magnetization as a function of the As-Fe layer separation, and softening of the As Raman phonon mode.

164916.fig.003
Figure 3: Electron energy as a function of the Fe-As layer separation is calculated by LDA for , with spin polarization; the elastic constant is reduced by 29% compared to the state without spin polarization, accounting for the phonon softening by 15% due to spin polarization.

3. Generalized Stoner Condition

We now turn our attention to the Fe band splitting. We start with the classical Stoner theory of itinerant ferromagnetism [30], and generalize it to an antiferromagnet [3133]. Even though more complex and accurate DFT calculations can be made, this is a useful exercise for simplicity and clarity of logic. In the Stoner theory the electron energy is given by

where is the electron density of states for up spins, is the density of electrons with up spin, and is the energy of an electron with up spin. Magnetization is given by . If we start with the nonmagnetic state and introduce a small spin splitting by shifting the up spin by , the energy changes

which gives the Stoner criterion,

Near the Stoner QCP,

thus

and in (1),

Thus at the QCP.

In the case of an antiferromagnet, the same argument can be constructed for the staggered spin-split bands, except that the exchange energy term I includes the kinetic energy cost for modulating the spin split band by [32, 33]. Therefore, we can interpret as the generalized Stoner QCP. In general for a spin density wave (SDW) ordering with , within the random phase approximation (RPA), the magnetic moment above the SDW ordering temperature is given by

where is the SDW amplitude, is the generalized bare susceptibility, and is the SDW mean-field [31]. Thus the generalized Stoner condition is given by [3133]

Note that , which recovers the Stoner condition for ferromagnetism. Now the effect of lattice strain is to modify the generalized Stoner condition. For instance, reducing the As-Fe separation increases the bandwidth, thus decreases the generalized susceptibility. This brings the system closer to the Stoner QCP, and reduces the magnetic moment. Because the Fe pnictides are close to the Stoner QCP, even a small lattice strain, including phonons, can have very significant effects. Similarly, the in-plane Fe phonon mode that is relevant to the tetragonal-orthorhombic structural phase transition could also be important to the magnetism of Fe pnictides. The strong anisotropy of the spin exchange in the Fe plane [34] is indicative of the strong spin-lattice coupling in the Fe plane.

4. Relation to Superconductivity

One of the most intriguing lattice effects on the superconductivity of Fe pnictides is the dependence of the critical temperature, , on the geometry of the tetrahedron [21, 22]. Data show that is strongly related to the As-Fe-As angle. Because the As-Fe-As angle is directly related to the Fe-As layer separation, , in Figure 4, we plotted as a function of , using the published results of crystallographic analysis. The results are shown also in Table 1, with references for the data. Clearly the behavior above is different from that below . Above is not much dependent on , whereas there is strong dependence below. It is possible that the systems with are regular BCS superconductors, and the enhancement is present only for . Below there is recognizable correlation between and , except for a few outliers. This correlation supports the idea that is a universal parameter for the properties of FeAs compounds, including the superconductivity, regardless of the composition.

tab1
Table 1: The values of z, for various Fe pnictides. Na-111 means NaFeAs, K-Ba122 means , and so forth.
164916.fig.004
Figure 4: Superconducting critical temprture , as a function of the As-Fe layer separation, .

It is interesting to note that, from (2) and (3), Thus we plotted against calculated by (3), not the experimental values of , in Figure 5. Again a linear correlation appears to be present, although the correlation is far from perfect. On the other hand, the relation, , is observed if we plot against the moment experimentally determined for the CeFe(As, P)O system shown in Figure 2 [29]. An obvious implication of these correlations is that indeed magnetism is deeply involved in superconductivity, even though there is no static magnetic order in most of the superconducting samples. However, the involvement of spins in the mechanism may not be limited to the spin-fluctuation mechanism. The spin-lattice coupling could be involved in the superconductivity mechanism through the electron-phonon coupling in the spin-channel.

164916.fig.005
Figure 5: Superconducting critical temperature, , against calculated by the LDA.

For instance, the phonon can modify the electron hopping integral [51]. In the presence of antiferromagnetic correlation, the phonon-induced charge transfer from one spin sublattice to the other can be given by where refers to spin , is the derivative of t with respect to phonon displacement, is a phonon annihilation operator, and and are electron annihilation operators for the spin sublattice and the spin sublattice. The spin is a minority spin for the spin sublattice, so (15) results in the spin transfer between the majority band and the minority band. Note that this coupling is different from the usual spin-phonon coupling through the modification of the exchange integral by phonons, and ultimately we will have to consider both [52]. Even though the conventional charge-channel coupling (Fröhlich coupling) is weak for the Fe pnictides [53], the coupling through the spin-channel, such as the one in (15), may be strong enough to make a difference. Other possibility includes the mechanism proposed by Kulic and Haghighirad [54] in which the on-site Hubbard repulsion, , is modified by the dipolar moment of pnictide ions.

Possible importance of the spin-phonon coupling in the cuprates was discussed earlier [5557]. Whereas many people speculate that the spin-fluctuation is the common mechanism for the cuprates as well as for Fe pnictides, it is possible that the spin-channel coupling is the common thread for high-temperature superconductors, although much remain to be researched before we reach any definite conclusion.

5. Conclusions

The conventional electron-phonon (e-p) coupling through the charge channel is quite small for the Fe pnictide compounds [53]. This led many to conclude that lattice and phonons are irrelevant to the superconductivity of the Fe pnictides. Consequently, the spin-fluctuation mechanism is regarded to be the leading mechanism to explain their high [15]. However, the lattice is intimately involved in the magnetism of this compound through the magneto-volume effect, as shown in this paper. This coupling has been known for a long time as Invar effect. The lattice controls the Stoner condition, and thus the onset of spin-splitting. Because the lattice is so intimately involved in magnetism, it is furthermore possible that the e-p coupling through the spin-channel is relevant, for instance involving the As Raman phonon mode or the in-plane Fe mode. The lattice effect may be much more important than generally assumed to the properties of Fe pnictides, including superconductivity.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to I. I. Mazin, T. Yildirim, A. Bussman-Holder, N. Mannella, M. Tachiki, P. Dai, and D. J. Scalapino for stimulating and useful discussions. This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Sciences, through the EPSCoR Grant, DE-FG02-08ER46528. The work at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory was supported by the Scientific User Facilities Division and by the Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Department of Energy.

References

  1. Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, “Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1xFx]FeAs (x=0.050.12) with Tc=26 K,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 3296–3297, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Z.-A. Ren, W. Lu, J. Yang, et al., “Superconductivity at 55 K in iron-based F-doped layered quaternary compound Sm[O1xFx] FeAs,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2215–2216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. de la Cruz, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, et al., “Magnetic order close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered LaO1xFxFeAs systems,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7197, pp. 899–902, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Bondino, E. Magnano, M. Malvestuto, et al., “Evidence for strong itinerant spin fluctuations in the normal state of CeFeAsO0.89F0.11 iron-oxypnictide superconductors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 26, Article ID 267001, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. D. Christianson, E. A. Goremychkin, R. Osborn, et al., “Unconventional superconductivity in Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 from inelastic neutron scattering,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7224, pp. 930–932, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. D. Lumsden, A. D. Christianson, D. Parshall, et al., “Two-dimensional resonant magnetic excitation in BaFe1.84Co0.16As2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 10, Article ID 107005, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Chi, A. Schneidewind, J. Zhao, et al., “Inelastic neutron-scattering measurements of a three-dimensional spin resonance in the FeAs-based BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 superconductor,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 10, Article ID 107006, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Parshall, K. A. Lokshin, J. Niedziela, et al., “Spin excitations in BaFe1.84Co0.16As2 superconductor observed by inelastic neutron scattering,” Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 1, Article ID 012502, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. J. Singh and M.-H. Du, “Density functional study of LaFeAsO1xFx: a low carrier density superconductor near itinerant magnetism,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 23, Article ID 237003, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. I. Mazin, M. D. Johannes, L. Boeri, K. Koepernik, and D. J. Singh, “Problems with reconciling density functional theory calculations with experiment in ferropnictides,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 8, Article ID 085104, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. I. I. Mazin and M. D. Johannes, “A key role for unusual spin dynamics in ferropnictides,” Nature Physics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 141–146, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Yildirim, “Strong coupling of the Fe-Spin state and the As-As hybridization in iron-pnictide superconductors from first-principle calculations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 3, Article ID 037003, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Reznik, K. Lokshin, D. C. Mitchell, et al., “Phonons in doped and undoped BaFe2As2 investigated by inelastic x-ray scattering,” Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 21, Article ID 214534, 5 pages, 2009.
  14. A. Kreyssig, M. A. Green, Y. Lee, et al., “Pressure-induced volume-collapsed tetragonal phase of CaFe2As2 as seen via neutron scattering,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 18, Article ID 184517, 6 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, and M. H. Du, “Unconventional superconductivity with a sign reversal in the order parameter of LaFeAsO1xFx,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 5, Article ID 057003, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. A. Maier and D. J. Scalapino, “Theory of neutron scattering as a probe of the superconducting gap in the iron pnictides,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 020514, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. M. Korshunov and I. Eremin, “Theory of magnetic excitations in iron-based layered superconductors,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 14, Article ID 140509, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ishtkado, R. Kajtmoto, S.-I. Shamoto, et al., “Two-dimensional spin density wave state in LaFeAsO,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 78, no. 4, Article ID 043705, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. J. Singh, “Electronic structure of BaCu2As2 and SrCu2As2: sp-band metals,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 15, Article ID 153102, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. P. Yin, S. Lebègue, M. J. Han, B. P. Neal, S. Y. Savrasov, and W. E. Pickett, “Electron-hole symmetry and magnetic coupling in antiferromagnetic LaFeAsO,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 4, Article ID 047001, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, et al., “Effect of structural parameters on superconductivity in fluorine-free LnFeAsO1y (Ln = La, Nd),” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, no. 8, Article ID 083704, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Zhao, Q. Huang, C. de la Cruz, et al., “Structural and magnetic phase diagram of CeFeAsO1xFx and its relation to high-temperature superconductivity,” Nature Materials, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 953–959, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1964.
  24. S. A. J. Kimber, D. N. Argyriou, F. Yokaichiya, et al., “Magnetic ordering and negative thermal expansion in PrFeAsO,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 14, Article ID 140503, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. J. Singh and L. Nordstrom, Planewaves, Pseudopotentials and the LAPW Method, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2006.
  26. D. Singh, “Ground-state properties of lanthanum: treatment of extended-core states,” Physical Review B, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 6388–6392, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Rotter, M. Tegel, D. Johrendt, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, and R. Pöttgen, “Spin-density-wave anomaly at 140 K in the ternary iron arsenide BaFe2As2,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 020503, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. de la Cruz, W. Z. Hu, S. Li, et al., “Lattice Distortion and Magnetic Quantum Phase Transition in CeFeAs1-xPxO,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 1, Article ID 017204, 4 pages, 2010.
  29. T. Egami, B. Fine, D. J. Singh, D. Parshall, C. de la Cruz, and P. Dai, “Spin–lattice coupling in iron-pnictide superconductors,” Physica C in press, 2010.
  30. E. C. Stoner, “Ferromagnetism,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43–112, 1947. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. P. Gupta and S. K. Sinha, “Wave-number-dependent susceptibility function for paramagnetic chromium,” Physical Review B, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 2401–2411, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. L. Skriver, “The electronic structure of antiferromagnetic chromium,” Journal of Physics F, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 97–111, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. Fawcett, “Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 209–283, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Zhao, D. T. Adroja, D.-X. Yao, et al., “Spin waves and magnetic exchange interactions in CaFe2As2,” Nature Physics, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 555–560, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Li, C. de la Cruz, Q. Huang, et al., “Structural and magnetic phase transitions in Na1–δFeAs,” Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 2, Article ID 020504, 4 pages, 2009.
  36. M. Rotter, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt, “Superconductivity at 38 K in the iron arsenide (Ba1xKx)Fe2As2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 10, Article ID 107006, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Qiu, M. Kofu, W. Bao, et al., “Neutron-scattering study of the oxypnictide superconductor LaFeAsO0.87F0.13,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 5, Article ID 052508, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. Qiu, W. Bao, Q. Huang, et al., “Crystal structure and antiferromagnetic order in NdFeAsO1xFx (x=0.0 and 0.2) superconducting compounds from neutron diffraction measurements,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 25, Article ID 257002, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Zhao, Q. Huang, C. de la Cruz, et al., “Structural and magnetic phase diagram of CeFeAsO1xFx and its relation to high-temperature superconductivity,” Nature Materials, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 953–959, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Zhao, Q. Huang, C. de la Cruz, et al., “Lattice and magnetic structures of PrFeAsO, PrFeAsO0.85F0.15, and PrFeAsO0.85,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 13, Article ID 132504, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Nomura, S. W. Kim, Y. Kamihara, et al., “Crystallographic phase transition and high-Tc superconductivity in LaFeAsO:F,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 12, Article ID 125028, 9 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Martinelli, M. Ferretti, P. Manfrinetti, et al., “Synthesis, crystal structure, microstructure, transport and magnetic properties of SmFeAsO and SmFeAs(O0.93F0.07),” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 9, Article ID 095017, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, et al., “Effect of structural parameters on superconductivity in fluorine-free LnFeAsO1y (Ln = La, Nd),” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, no. 8, Article ID 083704, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. S. Sefat, A. Huq, M. A. McGuire, et al., “Superconductivity in LaFe1xCoxAsO,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 10, Article ID 104505, 9 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. Li, C. de la Cruz, Q. Huang, et al., “First-order magnetic and structural phase transitions in Fe1+ySexTe1x,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 5, Article ID 054503, 7 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. J. Pitcher, D. R. Parker, P. Adamson, et al., “Structure and superconductivity of LiFeAs,” Chemical Communications, no. 45, pp. 5918–5920, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, Y. X. Lv, et al., “The superconductivity at 18 K in LiFeAs system,” Solid State Communications, vol. 148, no. 11-12, pp. 538–540, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, Z. Bukowski, S. Weyeneth, R. Puzniak, and J. Karpinski, “Single crystals of superconducting SmFeAsO1xFy grown at high pressure,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 20, no. 34, Article ID 342202, 5 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J.-W. G. Bos, G. B. S. Penny, J. A. Rodgers, D. A. Sokolov, A. D. Huxley, and J. P. Attfield, “High pressure synthesis of late rare earth RFeAs(O,F) superconductors; R = Tb and Dy,” Chemical Communications, no. 31, pp. 3634–3635, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Matsuishi, Y. Inoue, T. Nomura, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, “Cobalt-substitution-induced superconductivity in a new compound with ZrCuSiAs-type structure, SrFeAsF,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, no. 11, Article ID 113709, 3 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, “Solitons in polyacetylene,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 42, no. 25, pp. 1698–1701, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. B. Normand, H. Kohno, and H. Fukuyama, “Spin-phonon coupling in the single-layer extended t-J model,” Physical Review B, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 856–870, 1996. View at Scopus
  53. L. Boeri, O. V. Dolgov, and A. A. Golubov, “Is LaFeAsO1xFx an electron-phonon superconductor?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 2, Article ID 026403, 4 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. L. Kulić and A. A. Haghighirad, “Possible strong electron-lattice interaction and giant magneto-elastic effects in Fe-pnictides,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 17007, 6 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Ishihara, T. Egami, and M. Tachiki, “Electron-lattice interaction in cuprates: effect of electron correlation,” Physical Review B, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 3163–3172, 1997. View at Scopus
  56. M. L. Kulić, “Interplay of electron-phonon interaction and strong correlations: the possible way to high-temperature superconductivity,” Physics Report, vol. 338, no. 1-2, pp. 1–264, 2000. View at Scopus
  57. P. Piekarz and T. Egami, “Dynamic charge transfer and spin-phonon interaction in high-Tc supeconductors,” Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 5, Article ID 054530, 9 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus