About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Autoimmune Diseases
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 728529, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/728529
Review Article

p38 MAPK Signaling in Pemphigus: Implications for Skin Autoimmunity

1Cellular Immunotherapy and Molecular Immunodiagnostics, Institute for Research and Technology-Thessaly (I.RE.TE.TH), 41222 Larissa, Greece
2Institute of Liver Studies, Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King’s College London School of Medicine at King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill Campus, London SE5 9RS, UK
3Department of Animal Production, Technological Educational Institute of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece
4Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece

Received 21 February 2013; Revised 18 June 2013; Accepted 19 June 2013

Academic Editor: Jozélio Freire De Carvalho

Copyright © 2013 Athanasios Mavropoulos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) signaling plays a major role in the modulation of immune-mediated inflammatory responses and therefore has been linked with several autoimmune diseases. The extent of the involvement of p38 MAPK in the pathogenesis of autoimmune blistering diseases has started to emerge, but whether it pays a critical role is a matter of debate. The activity of p38 MAPK has been studied in great detail during the loss of keratinocyte cell-cell adhesions and the development of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). These diseases are characterised by autoantibodies targeting desmogleins (Dsg). Whether autoantibody-antigen interactions can trigger signaling pathways (such as p38 MAPK) that are tightly linked to the secretion of inflammatory mediators which may perpetuate inflammation and tissue damage in pemphigus remains unclear. Yet, the ability of p38 MAPK inhibitors to block activation of the proapoptotic proteinase caspase-3 suggests that the induction of apoptosis may be a consequence of p38 MAPK activation during acantholysis in PV. This review discusses the current evidence for the role of p38 MAPK in the pathogenesis of pemphigus. We will also present data relating to the targeting of these cascades as a means of therapeutic intervention.

1. Introduction

The skin represents the first organ of the body exposed to the external environment and thus serves as the primary barrier of the immune defense system. Its key role is to maintain protection against hazardous environmental threats such as microorganisms and viruses [1, 2]. The epidermis is the outmost cellular tissue of the skin and expresses several proteins that orchestrate the essential protective functions. Inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins, histamines, cytokines, and chemokines are synthesized and secreted from keratinocytes regulating the skin’s immune responses [3, 4].

When this epithelial barrier is compromised due to the deterioration of skin tissue integrity, patients are at high risk of fluid and electrolyte loss, as well as infection. If left untreated, conditions can be fatal. Even though the mechanisms of skin damage are essentially the same as the ones that control protective immunity and despite the evolution of sophisticated anti-inflammatory and tissue repair mechanisms, the formation of immune complexes against self-antigens (a hallmark of autoimmunity) initiates a sustained inflammatory response characterized by autoreactive immune cells, cytokines, and autoantibody production [58].

Pemphigus signifies a distinctive skin-specific acquired autoimmune disease characterized by intraepidermal blistering, which is induced by autoantibodies against desmosomal cadherins, desmoglein 1 (Dsg1), and Dsg3 [911]. Three typical variations are known and are classified as pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus (PF), and some other variants distinguished by the degree of inflammation, the level of separation in the epidermis, and immunologic properties of autoantigens. PV-IgG-targeted cells and triggered signaling pathways are tightly linked to the secretion of cytokines and chemokines that initiate and perpetuate inflammation and subsequent tissue damage [1214].

This review will discuss up to date evidence of the role of certain key signaling pathways such as p38 MAPK in the pathogenesis of pemphigus, with particular emphasis on the protagonist cells. These data may help us to better understand the signaling cascade pathways of other distinct immune-mediated skin pathologies such as psoriasis [1518].

2. Pemphigus Vulgaris: An Ideal Model to Study Autoimmunity

PV is a potentially lethal autoimmune blistering disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes [23]. It is a relatively rare disease with an incidence of about 1–3.5 cases per 100,000 individuals annually worldwide, being more frequent amongst middle aged individuals. Despite its low frequency, research on PV has benefited from some distinct advantages fundamental for the elucidation of its molecular pathogenesis and the development of unique targeted therapies [24, 25]. Firstly, a distinct clinical pathology is easily observable; secondly, the molecular targets (autoantigens and reactive autoantibodies) are clearly defined; thirdly, some successful in vivo models are readily available; and lastly but not the least, the skin is easily accessible to topical and systemically delivered pharmaceutics. Detection of tissue-specific and serum autoantibodies and further characterization of their molecular specificity are mandatory for the diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases. For this purpose, various specific immunoassays, including immunofluoresence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoprecipitation, have been developed [2628].

The trademark of PV histopathology is intraepidermal blistering-associated acantholysis. Acantholysis is defined as the loss of adherence between epithelial cells and structural components maintaining cell-cell and cell matrix adhesion in the skin and mucous membranes [29]. The junctions that facilitate cohesiveness between epithelial cells are termed desmosomes. Desmosomes are principally located in tissues that experience mechanical forces such as the skin and heart and function as anchor sites for cytoskeleton microfilaments [30]. The desmosomal proteins responsible for mediating cellular adhesion are called cadherins and include the Dsg and desmocollins (Dsc). These constitute the protein components of desmosomes that are responsible for mediating cellular adhesion [31]. In the epidermis, a total of four Dsg (Dsg1–4) and three Dsc (Dsc1–3) isoforms are expressed. Autoantibodies directed against the Dsgs are typical in PV, and several studies have demonstrated that antibodies directed against Dsg1 and Dsg3 induce acantholysis within the epidermis and mucous membranes [3234]. In contrast, PF is characterized by antibodies directed against Dsg1 only [35]. Seminal studies by the group of Jensen and Lazarus have suggested that keratinocyte inflammatory responses are probably involved in PV-IgG-induced acantholysis [36, 37], but the direct link with Dsgs was not addressed at that time.

The expression of Dsg3 is mainly confined to stratified epithelia. In the epidermis, it is expressed throughout the basal and the spinous layers. Dsg3 inactivation is sufficient to induce the characteristic blistering pathology of PV patients [38, 39]. Mice injected with Dsg3-specific IgG purified from PV patients have been shown to develop acantholysis. Similarly, genetic deletion of Dsg3 or Dsc3 in mice results in a phenotype resembling PV in its mucosal-dominant form [4042]. Dsg3-deficient littermates suffer from oral erosions and epidermal blistering in areas subjected to extensive mechanical stress. Recombinant Dsg3 can also be used to deplete patient sera of disease-causing antibodies, demonstrating that autoantibodies are indeed directed against Dsg3 and induce blistering. The exact mechanism of this histopathology is defined loss of keratinocyte adhesions by binding of anti-Dsg3 antibodies to Dsg3 through steric hindrance, internalization of Dsg3, changes in molecular integrity, and subsequent intracellular signal transduction [43].

Prevention of Dsg3 endocytosis and/or inhibition of downstream signaling pathways can prevent PV autoantibody-induced loss of adhesion in both cell culture and animal model systems [21]. Tyrosine kinase initiated pathways, protein kinase C (PKC), RhoA, and c-myc have all been implicated in the series of events leading to loss of adhesion in keratinocytes treated with PV IgG [44, 45]. Particularly convincing data has recently been published regarding the involvement of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which has been linked to both Dsg3 endocytosis and the loss of keratinocyte adhesion in response to PV IgG [19, 21, 4648]. Interestingly, the pathogenic activity of polyclonal PV IgG can be attributed to p38-MAPK-dependent clustering and endocytosis of Dsg3, whereas pathogenic monoclonal Dsg3 antibodies can function independently of this pathway [49]. Detailed evidence is beginning to accumulate that activation of signaling molecules may have an important role in the ability of pathogenic pemphigus IgGs to induce blistering. In fact, both p38 and downstream mediators such as heat shock protein (HSP) 27 may be part of this important process [19].

3. p38 MAPK Pathway Activation, Detection, and Relevance to Skin Autoimmunity

The p38 MAPK signaling pathway is a critical participator in the regulation of cellular and humoral autoimmune responses [50, 51]. Usually initiated by cellular stresses or inflammatory cytokines, its main task is to orchestrate cytokine gene expression including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) by means of transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms such as stabilization of mRNA transcripts [5256]. P38 MAPK is also important for cellular survival, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [57]. An increasing number of studies have provided data demonstrating the significant role of this cascade in the pathogenesis of several immune-mediated diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and psoriasis to name a few [58]. Defects in p38 MAPK pathway can explain the increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines seen in psoriasis [59]. For instance, there is increased TNF-α protein expression, but similar mRNA levels, in lesional compared with nonlesional psoriatic skin, demonstrating that TNF-α expression in psoriatic skin is regulated posttranscriptionally by p38 MAPK, and therefore p38 signaling pathway can be targeted therapeutically [6062].

The activity of p38 MAPK can be studied in available experimental models and clinical material such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and pathological tissue from patients with autoimmune diseases [63]. The conventional techniques for p38 detection include western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy that detects the active p38 kinase translocated to the cell nucleus. However, these applications require large populations of homogenous cells, and the data obtained are not fully quantitative. Extended culturing of primary cells is also mandatory in order to maximize cell densities. It should be noted that extensive culturing periods, often in the presence of Interleukin (IL)-2 and other growth factors, can affect or bias signaling analyses that depend on interaction of cell receptors and phosphorylation of intracellular proteins.

Optimized protocols based on sensitive phospho flow cytometry has been recognised as promising alternatives for the investigation of the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK within different PBMCs [6466]. Phospho-specific flow cytometry technology may help us to better understand the enigmatic role of this signalling cascade in the induction of autoimmunity, as well as its role in immunosuppressive-induced remission [67]. Its main advantage is that it delivers extremely rapid, sensitive, and fully quantifiable observations. Moreover, it allows multiparametric analysis of samples containing mixed subpopulations such as PBMCs. This is feasible upon successful combination of fluorochrome conjugated antibodies against surface markers such as anti-CD3 and anti-CD56 and intracellular epitopes such as phospho-p38 [63]. Therefore, direct analysis of rare populations becomes feasible, as does multiparametric detection of several epitopes within these cells. We have optimized methodology for the successful application of phosphor-specific flow cytometry in order to detect phosphorylated p38 MAPK within innate immune cells such as NK and NKT [63]. In addition, we have provided technical instructions permitting simultaneous flow cytometric measurement of p38 MAPK phosphorylation and intracellular cytokine production. This might be of special value in cases of autoimmunity or cancer where the unavailability of numerous cells from immune-compromised individuals hampers analysis of their biological responses.

Given the key role p38 MAPK signaling pathway plays in inflammatory responses through the production of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, its inhibition is considered to be a promising target for chronic inflammatory diseases [50, 68]. Several pharmaceutical companies have invested heavily on the development of agents specifically inhibiting p38 MAPK activation. An increasing number of novel p38 MAPK inhibitors have been used in experimental studies and clinical trials and have helped us to further define the role of p38 MAPK [6971]. For instance the α-selective p38 MAPK inhibitor, SCIO-469, acts as a topical anti-inflammatory agent via the p38 MAPK pathway to reduce neutrophil-induced acute inflammation in the skin, and observations in clinical models suggest that selective p38 MAPK inhibition may be an effective therapeutic strategy to manage acute skin inflammation [72].

4. p38 MAPK and Pemphigus Vulgaris

The p38 MAPK signaling pathway participates in chronic inflammatory skin pathologies, as p38 MAPK inhibitors reduce skin inflammation in various rodent models of human skin diseases [73]. For example, p38 MAPK inhibitors protect the epidermis against the acute damaging effects of ultraviolet irradiation by blocking apoptosis [74]. In addition, topical p38 MAPK inhibition reduces dermal inflammation and epithelial apoptosis in burn wounds [75, 76].

What is of particular importance is the finding of an autoantibody-mediated autoimmune skin disease where p38 MAPK is directly activated by the same autoantibodies and implicated in disease pathogenesis [12]. This occurs in PV and (regarding p38 MAPK) David Rubenstein’s lab has demonstrated that pemphigus-IgG binding to keratinocytes augmented intracellular phosphorylation events [13, 19]. In their studies, cultured human keratinocytes with IgG purified from patients with PV activate the p38 MAPK and lead to phosphorylation of the small HSP 27, actin cytoskeleton reorganization, as well as the collapse of the intermediate actin microfilaments. In isolated tissue cultures where p38 MAPK was inhibited, the phosphorylation of HSP 27 and cytoskeleton reorganization was greatly diminished. The same group of investigators have generated a mouse model in which PV was passively transferred. Inhibiting p38 MAPK in these mice prevented the formation of blisters in vivo. It also appears that inhibiting p38 MAPK blocks the pathogenic IgG from inducing blistering in the skin in mouse models of PV. Importantly, p38 MAPK and HSP27 phosphorylation has also been observed in the epidermis surrounding the skin lesions of both psoriasis and PV [77, 78] (Figure 1).

fig1
Figure 1: The role of p38 MAPK in the induction of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). There are at least three potential p38-MAPK-related mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis and/or the progression of PV. (a) The binding of pathogenic autoantibodies targeting Dsg3 in keratinocytes initiates an array of signals leading to the activation of p38 MAPK cascade with subsequent phosphorylation of MAPKAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinases 2/3) and heat shock protein 27 (Hsp 27). The final outcome of these events is actin filaments reorganization and induction of acantholysis [19]; (b) p38 MAPK, MAPKAPK, and Hsp27 may form a complex (signalosome) that regulates the reorganization of actin filaments and the induction of acantholysis [20]; (c) studies in p38−/− keratinocytes demonstrate a p38 MAPK-independent blister formation. The subsequent activation of this pathway, however, can lead to de novo depletion of multiple desmosomal molecules, further facilitating spontaneous blister formation [21]. This latter hypothesis indicates that p38 MAPK signaling may not be responsible for the induction of PV but could play a role for the progression of the disease.

Timing of p38 MAPK activation is critical for understanding the hierarchy of signaling events leading to acantholysis. Time course experiments demonstrated that the activities of Src and EGFRK peak at 30–60 min after exposure to PV IgG suggesting that engagement of Src/EGFRK is a critical step that generates signals from ligated antigens to the intracellular effectors such as p38 affecting keratinocyte adhesion and viability [46]. Phosphorylated p38 MAPK by antibodies from PV patients can be detected as early as 15 min; however, the majority of PV IgGs induced peak p38 activity after a prolonged incubation. In cultured keratinocytes, p38 knockdown abrogated desmosomal Dsg3 reduction by PV mAbs, whereas exogenous p38 activation caused internalization of Dsg3, Dsc3, and desmoplakin [21]. It was therefore suggested that p38 MAPK may not be essential for the loss of intercellular adhesion in PV but may function downstream to augment blistering via Dsg3 endocytosis.

Additionally, Marchencko et al. have demonstrated the circulation of antimitochondrial antibodies against various poorly defined mitochondrial autoantigens in sera from PV patients [47]. These autoantibodies appear to have the ability to penetrate keratinocytes and react with mitochondrial proteins. Data provided in the same study suggested that downstream signaling of antimitochondrial antibodies involves JNK and late p38 MAPK activation, further underlying the important role for these signaling cascades in non-Dsg3 or Dsg1 autoantibody-specific autoimmune blistering.

Whether pemphigus-IgG-augmented p38 signaling is directly or indirectly linked to the pathogenesis of pemphigus through the secretion of cytokines and chemokines that initiate or activate inflammatory events remains debatable [79, 80]. Natural killer (NK) cells are professionally programmed to induce rapid bursts of cytokines and chemokines during innate immune responses [81]. Recent studies on innate immunity have noticeably expanded our understanding of the function of NK cells in health and disease [82]. Besides their well-known functions in cancer and autoimmunity, significant contributions from NK cells to allergies, and various skin diseases have emerged. NK cells play an important part in skin autoimmunity, such as in psoriasis [83]. Evidence that NK may also participate in the pathobiology of pemphigus is beginning to emerge. Takahashi et al. showed that a higher percentage and number of NK cells are present in the peripheral blood of PV patients [84]. These expressed the CD69 cell surface marker indicating that the NK cells were activated and expanded in the peripheral blood of PV patients. They also exhibited lower levels of perforin and granzyme defects in their cytotoxic ability and increased levels of Interleukin 10 expression.

In another study by Stern et al., CD4+ T cells from the PBMCs and perilesional skin of PV patients were cocultured with CD56+ CD3-NK cells from the PBMCs of the same patients [22]. In the presence of Dsg3 peptides, CD4+ T cells proliferated, indicating that NK cells functioned as antigen-presenting cells. Supernatants from these cocultures and serum from the same patients with active PV had statistically significantly elevated levels of IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-8, compared with controls indicating that the NK cells stimulated CD4+ T cells to produce proinflammatory cytokines in a similar manner to other autoimmune pathologies [85]. These data have led to the formulation of a hypothetical scenario for the p38 MAPK-induced pathogenesis of PV (Figure 2). In the microenvironment of the affected tissues, NK cells may present Dsg3 peptides to resident and circulating CD4+ T cells which proliferate and produce various cytokines. Both Dsg3-reactive Th1 and Th2 cells have been detected at similar frequencies in studied PV patients, yet the numbers of autoreactive Th1 cells exceeded those of Th2 cells in chronic active PV. The in-vivo-activated NK cells may also travel to lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow and stimulate B cells to produce high levels of pathogenic autoantibodies [8, 86].

728529.fig.002
Figure 2: Schematic representation of the suggested interplay between natural killer (NK), CD4+ T, B cells, and polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) during pemphigus pathogenesis [22]. NK cells accumulate from the bloodstream to the epidermis and act as antigen-presenting cells by introducing desmoglein (Dsg3) peptides to CD4+ T cells. p38 MAPK phosphorylation within lymphoid subpopulations such as NK and CD4+ T cells induces expression of IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-8 that amplify the inflammatory response, MHC-II presentation, and autoantibody production by B cells. The activated T cells further enhance B-cell anti-Dsg3 secretion and presentation to epidermal cells. Anti-Dsg3 activates the p38 MAPK pathway within keratinocytes leading to MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 (MK-2) mediated heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) phosphorylation, actin microfilament reorganization, and acantholysis.

NK cells are controlled by activating and inhibiting receptors. The killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and their cognate HLA class I ligands are crucial for NK regulation. Activating KIR genes have been utilized in risk estimation for autoimmunity [87]. In a recent report, activating KIR and HLA Bw4 ligands have been demonstrated to be associated with decreased susceptibility to PF [88]. Activation of NK cells appears to be critical for the clinical manifestations and subsequent clinical stages of autoimmune blistering diseases. Based on the latest observations in the literature, a vital role of NK cells in the pathogenesis of PV is brought to light. However, more research is necessary in order to delineate the precise molecular mechanisms and activated signaling pathways in NK cells. There is currently no thorough information to the activation of p38 MAPK in NK and NKT cells from PF and PV patients.

5. Targeting p38 MAPK in Pemphigus: Corticosteroids versus Monoclonal Antibodies

The mainstay of PV treatment is systemic administration of corticosteroids aiming at reducing inflammation and autoantibody production [89, 90]. PV patients have traditionally been treated with glucocorticoids and adjuvant immunosuppressive therapies. However, clinical remission has been achieved in only 30% of patients. Methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or cyclophosphamide are typically introduced as steroid sparing agents, since many patients experience severe side effects from glucocorticoid-induced immunosuppression [91, 92]. Newer modalities of treatment, such as B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab, have begun to show some promise in such patients. Rituximab is increasingly used in patients with PV with inadequate response to conventional therapy [93, 94].

Corticosteroids dampen inflammatory responses, and this occurs at least in part by inducing rapid and prolonged expression of MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1), which potently inactivates p38 MAPK [95]. Any attempt for discussing therapeutic inhibition of p38 MAPK pathway stems from the fact that natural negative feedback mechanisms exist to guarantee that, within cells, MAPKs are not activated ad infinitum. In this regard, MAP kinases can themselves induce different types of protein phosphatases that dephosphorylate and cease their function. These are termed dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSPs), and each member of the DUSP family has a unique set of properties including tissue distribution, subcellular localization, and precise substrate affinity and specificity [96]. For example, MKP-1 targets primarily p38 MAPK contrary to MKP-2 which preferentially dephosphorylates ERK and JNK [9799]. The strength and duration of p38 MAPK activation are often the critical determinant of cellular responses regulated by the action of these phosphatases [100]. In psoriatic lesions the p38 MAPK negative feedback mechanism provided by DUSP1 seems to be defective. DUSP1 mRNA expression was demonstrated to be significantly downregulated in psoriatic skin lesions as compared with paired samples of nonlesional psoriatic skin [101]. Downregulation of DUSP1 may contribute to the sustained inflammatory response seen in psoriasis. However, there is no information available regarding the expression of MKP-1 in PV. Yet, inhibition of p38 MAPK by MKP-1-dependent mechanisms leads to downregulation of IL-8, one of the cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of PV [22, 56, 98].

As previously mentioned, p38 MAPK inhibition prevented blistering in the murine model of PV. Early clinical studies focusing on targeting p38 MAPK in inflammatory disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and psoriasis, raised significant safety concerns [70]. A novel allosteric p38 MAPK inhibitor, KC-706 (Kémia Inc), has been tested during a phase II multicenter, open-label trial in patients with active PV [102]. The safety and efficacy of KC-706 in accomplishing remission, while maintaining stable doses of corticosteroids, were monitored over a 3-month period. KC-706 had been administered orally to 15 patients with PV. Approximately half of the patients exhibited a partial response to treatment, while the remaining patients either failed to improve or deteriorated [102]. Disappointingly, the inhibitor had to be abandoned due to severe adverse reactions. Thus the notion that p38 MAPK signaling is directly involved in the pathogenesis of PV, and hence p38 MAPK inhibitors can be ideal treatment agents needed to be treated with caution. Nevertheless, there is a continuous generation of biologics targeting the p38 pathway in a more sophisticated manner aiming to avoid undesirable side reactions [14, 24, 48, 103].

Currently, there is an advent of certain other biologics and monoclonal antibodies that have shown particular potential in the treatment of PV. For example rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 molecule on B cells resulting in their depletion [104]. Administration of rituximab has been approved for certain lymphomas, RA, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and Wegener’s granulomatosis [105, 106]. It is also used in certain cases to treat PV [107109]. The rationale for the use of rituximab in patients with PV is based on its ability to deplete CD20+ B cells that presumably produce pathogenic antibodies. Antibodies against CD20 can activate complement and induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in B lymphocytes. In B lymphocytic leukemia cells, cross-linking of rituximab induced strong and sustained phosphorylation of p38 MAPK [104]. Introduction of the p38 inhibitor completely blocked signaling downstream of p38, which was evident by the absence of MK2 activity and significantly reduced the degree of anti-CD20-induced apoptosis. Therefore the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody rituximab induces apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through a p38-mitogen-activated protein-kinase-dependent mechanism. Yet, in 2F7 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells, rituximab inhibited p38 MAPK and NF-kappaB activity and downregulated IL-10 expression via Sp1 [110]. Interestingly, other monoclonal antibodies such as the anti-TNF monoclonal antibody adalimumab (Humira) rapidly inhibit p38 MAPK activity in lesional psoriatic skin preceding clinical improvement [62, 101]. The activities of ERK1/2, MSK1/2, and MK2 and the levels of TNF-α were also reduced. The clinical benefits of anti-TNF antibodies adalimumab (Humira), etanercept (Enbrel), and infliximab (Remicade) in the treatment of PV have been previously reported [111, 112].

6. Concluding Remarks

It has become apparent that p38 MAPK is involved in skin autoimmune diseases such as pemphigus. Nevertheless, its targeting can lead to completely unpredictable outcomes and certain adverse side effects depending on the different cells participating in skin autoimmune pathogenesis. PV pathogenesis is still disputed, and treatment remains perplexing [113].

Activating p38 MAPK in autoreactive B cells will enhance their apoptosis and cessation of autoantibody production. As for keratinocytes, the de facto inflicted cell type in PV, a different strategy might be necessary since apoptosis and acantholysis appear to be tightly linked to each other. The time course of p38 MAPK activation, as well as the ability of inhibitors of p38 MAPK to block activation of the proapoptotic proteinase caspase-3, suggests that induction of apoptosis is a consequence of p38 MAPK activation during acantholysis in PV [13]. Therefore, acantholysis can be prevented by inhibitors of p38 MAPK signaling kinases, in addition to other known targets such as the mammalian target of rapamycin, Src, EGFR kinase, phospholipase C, calmodulin, and protein kinase C, as well as inhibitors of executioner caspases [114].

In PV, skin infiltrating NK, NKT, and T cells, prolonged p38 MAPK activity will favor an uncontrolled self-perpetuating inflammatory loop and generation of auto-reactivity. If we are to induce apoptosis of autoreactive T cells, it may be wise to spare their assassins, namely, NK and NKTs. Therefore, careful monitoring of p38 signaling events within each cell type is of paramount importance. The advent of phospho-specific flow cytometry technology allows multiparametric analysis of rare populations and multiparametric detection of several epitopes within those cells. A typical example of how powerful this technology can become is the analysis of p38 phosphorylation within rare human CD3+ CD56+ cells [63]. We are currently capable of detecting p38/IFN-γ double positive NK and NKT cells using optimized phospho-flow cytometry protocols. This has been tested in cells from healthy individuals and in peripheral blood NK and NKT cells from patients with AIH and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) [115119]. In AIH, p38 MAPK pathway is activated in the NKT cells, and the magnitude of this activation parallels the disease activity status of the patient [67]. Phospho-p38 MAPK positive NKT cells were more frequent in patients tested at diagnosis than in patients with immunosuppressive drug-induced remission.

The holy grail of current research in PV and PF is to be able to achieve and maintain clinical remission without extensive use of corticosteroids. This is crucial since glucocorticosteroids can only block but not reverse acantholysis. Since p38 MAPK is phosphorylated in PV and is one of the targeted molecules by glucocorticoids, advancing our knowledge on the exact kinase phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events in every single cell involved can provide fresh impetus for further research into the precise role of this enigmatic signaling cascade in pemphigus and other autoimmune skin diseases. This will greatly facilitate to resolve debates on autoimmune molecular pathogenesis and open novel perspectives on successful targeted therapies.

Abbreviations

AIH: Autoimmune hepatitis
Dsc: Desmocollin
Dsg: Desmoglein
DUSP: Dual specificity phosphatase
HSP: Heat shock protein
IFN: Interferon
IL: Interleukin
LPS: Liposaccharide
MAPK: Mitogen activated protein kinase
PF: Pemphigus foliaceus
PV: Pemphigus vulgaris
RA: Rheumatoid arthritis
Th1: T-helper 1
TNF: Tumor necrosis factor.

References

  1. F. S. Dhabhar, “Psychological stress and immunoprotection versus immunopathology in the skin,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Moens and M. Veldhoen, “Epithelial barrier biology: good fences make good neighbours,” Immunology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. L. Eckert, G. Adhikary, S. Balasubramanian et al., “Biochemistry of epidermal stem cells,” Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 1830, no. 2, pp. 2427–2434, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Metz-Boutigue, P. Shooshtarizadeh, G. Prevost, Y. Haikel, and J. Chich, “Antimicrobial peptides present in mammalian skin and gut are multifunctional defence molecules,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1024–1039, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. M. Bautista, M. Pellegrino, and M. Tsunozaki, “TRPA1: a gatekeeper for inflammation,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 75, pp. 181–200, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. P. Rodero and K. Khosrotehrani, “Skin wound healing modulation by macrophages,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 643–653, 2010. View at Scopus
  7. D. L. Woodland and J. E. Kohlmeier, “Migration, maintenance and recall of memory T cells in peripheral tissues,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. von Bubnoff, E. Andrès, F. Hentges, T. Bieber, T. Michel, and J. Zimmer, “Natural killer cells in atopic and autoimmune diseases of the skin,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 125, no. 1–3, pp. 60–68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. R. Rosenberg, S. Sanders, and C. T. Nelson, “Pemphigus. A 20 year review of 107 patients treated with corticosteroids,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 962–970, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. R. Stanley, M. Yaar, P. Hawley-Nelson, and S. I. Katz, “Pemphigus antibodies identify a cell surface glycoprotein synthesized by human and mouse keratinocytes,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 281–288, 1982. View at Scopus
  11. M. Amagai, V. Klaus-Kovtun, and J. R. Stanley, “Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in Pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion,” Cell, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 869–877, 1991. View at Scopus
  12. P. Berkowitz, M. Chua, Z. Liu, L. A. Diaz, and D. S. Rubenstein, “Autoantibodies in the autoimmune disease pemphigus foliaceus induce blistering via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent signaling in the skin,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 1628–1636, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. E. Lee, P. Berkowitz, P. S. Jolly, L. A. Diaz, M. P. Chua, and D. S. Rubenstein, “Biphasic activation of p38MAPK suggests that apoptosis is a downstream event in pemphigus acantholysis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 18, pp. 12524–12532, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Getsios, J. Waschke, L. Borradori, M. Hertl, and E. J. Müller, “From cell signaling to novel therapeutic concepts: international pemphigus meeting on advances in pemphigus research and therapy,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 1764–1768, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. A. Lowes, A. M. Bowcock, and J. G. Krueger, “Pathogenesis and therapy of psoriasis,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7130, pp. 866–873, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. O. Nestle, D. H. Kaplan, and J. Barker, “Mechanisms of disease: psoriasis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 5, pp. 444–509, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Kagami, H. L. Rizzo, J. J. Lee, Y. Koguchi, and A. Blauvelt, “Circulating Th17, Th22, and Th1 cells are increased in psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1373–1383, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Mattozzi, A. G. Richetta, C. Cantisani, L. Macaluso, and S. Calvieri, “Psoriasis: new insight about pathogenesis, role of barrier organ integrity, NLR/CATERPILLER family genes and microbial flora,” The Journal of Dermatology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 752–760, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. P. Berkowitz, P. Hu, S. Warren, Z. Liu, L. A. Diaz, and D. S. Rubenstein, “p38MAPK inhibition prevents disease in Pemphigus vulgaris mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 34, pp. 12856–12860, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Zheng, Z. Lin, Z. J. Zhao, Y. Yang, H. Niu, and X. Shen, “MAPK-activated protein kinase-2 (MK2)-mediated formation and phosphorylation-regulated dissociation of the signal complex consisting of p38, MK2, Akt, and Hsp27,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 48, pp. 37215–37226, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. X. Mao, Y. Sano, J. M. Park, and A. S. Payne, “p38 MAPK activation is downstream of the loss of intercellular adhesion in Pemphigus vulgaris,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. 1283–1291, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. N. Stern, D. B. Keskin, N. Barteneva, J. Zuniga, E. J. Yunis, and A. R. Ahmed, “Possible role of natural killer cells in Pemphigus vulgaris-preliminary observations,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 472–481, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Hashimoto, “Recent advances in the study of the pathophysiology of pemphigus,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 295, supplement 1, pp. S2–S11, 2003.
  24. S. A. Grando, “Pemphigus autoimmunity: hypotheses and realities,” Autoimmunity, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 7–35, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. X. Mao and A. S. Payne, “Seeking approval: present and future therapies for Pemphigus vulgaris,” Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 497–504, 2008. View at Scopus
  26. I. Zagorodniuk, S. Weltfriend, L. Shtruminger et al., “A comparison of anti-desmoglein antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence in the serodiagnosis of Pemphigus vulgaris,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 541–544, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Alaibac, A. Belloni-Fortina, D. Faggion et al., “Detection of autoantibodies against recombinant desmoglein 1 and 3 molecules in patients with Pemphigus vulgaris: correlation with disease extent at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2009, Article ID 187864, 6 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Tsunoda, T. Ota, M. Saito et al., “Pathogenic relevance of IgG and IgM antibodies against desmoglein 3 in blister formation in Pemphigus vulgaris,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 795–806, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. F. Diercks, H. H. Pas, and M. F. Jonkman, “The ultrastructure of acantholysis in Pemphigus vulgaris,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 460–461, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. S. Payne, Y. Hanakawa, M. Amagai, and J. R. Stanley, “Desmosomes and disease: pemphigus and bullous impetigo,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 536–543, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Hartlieb, B. Kempf, M. Partilla, B. Vigh, V. Spindler, and J. Waschke, “Desmoglein 2 is less important than desmoglein 3 for keratinocyte cohesion,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e53739, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. R. W. Eyre and J. R. Stanley, “Human autoantibodies against a desmosomal protein complex with a calcium-sensitive epitope are characteristic of pemphigus foliaceus patients,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 1719–1724, 1987. View at Scopus
  33. V. T. Nguyen, A. Ndoye, L. D. Shultz, M. R. Pittelkow, and S. A. Grando, “Antibodies against keratinocyte antigens other than desmogleins 1 and 3 can induce Pemphigus vulgaris-like lesions,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 1467–1479, 2000. View at Scopus
  34. M. Hertl and C. Veldman, “T-cellular autoimmunity against desmogleins in pemphigus, an autoantibody-mediated bullous disorder of the skin,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 278–283, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. G. Mahoney, Z. Wang, K. Rothenberger, P. J. Koch, M. Amagai, and J. R. Stanley, “Explanations for the clinical and microscopic localization of lesions in pemphigus foliaceus and vulgaris,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 461–468, 1999. View at Scopus
  36. S. Morioka, G. S. Lazarus, and P. J. Jensen, “Involvement of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in acantholysis induced by pemphigus IgG,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 474–477, 1987. View at Scopus
  37. K. H. Singer, K. Hashimoto, P. J. Jensen, S. Morioka, and G. S. Lazarus, “Pathogenesis of autoimmunity in pemphigus,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 3, pp. 87–108, 1985. View at Scopus
  38. M. S. Lin, S. J. Swartz, A. Lopez et al., “Development and characterization of desmoglein-3 specific T cells from patients with Pemphigus vulgaris,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1997. View at Scopus
  39. Y. Yamamoto, Y. Aoyama, E. Shu, K. Tsunoda, M. Amagai, and Y. Kitajima, “Anti-desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) monoclonal antibodies deplete desmosomes of Dsg3 and differ in their Dsg3-depleting activities related to pathogenicity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 24, pp. 17866–17876, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. J. Koch, M. G. Mahoney, H. Ishikawa et al., “Targeted disruption of the Pemphigus vulgaris antigen (desmoglein 3) gene in mice causes loss of keratinocyte cell adhesion with a phenotype similar to Pemphigus vulgaris,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1091–1102, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Amagai, K. Tsunoda, H. Suzuki, K. Nishifuji, S. Koyasu, and T. Nishikawa, “Use of autoantigen-knockout mice in developing an active autoimmune disease model for pemphigus,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 625–631, 2000. View at Scopus
  42. X. Mao, A. R. Nagler, S. A. Farber et al., “Autoimmunity to desmocollin 3 in Pemphigus vulgaris,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 2724–2730, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Kawasaki, Y. Aoyama, K. Tsunoda, M. Amagai, and Y. Kitajima, “Pathogenic monoclonal antibody against desmoglein 3 augments desmoglein 3 and p38 MAPK phosphorylation in human squamous carcinoma cell line,” Autoimmunity, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 587–590, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. H. Lorch, J. Klessner, J. K. Park et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition promotes desmosome assembly and strengthens intercellular adhesion in squamous cell carcinoma cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 35, pp. 37191–37200, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. Sharma, X. Mao, and A. S. Payne, “Beyond steric hindrance: the role of adhesion signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of pemphigus,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. I. Chernyavsky, J. Arredondo, Y. Kitajima, M. Sato-Nagai, and S. A. Grando, “Desmoglein versus non-desmoglein signaling in pemphigus acantholysis: characterization of novel signaling pathways downstream of Pemphigus vulgaris antigens,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 13804–13812, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Marchenko, A. I. Chernyavsky, J. Arredondo, V. Gindi, and S. A. Grando, “Antimitochondrial autoantibodies in Pemphigus vulgaris: a missing link in disease pathophysiology,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. 3695–3704, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. V. Spindler, V. Rotzer, C. Dehner et al., “Peptide-mediated desmoglein 3 crosslinking prevents Pemphigus vulgaris autoantibody-induced skin blistering,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 800–811, 2013.
  49. M. Saito, S. N. Stahley, C. Y. Caughman et al., “Signaling dependent and independent mechanisms in Pemphigus vulgaris blister formation,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e50696, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. Saklatvala, “The p38 MAP kinase pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory disease,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 372–377, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Y. Seko, S. Cole, W. Kasprzak, B. A. Shapiro, and J. A. Ragheb, “The role of cytokine mRNA stability in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 299–305, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Brook, G. Sully, A. R. Clark, and J. Saklatvala, “Regulation of tumour necrosis factor α mRNA stability by the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 signalling cascade,” FEBS Letters, vol. 483, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Mavropoulos, G. Sully, A. P. Cope, and A. R. Clark, “Stabilization of IFN-γ mRNA by MAPK p38 in IL-12- and IL-18-stimulated human NK cells,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 282–288, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Clark, J. Dean, C. Tudor, and J. Saklatvala, “Post-transcriptional gene regulation by MAP kinases via AU-rich elements,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 847–871, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. K. Otkjaer, H. Holtmann, T. W. Kragstrup et al., “The p38 MAPK regulates IL-24 expression by stabilization of the 3′ UTR of IL-24 mRNA,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8671, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Dauletbaev, D. Eklove, N. Mawji et al., “Down-regulation of cytokine-induced interleukin-8 requires inhibition of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) via MAPK phosphatase 1-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 18, pp. 15998–16007, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. L. R. Coulthard, D. E. White, D. L. Jones, M. F. McDermott, and S. A. Burchill, “p38MAPK: stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 369–379, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Mavropoulos, T. Orfanidou, C. Liaskos et al., “p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK)-mediated autoimmunity: lessons to learn from ANCA vasculitis and Pemphigus vulgaris,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 580–590, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. S. Arthur and J. Darragh, “Signaling downstream of p38 in psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1689–1691, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. Johansen, A. T. Funding, K. Otkjaer et al., “Protein expression of TNF-α in psoriatic skin is regulated at a posttranscriptional level by MAPK-activated protein kinase 2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 1431–1438, 2006. View at Scopus
  61. B. B. Aggarwal, S. Shishodia, Y. Takada et al., “TNF blockade: an inflammatory issue,” Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop, no. 56, pp. 161–186, 2006. View at Scopus
  62. L. Soegaard-Madsen, C. Johansen, L. Iversen, and K. Kragballe, “Adalimumab therapy rapidly inhibits p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in lesional psoriatic skin preceding clinical improvement,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 1216–1223, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. Mavropoulos, D. Smyk, E. I. Rigopoulou, and D. P. Bogdanos, “Human peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture for flow cytometric analysis of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinases,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 806, pp. 275–285, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. O. D. Perez, P. O. Krutzik, and G. P. Nolan, “Flow cytometric analysis of kinase signaling cascades,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 263, pp. 67–94, 2004. View at Scopus
  65. P. O. Krutzik, J. M. Irish, G. P. Nolan, and O. D. Perez, “Analysis of protein phosphorylation and cellular signaling events by flow cytometry: techniques and clinical applications,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 206–221, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. T. Montag and M. T. Lotze, “Rapid flow cytometric measurement of cytokine-induced phosphorylation pathways [CIPP] in human peripheral blood leukocytes,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 215–226, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. Mavropoulos, E. Spyrou, E. I. Rigopoulou, D. Vergani, G. N. Dalekos, and D. P. Bogdanos, “1107 Phosphorylation of P38 MAPK is detectable in NKT cells of patients with autoimmune hepatitis in whom it mirrors disease activity,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 52, p. S428, 2010.
  68. G. Schett, J. Zwerina, and G. Firestein, “The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 909–916, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. L. H. Pettus and R. P. Wurz, “Small molecule p38 MAP kinase inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases: novel structures and developments during 2006–2008,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 1452–1467, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. E. Sweeney, “The as-yet unfulfilled promise of p38 MAPK inhibitors,” Nature Reviews, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 475–477, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Terajima, T. Inoue, K. Magari, H. Yamazaki, Y. Higashi, and H. Mizuhara, “Anti-inflammatory effect and selectivity profile of AS1940477, a novel and potent p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 698, no. 1–3, pp. 455–462, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. S. Medicherla, J. Y. Ma, M. Reddy et al., “Topical alpha-selective p38 MAP kinase inhibition reduces acute skin inflammation in guinea pig,” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2010. View at Scopus
  73. S. Wang, H. Uchi, S. Hayashida, K. Urabe, Y. Moroi, and M. Furue, “Differential expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, phosphorylated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κB p105/p50 in chronic inflammatory skin diseases,” Journal of Dermatology, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 534–540, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. L. Jinlian, Z. Yingbin, and W. Chunbo, “p38 MAPK in regulating cellular responses to ultraviolet radiation,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 303–312, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Hildesheim, R. T. Awwad, and A. J. Fornace Jr., “p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor protects the epidermis against the acute damaging effects of ultraviolet irradiation by blocking apoptosis and inflammatory responses,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 497–502, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. K. Ipaktchi, A. Mattar, A. D. Niederbichler et al., “Topical p38MAPK inhibition reduces dermal inflammation and epithelial apoptosis in burn wounds,” Shock, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. C. Jonak, M. Mildner, G. Klosner et al., “The hsp27kD heat shock protein and p38-MAPK signaling are required for regular epidermal differentiation,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. H. Choi, D. K. Choi, K. C. Sohn et al., “Absence of a human DnaJ protein hTid-1S correlates with aberrant actin cytoskeleton organization in lesional psoriatic skin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 31, pp. 25954–25963, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. B. Rock, R. S. Labib, and L. A. Diaz, “Monovalent Fab' immunoglobulin fragments from endemic pemphigus foliaceus autoantibodies reproduce the human disease in neonatal Balb/c mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 296–299, 1990. View at Scopus
  80. M. Kalantari-Dehaghi, G. J. Anhalt, M. J. Camilleri et al., “Pemphigus vulgaris autoantibody profiling by proteomic technique,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e57587, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. M. Papamichail, S. A. Perez, A. D. Gritzapis, and C. N. Baxevanis, “Natural killer lymphocytes: biology, development, and function,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 176–186, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Johansson, H. Hall, L. Berg, and P. Hoglund, “NK cells in autoimmune disease,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 298, pp. 259–277, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. A. Cameron, B. Kirby, W. Fei, and C. Griffiths, “Natural killer and natural killer-T cells in psoriasis,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 294, no. 8, pp. 363–369, 2002. View at Scopus
  84. H. Takahashi, M. Amagai, A. Tanikawa et al., “T helper type 2-biased natural killer cell phenotype in patients with Pemphigus vulgaris,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 324–330, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. B. Hervier, V. Beziat, J. Haroche et al., “Phenotype and function of natural killer cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: excess interferon-γ production in patients with active disease,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1698–1706, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. L. R. Zakka, E. Fradkov, D. B. Keskin, I. Tabansky, J. N. H. Stern, and A. R. Ahmed, “The role of natural killer cells in autoimmune blistering diseases,” Autoimmunity, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. V. de Re, L. Caggiari, M. de Zorzi, and G. Toffoli, “KIR molecules: recent patents of interest for the diagnosis and treatment of several autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammation, and B-cell malignancies,” Recent Patents on DNA and Gene Sequences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. D. G. Augusto, S. C. Lobo-Alves, M. F. Melo, N. F. Pereira, and M. L. Petzl-Erler, “Activating KIR and HLA Bw4 ligands are associated to decreased susceptibility to pemphigus foliaceus, an autoimmune blistering skin disease,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e39991, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. S. E. Dick and V. P. Werth, “Pemphigus: a treatment update,” Autoimmunity, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 591–599, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. D. Tsuruta, N. Ishii, and T. Hashimoto, “Diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus,” Immunotherapy, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 735–745, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. S. Baum, S. Greenberger, L. Samuelov et al., “Methotrexate is an effective and safe adjuvant therapy for Pemphigus vulgaris,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. N. Vyas, N. S. Patel, and G. F. Cohen, “Mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in the treatment of Pemphigus vulgaris,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 210–216, 2013.
  93. R. J. Feldman and A. R. Ahmed, “Relevance of rituximab therapy in Pemphigus vulgaris: analysis of current data and the immunologic basis for its observed responses,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 529–541, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. L. R. Zakka, S. S. Shetty, and A. R. Ahmed, “Rituximab in the treatment of Pemphigus vulgaris,” Dermatology and Therapy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2–17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. A. R. Clark, “MAP kinase phosphatase 1: a novel mediator of biological effects of glucocorticoids?” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. R. Lang, M. Hammer, and J. Mages, “DUSP meet immunology: dual specificity MAPK phosphatases in control of the inflammatory response,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 7497–7504, 2006. View at Scopus
  97. M. Lasa, S. M. Abraham, C. Boucheron, J. Saklatvala, and A. R. Clark, “Dexamethasone causes sustained expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase 1 and phosphatase-mediated inhibition of MAPK p38,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 7802–7811, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. E. M. King, N. S. Holden, W. Gong, C. F. Rider, and R. Newton, “Inhibition of NF-κ-dependent transcription by MKP-1. Transcriptional repression by glucocorticoids occuring via p38 MAPK,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 39, pp. 26803–26815, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. A. Lawan, E. Torrance, S. Al-Harthi et al., “MKP-2: out of the DUSP-bin and back into the limelight,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 235–239, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. H. Hu, T. Chen, Z. H. Zhuang et al., “Feedback control of MKP-1 expression by p38,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 393–400, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. R. B. Kjellerup, C. Johansen, K. Kragballe, and L. Iversen, “The expression of dual specificity phosphatase 1 mRNA is downregulated in lesional psoriatic skin,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 339–345, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. H. Y. Schultz, L. A. Diaz, D. A. Sirois, V. P. Werth, and S. A. Grando, “Generating consensus research goals and treatment strategies for pemphigus and pemphigoid: the 2010 JC Bystryn pemphigus and pemphigoid meeting,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 1395–1399, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. P. Cohen, “Targeting protein kinases for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 317–324, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. I. M. Pedersen, A. M. Buhl, P. Klausen, C. H. Geisler, and J. Jurlander, “The chimeric anti-CD20 antibody rituximab induces apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through a p38 mitogen activated protein-kinase-dependent mechanism,” Blood, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1314–1319, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. Stewart, V. Malkovska, J. Krishnan, L. Lessin, and W. Barth, “Lymphoma in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate treatment: successful treatment with rituximab,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 892–893, 2001. View at Scopus
  106. E. Kimby, “Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera),” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 456–473, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. T. G. Salopek, S. Logsetty, and E. E. Tredget, “Anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody (rituximab) for the treatment of recalcitrant, life-threatening Pemphigus vulgaris with implications in the pathogenesis of the disorder,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 785–788, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. M. J. Arin, A. Engert, T. Krieg, and N. Hunzelmann, “Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) in the treatment of pemphigus,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 620–625, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. H. H. Cho, S. P. Jin, and J. H. Chung, “Clinical experiences of different dosing schedules of rituximab in pemphigus with various disease severities,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. M. I. Vega, S. Huerta-Yepaz, H. Garban, A. Jazirehi, C. Emmanouilides, and B. Bonavida, “Rituximab inhibits p38 MAPK activity in 2F7 B NHL and decreases IL-10 transcription: pivotal role of p38 MAPK in drug resistance,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 20, pp. 3530–3540, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. A. Jacobi, G. Schuler, and M. Hertl, “Rapid control of therapy-refractory Pemphigus vulgaris by treatment with the tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor infliximab [6],” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 448–449, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. A. Shetty, C. B. Marcum, L. F. Glass, and J. D. Carter, “Successful treatment of Pemphigus vulgaris with etanercept in four patients,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 940–943, 2009. View at Scopus
  113. N. Cirillo, E. Cozzani, M. Carrozzo, and S. A. Grando, “Urban legends: Pemphigus vulgaris,” Oral Diseases, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 442–458, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. S. A. Grando, J. Bystryn, A. I. Chernyavsky et al., “Apoptolysis: a novel mechanism of skin blistering in Pemphigus vulgaris linking the apoptotic pathways to basal cell shrinkage and suprabasal acantholysis,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 764–770, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. D. P. Bogdanos, H. Baum, M. Okamoto et al., “Primary biliary cirrhosis is characterized by IgG3 antibodies cross-reactive with the major mitochondrial autoepitope and its lactobacillus mimic,” Hepatology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 458–465, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. D. P. Bogdanos, G. Mieli-Vergani, and D. Vergani, “Autoantibodies and their antigens in autoimmune hepatitis,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 241–253, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. E. I. Rigopoulou, E. T. Davies, D. Bogdanos et al., “Antimitochondrial antibodies of immunoglobulin G3 subclass are associated with a more severe disease course in primary biliary cirrhosis,” Liver International, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1226–1231, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. D. S. Smyk, E. I. Rigopoulou, A. Lleo et al., “Immunopathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis: an old wives' tale,” Immunity and Ageing, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. G. Mieli-Vergani and D. Vergani, “Autoimmune hepatitis,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 320–329, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus