Advances in Difference Equations
Volumeย 2010ย (2010), Article IDย 262461, 17 pages
doi:10.1155/2010/262461
Research Article

Existence of 2 ๐‘› Positive Periodic Solutions to ๐‘› -Species Nonautonomous Food Chains with Harvesting Terms

1Department of Mathematics, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091, China
2Department of Mathematics, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi, Yunnan 653100, China

Received 12 November 2009; Accepted 10 January 2010

Academic Editor: Gaston Mandataย N'Guerekata

Copyright ยฉ 2010 Yongkun Li and Kaihong Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

By using Mawhin's continuation theorem of coincidence degree theory and some skills of inequalities, we establish the existence of at least 2 ๐‘› positive periodic solutions for ๐‘› -species nonautonomous Lotka-Volterra type food chains with harvesting terms. An example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of our results.

1. Introduction

The dynamic relationship between predators and their prey has long been and will continue to be one of the dominant themes in both ecology and mathematical ecology due to its universal existence and importance. These problems may appear to be simple mathematically at first; sight, they are, in fact, very challenging and complicated. There are many different kinds of predator-prey models in the literature. For more details, we refer to [1, 2]. Food chain predator-prey system, as one of the most important predator-prey system, has been extensively studied by many scholars, many excellent results concerned with the persistent property and positive periodic solution of the system; see [313] and the references cited therein. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, to this day, still no scholar study the ๐‘› -species nonautonomous case of Food chain predator-prey system with harvesting terms. Indeed, the exploitation of biological resources and the harvest of population species are commonly practiced in fishery, forestry, and wildlife management; the study of population dynamics with harvesting is an important subject in mathematical bioeconomics, which is related to the optimal management of renewable resources (see [1416]). This motivates us to consider the following ๐‘› -species nonautonomous Lotka-Volterra type food chain model with harvesting terms:

ฬ‡ ๐‘ฅ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐‘ฅ 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ( ๐‘ก ) 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 2 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ 2 ๎€ธ ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 โ‹ฎ ( ๐‘ก ) , ฬ‡ ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– ๎€ท ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– + 1 ๎€ธ ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– โ‹ฎ ( ๐‘ก ) , ฬ‡ ๐‘ฅ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐‘ฅ ๐‘› ๎€ท ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘ฅ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๎€ธ ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) , ( 1 . 1 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) is the ๐‘– th species population density, ๐‘Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) is the growth rate of the first species that is the only producer in system (1.1), ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) and โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) stand for the ๐‘– th species intraspecific competition rate and harvesting rate, respectively, ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) is the death rate of the ๐‘– th species, ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ) represents the ( ๐‘– + 1 ) th species predation rate on the ๐‘– th species, and ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) stands for the transformation rate from the ( ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ) th species to the ๐‘– th species. In addition, the effects of a periodically varying environment are important for evolutionary theory as the selective forces on systems in a fluctuating environment differ from those in a stable environment. Therefore, the assumptions of periodicity of the parameters are a way of incorporating the periodicity of the environment (e.g, seasonal effects of weather, food supplies, mating habits, etc), which leads us to assume that ๐‘Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘ ๐‘– ๐‘— ( ๐‘ก ) , and โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ( ๐‘– , ๐‘— = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› ) are all positive continuous ๐œ” -periodic functions.

Since a very basic and important problem in the study of a population growth model with a periodic environment is the global existence and stability of a positive periodic solution, which plays a similar role as a globally stable equilibrium does in an autonomous model, this motivates us to investigate the existence of a positive periodic or multiple positive periodic solutions for system (1.1). In fact, it is more likely for some biological species to take on multiple periodic change regulations and have multiple local stable periodic phenomena. Therefore, it is essential for us to investigate the existence of multiple positive periodic solutions for population models. Our main purpose of this paper is by using Mawhin's continuation theorem of coincidence degree theory [17], to establish the existence of 2 ๐‘› positive periodic solutions for system (1.1). For the work concerning the multiple existence of periodic solutions of periodic population models which was done using coincidence degree theory, we refer to [1821].

The organization of the rest of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, by employing the continuation theorem of coincidence degree theory and the skills of inequalities, we establish the existence of at least 2 ๐‘› positive periodic solutions of system (1.1). In Section 3, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of our results.

2. Existence of at Least ๐Ÿ ๐ง Positive Periodic Solutions

In this section, by using Mawhin's continuation theorem and the skills of inequalities, we shall show the existence of positive periodic solutions of (1.1). To do so, we need to make some preparations.

Let ๐‘‹ and ๐‘ be real normed vector spaces. Let ๐ฟ โˆถ D o m ๐ฟ โŠ‚ ๐‘‹ โ†’ ๐‘ be a linear mapping and ๐‘ โˆถ ๐‘‹ ร— [ 0 , 1 ] โ†’ ๐‘ be a continuous mapping. The mapping ๐ฟ will be called a Fredholm mapping of index zero if dim K e r ๐ฟ = c o d i m I m ๐ฟ < โˆž and I m ๐ฟ is closed in ๐‘ . If ๐ฟ is a Fredholm mapping of index zero, then there exist continuous projectors ๐‘ƒ โˆถ ๐‘‹ โ†’ ๐‘‹ and ๐‘„ โˆถ ๐‘ โ†’ ๐‘ such that I m ๐‘ƒ = K e r ๐ฟ and K e r ๐‘„ = I m ๐ฟ = I m ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) , and ๐‘‹ = K e r ๐ฟ โŠ• K e r ๐‘ƒ , ๐‘ = I m ๐ฟ โŠ• I m ๐‘„ . It follows that ๐ฟ | D o m ๐ฟ โˆฉ K e r ๐‘ƒ โˆถ ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘ƒ ) ๐‘‹ โ†’ I m ๐ฟ is invertible and its inverse is denoted by ๐พ ๐‘ƒ . If ฮฉ is a bounded open subset of ๐‘‹ , the mapping ๐‘ is called ๐ฟ -compact on ฮฉ ร— [ 0 , 1 ] , if ๐‘„ ๐‘ ( ฮฉ ร— [ 0 , 1 ] ) is bounded and ๐พ ๐‘ƒ ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) ๐‘ โˆถ ฮฉ ร— [ 0 , 1 ] โ†’ ๐‘‹ is compact. Because Im ๐‘„ is isomorphic to Ker ๐ฟ , there exists an isomorphism ๐ฝ โˆถ I m ๐‘„ โ†’ K e r ๐ฟ .

The Mawhin's continuous theorem [17, page 40] is given as follows.

Lemma 2.1 (see [9]). Let ๐ฟ be a Fredholm mapping of index zero and let ๐‘ be ๐ฟ -compact on ฮฉ ร— [ 0 , 1 ] . Assume that (a)for each ๐œ† โˆˆ ( 0 , 1 ) , every solution ๐‘ฅ of ๐ฟ ๐‘ฅ = ๐œ† ๐‘ ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐œ† ) is such that ๐‘ฅ โˆ‰ ๐œ• ฮฉ โˆฉ D o m ๐ฟ ; (b) ๐‘„ ๐‘ ( ๐‘ฅ , 0 ) ๐‘ฅ โ‰  0 for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐œ• ฮฉ โˆฉ K e r ๐ฟ ; (c) d e g ( ๐ฝ ๐‘„ ๐‘ ( ๐‘ฅ , 0 ) , ฮฉ โˆฉ K e r ๐ฟ , 0 ) โ‰  0 . Then ๐ฟ ๐‘ฅ = ๐‘ ( ๐‘ฅ , 1 ) has at least one solution in ฮฉ โˆฉ D o m ๐ฟ .

For the sake of convenience, we denote ๐‘“ ๐‘™ = m i n ๐‘ก โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘“ ๐‘€ = m a x ๐‘ก โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ก ) , โˆซ ๐‘“ = ( 1 / ๐œ” ) ๐œ” 0 ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ก ) d ๐‘ก , respectively; here ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ก ) is a continuous ๐œ” -periodic function.

For simplicity, we need to introduce some notations as follows:

๐ด ยฑ 1 = ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 ๎€ธ ยฑ ๎” ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 ๎€ธ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , ๐‘™ ยฑ ๐‘– = ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ยฑ ๎‚™ ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๎‚ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘– 2 ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘™ ยฑ 1 = ๐‘Ž ๐‘€ 1 ยฑ ๎” ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๎€ธ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘› 2 ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐ด ยฑ ๐‘› = ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ ยฑ ๎‚™ ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , ๐ด ยฑ ๐‘– = ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ ยฑ ๎‚™ ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐ต ยฑ 1 = ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 ยฑ ๎” ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 ๎€ธ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , ๐ต ยฑ ๐‘– = ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ยฑ ๎‚™ ๎‚€ ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๎‚ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ( 2 . 1 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› .

Throughout this paper, we need the following assumptions:

( ๐ป 1 ) ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 ๎” > 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 and ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎” > 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› ; ( ๐ป 2 ) ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎” > 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 .

Lemma 2.2. Let ๐‘ฅ > 0 , ๐‘ฆ > 0 , ๐‘ง > 0 and โˆš ๐‘ฅ > 2 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง , for the functions ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) = ( ๐‘ฅ + โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง ) / 2 ๐‘ง and ๐‘” ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) = ( ๐‘ฅ โˆ’ โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง ) / 2 ๐‘ง , the following assertions hold: (1) ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) and ๐‘” ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) are monotonically increasing and monotonically decreasing on the variable ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ( 0 , โˆž ) , respectively. (2) ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) and ๐‘” ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) are monotonically decreasing and monotonically increasing on the variable ๐‘ฆ โˆˆ ( 0 , โˆž ) , respectively. (3) ๐‘“ ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) and ๐‘” ( ๐‘ฅ , ๐‘ฆ , ๐‘ง ) are monotonically decreasing and monotonically increasing on the variable ๐‘ง โˆˆ ( 0 , โˆž ) , respectively.

Proof. In fact, for all ๐‘ฅ > 0 , ๐‘ฆ > 0 , ๐‘ง > 0 , we have ๐œ• ๐‘“ = ๐œ• ๐‘ฅ ๐‘ฅ + โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง 2 ๐‘ง โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง > 0 , ๐œ• ๐‘” = โˆš ๐œ• ๐‘ฅ ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง โˆ’ ๐‘ฅ 2 ๐‘ง โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง < 0 , ๐œ• ๐‘“ = ๐œ• ๐‘ฆ โˆ’ 1 โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง < 0 , ๐œ• ๐‘” = 1 ๐œ• ๐‘ฆ โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง > 0 , ๐œ• ๐‘“ = ๎‚€ ๐œ• ๐‘ง โˆ’ ๐‘ฅ ๐‘ฅ + โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 ๎‚ โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง 2 ๐‘ง 2 โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง < 0 , ๐œ• ๐‘” = ๐‘ฅ ๎‚€ ๐œ• ๐‘ง ๐‘ฅ โˆ’ โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 ๎‚ โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง 2 ๐‘ง 2 โˆš ๐‘ฅ 2 โˆ’ 4 ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ง > 0 . ( 2 . 2 ) By the relationship of the derivative and the monotonicity, the above assertions obviously hold. The proof of Lemma 2.2 is complete.

Lemma 2.3. Assume that ( ๐ป 1 ) and ( ๐ป 2 ) hold, then we have the following inequalities: l n ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– < l n ๐ต โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ด โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ด + ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ต + ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐‘™ + ๐‘– , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› . ( 2 . 3 )

Proof. Since ๐‘Ž ๐‘€ 1 โ‰ฅ ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 > ๐‘Ž ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 ๎” > 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 > 0 , 0 < ๐‘ ๐‘™ 1 โ‰ค ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , 0 < โ„Ž ๐‘™ 1 โ‰ค โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 > ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– > ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– > 0 , 0 < ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– โ‰ค ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , 0 < โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘– โ‰ค โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๐‘ , ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘€ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 > ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 > ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎” > 2 ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› > 0 , 0 < ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› โ‰ค ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , 0 < โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘› โ‰ค โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› . ( 2 . 4 ) By assumptions ( ๐ป 1 ) , ( ๐ป 2 ) , Lemma 2.2 and the expressions of ๐ด ยฑ ๐‘– , ๐ต ยฑ ๐‘– , and ๐‘™ ยฑ ๐‘– , we have 0 < ๐‘™ โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž = ๐‘” ๐‘€ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘™ 1 ๎€ธ ๎€ท ๐‘Ž < ๐‘” ๐‘™ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๎€ธ = ๐ต โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž < ๐‘” ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๎€ธ = ๐ด โˆ’ 1 < ๐ด + 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 2 ๐‘™ + 2 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๎€ธ < ๐ต + 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๎€ธ ๎€ท ๐‘Ž < ๐‘“ ๐‘€ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ 1 , โ„Ž ๐‘™ 1 ๎€ธ = ๐‘™ + 1 , 0 < ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘” ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘– ๎‚ ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘” ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ = ๐ต โˆ’ ๐‘– ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘” ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ = ๐ด โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐ด + ๐‘– ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– + 1 โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ < ๐ต + ๐‘– ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘– ๎‚ ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘“ ๐‘€ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘– , โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘– ๎‚ = ๐‘™ + ๐‘– , 0 < ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘” ๐‘€ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๎‚ ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘” ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ = ๐ต โˆ’ ๐‘› ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘” ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ = ๐ด โˆ’ ๐‘› < ๐ด + ๐‘› ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ < ๐ต + ๐‘› ๎‚€ ๐‘ = ๐‘“ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘€ ๐‘› ๎‚ ๎‚€ ๐‘ < ๐‘“ ๐‘€ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๐‘™ + ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐‘ ๐‘™ ๐‘› , โ„Ž ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๎‚ = ๐‘™ + ๐‘› , ( 2 . 5 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , that is 0 < ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐ต โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐ด โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐ด + ๐‘– < ๐ต + ๐‘– < ๐‘™ + ๐‘– , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› . Thus, we have l n ๐‘™ โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ต โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ด โˆ’ ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ด + ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐ต + ๐‘– < ๐‘™ ๐‘› ๐‘™ + ๐‘– , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› . The proof of Lemma 2.3 is complete.

Theorem 2.4. Assume that ( ๐ป 1 ) and ( ๐ป 2 ) hold. Then system (1.1) has at least 2 ๐‘› positive ๐œ” -periodic solutions.

Proof. By making the substitution ๐‘ฅ ๐‘– ๎€ฝ ๐‘ข ( ๐‘ก ) = e x p ๐‘– ๎€พ ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› , ( 2 . 6 ) system (1.1) can be reformulated as ฬ‡ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐‘Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 2 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) , โ‹ฎ ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) = โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) , โ‹ฎ ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) = โˆ’ ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) , ( 2 . 7 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 .
Let
๎‚† ๎€ท ๐‘ข ๐‘‹ = ๐‘ = ๐‘ข = 1 , ๐‘ข 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘ข ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘‡ โˆˆ ๐ถ ( ๐‘… , ๐‘… ๐‘› ๎‚‡ ) โˆถ ๐‘ข ( ๐‘ก + ๐œ” ) = ๐‘ข ( ๐‘ก ) ( 2 . 8 ) and define โ€– ๐‘ข โ€– = ๐‘› ๎“ ๐‘– = 1 m a x ๐‘ก โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] | | ๐‘ข ๐‘– | | ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘ข โˆˆ ๐‘‹ o r ๐‘ . ( 2 . 9 ) Equipped with the above norm โ€– โ‹… โ€– , ๐‘‹ and ๐‘ are Banach spaces. Let โŽ› โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽ ๐‘Ž ๐‘ ( ๐‘ข , ๐œ† ) = 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โ‹ฎ โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) โ‹ฎ โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) โŽž โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽ  ๐‘› ร— 1 , ( 2 . 1 0 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 , ๐ฟ ๐‘ข = ฬ‡ ๐‘ข = ( d ๐‘ข ( ๐‘ก ) ) / d ๐‘ก . We put โˆซ ๐‘ƒ ๐‘ข = ( 1 / ๐œ” ) ๐œ” 0 ๐‘ข ( ๐‘ก ) d โˆซ ๐‘ก , ๐‘ข โˆˆ ๐‘‹ ; ๐‘„ ๐‘ง = ( 1 / ๐œ” ) ๐œ” 0 ๐‘ง ( ๐‘ก ) d ๐‘ก , ๐‘ง โˆˆ ๐‘ . Thus it follows that K e r ๐ฟ = ๐‘… ๐‘› , I m โˆซ ๐ฟ = { ๐‘ง โˆˆ ๐‘ โˆถ ๐œ” 0 ๐‘ง ( ๐‘ก ) d ๐‘ก = 0 } is closed in ๐‘ , d i m K e r ๐ฟ = ๐‘› = c o d i m I m ๐ฟ , and ๐‘ƒ , ๐‘„ are continuous projectors such that I m ๐‘ƒ = K e r ๐ฟ , K e r ๐‘„ = I m ๐ฟ = I m ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) . ( 2 . 1 1 ) Hence, ๐ฟ is a Fredholm mapping of index zero. Furthermore, the generalized inverse (to ๐ฟ ) ๐พ ๐‘ƒ โˆถ I m โ‹‚ ๐ฟ โ†’ K e r ๐‘ƒ D o m ๐ฟ is given by ๐พ ๐‘ƒ ( ๎€œ ๐‘ง ) = ๐‘ก 0 ๐‘ง ( ๐‘  ) d 1 ๐‘  โˆ’ ๐œ” ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๎€œ ๐‘  0 ๐‘ง ( ๐‘  ) d ๐‘  . ( 2 . 1 2 ) Then โŽ› โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽ 1 ๐‘„ ๐‘ ( ๐‘ข , ๐œ† ) = ๐œ” ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๐น 1 ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  โ‹ฎ 1 ๐œ” ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๐น ๐‘› ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  โŽž โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽ  ๐‘› ร— 1 , ( 2 . 1 3 ) ๐พ ๐‘ƒ โŽ› โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽ ๎€œ ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) ๐‘ ( ๐‘ข , ๐œ† ) = ๐‘ก 0 ๐น 1 ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d 1 ๐‘  โˆ’ ๐œ” ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๎€œ ๐‘ก 0 ๐น 1 ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  d ๎‚€ 1 ๐‘ก + 2 โˆ’ ๐‘ก ๐œ” ๎‚ ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๐น 1 ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  โ‹ฎ ๎€œ ๐‘ก 0 ๐น ๐‘› ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d 1 ๐‘  โˆ’ ๐œ” ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๎€œ ๐‘ก 0 ๐น ๐‘› ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  d ๎‚€ 1 ๐‘ก + 2 โˆ’ ๐‘ก ๐œ” ๎‚ ๎€œ ๐œ” 0 ๐น ๐‘› ( ๐‘  , ๐œ† ) d ๐‘  โŽž โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽ  ๐‘› ร— 1 , ( 2 . 1 4 ) where โŽ› โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽœ โŽ ๐‘Ž ๐น ( ๐‘ข , ๐œ† ) = 1 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘  ) โ‹ฎ โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘  ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘  ) โ‹ฎ โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘  ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘  ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ( ๐‘  ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘  ) โŽž โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽŸ โŽ  ๐‘› ร— 1 . ( 2 . 1 5 ) Obviously, ๐‘„ ๐‘ and ๐พ ๐‘ƒ ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) ๐‘ are continuous. It is not difficult to show that ๐พ ๐‘ƒ ( ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐‘„ ) ๐‘ ( ฮฉ ) is compact for any open bounded set ฮฉ โŠ‚ ๐‘‹ by using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. Moreover, ๐‘„ ๐‘ ( ฮฉ ) is clearly bounded. Thus, ๐‘ is ๐ฟ -compact on ฮฉ with any open bounded set ฮฉ โŠ‚ ๐‘‹ .
In order to use Lemma 2.1, we have to find at least 2 ๐‘› appropriate open bounded subsets of ๐‘‹ . Corresponding to the operator equation ๐ฟ ๐‘ข = ๐œ† ๐‘ ( ๐‘ข , ๐œ† ) , ๐œ† โˆˆ ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
ฬ‡ ๐‘ข 1 ๎€ท ๐‘Ž ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐œ† 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๎€ธ , โ‹ฎ ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ๎€ท ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐œ† โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) ๎€ธ , โ‹ฎ ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ๎€ท ( ๐‘ก ) = ๐œ† โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐‘ก ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐‘ก ) ๎€ธ , ( 2 . 1 6 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 . Assume that ๐‘ข โˆˆ ๐‘‹ is an ๐œ” -periodic solution of system (2.16) for some ๐œ† โˆˆ ( 0 , 1 ) . Then there exist ๐œ‰ ๐‘– , ๐œ‚ ๐‘– โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] such that ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) = m a x ๐‘ก โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) = m i n ๐‘ก โˆˆ [ 0 , ๐œ” ] ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐‘ก ) , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› . It is clear that ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) = 0 , ฬ‡ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) = 0 , ๐‘– = 1 , 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› . From this and (2.16), we have ๐‘Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โ‹ฎ = 0 , โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ) โ‹ฎ = 0 , โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘– ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ) + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ( ๐œ‰ ๐‘› ) = 0 ( 2 . 1 7 ) ๐‘Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ 1 ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‚ 1 ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‚ 1 ) โˆ’ โ„Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‚ 1 ) โ‹ฎ = 0 , โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) + ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– โˆ’ 1 ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ ๐‘– , ๐‘– + 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– + 1 ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘– ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘– ( ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ) โ‹ฎ = 0 , โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘‘ ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘– ๎€ธ โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ + ๐‘ ๐‘› , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ โˆ’ โ„Ž ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ ๐‘’ โˆ’ ๐‘ข ๐‘› ๎€ท ๐œ‚ ๐‘› ๎€ธ = 0 , ( 2 . 1 8 ) where ๐‘– = 2 , 3 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘› โˆ’ 1 .
On one hand, according to (2.17), we have
๐‘ ๐‘™ 1 ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) + โ„Ž ๐‘™ 1 โ‰ค ๐‘ 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) + โ„Ž 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ = โˆ’ ๐œ† ๐‘ 1 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) + ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) < 0 , ( 2 . 1 9 ) namely, ๐‘ ๐‘™ 1 ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) โˆ’ ๐‘Ž ๐‘€ 1 ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 1 ( ๐œ‰ 1 ) + โ„Ž ๐‘™ 1 < 0 , ( 2 . 2 0 ) which implies that l n ๐‘™ โˆ’ 1 < ๐‘ข 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 1 ๎€ธ < l n ๐‘™ + 1 , ( 2 . 2 1 ) ๐‘ ๐‘™ 2 ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + โ„Ž ๐‘™ 2 < ๐‘ 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + ๐œ† ๐‘ 2 3 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + ๐‘ข 3 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + ๐œ† ๐‘‘ 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + โ„Ž 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ = ๐‘ 2 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ + ๐‘ข 1 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ < ๐‘ ๐‘€ 2 1 ๐‘™ + 1 ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ๎€ท ๐œ‰ 2 ๎€ธ ; ( 2 . 2 2 ) that is, ๐‘ ๐‘™ 2 ๐‘’ 2 ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) โˆ’ ๐‘ ๐‘€ 2 1 ๐‘™ + 1 ๐‘’ ๐‘ข 2 ( ๐œ‰ 2 ) + โ„Ž ๐‘™ 2 < 0 , ( 2 . 2 3