Review Article

Impact of Biochar on Earthworm Populations: A Review

Table 1

Summary of laboratory (L) and field (F) studies using biochar and wood ash and reporting direct impacts on earthworms.

StudyEarthworm speciesStudy typeCharcoal/biochar description and application rateLocationSoil/pHEarthworm impact

Topoliantz and Ponge [45]Pontoscolex corethrurusLChar from slash-and-burn field 60% char mixtureFrench GuianaOxisol pH 4.6 inc 6.9Normal growth rates; less casting and burrowing activity in char:soil mixtures; 1 of 10 earthworms died
Topoliantz and Ponge [46]Pontoscolex corethrurusLCharred wood from slash-and-burn 60% char mixtureFrench GuianaOxisol PH 4.2–4.6 inc 6.9Nonsignificant growth increases; direct charcoal consumption observed; surface cast production greater with soil : char mixture
Topoliantz et al. [74]Pontoscolex corethrurusL“local homemade charcoal” no further description
One half of a 67 L m−2 mixture of organic amendment mounded and covered with soil
French Guiana: (3°39′N; 54°2′W)Oxisol pH 4.4 inc 4.9Decrease in abundance of juveniles not significant; decrease in number of cocoons significant (charcoal + saw dust only)
Chan et al. [49]Earthworms, spp. not statedLPoultry litter
Slow pyrolysis
450 (pH 9.9) and activation (pH 13)
0, 10, 25 and 50 t ha−1
AustraliaAlfisol pH 4.8–5.0 inc 6.0–7.8Earthworms showed no preference/avoidance for soil over soil : char mixtures (specific data on char concentrations not provided); preference better for lower pH char
Cui et al. [47]Eisenia fetidaLCrop ash from burned rice residue
1, 3, 5, and 10% mixtures
ChinaSediment No mortality, but genotoxicity (damage to earthworm DNA) occurred at ash concentrations of 10%
Van Zwieten et al. [22]Eisenia fetidaLWood chip biochar Slow pyrolysis, 550°C 50 : 50 and 30 : 70 Paper pulp sludge to 10 t ha−1
2% Ferrosol
1.5% calcarosol
AustraliaFerrosol pH 4.2 inc’d to 5.9
Calcarosol pH 7.6 did not change
Biochar : Ferrosol mixture preferred; no preference for biochar : Calcarosol mixture; biochar with 70% wood chips slightly more preferred over biochar with 50% wood chips
Liesch et al. [12]Eisenia fetidaLPoultry litter and pine chip biochars 400°C 30 min
0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, and 90 Mg ha−1
USSimulated soil pH initially 7.0Poultry litter biochar mortality and weight loss increased with application rate; Pine chip biochar no significant effect on mortality
Li et al. [50]Eisenia fetidaLApple wood chips
Batch reactor slow pyrolysis 525°C 90–180 t ha−1
1, 10, 20% mixtures
USSimulated soil pH initially ~7.0Avoidance of biochar amended soil—eliminated by wetting biochar; weight loss increasing with application rate
Gomez-Eyles et al. [55]Eisenia fetidaLDeciduous, hardwood-derived biochar; 600°C
10% char mixture
UKContaminated soil, type not statedpH 7.63Weight loss observed with biochar; reduced contaminant accumulation in body tissue
Husk and Major [75]Earthworms spp. not statedFHardwood waste material
Fast pyrolysis
5.6 Mg ha−1
CanadaSoil type not stated; pH variable between 6.4–7.4Generally higher abundance in biochar plots but not statistically compared
Current studyEuropean lumbricidsFWood-derived biochar ( manure) by fast pyrolysis
Macadamia nut— derived biochar by slow pyrolysis
22.5 Mg ha−1
USWaukagan silt loam; pH 6.3–6.6No impact on field populations
Haimi et al. [56]Cognettia sphagnetorumFWood ash
1000 and 5000 kg ha−1
FinlandForest soil (podzolized sandy soil)Decreased abundance following 2500 and 5000 kg ha−1
Insignificant decrease at 1000 kg ha−1
Liiri et al. [58]Cognettia sphagnetorumLWood ash 5000 kg ha−1FinlandPine forest humus
pH 4.7–5.8 inc. 6.8–7.8
Decreased biomass but only when wood ash mixed into treated humus
Liiri et al. [59]Cognettia sphagnetorumLWood ash 5000 kg ha−1FinlandPine forest humus pH 4.5Decreased biomass
Cox et al. [60]Earthworms; spp not statedFCoal ash110 t ha−1USNaff silt loamNo significant difference in total biomass or abundance
Nieminen [61]Cognettia sphagnetorumLWood ashFinlandNorway Spruce forest humus pH 4.6Decreases with solely wood ash
No significant effect with the combination of ash
Lundkvist [89]Cognettia sphagnetorumL/FWood ashSwedenForest soilNo significant differences
Huhta et al. [90]Cognettia sphagnetorumFWood ashFinlandForest soilDecreased biomass following ash addition; Controls lacked earthworms; few earthworms found where ash applied
Lundkvist [62]Cognettia sphagnetorum; Earthworms species not statedFWood ash
Wood ash NH4NO3
SwedenForest soilNo population effects; Increased Cd in body tissue; Increase in earthworm
population after 2 yrs
Nieminen [91]Cognettia sphagnetorumLWood Ash (0.5 Mg ha−1)FinlandMineral soil pH 6Wood ash reduced enchytraeid size, but no significant effect on total biomass
Nieminen and Haimi [92]Cognettia sphagnetorumLWood ash (birch ash)FinlandNorway Spruce forest humus pH 4.6Initially decreased body size; lower reproductive rates