About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 510278, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/510278
Research Article

Monometal and Competitive Adsorption of Cd, Ni, and Zn in Soil Treated with Different Contents of Cow Manure

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

Received 5 March 2013; Accepted 3 June 2013

Academic Editor: Leonid Perelomov

Copyright © 2013 Mostafa Chorom et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the monometal and competitive adsorption of Cd, Ni, and Zn in the soil incubated with different contents of decayed cow manure (: 0, : 25, and : 50 tha−1) for 90-d at 25°C. Sorption isotherms were characterized using the linear Freundlich equation. Most sorption isotherms were well described by the Freundlich equation (maximum and minimum ) and the monometal and competitive adsorption isotherms of Zn, Cd, and Ni followed the L-curve type (L-2). Results showed that the mono- and multimetal sorption amounts increased with an increase in organic amendment content as the sorption capacities for Cd, Ni, and Zn followed the following sequence: . This sequence was consistent with the CEC and particularly pH for the three soils. All soils showed greater sorption capacity for Zn than the other trace elements as the sorption sequence in was , while in both and was . Therefore, the metal-binding sites in OM were more selective for Zn and Ni than Cd. Competition significantly reduced metals , especially for Cd and Ni.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal pollution of soils has become a dangerous problem in agricultural production around the world in the past few decades, as a result of anthropogenic activities, such as mining or industrial activities and improper use of heavy metal-enriched materials in agriculture, including chemical fertilizer and pesticides, industrial effluents, sewage sludge, and wastewater irrigation [1, 2]. Anthropogenic trace elements are easily accumulated in the surface soil [3], leading to serious environmental concerns [4]. There is concern that increased anthropogenic inputs of trace elements in soils may result in transport of these metals in the soil profile, leading to the increased concentrations of trace elements in the ground or surface waters [5]. The movement of trace elements in soil is greatly affected by their physicochemical forms in the soil solid phase [6] and adsorption [4]. The most important process that affects heavy metal availability and mobility is sorption onto soil solid phases. Sorption of heavy metals by soil depends on factors such as the nature and content of the mineral and organic constituents, the nature and concentration of the metal, the composition of the soil solution, and pH [7, 8].

Organic matter is one of the major contributors to the ability of soils for retention of heavy metals in an exchangeable form. Moreover, organic matter also improves soil fertility and structure and other soil properties. The effect of organic matter on the reduction of metals in soil solutions is highly complex. It depends on the other soil components and the chemistry of the metals and also the characteristics of the OM, particularly with respect to its degree of humification, content of heavy metals, salts, and its effect on soil pH [914]. Application of fresh manure can increase heavy metal mobility in soil due to the production of soluble organic compounds which form complexes with the metals [9, 12], while the humic substances which constitute a major part of the OM of compost, peats, or decayed manure can reduce metal solubility and bioavailability by adsorption and by forming stable complexes with metals [11, 12]. It was reported that heavy metals’ adsorption onto soil constituents declines with decreased organic matter content in soils [15, 16]. The ability of OM to bind heavy metal ions can be attributed to their high content of oxygen-containing functional groups, including carboxyl, phenol, hydroxyl, enol, and carbonyl structures of various types [17]. Clemente et al. [18] showed that cow manure and compost can be useful for the immobilization of heavy metals in calcareous-contaminated soils, particularly manure, an organic material rich in P, which plays an important role in the reduction of their solubility. OM has been of particular interest in studies of heavy metal fixation in soils due to the tendency of transition metals to form stable complex with organic ligands [19].

Heavy metal adsorption and hence their plant availability do not only depend on soil constituents (inorganic and organic), but also on the nature of metals involved, and on their competition for soil sorption sites. Usually when competitive sorption of metals is compared with their monometal behavior, it is found that their adsorption is lower in the competitive systems [20]. More strongly sorbed metals, such as lead and copper, are less affected by competition than mobile metals, such as cadmium and zinc [21, 22]. However, the effect of competition among poorly sorbed metals, such as Cd, Ni, and Zn, especially in organic amended soils, has not been documented. Moreover, it is not clear how the competitive adsorption of poorly sorbed heavy metals affects their behavior and availability over time.

While numerous studies have been conducted to understand monometal and competitive adsorption of trace elements in pure minerals and other soil components, their noncompetitive and competitive adsorptions in the presence of different contents of animal manure are barely known and there is limited information on the effects of the manure on the availability of metals in contaminated soils. Therefore, the objectives of present study were to evaluate the adsorption of Cd, Ni, and Zn applied as single or together affected by adding different contents of cow manure to soil after an incubation period of 90-d from the addition date of cow manure and also their Freundlich isotherms. Changes in the physical and chemical nature of the manure-soil mixture after the incubation period were also quantified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Soil samples were collected from the surface layer (0–30 cm) of the field in Agricultural Faculty of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, air-dried at room temperature, and sieved through a 2 mm plastic sieve. A subsample of soil was used to determine chemical and physical properties.

Decayed cow manure sample obtained from the Ahvaz ranches was used as the organic amendment, air-dried, and sieved through a 2 mm plastic sieve to increase the active surface area of the amendment particles. Some of the chemical and physical characteristics of the soil and cow manure are reported in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Some chemical and physical properties of the soil and manure.

2.2. Preparation of Treatments and Heavy Metal Solutions

The sampled soil was used to fill greenhouse pots and three levels of cow manure including 0 (control), 25, and 50  were amended to soils. Soil-manure mixtures were placed in plastic bags, wetted to 65–70% of their water holding capacity, and then incubated for 90 days in a temperature-controlled chamber at 25˚C. During this period, soil-manure mixtures were weighed and rewetted so as to maintain the soil moisture content constant, as appropriate. Soil samples were air-dried after 90 days and prepared for next experiments. Three replicates were arranged for each treatment.

Ni, Cd, and Zn were, respectively, used as NiCl2, CdCl2, and ZnCl2 in varying concentrations, including 10, 25, 30, 40, 50, and 100 mg L−1. Stock solutions of the metal salts were prepared in distilled water.

2.3. Noncompetitive Adsorption Experiments

2 gr from each air-dried soil sample was weighed and poured into acid-washed polyethylene tubes and 20 mL of solution of Cd+2, Ni+2, or Zn+2, in the above concentrations, individually added to the tubes. Then, the tubes were shaked at 150 rpm (rate per minute) with a rotator agitator for 24 h, as the equilibrium time, at 25˚C. The soil samples dissolved in metal solutions (1 : 10 w/v) were centrifuged initially at 3000 rpm for 15 min to remove soil. Then, the supernatant was filtered through filter paper (Wathman filters Number 42). Cd, Ni, and Zn concentrations in the supernatant were measured by atomic adsorption spectrophotometer (model: Unicam 939).

2.4. Competitive Sorption Experiments

Competitive adsorption isotherms were performed in the same way, but by adding Cd, Ni, and Zn at a 1 : 1 : 1 mole ratio.

Monometal and competitive adsorption experiments had been conducted in constant pH. The control of pH was done by acid or base solutions and both experiments were carried out in a background electrolyte of 0.01 M CaCl2 and were replicated three times.

2.5. Sorption Equations

The amount of trace elements sorbed by soil was calculated with the following equation: where is the amount of adsorbed species (mg kg−1), is the initial concentration of the species in solution (mg L−1), is the equilibrium concentration of the species in solution (mg L−1), is the solution volume (mL), and is the weight of air-dried soil (kg).

The relation between the concentration of dissolved and adsorbed heavy metal was expressed by the Freundlich isotherm. The linear form of the Freundlich isotherm is given by where (or ) is the amount of metal adsorbed per gram of sorbent (mg kg−1), is the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate (mg L−1), and and are the Freundlich constants related to adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity, respectively. Freundlich parameters can be obtained by plotting versus , with being the slope and log being the intercept of the line. is the Freundlich coefficient, related to the total sorption capacity of the soil and is a constant that typically has a value of less than 1.

Distribution coefficient, , is an index of a metal’s potential mobility and calculated with the following equation: The distribution coefficient represents the sorption affinity of the metal cations in solution for the soil solid phase and can be used to characterize the mobility and retention of trace elements in a soil system. Low distribution coefficients indicate that most of the metals present in the system remain in the solution and are available for transport, chemical processes, and plant uptake [23], whereas higher values indicate lower mobility and higher retention of metals in the soil. is positively related to metal sorption capacity of soils. Also, the higher the sorption intensity parameter (), the lower the binding affinity () of soil with metal. The sorption isotherms were obtained for each soil sample by equilibrating 2 g soil with 20 mL of solutions containing concentrations of 10, 25, 30, 40, 50, and 100 mg L−1 of mono- and three metals, separately. Statistical analysis was performed using the Excel programs.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Incubation Effects on the Soil Characteristics

As can be seen in Table 1, the cow manure has the near-neutral pH, low salinity and is unpolluted with heavy metals. Therefore, adding the manure to soil led to increase of the soil OM and slight change in the soil pH. Addition of manure amendment affects the properties of soils. The treatments of the soil with different contents of decayed cow manure resulted in increases at pH in the range from 7.56 (25 ) to 7.54 (50 ); when compared to the control soil (7.16), the EC increased to 3.12 and 4.34 in response to treatments with 25  and 50  manure amendment, respectively. Thus, the primary change of soil during incubation and hence the processes most likely to influence metal sorption were OM and consequently CEC, that the latter factor is affected by the soil OM content. Raising the soil OM content can increase soil CEC, a factor which may affect both soluble and exchangeable metal levels [12, 24] (see Table 2).

tab2
Table 2: Some variable properties of soil due to addition of manure in different levels at the end of incubation period.
3.2. Effect of Contents of Cow Manure and Initial Concentration of Metals on the Sorption Isotherms

Monometal and competitive Zn, Cd, and Ni adsorption isotherms for , , and were obtained based on the Freundlich equation after the 90-d incubation with cow manure. Monometal (Figure 1) and competitive (Figure 2) sorption isotherms by the three soil treatments exhibited differences in shape and in amount retained. Sorption isotherms provide important information about the soil immobilization capacity and the strength with which the sorbate is held onto the soil [25]. On the -axis represents the metal concentration sorbed onto solid phases and on the -axis represents metal equilibrium concentration in solution.

fig1
Figure 1: Noncompetitive adsorption isotherms of Zn, Cd, and Ni in soil control (a), (b), and (c) samples. Data are means of triplicate determinations.
fig2
Figure 2: Competitive adsorption isotherms of Zn, Cd, and Ni in soil control (a), (b), and (c) samples. Data are means of triplicate determinations. Coefficients of variation were less than 10%.

Experimental data from the adsorption tests for all metals and all treatments in both systems (monometal and competitive) gave a satisfactory fit (Table 3) to the Freundlich model (maximum for Cd-monometal at and minimum for Cd-competitive at ).

tab3
Table 3: The Freundslich constants and values obtained from the Freundlich isotherm in single and multimetal systems.

Figures 1 and 2 showed that the sorption amount increased with an increase in equilibrium Zn, Cd, and Ni concentrations and approached a plateau value at higher equilibrium concentrations for the soils. Therefore, the monometal and competitive adsorption isotherms of Zn, Cd, and Ni for (a), (b), and (c) were of the L-curve type (L-2), which is characterized by an initial slope that does not increase with the concentration of the added metal in the soil solution. This explains the higher adsorption at lower concentrations, which then decreases as the concentration increases [26]. The isotherm shapes at low concentration range, do not change markedly between , , and , despite the significant increase of organic matter at the end of incubation period, whereas they vary with increasing the heavy metal concentrations in all treatments.

The sorption amount increased with an increase in organic amendment content. Organic matter is considered to play an important role in reducing plant uptake of heavy metals from soils due to its high CEC and complexing ability. Many authors have found that high organic matter content or addition of organic matter by organic amendments decreased the heavy metals concentration in solution [14, 2729]. This effect is attributed to the high CEC of organic matter and its ability to form chelate complexes with metals. Haghiri [30] concluded that the decreased plant availability of heavy metal concentration with higher levels of organic matter added was predominantly due to the effect of increasing soil CEC.

The adsorption values in the treatments were positively correlated with manure contents, indicating that the organic manure has the capacity of metal adsorption. As seen in Table 3, was increased with increasing amount of the manure in soil; hence the adsorption sequences for three treatments in both noncompetitive and competitive systems were found: . This sequence is consistent with OM and CEC sequences and also is consistent with pH sequence in the treatments. Clemente et al. [18] in their study on the short-term effects of two different OM amendments (fresh cow manure and a mature compost) found that the concentrations of Zn extracted with CaCl2 were significantly different in every sampling in control, manure-, and compost-treated samples. The main effect of manure treatment on Zn was the significant decrease of NaOH- and EDTA-extractable concentrations of this element with respect to control soil after incubation period, showing a decrease in metal availability shortly after amendment addition to soil. Petruzzelli et al. [31] and Agbenin and Olojo [32] report significant decreases in the adsorption of heavy metal on soil after the chemical removal of organic matter.

Sorption values from to were decreased slightly, that attributed to increase of pH. Increases in pH decrease surface potential and proton competition and thus favor metal binding [33]. Adding the organic material to soil and the subsequent incubation conditions may influence the pH and therefore modify metal speciation [13]. Walker et al. [34] found that cow manure is capable of preventing soil acidification and decreasing heavy metal bioavailability. Also, they expressed that the increase of soil pH caused by manure addition is the main factor reducing metal availability. Ram and Verloo [35] found that farmyard manure and peat soil enhanced the mobility of Cd at lower pH and decreased it at higher pH.

The steep slope of the Zn and Cd isotherms in contrast to the gentle slope of the Ni isotherm in the control treatment indicated a stronger affinity of the soil for Zn and Cd than Ni. On the basis of values, the following selectivity sequence for was found: Zn > Cd > Ni (Table 3), which may be attributed to their adsorption affinities and their first hydrolysis equilibrium constant: (9.0) Zn > (9.9) Ni ≥ (10.1) Cd. Similar result was also reported by Antoniadis et al. [36], who studied monometal and competitive adsorption of Cd, Zn, and Ni by a soil before and after one-year incubation with sewage sludge and observed the decreasing sequence adsorption: Zn > Cd > Ni.

Ni sorption increased with an addition of cow manure to soil more than Cd sorption, as in treatments of 25 and 50 ; sorption sequences followed this sequence: Zn > Ni ≥ Cd. Zn and Cd were sorbed more favorably than Ni on inorganic surfaces of soil, but organic matter favored retention of Ni over Cd. When OM was added to the soil, (monometal system) increased 9.6% and 12.18% at and , and increased 11.5% and 5.9%, respectively, as compared to the control, whereas had no significant change as compared to the control. The higher increasing of and than suggested that the metal binding sites in OM were more selective for Zn and Ni than Cd. Also, these results suggest that Ni has higher affinity for organic activity sites than for inorganic sites, whereas Zn would prefer both inorganic and organic sites. The higher affinity of the control soil for Zn and Cd is probably due to the existence of a greater number of active sites with high specificity for these metals, so when they are present, these sites would not be occupied by other cations [37].

3.3. Effect of Competition on the Sorption Isotherms and the Freundlich Constants

The presence of other metals reduced the amount of each metal sorbed compared to monometal system, so the adsorption capacity () of each metal in the multimetal condition was lower than that in the monometal condition. This suggests that the metals were competing for the same binding sites as one another, though the total amount of added metals was not so high as to occupy a large part of the available surface adsorption sites. Significant inhibitory effects of competitive metals on the adsorption of a particular metal have also been reported by Basta and Sloan [27].

Although values indicated a reduction in metal adsorption due to competition sorption, they were evident mostly at the higher end of equilibrium concentrations. Thus, at low metal concentrations, effects of competition were not very strong. This seems to concur with the work of Saha et al. [38], who found no evidence of metal (Cd, Zn, and Pb) competition at low concentrations. They explained that at low added metal concentrations, metals are mainly adsorbed onto specific adsorption sites, while at higher metal inputs, soils lose some of their ability to bind heavy metals as adsorption sites overlap, becoming thus less specific for a particular metal. This, in turn, induces a reduction in metal sorption. Although competition reduced sorption of all three metals, the magnitude of these effects was different for each metal. decreased by nearly 51.3% at due to competition, by 21.2% at , and by 31.9% at . This compares to competition-induced reductions of around 67.3%, 54.7%, and 66.1% for Cd at , , and , respectively, and 67.9%, 57.9%, and 57.1% for Ni at , , and , respectively. Thus, the effect of competition in reducing the sorption of metals followed the following order: Cd ≥ Ni > Zn. This suggests that upon coaddition of the three metals to the soil, Zn, and to a less extent Ni, became preferentially adsorbed at the expense of Cd. This is likely to have been the result of differences in the nature of the dominant sorbing surfaces for each metal [32].

4. Conclusion

The monometal and competitive adsorption behavior of Cd, Ni, and Zn in soil, affected by different contents of decayed cow manure (0, 25, and 50 ), was investigated in the present study. Evidences showed that soils which received decayed manure exhibited higher CEC and pH in general terms. Therefore, the organic matter had metal immobilization effect after the incubation.

Monometal system values in control soil followed the following order: Zn > Cd > Ni. In amended soils, Zn and particularly Ni sorption values increased significantly, while Cd did not after 90-d incubation. The adsorption sequences in and were in the order of Zn > Ni ≥ Cd. The adsorption capacity () of each metal in the multimetal condition was lower than that in the monometal condition. Low values of for Cd and Ni in competitive system indicate that most Cd and Ni remain in the solution and are available for transport, chemical processes, and plant uptake. The effect of competition in reducing the sorption of metals followed the following order: Cd ≥ Ni > Zn. Most sorption isotherms for trace elements were adequately described by the Freundlich equation and were of the L-curve type.

References

  1. S. Kuo, M. S. Lai, and C. W. Lin, “Influence of solution acidity and CaCl2 concentration on the removal of heavy metals from metal-contaminated rice soils,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 918–925, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. A. E. Ramadan and E. A. Al-Ashkar, “The effect of different fertilizers on the heavy metals in soil and tomato plant,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 300–306, 2007.
  3. D. L. Baker, “Copper,” in Heavy Metals in Soils, B. J. Alloway, Ed., pp. 151–176, Blackie, London, UK, 1990.
  4. W. R. Berti and L. W. Jacobs, “Distribution of trace elements in soil from repeated sewage sludge applications,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1280–1286, 1998. View at Scopus
  5. P. S. Hooda and B. J. Alloway, “Effects of time and temperature on the bioavailability of Cd and Pb from sludge-amended soils,” Soil Science, vol. 44, pp. 97–110, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Zhenbin and L. M. Shuman, “Redistribution of forms of zinc, cadmium and nickel in soils treated with EDTA,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 191, no. 1-2, pp. 95–107, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. Antoniadis and B. J. Alloway, “The role of dissolved organic carbon in the mobility of Cd, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge-amended soils,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 515–521, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Msaky and R. Calvet, “Adsorption behavior of copper and zinc in soils: influence of pH on adsorption characteristics,” Soil Science, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 513–522, 1990. View at Scopus
  9. Å. Almås, B. R. Singh, and B. Salbu, “Mobility of cadmium-109 and zinc-65 in soil influenced by equilibration time, temperature, and organic matter,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1742–1750, 1999. View at Scopus
  10. R. P. Narwal and B. R. Singh, “Effect of organic materials on partitioning, extractability and plant uptake of metals in an alum shale soil,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 103, no. 1–4, pp. 405–421, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. M. Ross, “Retention, transformation and mobility of toxic metals in soils,” in Toxic Metals in Soil-Plant Systems, S. M. Ross, Ed., pp. 63–152, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  12. L. M. Shuman, “Organic waste amendments effect on zinc fractions of two soils,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1442–1447, 1999. View at Scopus
  13. S. Staunton, “Direct and indirect effects of organic matter on metal immobilisation in soil,” Developments in Soil Science, vol. 28, pp. 79–97, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. J. Walker, R. Clemente, A. Roig, and M. P. Bernal, “The effects of soil amendments on heavy metal bioavailability in two contaminated Mediterranean soils,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 303–312, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. Antoniadis, J. S. Robinson, and B. J. Alloway, “Effects of short-term pH fluctuations on cadmium, nickel, lead, and zinc availability to ryegrass in a sewage sludge-amended field,” Chemosphere, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 759–764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. M. Hettiarachchi, J. A. Ryan, R. L. Chaney, and C. M. la Fleur, “Sorption and desorption of cadmium by different fractions of biosolids-amended soils,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1684–1693, 2003. View at Scopus
  17. G. R. Aiken, D. M. McKnight, and R. L. Wershaw, Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  18. R. Clemente, Á. Escolar, and M. P. Bernal, “Heavy metals fractionation and organic matter mineralisation in contaminated calcareous soil amended with organic materials,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 97, no. 15, pp. 1894–1901, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Chen, “Organic matter reactions involving micronutrients in soils and their effect on plants,” in Humic Substances in Terrestrial Ecosystems, A. Piccolo, Ed., pp. 507–530, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.
  20. R. D. Harter, “Competitive sorption of cobalt, copper, and nickel ions by a calcium- saturated soil,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 444–449, 1992. View at Scopus
  21. N. T. Basta and M. A. Tabatabai, “Effect of cropping systems on adsorption of metals by soils: III. Competitive adsorption,” Soil Science, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 331–337, 1992. View at Scopus
  22. B. Zhu and A. K. Alva, “Differential adsorption of trace metals by soils as influenced by exchangeable cations and ionic strength,” Soil Science, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 1993. View at Scopus
  23. M. T. Morera, J. C. Echeverría, C. Mazkiarán, and J. J. Garrido, “Isotherms and sequential extraction procedures for evaluating sorption and distribution of heavy metals in soils,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. S. Yoo and B. R. James, “Zinc extractability as a function of pH in organic waste-amended soils,” Soil Science, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 246–259, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. D. Harter, “Micronutrient adsorption-desorption reactions in soils,” in Micronutrients in Agriculture, J. J. Mortvedt, F. R. Cox, L. H. Shuman, and R. H. Welch, Eds., vol. 4 of SSSA Book Series, pp. 59–87, SSSA, Madison, Wis, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
  26. G. Sposito, The Chemistry of Soils, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  27. N. T. Basta and J. J. Sloan, “Bioavailablility of heavy metals in strongly acidic soils treated with exceptional quality biosolids,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 633–638, 1999. View at Scopus
  28. S. Brown, B. Christensen, E. Lombi et al., “An inter-laboratory study to test the ability of amendments to reduce the availability of Cd, Pb, and Zn in situ,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Karaca, “Effect of organic wastes on the extractability of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in soil,” Geoderma, vol. 122, no. 2–4, pp. 297–303, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Haghiri, “Plant uptake of cadmium as influenced by cation exchange capacity, organic matter, zinc, and soil temperature,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 180–183, 1974. View at Scopus
  31. G. Petruzzelli, G. Guidi, and L. Lubrano, “Organic matter as an influencing factor on copper and cadmium adsorption by soils,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 1978. View at Scopus
  32. J. O. Agbenin and L. A. Olojo, “Competitive adsorption of copper and zinc by a Bt horizon of a savanna Alfisol as affected by pH and selective removal of hydrous oxides and organic matter,” Geoderma, vol. 119, no. 1-2, pp. 85–95, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Yin, C. A. Impellitteri, S.-J. You, and H. E. Allen, “The importance of organic matter distribution and extract soil: solution ratio on the desorption of heavy metals from soils,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 287, no. 1-2, pp. 107–119, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. J. Walker, R. Clemente, and M. P. Bernal, “Contrasting effects of manure and compost on soil pH, heavy metal availability and growth of Chenopodium album L. in a soil contaminated by pyritic mine waste,” Chemosphere, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 215–224, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. N. Ram and M. Verloo, “Effect of various organic materials on the mobility of heavy metals in soil,” Environmental Pollution B, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 241–248, 1985. View at Scopus
  36. V. Antoniadis, C. D. Tsadilas, and D. J. Ashworth, “Monometal and competitive adsorption of heavy metals by sewage sludge-amended soil,” Chemosphere, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 489–494, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. C. Uren, “Forms, reactions, and availability of nickel in soils,” in Advances in Agronomy, D. L. Sparks, Ed., vol. 48, pp. 141–203, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  38. U. K. Saha, S. Taniguchi, and K. Sakurai, “Simultaneous adsorption of cadmium, zinc, and lead on hydroxyaluminum- and hydroxyaluminosilicate-montmorillonite complexes,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 2002. View at Scopus