Review Article

Prognostication and Risk-Adapted Therapy of Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using Positron Emission Tomography

Table 1

PET during first-line chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

StudyProspectiveNo.StageChemo, ±RTCycles before PETNo. PET+ (%)PPVNPVEFS, PET+EFS, PET–Median follow-up

Friedberg et al. 2004 [28]yes22I–IV; 28% III-IVMostly ABVD35 (23%)80%94%24 mo

Hutchings et al. 2005 [29]no85I–IV; 33% III-IVMostly ABVD2-313 (15% 61.5%94%46% (2 y)97% (2 y)40 mo
39% (5 y)92% (5 y)

Gallamini et al. 2006 [34]yes108IIA with RF, IIB-IV; 46% III-IVMostly ABVD220 (19%)90%97%6% (2 y)96% (2 y)20 mo (mean)

Hutchings et al. 2006 [30]yes77I-IV; 36% III-IVMostly ABVD216 (21% 69%95%0% (2 y)96% (2 y)23 mo
    64    413 (20%)85%96%19% (2 y)96% (2 y)23 mo

Zinzani et al. 2006 [32]yes40IIB-IV; 48% III-IVABVD28 (20% 100%100%18 mo
4047 (18% 100%100%18 mo

Kostakoglu et al. 2006 [25]no23II–IV; 35% III-IVABVD16 (26%)83%100%17% (2 y)100% (2 y)20 mo

Querellou et al. 2006 [33]no44IIA-IV; 63% III-IVMostly ABVD3-4 95 95% (1 y)18 mo

Gallamini et al. 2007 [31]yes26 IIA with RF, IIB-IV; 47% III–IVMostly ABVD250 (19% 86%95%13% (2 y)95% (2 y)26 mo

Sher et al. 2009 [35]no46Mostly I-IIABVD-base 20 (43%)15%96%85% (2 y)96% (2 y

Markova et al. 2009 [36]no50IIB with RF, III–IV; 78% III–IVBEACOPP414 (28%)14 97 86% (2 y 97% (2 y)25 mo

Furth et al. 2009 [37]yes40I–IV; 48% III-IVOEP 214 (35%)14%100%86% (4 y)100% (4 y)46 mo

Avigdor et al. 2009 [38]yes45IIB-IV; 93% III–IVBEACOPPesc × 2, then ABV 213 (29%)45%87%53% (4 y)87% (4 y)48 mo

ABVD: doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; BEACOPP: bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; EFS: event-free survival; esc: escalated; MRU: minimal residual uptake; NPV: negative predictive value; OEPA: vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin; PPV: positive predictive value; RF: risk factor(s); RT: radiation therapy. Definition of an event variably includes relapse or progression, incomplete remission, disease-related death, and/or any death; starting points for EFS estimates vary. Table modified from Kasamon et al. [21].
RU cases were analyzed with PET− cases.
RU cases (4 after cycle 2 PET, 3 after cycle 4 PET) were analyzed separately; 1 relapsed.
/24 patients were PET+, 1 being newly diagnosed; 18/20 PET− patients were newly diagnosed.
ncludes previously reported patients [30, 34].
ll received radiation.
or interim and post-chemotherapy PET− disease; 1/26 was interim PET−, post-chemotherapy PET+.
/14 received RT, which was restricted to >2.5 cm, PET+ masses on post-chemotherapy imaging.
ncludes 1 non-relapse death.
ediatric study; 98% received RT.
esponse-adapted study; with or without additional therapy.