Research Article
Subliminal Cues While Teaching: HCI Technique for Enhanced Learning
Table 2
No significant difference found between participants’ pre- and posttests results.
| | Analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups | Sum of squares | Mean square | F | Sig. (-value) at alpha =.05 |
| | Spatial Recognition Memory (SRM) pretest result | 138.870 | 69.435 | .192 | .826 | | Patter Recognition Memory (PRM) pretest result | 1512.797 | 756.398 | 3.110 | .066 | | Speed pretest response time result | .322 | .161 | 1.310 | .281 | | Speed pretest accuracy result | 1603.128 | 801.564 | .848 | .436 | | EEG posttest intrusiveness resul | 1.291 | .646 | .481 | .622 | | Physiological sensors posttest intrusiveness resul | 2.789 | 1.395 | 1.216 | .307 | | Lesson liquability post-test resul | 7.580 | 3.790 | 2.228 | .121 | | Question difficulty posttest resul | 8.966 | 4.483 | 2.956 | .063 | | Lesson difficulty posttest resul | 2.466 | 1.233 | .421 | .659 |
|
|
based on a Likert scale from 1 to 6.
|
