About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 493514, 30 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/493514
Review Article

On the Minimal Length Uncertainty Relation and the Foundations of String Theory

Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

Received 1 June 2011; Accepted 9 August 2011

Academic Editor: Yang-Hui He

Copyright © 2011 Lay Nam Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, vol. I,II, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  2. J. Polchinski, String Theory, vol. I,II, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  3. K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  4. J. A. Wheeler, “On the nature of quantum geometrodynamics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 604–614, 1957.
  5. C. A. Mead, “Possible connection between gravitation and fundamental length,” Physical Review, vol. 135, no. 3B, pp. B849–B862, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Scopus
  7. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–165, 1995.
  8. S. Weinberger, “The cosmological constant problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989.
  9. S. M. Carroll, “The cosmological constant,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 4, article 1, 2001.
  10. E. Witten, “The cosmological constant from the viewpoint of string theory,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0002297.
  11. N. Straumann, “The history of the cosmological constant problem,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0208027.
  12. S. Nobbenhuis, “Categorizing different approaches to the cosmological constant problem,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 613–680, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Polchinski, “What is string theory?” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9411028.
  14. L. N. Chang, Z. Lewis, D. Minic, T. Takeuchi, and C. H. Tze, “Bell's inequalities, superquantum correlations, and string theory,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3359.
  15. H. Kragh, “Arthur March, Werner Heisenberg, and the search for a smallest length,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 401–434, 1995.
  16. H. Kragh, “Heisenberg's lattice world: the 1930 theory sketch,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 63, pp. 595–605, 1995.
  17. W. Heisenberg and W. Pauli, “Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 1–61, 1929. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Born, “Modified field equations with a finite radius of the electron,” Nature, vol. 132, no. 3329, p. 282, 1933. View at Scopus
  19. H. S. Snyder, “Quantized space-time,” Physical Review, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 1947.
  20. H. S. Snyder, “The electromagnetic field in quantized space-time,” Physical Review, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 68–71, 1947. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. N. Yang, “On quantized space-time,” Physical Review, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 874, 1947.
  22. C. A. Mead, “Observable consequences of fundamental-length hypotheses,” Physical Review, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 990–1005, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. G. Pavlopoulos, “Breakdown of Lorentz invariance,” Physical Review, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1106–1110, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Padmanabhan, “Physical significance of planck length,” Annals of Physics, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 38–58, 1985.
  25. T. Padmanabhan, “Limitations on the operational definition of spacetime events and quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 4, article L107, 1987.
  26. T. Padmanabhan, “Duality and zero-point length of spacetime,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1854–1857, 1997.
  27. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer, and H. Stöcker, “Signatures in the Planck regime,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 575, no. 1-2, pp. 85–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. U. Harbach, S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, and H. Stöcker, “Probing the minimal length scale by precision tests of the muon g - 2,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 584, no. 1-2, pp. 109–113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. U. Harbach and S. Hossenfelder, “The Casimir effect in the presence of a minimal length,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 632, no. 2-3, pp. 379–383, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Hossenfelder, “Running coupling with minimal length,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 10, Article ID 105003, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Hossenfelder, “A note on theories with a minimal length,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1815–1821, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Hossenfelder, “Interpretation of quantum field theories with a minimal length scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 10, Article ID 105013, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 22, Article ID 221301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Phenomenological implications of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Das and Vagenas reply:,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 11, Article ID 119002, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 678, no. 5, pp. 497–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Basilakos, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Quantum gravity corrections and entropy at the planck time,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. F. Ali, “Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 690, no. 4, pp. 407–412, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. Farag Ali, “Erratum to Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 692, no. 5, p. 342, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Bagchi and A. Fring, “Minimal length in quantum mechanics and non-Hermitian Hamiltonian systems,” Physics Letters Section A, vol. 373, no. 47, pp. 4307–4310, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Fring, L. Gouba, and F. G. Scholtz, “Strings from position-dependent noncommutativity,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 43, no. 34, Article ID 345401, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Fring, L. Gouba, and B. Bagchi, “Minimal areas from q-deformed oscillator algebras,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 43, no. 42, Article ID 425202, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Weinberg, “Precision tests of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 485–488, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Weinberg, “Testing quantum mechanics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 336–386, 1989. View at Scopus
  45. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, “Complex extension of quantum mechanics,” eConf, vol. 617, Article ID C0306234, 2003.
  46. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, “Complex extension of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, Article ID 270401, 2002.
  47. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, “Erratum: complex extension of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 11, Article ID 119902, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 83–86, 1993.
  50. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Scopus
  52. E. Witten, “Reflections on the fate of spacetime,” Physics Today, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 24–30, 1996. View at Scopus
  53. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “The high-energy behavior of string scattering amplitudes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, no. 1-2, pp. 129–134, 1987. View at Scopus
  54. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “String theory beyond the Planck scale,” Nuclear Physics Section B, vol. 303, no. 3, pp. 407–454, 1988. View at Scopus
  55. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Superstring collisions at planckian energies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, no. 1-2, pp. 81–88, 1987. View at Scopus
  56. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Classical and quantum gravity effects from Planckian energy superstring collisions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1615–1661, 1988. View at Scopus
  57. W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, University of Chicago Press, Dover Publications, 1930.
  58. J. A. Wheeler, “On the mathematical description of light nuclei by the method of resonating group structure,” Physical Review, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1107–1122, 1937. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. W. Heisenberg, “Die beobachtbaren Größen in der theorie der elementarteilchen,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 120, no. 7–10, pp. 513–538, 1943. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. W. Heisenberg, “Die beobachtbaren Größen in der theorie der elementarteilchen. II,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 120, no. 11-12, pp. 673–702, 1943.
  61. W. Heisenberg, “Die beobachtbaren Größen in der theorie der elementarteilchen. III,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 93–112, 1944.
  62. L. Susskind and E. Witten, “The holographic bound in anti-de sitter space,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9805114.
  63. A. W. Peet and J. Polchinski, “UV-IR relations in AdS dynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1–5, 1999.
  64. L. I. Mandelshtam and I. E. Tamm, “The uncertainty relation between energy and time in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics,” Journal of Physics-USSR, vol. 9, pp. 249–254, 1945.
  65. E. P. Wigner, “On the time–energy uncertainty relation,” in Aspects of Quantum Theory, A. Salam and E. P. Wigner, Eds., pp. 237–247, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  66. M. Bauer and P. A. Mello, “The time-energy uncertainty relation,” Annals of Physics, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 38–60, 1978. View at Scopus
  67. T. Yoneya, “On the interpretation of minimal length in string theories,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 1587–1595, 1989.
  68. T. Yoneya, “Schild action and space-time uncertainty principle in string theory,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 949–961, 1997.
  69. T. Yoneya, “String theory and the space-time uncertainty principle,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 1081–1125, 2000. View at Scopus
  70. M. Li and T. Yoneya, “Short-distance space-time structure and black holes in string theory: a short review of the present status,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 423–443, 1999. View at Scopus
  71. A. Jevicki and T. Yoneya, “Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in D-particle dynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 535, no. 1-2, pp. 335–348, 1998. View at Scopus
  72. H. Awata, M. Li, D. Minic, and T. Yoneya, “On the quantization of Nambu brackets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 2, article 013, 2001. View at Scopus
  73. D. Minic, “On the space-time uncertainty principle and holography,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 442, no. 1–4, pp. 102–108, 1998. View at Scopus
  74. F. Brau, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen atom,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 32, no. 44, pp. 7691–7696, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. F. Brau and F. Buisseret, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and gravitational quantum well,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 036002, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. S. Z. Benczik, , Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Tech, 2007.
  77. A. Kempf, “Non-pointlike particles in harmonic oscillators,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2093–2101, 1997. View at Scopus
  78. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Exact solution of the harmonic oscillator in arbitrary dimensions with minimal length uncertainty relations,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125027, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “Hydrogen-atom spectrum under a minimal-length hypothesis,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, no. 1, Article ID 012104, p. 4, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. A. Chodos and E. Myers, “Gravitational contribution to the Casimir energy in Kaluza-Klein theories,” Annals of Physics, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 412–441, 1984. View at Scopus
  81. A. Higuchi, “Symmetric tensor spherical harmonics on the N-sphere and their application to the de Sitter group SO(N,1),” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1553–1566, 1987. View at Scopus
  82. N. A. Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations, American Mathematical Society, 1968.
  83. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Acedemic Press, 2000.
  84. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Table, Dover Publications, 1965.
  85. E. W. Weisstein, “Confluent Hypergeometric Function of the Second Kind,” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConfluentHypergeometricFunctionoftheSecondKind.html.
  86. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, “The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 429, no. 3-4, pp. 263–272, 1998. View at Scopus
  87. K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, “Extra spacetime dimensions and unification,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 436, no. 1-2, pp. 55–65, 1998. View at Scopus
  88. T. Han, J. D. Lykken, and R. J. Zhang, “Kaluza-Klein states from large extra dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1–14, 1999. View at Scopus
  89. T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu, “Bounds on universal extra dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 3, Article ID 035002, 2001.
  90. C. Schwob, L. Jozefowski, B. De Beauvoir et al., “Optical frequency measurement of the 2S-12D transitions in hydrogen and deuterium: Rydberg constant and lamb shift determinations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 25, pp. 4960–4963, 1999. View at Scopus
  91. S. Mallampalli and J. Sapirstein, “Perturbed orbital contribution to the two-loop lamb shift in hydrogen,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 24, pp. 5297–5300, 1998. View at Scopus
  92. M. I. Eides, H. Grotch, and V. A. Shelyuto, “Theory of light hydrogenlike atoms,” Physics Report, vol. 342, no. 2-3, pp. 63–261, 2001. View at Scopus
  93. G. G. Simon, C. Schmitt, F. Borkowski, and V. H. Walther, “Absolute electron-proton cross sections at low momentum transfer measured with a high pressure gas target system,” Nuclear Physics Section A, vol. 333, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 1980. View at Scopus
  94. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, H. G. Börner, A. K. Petukhov et al., “Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6869, pp. 297–299, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, et al., “Measurement of quantum states of neutrons in the Earth’s gravitational field,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 10, Article ID 102002, 2003.
  96. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, A. K. Petukhov, H. G. Börner et al., “Study of the neutron quantum states in the gravity field,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 479–491, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Effect of the minimal length uncertainty relation on the density of states and the cosmological constant problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125028, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, S. Rayyan, and T. Takeuchi, “Short distance versus long distance physics: the classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 026003, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. T. Banks, “The Cosmological Constant Problem,” Physics Today, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 46–51, 2004. View at Scopus
  100. J. Polchinski, “The cosmological constant and the string landscape,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0603249.
  101. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1753–1935, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. E. Komatsu, et al., “Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, vol. 192, no. 2, 2011.
  103. E. P. Wigner, “Relativistic invariance and quantum phenomena,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. H. Salecker and E. P. Wigner, “Quantum limitations of the measurement of space-time distances,” Physical Review, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 571–577, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. F. Karolyhazy, “Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects,” Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 390–402, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. Y. J. Ng and H. Van Dam, “Limit to space-time measurement,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 335–340, 1994.
  107. Y. J. Ng and H. Van Dam, “Remarks on gravitational sources,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 10, no. 36, pp. 2801–2808, 1995.
  108. Y. J. Ng and H. Van Dam, “Measuring the foaminess of space-time with gravity-wave interferometers,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 795–805, 2000.
  109. Y. J. Ng, “Spacetime foam: from entropy and holography to infinite statistics and nonlocality,” Entropy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 441–461, 2008.
  110. Non-relativistic space-time foam has more general “turbulent” scaling.
  111. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Limits on the measurability of space-time distances in (the semiclassical approximation of) quantum gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 9, no. 37, pp. 3415–3422, 1994.
  112. L. Diósi and B. Lukács, “On the minimum uncertainty of space-time geodesics,” Physics Letters A, vol. 142, no. 6-7, pp. 331–334, 1989.
  113. L. Diósi and B. Lukács, “Critique of proposed limit to space-time measurement, based on Wigner's clocks and mirrors,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 479–481, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. V. Jejjala, D. Minic, Y. J. Ng, and C. H. Tze, “Turbulence and holography,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 22, Article ID 225012, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. T. Banks, “Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 910–921, 2001.
  116. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, “Complex spinors and unified theories,” in Supergravity, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman, Eds., North Holland, 1979.
  117. T. Yanagida, “Horizontal symmetry and masses of neutrinos,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1103–1105, 1980.
  118. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, “Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 912–915, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. S. Weinberg, “Varieties of baryon and lepton nonconservation,” Physical Review D, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1694–1700, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. B. Schmittmann, K. Hwang, and R. K. P. Zia, “Onset of spatial structures in biased diffusion of two species,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 19, no. 1, article 19, 1992.
  121. D. Helbing, I. J. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Freezing by heating in a driven mesoscopic system,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1240–1243, 2000. View at Scopus
  122. D. Helbing, “Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1067–1141, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. R. K. P. Zia, E. L. Praestgaard, and O. G. Mouritsen, “Getting more from pushing less: negative specific heat and conductivity in nonequilibrium steady states,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 384–392, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. D. Minic and C. H. Tze, “Background independent quantum mechanics and gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 6, Article ID 061501, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. D. Minic and C. H. Tze, “A general theory of quantum relativity,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 581, no. 1-2, pp. 111–118, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. V. Jejjala and D. Mimic, “Why there is something so close to nothing: towards a fundamental theory of the cosmological constant,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1797–1818, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, D. Minic, and C. H. Tze, “On the origin of time and the universe,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2515–2523, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, D. Minic, and C. -H. Tze, “The big bang as the ultimate traffic jam,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 2257–2263, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. Y. A. Gol’fand, Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 10, p. 842, 1960.
  130. Y. A. Gol’fand, “Quantum field theory in constant curvature p-space,” Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 16, p. 184, 1963.
  131. Y. A. Gol’fand, Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 37, p. 365, 1966.
  132. L. Freidel and E. R. Livine, “3D quantum gravity and effective noncommutative quantum field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 22, Article ID 221301, p. 2947, 2006.
  133. G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Smolin, “The principle of relative locality,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0931.
  134. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “Quantum gravity, dynamical energymomentum space and vacuum energy,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 25, no. 35, pp. 2947–2954, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. I. Bars, “Gauge symmetry in phase space consequences for physics and space-time,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 5235–5252, 2010.
  136. A. Einstein, “Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement,” 2011, http://www.bnpublishing.net/.
  137. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 19, Article ID 190403, 2002.
  138. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Generalized Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 044017, 2003.
  139. J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Introduction to doubly special relativity,” Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 669, pp. 131–159, 2005.
  140. F. Girelli and E. R. Livine, “Special relativity as a noncommutative geometry: lessons for deformed special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 8, Article ID 085041, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. E. Witten, “Noncommutative geometry and string field theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 268, p. 253, 1986.
  142. G. T. Horowitz, J. Lykken, R. Rohm, and A. Strominger, “Purely cubic action for string field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 283–286, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Strominger, “Closed string field theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 294, pp. 93–112, 1987.
  144. S. Okubo, Introduction to Octonion and Other Non-Associative Algebras in Physics, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  145. H. Awata, M. Li, D. Minic, and T. Yoneya, “On the quantization of Nambu brackets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 13–16, 2001.
  146. Y. Nambu, “Generalized hamiltonian dynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2405–2412, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. L. Takhtajan, “On foundation of the generalized Nambu mechanics,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 295–315, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. R. Chatterjee and L. Takhtajan, “Aspects of Classical and Quantum Nambu Mechanics,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 1996. View at Scopus
  149. G. Dito, M. Flato, D. Sternheimer, and L. Takhtajan, “Deformation quantization and Nambu mechanics,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1997. View at Scopus
  150. R. G. Leigh, A. Mauri, D. Minic, and A. C. Petkou, “Gauge fields, membranes, and subdeterminant vector models,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 22, Article ID 221801, 2010.
  151. R. Jackiw, “Topological investigations of quantized gauge theories,” in Current Algebra and Anomalies, S. Trieman, R. Jackiw, B. Zumino, and E. Witten, Eds., Princeton, 1985.
  152. J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998.
  153. J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1113–1133, 1999.
  154. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Physics Letters Section B, vol. 428, no. 1-2, pp. 105–114, 1998. View at Scopus
  155. E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998.
  156. R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, “Nonassociative gravity in string theory?” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 1, Article ID 015401, 2011.