About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 201856, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/201856
Research Article

Quantization of Free Scalar Fields in the Presence of Natural Cutoffs

Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

Received 22 September 2012; Accepted 29 October 2012

Academic Editor: Joseph Formaggio

Copyright © 2012 K. Nozari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, Y. Ling, and G. Mandanici, “Black-hole thermodynamics with modified dispersion relations and generalized uncertainty principles,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2585–2606, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, p. 199, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Amati, M. Cialfaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Superstring collisions at planckian energies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, pp. 81–88, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Amati, M. Cialfaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “The high-energy behavior of string scattering amplitudes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, pp. 129–134, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, and P. Provero, “Minimum physical length and the generalized uncertainty principle in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 1990. View at Scopus
  7. R. Guida, K. Konishi, and P. Provero, “On the short distance behavior of string theories,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 6, p. 1487, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Kato, “Particle theories with minimum observable length and open string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 245, pp. 43–47, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, p. 145, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, and G. Scarpetta, “Generalized uncertainty principle from quantum geometry,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2000. View at Scopus
  11. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Hossenfelder, “Can we measure structures to a precision better than the Planck length?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, Article ID 115011, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Pedram, “New approach to nonperturbative quantum mechanics with minimal length uncertainty,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 024016, 2012.
  16. R. J. Adler, “Six easy roads to the Planck scale,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, p. 925, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity in spacetimes with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (planckian) length scale,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, p. 35, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity: special treatment,” Nature, vol. 418, pp. 34–35, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Doubly-special relativity: first results and key open problems,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, p. 1643, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Introduction to doubly special relativity,” Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 669, pp. 131–159, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. G. Amelino-Camelia, J. Kowalski-Glikman, G. Mandanici, and A. Procaccini, “Phenomenology of doubly special relativity,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 20, p. 6007, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. K. Imilkowska and J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Doubly special relativity as a limit of gravity,” Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 702, p. 279, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, Article ID 1904303, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Generalized Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, Article ID 044017, 2003.
  27. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “String theories with deformed energy-momentum relations, and a possible nontachyonic bosonic string,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 026010, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. L. Cortes and J. Gamboa, “Quantum uncertainty in doubly special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 065015, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Kempf, “Quantum field theory with nonzero minimal uncertainties in positions and momenta,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 38, Article ID 124014, p. 1374, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Kempf and G. Mangano, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and ultraviolet regularization,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, Article ID 124014, p. 7909, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Kempf, “Fields with finite information density,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 124014, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Hossenfelder, “Interpretation of quantum field theories with a minimal length scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 105013, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Hossenfelder, “A note on quantum field theories with a minimal length scale,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, Article ID 038003, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. T. Matsuo and Y. Shibusa, “Quantization of fields based on generalized uncertainty principle,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 21, p. 1285, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Y. Shibusa, “Supersymmetric field theory based on generalized uncertainty principle,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, p. 5279, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. K. Nozari and A. Etemadi, “Minimal length, maximal momentum, and Hilbert space representation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 104029, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, pp. 497–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. Farag Ali, “Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 692, no. 5, p. 342, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. Pedram, K. Nozari, and S. H. Taheri, “The effects of minimal length and maximal momentum on the transition rate of ultra cold neutrons in gravitational field,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 3, article 93, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. J. D. Bjorken, “Applications of the chiral U(6)U(6) algebra of current densities,” Physical Review, vol. 148, p. 1467, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. K. Johnson and F. E. Low, “Current algebras in a simple model,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, Supplement, no. 37-38, pp. 74–93, 1966.
  42. D. V. Ahluwalia, “Quantum measurement, gravitation, and locality,” Physics Letters B, vol. 339, pp. 301–303, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, “Spacetime quantization induced by classical gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 331, pp. 39–44, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Gravity-wave interferometers as probes of a low-energy effective quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 024015, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. G. Amelino-Camelia, D. Benedetti, F. D'Andrea, and A. Procaccini, “Comparison of relativity theories with observer-independent scales of both velocity and length/mass,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 5353–5370, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. McMahon, Quantum Field Theory Demystified, McGraw-Hill, 2008.