About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 196986, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/196986
Research Article

Spin and Pseudospin Symmetries with Trigonometric Pöschl-Teller Potential including Tensor Coupling

Physics Department, Shahrood University of Technology, P.O. Box 3619995161, Shahrood, Iran

Received 12 November 2012; Accepted 7 February 2013

Academic Editor: Frederik G. Scholtz

Copyright © 2013 M. Hamzavi and A. A. Rajabi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We study approximate analytical solutions of the Dirac equation with the trigonometric Pöschl-Teller (tPT) potential and a Coulomb-like tensor potential for arbitrary spin-orbit quantum number κ under the presence of exact spin and pseudospin (-spin) symmetries. The bound state energy eigenvalues and the corresponding two-component wave functions of the Dirac particle are obtained using the parametric generalization of the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method. We show that tensor interaction removes degeneracies between spin and pseudospin doublets. The case of nonrelativistic limit is studied too.

1. Introduction

The Dirac equation, which describes the motion of a spin-1/2 particle, has been used in solving many problems of nuclear and high-energy physics. The spin and the -spin symmetries of the Dirac Hamiltonian had been discovered many years ago; however, these symmetries have recently been recognized empirically in nuclear and hadronic spectroscopes [1]. Within the framework of Dirac equation, -spin symmetry used to feature the deformed nuclei and the super deformation to establish an effective shell-model [24], whereas spin symmetry is relevant for mesons [5]. The spin symmetry occurs when the scalar potential is nearly equal to the vector potential or equivalently , and -spin symmetry occurs when [6, 7]. The -spin symmetry refers to a quasidegeneracy of single nucleon doublets with nonrelativistic quantum number and , where , , and are single nucleon radial, orbital, and total angular quantum numbers, respectively [8, 9]. The total angular momentum is given by  , where pseudoangular momentum and is -spin angular momentum [10, 11]. Liang et al. [12] investigated the symmetries of the Dirac Hamiltonian and their breaking in realistic nuclei in the framework of perturbation theory. Guo [13] used the similarity renormalization group to transform the spherical Dirac operator into a diagonal form, and then the upper (lower) diagonal element became an operator describing Dirac (anti-)particle, which holds the form of the Schrödinger-like operator with the singularity disappearing in every component. Chen and Guo [14] investigated the evolution toward the nonrelativistic limit from the solutions of the Dirac equation by a continuous transformation of the Compton wavelength. Lu et al. [15] recently showed that the -spin symmetry in single particle resonant states in nuclei is conserved when the attractive scalar and repulsive vector potentials have the same magnitude but opposite sign.

Tensor potentials were introduced into the Dirac equation with the substitution , and a spin-orbit coupling is added to the Dirac Hamiltonian [16, 17]. Lisboa et al. [18] have studied a generalized relativistic harmonic oscillator for spin- particles by considering a Dirac Hamiltonian that contains quadratic vector and scalar potentials together with a linear tensor potential, under the conditions of pseudospin and spin symmetry. Alberto et al. [19] studied the contribution of the isoscalar tensor coupling to the realization of pseudospin symmetry in nuclei. Akcay showed that the Dirac equation with scalar and vector quadratic potentials and a Coulomb-like tensor potential can be solved exactly [20]; also, he exactly solved Dirac equation with tensor potential containing a linear and Coulomb-like terms too [21]. Aydoğdu and Sever obtained exact solution of Dirac equation for the pseudoharmonic potential in the presence of linear tensor potential under the pseudospin symmetry and showed that tensor interactions remove all degeneracies between members of pseudospin doublets [22]. Zhou et al. solved Dirac equation approximately for Hulthén potential including Coulomb-like tensor potential with arbitrary spin-orbit coupling number under spin and pseudospin symmetry limit [10]. Aydoğdu and Sever solved approximately for the Woods-Saxon potential and a tensor potential with the arbitrary spin-orbit coupling quantum number under pseudospin and spin symmetry [23]. Very recently, Hamzavi et al. gave exact solutions of the Dirac equation for Mie-type potential and position-dependent mass Coulomb potential with a Coulomb-like tensor potential [24, 25] and pseudoharmonic potential with linear plus Coulomb-like tensor potential [26].

The tPT potential has been proposed for the first time by Pöschl and Teller [27] in 1933 to describe the diatomic molecular vibration. Chen [28] and Zhang and Wang [29] have studied the relativistic bound state solutions for the tPT potential and hyperbolical PT (Second PT) potential, respectively. Liu et al. [30] studied the tPT potential within the framework of the Dirac theory. Recently, Candemir [31] investigated the analytical -wave solutions of Dirac equation for tPT potential under the -spin symmetry condition. Very recently, Hamzavi and Rajabi [32] studied the exact -wave solution of the Schrödinger equation for the vibrational tPT potential. The tPT takes the form: where the parameters and describe the property of the potential well, while the parameter is related to the range of this potential [30]. We find out that this potential has a minimum value at . The case when , the minimum value is at for . The second derivative which determines the force constants at is given by for any value, and thus which means that at has a relative minimum for . When then minimum value is and . In Figures 1(a) and 1(b), we draw the tPT potential (1) for parameter values ,  and . Here the potential has a minimum value at . The curve is nodeless in . For example, with and minimum potential . It is worthy to note that in the limiting case when , the tPT potential can be reduced to the Kratzer potential [33, 34] , where is the equilibrium intermolecular separation and is the dissociation energy between diatomic molecules. In our case, ,  and . In the case of it reduces to the molecular potential which is called the modified Kratzer potential proposed by Simons et al. [35] and Molski and Konarski [36]. In the case of , this potential turns into the Kratzer potential, which includes an attractive Coulomb potential and a repulsive inverse square potential introduced by Kratzer in 1920 [37].

fig1
Figure 1: (a) A plot of the tPT potential for . (b) A plot of the tPT potential for .

The aim of the present work is to extend our previous work [32] to the relativistic case and (rotational case) including a Coulomb-like tensor potential. We introduce a convenient approximation scheme to deal with the strong singular centrifugal term. The ansätz of this approximation possesses the same form of the potential and is singular as the centrifugal term .

Since the relativistic solution is indispensable, we need to solve the Dirac equation with flexible parameters tPT potential model. However, the Dirac-tPT problem can no longer be solved in a closed form due to the existence of spin-orbit coupling term and it is necessary to resort to approximation methods. Therefore, we use an approximation scheme to deal with this term and solve approximately the Dirac equation with the tPT potential for arbitrary spin-orbit quantum number . In the presence of spin and -spin symmetric limitation, we obtain the approximate relativistic bound state solutions including the energy eigenvalue equations and the corresponding unnormalized upper- and lower-spinor components of the wave functions using the concepts of parametric generalization of the NU method [38] since the relativistic corrections are not neglected.

Over the past years, the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method [39] has shown to be a powerful tool in solving the second-order differential equation. It was applied successfully to a large number of potential models [4046]. This method has also been used to solve the spinless (spin-) Schrödinger [4751] and Klein-Gordon (KG) [5257] equations and also relativistic spin- Dirac equation [5863] with different potential models.

The structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, in the context of spin and -spin symmetry, we briefly introduce the Dirac equation with scalar and vector tPT and also tensor potential potentials for arbitrary spin-orbit quantum number . The parametric generalization of the NU method is displayed in the appendix. In the presence of the spin and -spin symmetry, the approximate energy eigenvalue equations and corresponding two-component wave functions of the Dirac-tPT problem are obtained, and effect of tensor potential is shown in this section. The nonrelativistic limit of the problem is discussed in this section too. Finally, our final concluding remarks are given in Section 3.

2. Dirac Equation including Tensor Coupling

The Dirac equation for fermionic massive spin- particles moving in an attractive scalar potential , a repulsive vector potential , and a tensor potential is where is the relativistic energy of the system, is the three-dimensional momentum operator, and is the mass of the fermionic particle [64]. and are the usual Dirac matrices given as where is unitary matrix and are three-vector spin matrices The total angular momentum operator and spin-orbit operator , where is orbital angular momentum operator, of the spherical nucleons commute with the Dirac Hamiltonian. The eigenvalues of spin-orbit coupling operator are and for unaligned spin and the aligned spin , respectively. () can be taken as the complete set of the conservative quantities. Thus, the spinor wave functions can be classified according to their angular momentum , spin-orbit quantum number , and the radial quantum number and can be written as follows: where is the upper (large) component and is the lower (small) component of the Dirac spinors. and are spin and pseudospin spherical harmonics, respectively, and is the projection of the angular momentum on the -axis. Substituting (7) into (4) and using the following relations: with the following properties: one obtains two coupled differential equations for upper and lower radial wave functions and aswhere Eliminating and from (10a) and (10b), we obtain the following two Schrödinger-like differential equations for the upper and lower radial spinor components, respectively: where and . The quantum number is related to the quantum numbers for spin symmetry and pseudospin symmetry as and the quasidegenerate doublet structure can be expressed in terms of a pseudospin angular momentum and pseudoorbital angular momentum , which is defined as where . For example, and can be considered as pseudospin doublets.

2.1. Spin Symmetric Limit

In the spin symmetric limitation, or [7, 6567]; then, (11) with and tensor potential as Coulomb potential, becomeswhere is new spin-orbit centrifugal term and and for and , respectively. The Schrödinger-like equation (15a) that results from the Dirac equation is a second-order differential equation containing a spin-orbit centrifugal term which has a strong singularity at and needs to be treated very carefully while performing the approximation. In absence of tensor interaction, (15a) has an exact rigorous solution only for the states with because of the existence of the centrifugal term. However, when this term taken into account, the corresponding radial Dirac equation can no longer be solved in a closed form, and it is necessary to resort to approximate methods. Over the last few decades, several schemes have been used to calculate the energy spectrum. The main idea of these schemes relies on using different approximations of the spin-orbit centrifugal coupling term . So, we need to perform a new approximation for the spin-orbit term as a function of the tPT potential parameters. Therefore, we resort to use an appropriate approximation scheme to deal with the centrifugal potential term as where is a dimensionless shifting parameter and . The approximation (16) is done on the basis that and in the limit when . To show the validity and accuracy of our choice to the approximation scheme (16), we plot the centrifugal potential term and its approximations: and in Figure 2. As illustrated, the three curves coincide together and show how accurate this replacement is.

196986.fig.002
Figure 2: The centrifugal term (red line) and its approximations (16) with (green dash line) and (blue dot line), while .

Thus, employing such an approximation scheme, we can then write (15a) as Followed by making a new change of variables , this allows us to decompose the spin-symmetric Dirac equation (17) into the Schrödinger-type equation satisfying the upper-spinor component , where has been used. If the previous equation is compared with , we can obtain the specific values for constants as In order to obtain the bound state solutions of (17), it is necessary to calculate the remaining parametric constants, that is, , by means of the relation . Their specific values are displayed in Table 1 for the relativistic tPT potential model. Further, using these constants along with , we can readily obtain the energy eigenvalue equation for the Dirac-tPT problem as or equivalently To show the procedure of determining the energy eigenvalues from (21), we take a set of physical parameter values,, , , , and , and [30].

tab1
Table 1: The specific values of the parametric constants for the spin symmetric Dirac-tPT problem.

In Tables 2 and 3, we present the energy spectrum for the spin symmetric case. Obviously, the pairs , and so on are degenerate states. Thus, each pair is considered as spin doublet and has positive energy. In Table 2, we can see that tensor interaction removes degeneracies between spin doublets. Further, when potential range parameter approaches zero, the energy eigenvalues approaches a constant. From (21), we find that this constant is ; that is, , which can be seen from Table 3 too.

tab2
Table 2: The bound state energy eigenvalues in units of of the spin symmetry tPT potential for several values of and with .
tab3
Table 3: The spin symmetric bound state energy eigenvalues in units of of the tPT potential for several values of and with , and .

In Figure 3, we have investigated the effect of the tensor potential on the spin doublet splitting by considering the following pairs of orbital: and . We observe that in the case of (no tensor interaction), members of spin doublets have same energy. However, in the presence of the tensor potential, these degeneracies are removed. We can also see that spin doublet splitting increases with increasing. The reason is that term gives different contributions to each level in the spin doublet because takes different values for each state in the spin doublet.

196986.fig.003
Figure 3: Effect of tensor potential on spin doublets.

On the other hand, in order to establish the upper-spinor component of the wave functions , namely, (15a), the relations , , , and are used. Firstly, we find the first part of the wave function as Secondly, we calculate the weight function as which gives the second part of the wave function as where are the orthogonal Jacobi polynomials. Finally the upper spinor component for arbitrary can be found through the relation or where and is the normalization constant. Further, the lower-spinor component of the wave function can be calculated by using where and in the presence of the exact spin symmetry (), only positive energy states do exist.

2.2. p-Spin Symmetric Limit

Ginocchio showed that there is -spin symmetry in case when the relationship between the vector potential and the scalar potential is given by [7]. Further, Meng et al. showed that if , then , for which the -spin symmetry is exact in the Dirac equation [6567]. Thus, choosing the as tPT potential and as Coulomb potential, (12) under this symmetry becomeswhere, and for and , respectively. Employing the new approximation for the spin-orbit pseudocentrifugal term,, that is, (16), the -spin Dirac equation (29a) can be written as To avoid repetition of the negative energy solution of (30), the -spin symmetric case can be readily obtained directly via the spin symmetric solution throughout the following parametric mappings: Following the previous procedure, one can obtain the -spin symmetric energy equation as Furthermore, the lower-spinor component of the wave functions is found as with where is the normalization constant.

In Tables 4 and 5, we give the numerical results for the -spin symmetric case. In this case, we take the set of parameter values, , , , , and , and [30]. We observe the degeneracy in the following doublets,,, ,, and so on. Thus, each pair is considered as -spin doublet and has negative energy. In Table 4, we can see that tensor interaction removes degeneracies between spin doublets.

tab4
Table 4: The bound state energy eigenvalues in units of of the p-spin symmetry tPT potential for several values of and with .
tab5
Table 5: The bound state energy eigenvalues in units of of the -spin symmetry tPT potential for several values of and with .

In Figure 4, we have investigated the effect of the tensor potential on the -spin doublet splitting by considering the following pairs of orbital: and  , and one can observe that the results obtained in the -spin symmetric limit resemble the ones observed in the spin symmetric limit.

196986.fig.004
Figure 4: Effect of tensor potential on -spin doublets.

On the other hand, the upper-spinor component of the Dirac wave function can be calculated by where , and in the presence of the exact -spin symmetry (), only negative energy states do exist.

2.3. The Nonrelativistic Limiting Case

In this section, we study the energy eigenvalue equation (21) and upper-spinor component of wave function (26) of the Dirac-tPT problem under the nonrelativistic limits: ,,, and . Thereby, we obtain the energy equation of the Schrödinger equation with any arbitrary orbital state for the tPT potential as In the limit when , the vibration-rotation energy formula (36) reduces into a constant value: Further, there is no loss of generality if ; then, (36) becomes where and are the vibration and rotation quantum numbers, respectively. To obtain numerical energy eigenvalues for the present potential model, we take the following set of parameter values; namely, , , , and , and [30]. As seen from Table 6, in the limit when potential range parameter approaches zero, the energy eigenvalues approach a constant value given by (37).

tab6
Table 6: The bound state energy levels of the Schrödinger equation for the tPT potential.

Also, we can get the radial wave functions of the Schrödinger equation with tPT potential as Inserting in the previous equation, we can obtain where is a normalization factor to be calculated from the normalization conditions.

3. Concluding Remarks

In this work, we have studied the bound state solutions of the Dirac equation with trigonometric Pöschl-Teller and Coulomb-like tensor potentials for any spin-orbit quantum number . By making an appropriate approximation to deal with the spin-orbit centrifugal (pseudo-centrifugal) coupling term, we have obtained the approximate energy eigenvalue equation and the unnormalized two components of the radial wave functions expressed in terms of the Jacobi polynomials using the NU method. It is found that tensor interaction removes degeneracies between each pair of pseudospin or spin doublets.

Appendix

Parametric Generalization of the NU Method

The NU method is used to solve second-order differential equations with an appropriate coordinate transformation [39] where and are polynomials, at most of second degree, and is a first-degree polynomial. To make the application of the NU method simpler and direct without need to check the validity of solution, we present a shortcut for the method. So, at first, we write the general form of the Schrödinger-like equation (A.1) in a more general form applicable to any potential as follows [38]: satisfying the wave functions Comparing (A.2) with its counterpart (A.1), we obtain the following identifications: Following the NU method [39], we obtain the following [38]:

(i) the relevant constants: (ii) the essential polynomial functions: (iii) the energy equation: (iv) the wave functions: where , and are Jacobi polynomials with and is a normalization constant. Also, the previous wave functions can be expressed in terms of the hypergeometric function as where and .

References

  1. J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons,” Physics Reports, vol. 414, no. 4-5, pp. 165–261, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. A. Bohr, I. Hamamoto, and B. R. Mottelson, “Pseudospin in rotating nuclear potentials,” Physica Scripta, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 267, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Dudek, W. Nazarewicz, Z. Szymanski, and G. A. Leander, “Abundance and systematics of nuclear superdeformed states; Relation to the pseudospin and pseudo-SU(3) symmetries,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 1405–1408, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Troltenier, C. Bahri, and J. P. Draayer, “Generalized pseudo-SU(3) model and pairing,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 586, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 1995. View at Scopus
  5. P. R. Page, T. Goldman, and J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetry suppresses quark spin-orbit splitting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 204–207, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. N. Ginocchio, A. Leviatan, J. Meng, and S. G. Zhou, “Test of pseudospin symmetry in deformed nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 3, Article ID 034303, 11 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. N. Ginocchio, “Pseudospin as a relativistic symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 436–439, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. K. T. Hecht and A. Adler, “Generalized seniority for favored J0 pairs in mixed configurations,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Arima, M. Harvey, and K. Shimizu, “Pseudo LS coupling and pseudo SU3 coupling schemes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 517–522, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, and P. Ring, “Spin symmetry in the antinucleon spectrum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 26, part 1, Article ID 262501, 2003.
  11. X. T. He, S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, E. G. Zhao, and W. Scheid, “Test of spin symmetry in anti-nucleon spectra,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 265–269, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Liang, P. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Meng, and N. V. Giai, “Perturbative interpretation of relativistic symmetries in nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 83, no. 4, Article ID 041301, 5 pages, 2011.
  13. J. Y. Guo, “Exploration of relativistic symmetry by the similarity renormalization group,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 2, Article ID 021302, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. W. Chen and J. Y. Guo, “Relativistic effect of spin and pseudospin symmetries,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 5, Article ID 054312, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. B. N. Lu, E. G. Zhao, and S. G. Zhou, “Pseudospin symmetry in single particle resonant states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 7, Article ID 072501, 5 pages, 2012.
  16. M. Moshinsky and A. Szczepanika, “The Dirac oscillator,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 22, no. 17, p. L817, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. I. Kukulin, G. Loyola, and M. Moshinsky, “A Dirac equation with an oscillator potential and spin-orbit coupling,” Physics Letters A, vol. 158, no. 1-2, pp. 19–22, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, A. S. de Castro, P. Alberto, and M. Fiolhais, “Pseudospin symmetry and the relativistic harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 2, Article ID 024319, 15 pages, 2004. View at Scopus
  19. P. Alberto, R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, and A. S. de Castro, “Tensor coupling and pseudospin symmetry in nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, no. 3, Article ID 034313, 7 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Akcay, “Dirac equation with scalar and vector quadratic potentials and Coulomb-like tensor potential,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, no. 6, pp. 616–620, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. H. Akcay, “The Dirac oscillator with a Coulomb-like tensor potential,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 24, pp. 6427–6432, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. O. Aydoğdu and R. Sever, “Exact pseudospin symmetric solution of the Dirac equation for pseudoharmonic potential in the presence of tensor potential,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 193–200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. O. Aydoğdu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with Woods-Saxon potential and tensor potential,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact spin and pseudospin symmetry solutions of the Dirac equation for mie-type potential including a coulomb-like tensor potential,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 48, no. 2–4, pp. 171–182, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact pseudospin symmetry solution of the Dirac equation for spatially-dependent mass Coulomb potential including a Coulomb-like tensor interaction via asymptotic iteration method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 42, pp. 4303–4307, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exactly complete solutions of the Dirac equation with pseudoharmonic potential including linear plus Coulomb-like tensor potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 7-8, pp. 1363–1374, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. G. Pöschl and E. Teller, “Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszillators,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 83, no. 3-4, pp. 143–151, 1933. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. G. Chen, “Bound states of klein-gordon equation and dirac equation for scalar and vector Pöschl-teller-type potentials,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1651–1653, 2001 (Chinese).
  29. M. C. Zhang and Z. B. Wang, “Bound states of relativistic particles in the second Pöschl-Teller potentials,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 525–528, 2006.
  30. X.-Y. Liu, G.-F. Wei, X.-W. Cao, and H.-G. Bai, “Spin symmetry for Dirac equation with the trigonometric Pöschl-Teller potential,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 343–348, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. N. Candemir, “Pseudospin symmetry in trigonometric Pöschl-Teller potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 21, no. 6, Article ID 1250060, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Hamzavi and A. A. Rajabi, “Exact S-wave solution of the trigonometric Pöschl-Teller potential,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1592–1597, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Exact quantization rule to the Kratzer-type potentials: an application to the diatomic molecules,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1137–1152, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Durmus, “Non-relativistic treatment of diatomic molecules interacting with a generalized Kratzer potential in hyperspherical coordinates,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 15, Article ID 155205, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. G. Simons, R. G. Parr, and J. M. Finlan, “New alternative to the Dunham potential for diatomic molecules,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 59, no. 6, p. 3229, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Molski and J. Konarski, “Extended Simons-Parr-Finlan approach to the analytical calculation of the rotational-vibrational energy of diatomic molecules,” Physical Review A, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 711–714, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Kratzer, “Die ultraroten rotationsspektren der halogenwasserstoffe,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 289–307, 1920. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. M. Ikhdair, “Rotational and vibrational diatomic molecule in the Klein-Gordon equation with hyperbolic scalar and vector potentials,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 1563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Berlin, Germany, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  40. F. Yaşuk, C. Berkdemir, and A. Berkdemir, “Exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation with non-central potential by the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, no. 29, pp. 6579–6586, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. M. R. Setare and S. Haidari, “Bound states of the Dirac equation with some physical potentials by the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Physica Scripta, vol. 81, no. 1, Article ID 015201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Approximate eigenvalue and eigenfunction solutions for the generalized Hulthén potential with any angular momentum,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 461–471, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. M. G. Miranda, G. H. Sun, and S. H. Dong, “The solution of the second Pöschl-Teller like potential by Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 123, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact solutions of the Dirac equation with Coulomb plus a novel angle-dependent potential,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, vol. 66a, pp. 533–538, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Hamzavi, H. Hassanabadi, and A. A. Rajabi, “Exact solutions of dirac equation with Hartmann potential by nikiforovuvarov method,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2189–2197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Hamzavi, H. Hassanabadi, and A. A. Rajabi, “Approximate pseudospin solutions of the Dirac equation with the Eckart potential including a Coulomb-like tensor potential,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 454–464, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  47. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Any l-state solutions of the Woods-Saxon potential in arbitrary dimensions within the new improved quantization rule,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 20, pp. 3941–3952, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. S. M. Ikhdair and J. Abu-Hasna, “Quantization rule solution to the Hulthén potential in arbitrary dimension with a new approximate scheme for the centrifugal term,” Physica Scripta, vol. 83, no. 2, Article ID 025002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. Y.-F. Cheng and T.-Q. Dai, “Exact solution of the Schrödinger equation for the modified Kratzer potential plus a ring-shaped potential by the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Physica Scripta, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 274–277, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  50. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Exact solution of the Klein-Gordon equation for the PT-symmetric generalized Woods-Saxon potential by the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 218–232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  51. M. Aktaş and R. Sever, “Exact supersymmetric solution of Schrödinger equation for central confining potentials by using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, vol. 710, no. 1–3, pp. 223–228, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Şimşek and H. E. Eğrifes, “The Klein-Gordon equation of generalized Hulthén potential in complex quantum mechanics,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 37, no. 15, p. 4379, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Exact bound states of the D-dimensional Klein-Gordon equation with equal scalar and vector ring-shaped pseudoharmonic potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1425–1442, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  54. H. E. Eğrifes and R. Sever, “Bound-state solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation for the generalized PT-symmetric Hulthen potential,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 935–950, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Any l-state improved quasi-exact analytical solutions of the spatially dependent mass Klein–Gordon equation for the scalar and vector Hulthén potentials,” Physica Scripta, vol. 79, no. 3, Article ID 035002, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. S. M. Ikhdair, “Bound states of the Klein-Gordon for exponential-type potentials in D-dimensions,” Journal of Quantum Information Science, vol. 1, pp. 73–86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. N. Saad, “The Klein-Gordon equation with a generalized Hulthén potential in D-dimensions,” Physica Scripta, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 623–627, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  58. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Relativistic morse potential and tensor interaction,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 19–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. M. Hamzavi and A. A. Rajabi, “Exact solutions of the Dirac equation for the new ring-shaped non-central harmonic oscillator potential,” European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 128, Article ID 29, 2013.
  60. M. Hamzavi, H. Hassanabadi, and A. A. Rajabi, “Exact solution of dirac equation for Mie-type potential by using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method under the pseudospin and spin symmetry limit,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 25, no. 28, pp. 2447–2456, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Approximate analytical solutions of the generalized Woods-Saxon potentials including the spin-orbit coupling term and spin symmetry,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 665–666, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Relativistic and nonrelativistic bound states of the isotonic oscillator by Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 52, no. 12, Article ID 122108, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  63. S. M. Ikhdair and R. Sever, “Two approximation schemes to the bound states of the Dirac-Hulthén problem,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 35, Article ID 355301, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. W. Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 3rd edition, 2000. View at MathSciNet
  65. J. N. Ginocchio, “A relativistic symmetry in nuclei,” Physics Reports, vol. 315, no. 1–3, pp. 231–240, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, and A. Arima, “Pseudospin symmetry in Zr and Sn isotopes from the proton drip line to the neutron drip line,” Physical Review C, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, P. Ring, and A. Arima, “Pseudospin symmetry in relativistic mean field theory,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. R628–R631, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar