- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 203438, 17 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/203438

## Nonlinear Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of Torsional Spring-Loaded Antibacklash Gear with Time-Varying Meshing Stiffness and Friction

School of Mechatronics and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received 13 December 2012; Revised 15 June 2013; Accepted 28 August 2013

Academic Editor: Hakan F. Oztop

Copyright © 2013 Zheng Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Torsional spring-loaded antibacklash gear which can improve the transmission precision is widely used in many precision transmission fields. It is very important to investigate the dynamic characteristics of antibacklash gear. In the paper, applied force analysis is completed in detail. Then, defining the starting point of double-gear meshing as initial position, according to the meshing characteristic of antibacklash gear, single- or double-tooth meshing states of two gear pairs and the transformation relationship at any moment are determined. Based on this, a nonlinear model of antibacklash gear with time-varying friction and meshing stiffness is proposed. The influences of friction and variations of torsional spring stiffness, damping ratio and preload on dynamic transmission error (DTE) are analyzed by numerical calculation and simulation, and the results show that antibacklash gear can increase the composite meshing stiffness; when the torsional spring stiffness is large enough, the oscillating components of the DTE (ODTE) and the RMS of the DTE (RDTE) trend to be a constant value; the variations of ODTE and RDTE are not significant, unless preload exceeds a certain value.

#### 1. Introduction

With the advantages of high transmission efficiency, running stability, and high driving accuracy in one-way drive mode, gear transmission is a principle kind of drive, widely used in various mechanical systems and equipment. However, the gear backlash caused by side clearance leads to response lag in some servomechanism [1] which reduces the control accuracy seriously. Therefore, in order to improve the driving accuracy, some suitable methods of error control must be used in some fields which need to transfer high accuracy angle or position information, such as double electric motor method, double helical gear antibacklash method, adjusting center distance method, and spring- (or torsional spring-) loaded antibacklash method [2–8]. Among others, the spring-loaded antibacklash gear invented in 1952 or earlier [8] is extensively used in numerous fields of industrial robot [3], precision servos [5, 6], radar antennas [7], and precision machine tools.

In order to eliminate backlash, most methods above are with the method of increasing preload by artificial means. However, increased friction caused by preload is the major factor of wear, noise, and vibration. Many precision mechanisms with antibacklash gear require the dynamic characteristics of high speed, high accuracy, and high stability [6], and the antibacklash gear also is under the complex work conditions of often starting, commutation, and braking. Thus, the internal excitations of antibacklash gear such as time-varying meshing stiffness, friction, and damping have effects on dynamic performance of whole system, which is worth studying.

There were lots of research achievements on gear dynamics modeling and analysis, which were reviewed in Özgüven and Houser’s paper [9] and Wang et al.’s paper [10]. Özgüven and Houser [9] reviewed the mathematical models and dynamic characteristics before 1986, and most of them were linear. Nonlinear dynamics of spur gear pair using harmonic balance method were studied by Kahraman and Singh [11–13]. In paper [13], the backlash and time-varying meshing stiffness were considered; Theodossiades and Natsiavas [14] investigated dynamics of a gear-pair system with backlash and time-varying mesh stiffness, and the system was under the action of external excitation, caused by torsional moments and gear geometry errors; Vaishya and Singh [15] proposed alternative strategies for incorporating the phenomenon of sliding between gear teeth, and time-varying meshing stiffness was considered in their paper. From the recently published papers [16–18], more realistic and exact gear model with multiparameters excitations and strong nonlinearity will be one of the research trends.

At present, however, most of studies about antibacklash gear focus on structure design and calculations, transmission accuracy and applications. Boyuan and Zhiwu [7] analyzed the static force of the antibacklash gear in a transmission mechanism and estimated the composite transmission error. An antibacklash gear was used in a kind of farm tractor to reduce the noise of power takeoff system by Shim et al. [4], and the vibration and noise were analyzed by a simulation model which was validated by experiment.

There are fewer studies on the nonlinear dynamic including frequency characteristic, contact stiffness, and dynamic transmission error, of antibacklash gear. A simplified torsional dynamic model was established, and the natural frequency was analyzed and estimated by Guoming [2]. Imasaki and Tomizuka [3] proposed an approximate stiffness model of an antibacklash with the characteristic of three-segment flexible joint which was used in a manipulator. A dynamic model with friction of antibacklash gear servomechanism by Kwon et al. [5] and the stiffness model of antibacklash gear were similar as three-segment flexible joint characteristic. Allan and Levy [6] proposed a method for estimating the minimum preload torque required to obtain a satisfactory step response from a position control system with spring-loaded antibacklash gear.

The above studies on the antibacklash gear did not mention the time-vary meshing stiffness and friction with the characteristics of multimeshing points. In this paper, an antibacklash gear transmission mechanism is studied. Applied force between each two gears is analyzed completely. Meshing timing of every meshing point is defined and the phase difference between positive rotation and reversal is calculated. Based on this, a nonlinear dynamic model considering friction, side gear clearance, and nonlinear time-vary meshing stiffness is proposed, and the influences of friction and variations of torsional spring stiffness, damping ratio, and preload on dynamic transmission error (DTE) are analyzed by numerical calculation and simulation.

#### 2. Description and Assumptions of Antibacklash Gear

As shown in Figure 1, gear g1 is the pinion; gear g2 is called as fixed gear; gear g3 is a free gear called loaded gear. G2 and g3 connected by a torsional spring rotate relatively an angle of some teeth, and torsional spring is preloaded at this point, then g2 and g3 as a gear together engage with g1. Two sides of a tooth of gear g1 contact, respectively, with a tooth of g2 and a tooth of g3 under the action of torsional spring force. Therefore, there is no backlash in transmission no matter it is in positive rotation or in reversal.

There are some assumptions before modeling and analysis: ignoring the effects of stiffness and damping of each shaft; that is, the model is considered as a torsion vibration model; ignoring the effects of stiffness of lubricant film to contact stiffness; contact conditions meet Hertz contact theory.

#### 3. Applied Force Analysis of Each Two Gears

##### 3.1. Applied Force between Pinion g1 and Fixed Gear g2

The relative displacements in line of action of gear pair g1g2 and g1g3 are defined as and , also called dynamic transmission error (DTE), and , , where is the radius of base circle of g1; is the radius of base circle of g2 and g3; , , and separately are rotation angle of g1, g2, and g3. In order to describe conveniently, the equivalent relative displacement of rotation angle difference between g2 and g3 to line of action is written as , called DTE, too. The direction of anticlockwise is defined as positive rotation while clockwise as reversal. As shown in Figure 4, the initial state is the time when gear pair g1g2 is entering into the double-tooth meshing area (DMA) in positive rotation.

When antibacklash gear running, gear g1 is stressed by both g2 and g3. Gear g2 and g3 are connected by a torsional spring. The force analysis of each gear is done as follows, based on the assumption of all gear pair in the single-tooth meshing area (SMA).

As shown in Figure 2, there are 3 position relations in gear pair of g1 and g2: normal contact (Figure 2(a)), isolation (Figure 2(b)), and abnormal contact (Figure 2(c)). In point ( maybe or in double-tooth meshing area), the contact force and friction between g1 and g2 are written as where , , and are, respectively, the time-varying meshing stiffness, damping coefficient, and instantaneous friction coefficient of gear pair g1g2 in point , and the calculation formulas of time-varying meshing stiffness and instantaneous friction coefficient are given in Appendices A and B; is the composite transmission error of g1g2, considering the composite static transmission error and the effect of deformation caused by preload.

For the definition of composite transmission error , detail discussions are given as follows.

When gear pair g1g2 is in the state of normal contact and in positive rotation, if , then ; or when g1g2 is in the state of normal contact and in reverse, if , then , where is the composite static transmission error of gear pair g1g2, and is the static transmission error caused by profile error and other errors, , , where is the meshing stiffness at the initial meshing point of gear pair g1g2.

When gear pair g1g2 is in the state of isolation and in positive rotation, if , then ; or when g1g2 is in the state of isolation and in reverse, if , then also , where is the equivalent backlash in line of action, and , where is the circumferential backlash [19] of gear pair g1g2, which is calculated by where is the pressure angle of pitch circle; is the mean value of feed errors of gear ; is the feed tolerance of gear ; is the radial composite error of gear ; is the centre distance deviation.

A flag variable flag is defined to switch positive rotation and reverse of g1 as

Thus, the composite transmission error of g1g2 can be expressed by

When gear pair g1g2 is in the state of abnormal contact, if , then . In this case, it is equivalent that gear g2 applies a force in the inverse direction to g1, and the meshing point becomes ( maybe the or in double-tooth meshing area):

##### 3.2. Applied Force between Pinion g1 and Loaded Gear g3

Likewise, gear pair g1g3 also is in one of 3 states: normal contact (Figure 3(a)), isolation (Figure 3(b)), and abnormal contact (Figure 3(c)).

Similarly, the contact force and friction between g1 and g3 in point ( maybe or in double-tooth meshing area) are expressed as where , , and are, respectively, the time-varying meshing stiffness, damping coefficient, and instantaneous friction coefficient of gear pair g1g3 in point ; is the composite transmission error of g1g3.

In like manner, where is the composite static transmission error; is the static transmission error caused by profile error and other errors, , , where is the meshing stiffness of the initial meshing point of gear pair g1g3.

When gear pair g1g3 is in the state of abnormal contact, if , then . In this case, it is equivalent that gear g3 applies a force in the inverse direction to g1, and the meshing point becomes :

Generally, in order to ensure antibacklash gear work steadily, these states shown in Figures 2(b), 2(c), 3(b), and 3(c) must be avoid. Calculation results show that these states would arise, unless preload or stiffness of torsional spring satisfies (9a) and (9b): or where is the moment of inertia of g2 and g3; is the maximum value of relative acceleration of g2 and g3; is the load torque.

Among others, the states in Figures 2(c) and 3(c) are not considered in the rest calculations bellow.

##### 3.3. Applied Force between Fixed Gear g2 and Loaded Gear g3

is the preload torque of antibacklash torsional spring; then . When the angle difference of gear g2 and g3 changes, the interaction torque of g2 and g3 changes as well. It is easy to know that in positive rotation, where is the torsion stiffness of torsional spring; is the initial torsion angle in preload torque of torsional spring, ignoring the effects of gear tooth deformation, and ; , are, respectively, the angles of gear g2 and g3.

When gear g1 is in reverse, . Thus, .

The equivalent applied force of torque to the line of contact, considering damping, is expressed as where is the equivalent linear stiffness to the line of contact and ; ; ; is the equivalent damping coefficient of torsional spring.

#### 4. Nonlinear Dynamic Model

##### 4.1. Determination of SMA or DMA of Gear Pair G1G2

Without consideration of oil film rigidity, the composite meshing stiffness of normal gear pair is dependent on 2 factors: quantities of meshing points; time-vary meshing stiffness of single meshing point. The quantity of meshing points is dependent on contact ratio of each gear pair. In the paper, the contact ratio of each gear pair is ; thus the maximum quantity of meshing points is 4. The quantity is periodic variable within certain configure of structure and assembly parameters.

When gear g1 is in positive rotation, in Figure 4, meshing point is defined as the initial double-tooth meshing point (IDMP) of gear pair g1g2 in line of contact , and let , while is the IDMP of gear pair g1g3 in line of contact . The nearer meshing point to the IDMP is defined as , and the farer point as . is the rotation angle of gear g1 from to along the line of contact, and is the rotation angle of gear g1 from to . Thus, the rotation angle of gear g1 is where is the number of mesh cycles, nonnegative integers; is called meshing cycle angle which is the rotation angle of gear passing through a double-tooth meshing area and a single-tooth meshing area along the line of contact. According to the involute principle, ignoring the effect of base pitch error, the meshing cycle angle is calculated by where ; is the base pitch error; is the gear module; is the working pressure angle, in X-zero gear pair and gear pair with reference canter distance, .

According to (11), , where MOD is the function in MATLAB for getting modulus after division.

As shown in Figure 4, let ; then .

When ; that is, , gear pair g1g2 enters single-tooth meshing area, where is the length of actual line of action, , , are, respectively, the radiuses of addendum circle of gear g1 and g2, and , are the radiuses of pitch circle.

Thus, when , gear pair g1g2 is in the double-tooth meshing area. When , gear pair g1g2 is in the single-tooth meshing area.

##### 4.2. Determination of SMA or DMA of Gear Pair g1g3

In Figure 5(a), gear g2 and g3 are in the symmetrical position about -axis. According to the theory of engagement, when g1 rotates an angle in counter-clockwise direction as shown in Figure 5(b), gear pair g1g3 meshes at pitch point ; symmetrically, when g1 rotates an angle in clockwise direction, gear pair g1g2 meshes at , too. Angle is calculated by where is the tooth thickness of gear g2 or g3, , where is the distance coefficient between the middle line of outline of cutting tool and pitch line of cutting tool; is the deviation of tooth thickness [19].

Thus, when gear pair g1g2 meshes at IDMP ; that is, , the counter-clockwise angle of gear g1 along the line of contact of gear pair g1g3 is , , where is the angle of g1 from to , along in counter-clockwise direction; is the angle of g1 from to , along the line of contact of gear pair g1g2 in counter-clockwise direction: where ; .

So, , . Let ; then , and when , gear pair g1g3 is in the DMA; when , gear pair g1g3 is in the SMA.

##### 4.3. Relationship and Phase Analysis of Positive Rotation and Reversal

When gear g1 is in reversal and , all parameters including position of each meshing point, time-vary meshing stiffness, and friction, can be calculated by the calculation method used in positive rotation above. But, when , and do not satisfy their angle range of [0, ] any more. An analysis method based on symmetry is proposed to solve this problem in the paper. As shown in Figure 6, the moment at is the moment that gear pair g1g2 is entering into the double-tooth meshing area in positive rotation and also is the moment that g1g2 is entering into the single-tooth meshing area in reversal. Thus, the phase difference between positive rotation and reversal is . So, , are updated as where .

When gear g1 rotates in reversal from , in order to make full use of the calculation formulas of each meshing point in positive rotation, the 4 meshing points are replaced by each other: as shown in Figure 6, , , , and are replaced by , , , and separately; in the same way, the meshing stiffness of meshing points is replaced as , , , and are replaced by , , , separately. For example, the position of meshing point can be determined by given in positive rotation, and according to the analysis method based on symmetry, the position of in reversal can be determined at the same time.

By the above analysis, the position in double-tooth or single-tooth meshing area of gear pair g1g2 or g1g3 in reversal can be determined by the means of that used in positive rotation.

##### 4.4. Dynamic Equations

###### 4.4.1. Positive Rotation

As shown in Figure 7, according to the Newton’ second law, assuming the antibacklash gear satisfying the conditions in (9a) and (9b), the dynamics equations of the antibacklash gear in different meshing areas are written as (16a)–(16d).

When and , both gear pairs g1g2 and g1g3 are in double-tooth meshing area (DMA). Here,

When and , gear pair g1g2 is in DMA, and g1g3 is in single-tooth meshing area (SMA), while

When and , gear pair g1g2 is in SMA, and g1g3 is in DMA while

When and , both gear pairs g1g2 and g1g3 are in SMA. Here, where is the moment of inertia of ; is the angle of rotation of ; is the load moment. The other variables are defined in Appendix C.

In order to simplify these equations, a switch function is defined as where is the signum function, and

Therefore, the equations above can be simplified and composited as

By further derivation, where .

Let and ; thus

Equation (4) can be transformed to a normalized matrix equation as here,

Coefficients of matrix equation are written in Appendix D.

###### 4.4.2. Reversal

As shown in Figure 8, in reversal, the contact forces in meshing points are replaced by the method mentioned in Section 4.3. In other words, the forces , , , and in reversal are, respectively, replaced by , , , and calculated in positive rotation. So, the dynamic equations of mechanism are written as follows:

By further derivation,

The normalized matrix equation of (25) is written as here,

By simplification and compared with the matrix equation in positive rotation, the matrix elements are expressed as follows:

#### 5. Numerical Calculation and Discussion

In order to calculate and discuss the characteristics of antibacklash gear, an antibacklash gear, the parameters of which are shown in Table 1, is taken as an example. The numerical calculation model is established in Matlab/simulink with the algorithm of fifth-order Runge-Kutta and fixed-step of 0.00001 s.

##### 5.1. Basic Characteristics

Antibacklash gear is widely used for precision mechanisms to reduce transmission error, especially backlash. Figures from Figure 9(a) to Figure 9(c) show the meshing stiffness of gear pairs g1g2 , g1g3 and the composite meshing stiffness , respectively. As shown in Figure 10, broken line represents the stiffness curve of antibacklash gear, and the solid line represents normal gear pair with the same parameters, reversal at 0.0 s. Curves show that the composite meshing stiffness of antibacklash gear is larger than that of normal gear pair, and the backlash is eliminated in antibacklash gear.

##### 5.2. Effect of Friction and Damping Ratio

In the paper, the elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) regime is assumed, and Dowson’s formula of instantaneous coefficient of friction is adopted. The calculation formulas of friction and coefficient of friction are written in Appendix B. In Figure 11, instantaneous coefficient of friction at initial rotation speed 1000 rpm, N·mm, and N·mm is shown. In Dowson’s semirational formula, is limited in a range of [−0.08, 0.08], According to the range, when the coefficient of friction beyond 0.08, the coefficient of friction is equal to 0.08, and when the coefficient of friction beyond −0.08, the coefficient of friction is equal to −0.08. And at the pitch point, the farer meshing point is away from pitch point, the larger the absolute value of is. Figure 12 shows the curves of normal load, friction, and coefficient of friction at meshing point for 200 rpm and . From Figure 12, we can find out the pitch point of g1g2 at the point where . And the position is the same as the position where the pitch point of g1g2 appears in Figure 13.

The dynamic responses , , and of g1g2, g1g3, and g2g3 are shown in Figures 13 and 14. In Figures 13(a), 13(c), 13(e), 14(a), 14(c), and 14(e), there is no sliding friction and the only excitation is caused by the sudden changes in meshing stiffness. On including friction, as shown in Figures 13(b), 13(d), 13(f), 14(b), 14(d) and 14(f), additional impulsive effects are observed at the pitch points of gear pairs g1g2 and g1g3 where the changes its sign.

The other effect of friction is the reduction of rotation speed due to energy attenuation, which is more significant than that of damping. As shown in Figure 15, the declining curve represents the rotation speed of g1 with friction at the initial rotation speed of 2000 rpm, , no drive, and load torque. It shows that the rotation speed of g1 will be gradually close to zero under only the action of friction.

This characteristic can also be observed from the frequency spectrum of dynamic response , , and . In Figures 17(b), 17(d), and 17(f), the width of frequency band in the same value of center frequency is wider than that in Figures 16(b), 17(d), and 17(f) without friction, and the amplitude is lower. That is because as the rotation speeds reducing, the period of the response signal becomes longer, which leads the frequency band width wider, and the frequency resolution decreasing. All of these are mainly due to friction.

In addition, in Figures 13 and 14, damping ratios and , respectively. Obviously, damping ratio can reduce the vibration and impact due to gear pairs meshing in and out.

##### 5.3. Effect of Torsional Spring Stiffness and Preload

The RMS of the DTE and the oscillating components of the DTE at a specific constant rotation speed (2000 rpm in this study) are defined as [20] where represents one variable of , , and ; is the total number of time steps.

Figures 18–20 show the effects of torsional spring stiffness and preload on the ODTE and RDTE, and line style -- represents the g1g2; -- represents the g1g3; -○- represents the g2g3. In Figure 18, as the torsional spring stiffness increases from to N·mm/rad, both ODTE and RDTE of g1g2 and g1g3 decrease except ODTE of g2g3, but when the torsional spring stiffness is large enough, greater than N·mm/rad, the ODTE and RDTE trend to be a constant value, respectively. As shown in Figure 21, the increase of equivalent linear stiffness of torsional spring stiffness to line of action leads to the increase of composite meshing stiffness of antibacklash gear mechanism, which may be the reason why ODTE and RDTE of g1g2 and g1g3 decrease. The DTE of g2g3 depends on the difference of and ; thus, there may be no direct relationship between composite meshing stiffness and ODTE of g2g3, which deserves further study.

Preload of torsional spring is essential to eliminate the backlash of gear pair. However, if the preload is too small, the backlash will not be eliminated completely; if the preload is too large, friction between two meshing gears will become large due to the increase of normal load. As shown in Figure 18, when preload is less than a certain value, about N·mm, the changes of ODTE and RDTE are not significant, but when exceeding that range, the ODTE and RDTE increase rapidly. Figure 20 shows the ODTE and RDTE without friction for N·mm. The ODTE and RDTE basically unchanged. Thus, friction is the reason. The increase of friction causes the increase of the ODTE and RDTE, while the increase of the preload makes the increase of friction.

#### 6. Conclusions

(1)According to the meshing characteristics of antibacklash gear mechanism, the single- or double-tooth meshing state of two gear pairs was determined. A time-vary meshing stiffness model based on tooth bending stiffness per unit width and Hertz contact stiffness and Dowson’s coefficient of friction at each meshing point were applied in antibacklash gear mechanism, which improved the model accuracy of gear system, and also was a new application on modeling of double-gear antibacklash mechanism.(2)The proposed kinetic model with time-vary parameters will be useful for further study on dynamic characteristics such as vibration and noise of antibacklash gear and some precision transmission mechanism with antibacklash gear.(3)Some results were obtained by numerical calculations and simulations. (a) The composite meshing stiffness of antibacklash gear is larger than that of normal gear pair, and increasing the torsional spring stiffness can increase the composite meshing stiffness. (b) Friction leads to degradation of energy and impulses at the pitch points where the coefficients of friction change their signs. (c) Damping ratio plays a significant role in the suppression of the vibration and impact due to gear pairs meshing in and out. (d) Within a certain range, increasing the torsional spring stiffness can reduce the ODTE and RDTE except ODTE of g2g3, which deserves a further study, but when the torsional spring stiffness is large enough, the ODTE and RDTE trend to be a constant value. (e) Preload of torsional spring is important to ODTE and RDTE, and when preload is less than a certain value, the variations of ODTE and RDTE are not significant.

#### Appendices

#### A. Calculation Formula of Time-Varying Meshing Stiffness

According to the results of FE analysis, the bending stiffness per unit tooth width in the line of action proposed by Kuang and Yang [21] is written as here, represents the distance from meshing point to the centre of gear (; represents the meshing point, such as , , , and ); is the modification coefficient of gear ; (mm) is the radius of pitch circle of .

The meshing stiffness at point can be written as where is the Hertzian stiffness per unit tooth width, and [21]; is the Young’s module with unit of N/mm/mm; is Poisson’s ratio; is effective tooth width with unit of mm; .

#### B. Calculation Formula of Friction on Tooth Face

The friction between and is written as where is friction coefficient; is the normal load at the point ( maybe the , , , or ); ; .

The coefficient of friction is proposed by Dowson and Higginson [22] and written as where is sliding velocity at the meshing point , and is the radius of curvature of gear () at meshing point and is defined and calculated in Appendix C.

is the instantaneous viscosity of the lubricating film, and where and is the coefficient of heat conduction; is the viscosity-temperature coefficient.

is the viscosity of the lubricating film at any point , measured from the center of contact, and where , denote the datum viscosity coefficient and the lubricant viscosity coefficient; is the semiherzian contact width and written as , where , .

is the lubricant film thickness [22], written as where .

#### C. Definitions and Calculation Formulas of Variables in (3)

is the radius of curvature of gear g1, g2 (or g3) at meshing point , , and , , and , are the distance from meshing point , to , : , , and , are the distance from meshing point , to , :

#### D. Expressions of Matrix Coefficients

Consider

#### Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51175505).

#### References

- J. H. Baek, Y. K. Kwak, and S. H. Kim, “On the frequency bandwidth change of a servo system with a gear reducer due to backlash and motor input voltage,”
*Archive of Applied Mechanics*, vol. 73, no. 5-6, pp. 367–376, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - L. Guoming, “Calculation and analysis of double gear’s inherent frequency,”
*Electro-Mechanical Engineering*, vol. 3, pp. 11–12, 2001. - N. Imasaki and M. Tomizuka, “Adaptive control of robot manipulators with anti-backlash gears,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation*, pp. 306–311, May 1995. View at Scopus - S. B. Shim, Y. J. Park, and K. U. Kim, “Reduction of PTO rattle noise of an agricultural tractor using an anti-backlash gear,”
*Biosystems Engineering*, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 346–354, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Y. S. Kwon, H. Y. Hwang, H. R. Lee, and S. H. Kim, “Rate loop control based on torque compensation in anti-backlash geared servo system,” in
*Proceedings of the American Control Conference (AAC '04)*, pp. 3327–3332, July 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - P. M. Allan and N. M. Levy, “The determination of minimum pre-load torque for anti-backlash gears in a positional servomechanism,”
*IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics and Control Instrumentation*, vol. 27, pp. 1232–1239, 1980. - M. Boyuan and L. Zhiwu, “Drive Chain Return difference analysis and estimate of spring-loaded anti-backlash Gear,”
*Mechanical Design*, vol. 6, pp. 40–42, 2001. - C. W. Cairnes, “Antibacklash gearing,” US Patent: no. 2663198, 1953.
- H. N. Özgüven and D. R. Houser, “Mathematical models used in gear dynamics—a review,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 383–411, 1988. View at Scopus - J. Wang, R. Li, and X. Peng, “Survey of nonlinear vibration of gear transmission systems,”
*Applied Mechanics Reviews*, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 309–329, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - A. Kahraman and R. Singh, “Non-linear dynamics of a spur gear pair,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 49–75, 1990. View at Scopus - A. Kahraman and R. Singh, “Non-linear dynamics of a geared rotor-bearing system with multiple clearances,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 469–506, 1991. View at Scopus - A. Kahraman and R. Singh, “Interactions between time-varying mesh stiffness and clearance non-linearities in a geared system,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 135–156, 1991. View at Scopus - S. Theodossiades and S. Natsiavas, “Non-linear dynamics of gear-pair systems with periodic stiffness and backlash,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 229, no. 2, pp. 287–310, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Vaishya and R. Singh, “Strategies for modeling friction in gear dynamics,”
*Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME*, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 383–393, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. He, R. Gunda, and R. Singh, “Effect of sliding friction on the dynamics of spur gear pair with realistic time-varying stiffness,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 301, no. 3–5, pp. 927–949, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Moradi and H. Salarieh, “Analysis of nonlinear oscillations in spur gear pairs with approximated modelling of backlash nonlinearity,”
*Mechanism and Machine Theory*, vol. 51, pp. 14–31, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. Eritenel and R. G. Parker, “Three-dimensional nonlinear vibration of gear pairs,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 331, no. 15, pp. 3628–3648, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - X. Chang, W. Jiaxu, X. Ke, et al., “Calculation and analysis on return difference of filtering gear reducer based on probability theory,”
*Journal of Mechanical Transmission*, vol. 12, pp. 1–5, 2010. - C. Gill-Jeong, “Numerical study on reducing the vibration of spur gear pairs with phasing,”
*Journal of Sound and Vibration*, vol. 329, no. 19, pp. 3915–3927, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. H. Kuang and Y. T. Yang, “An estimate of mesh stiffness and load sharing ratio of a spur gear pair,” in
*Proceedings of the International Power Transmission and Gearing Conference*, pp. 1–10, Scottsdale, Ariz, USA, September 1992. View at Scopus - D. Dowson and G. Higginson,
*Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication*, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1977.