About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 297803, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/297803
Research Article

Performance Analysis of a Completely Sealed Double Oscillating Structure Applied in Wave Energy Extraction

1School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou 2, Nanjing 210096, China
2Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Latium, Via G. Di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino, Italy

Received 28 June 2013; Accepted 17 September 2013

Academic Editor: Luigi Cappelli

Copyright © 2013 Zhenchuan Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Most of the traditional wave energy converters are of a single oscillation structure, which leads to difficulties in sealing and installation. Based on the technological status of disc-type permanent magnetic coreless generator (DPMCLG) and long-stroke tape-type spring, a small scale wave energy extracting structure which can be completely sealed and work under the principle of double oscillation is proposed in this paper. By building a double oscillating model of the structure, the time domain differential equations and an equivalent circuit scheme are drawn, from which a phase-space solution by phase method is derived. Based on the solution, the performance of the structure is compared with that of single oscillating structure. The conclusion is that the double oscillating structure has a wider period range and higher power response for wave extraction, as well as the protection of power generator from damage in storm conditions.

1. Introduction

The enthusiasm towards the exploitation of renewable energies has prompted a significant interest in wave power so that various structures have been invented, among which the point absorber is an excellent approach for its simple mechanism, easy fabrication, and point absorption effect. The point absorption method usually aims for large capacity power systems, so such components are adopted as permanent magnets, linear generator, and buoy and anchor [18]. Anchored or stationary components work with floating components to extract as much power as possible. However, there are some problems for this type of structure. (1) It is difficult to encapsulate electric devices with relatively moving parts in ocean conditions. (2) Because of a large rating power, conventional linear generators often have considerable cogging force, and thus they are incapable of working in small waves. (3) To meet the requirements of buoy stroke, many permanent magnets should be used in linear generator. (4) Buoy’s direct driving generator can enhance wave conversion ability, but it is vulnerable to rough weather conditions. For small-capacity wave power systems, these drawbacks are unacceptable. In this paper, one wave power structure completely encapsulating the relatively moving parts is proposed to overcome these defects. The structure is a vibration pick-up device or double oscillating structure which has been applied in micropower harvesting system. For example, there are vibration generators based on piezoelectric effect and voice coil generators based on Faraday’s law [9, 10]. Both generators harvest vibration energy for sensors. There is a similar device used to collect shaking energy of vehicle, which works well in high frequency conditions [11]. For low frequency conditions such as marine gravity waves, particular study is required. Lancaster’s project FROG and PS FROG had played a pioneer role here by their two reactionless ocean wave energy converters, along with many materials about the design and performance evaluation [1, 8, 12, 13]. Project called ISWEC from Politecnico di Torino employs gyroscopic principle to achieve the similar goal [14, 15]. Being different, the paper tries to propose another realization and emphasis on performance comparison in various periods for double oscillating and single oscillating structures.

2. Structure

For analysis convenience, stoppers are neglected, though they are indispensable in reality. Therefore, the structure analyzed consists of three major parts (Figure 1).(1)Outer body: taking a form of vertical cylinder and working as a floater in water.(2)Inner body: working as oscillator moving vertically within the structure.(3)Tape spring for generator: tape spring connects outer body and inner body with an appropriate stiffness and concentrically couples a disc-type permanent-magnet coreless generator (DPMCLG) [16]. Both spring and generator rotate synchronously. The tape spring supports the inner body against gravity when the structure is at rest.

297803.fig.001
Figure 1: Double oscillating structure.

The operation principles of the structure are as follows.(1)When excited by waves, the outer body moves vertically.(2)Because of inertia, the inner body lags behind the outer body. Hence there is relative motion.(3)The relative motion revolves the tape spring, and the energy is absorbed by the coaxial generator.

Advantages of the structure are as follows.(1)The motion of generator and oscillator is within the chamber, so a totally sealed structure is available. (2)The tape spring is characterized by long stroke and small elastic coefficient, which enables inner body to work in a state of near weightlessness maximizing the absorption of vibration energy [17].(3)Compared with most other types of PM generators, DPMCLG suffers little cogging force and is suitable for small wave.(4)The tape spring with long stroke and small elastic coefficient finds mature application in lifting gear and DPMCLG in wind power generation.

3. Assumptions and Physical Model

For analysis convenience, the following assumptions are made. (1) There is full space for the inner body to move. (2) Friction between mechanical components is small enough. The system can be simplified to a double oscillating model as shown in Figure 2.

297803.fig.002
Figure 2: Simplified model of double oscillating structure.

4. Mathematical Model

4.1. Differential Equations

The resultant force acting upon the inner body is a summation of spring force, gravity, friction, and electromagnetic force, and that upon outer body is a summation of buoyancy, gravity, spring force, friction, and generator electromagnetic force. According to Newton’s second law, the dynamic differential equations for the oscillating model can be written as where , and is the wave excitation force. In reality, hydrodynamic parameters and depend on wave frequency.

4.2. Equivalent Scheme

The dynamic equations of double oscillating system can be expressed in circuit scheme just as Figure 3 demonstrates. To make a comparison, the equivalent scheme for single oscillating structure is shown in Figure 4 [18]. It is clear that both structures have a topology like a band-pass circuit. Compared with single oscillating structure, the double oscillating structure is more complicated; hence there is a wider range for regulation.

297803.fig.003
Figure 3: Equivalent scheme of dynamic equations for double oscillating system.
297803.fig.004
Figure 4: Equivalent circuit of dynamic equations for single oscillating system.
4.3. Phase Equations and Solution

For a monochromatic wave, water surface levitation can be expressed as follows:

When the size of the structure is small enough compared with the wavelength, the wave excitation force can be approximately expressed according to linear wave theory as follows:

The excitation force can be transformed into phase form by adding hat to variables; that is,

Based on research from [1820], the heave hydrodynamic damping and added mass for vertical cylinder can be expressed as , , where and are corresponding nondimensionalised coefficients, and if concentrating only on difference with single oscillating structure, constant values would bring benefits, so pick values with , for both structures. Thus, like the excitation force, the equations for system can be written as phase form accordingly: where . The solution for the linear phase equations can be easily deduced as follows: For comparison, the phase solution for single oscillating structure is as follows: The corresponding displacement and power can be calculated as follows:

5. Computation and Discussion

5.1. Model Parameters

The system is designed under the condition that the resonating period  s, wave height  m, generator power  W, and damping  kg/s. The radius of the structure is equal to 0.25 m. The parameters for double and single oscillating structure are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The and are absent in Table 2, and the equals the total mass of Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Parameters of double oscillating model.
tab2
Table 2: Parameters of single oscillating model.

5.2. Performance with Different Wave Period

The power absorption, max. velocity amplitude, and max. displacement amplitude of two structures under different wave periods are compared by computation according to expressions (8~12). The curves are in Figures 5, 6, and 7. First, the max. absorption power is about 150 W which is close to the designation for the single oscillating structure, while the double oscillating structure has a value of 220 W, which is about 1.5 times of the designation. Secondly, the period when max. power absorption happens is about 2 s for single oscillating structure, with a value of 2.4 s for double oscillating structure. Thirdly, suppose that there is a goal of contributing power of at least 100 W; the structure with single oscillation can only work in a range from 1.5 s to 2.6 s, while the double oscillating system can work in a wider range that is from 0.6 s to 2.7 s. All of these illustrate that the double oscillating structure can be smaller, lighter, and easier for control than single oscillating system with the same designing wave period scope and power demand. Finally, the response of the double oscillating system decays more quickly than that of the single one, which is useful in the protection of generator under extreme weather conditions because large wave period means high wave in general.

297803.fig.005
Figure 5: Generator power-wave period for two systems.
297803.fig.006
Figure 6: Speed amplitude-wave period for two systems.
297803.fig.007
Figure 7: Displacement amplitude-wave period for two systems.
5.3. Performance with Different

The special performance of double oscillating system derives from the parameter . The calculation results concerning performance of the double oscillating system with different value of are shown in Figures 8 and 9. It can be seen that the double oscillating system keeps its band-pass feature well. The period for max. response increases from 1.5 s to 2.3 s as increases from 200 N/m to 2600 N/m. When is larger than 2000 N/m, there is a saddle point at 1.5 s, and the max. response at 2.3 s increases rapidly. As increases, the scope of response narrows and max. value increases sharply.

297803.fig.008
Figure 8: Relative speed amplitude-wave period for double oscillating system with different .
297803.fig.009
Figure 9: Relative displacement amplitude-wave period for double oscillating system with different .

6. Conclusions

The double oscillating structure is proposed to solve the main problems of the single oscillating structure. The structure is modeled and analyzed by mathematical equations. According to the case given in the paper, the double oscillating structure has shown an advantage in wider wave range and rougher wave conditions. Furthermore, the double oscillating structure may reduce sealing and installation cost comparing with the single oscillating structure. However, to bring the structure into practice, there are many problems remaining to be solved. Firstly, the structure needs a more accurate model to explore its behavior more exactly by taking into account the nonlinear parameters that were simplified for comparison convenience here. Moreover, the design of the structure needs proper tape spring and generator, and the mechanical support needs further research.

Nomenclature

: Displacement of outer body from the equilibrium (m)
: Relative displacement of inner body from equilibrium to outer body (m)
: Velocity of outer body (m/s)
: Velocity of inner body (m/s)
: Relative velocity of inner body to outer body (m/s)
: Mass about parts moving with outer body (kg)
: A mass summation of components moving with inner body, including inner body and equivalent mass from control method for generator (kg)
: Added mass for system in the water (kg)
: Hydrodynamic damping (kg/s)
: Mechanical damping (kg/s)
: Damping from generator, which indicates the power absorption ability (kg/s)
: An equivalent resistance that indicates the power absorption of structure, including damping from mechanical action and generator (kg/s)
: Stiffness in the water of outer body (kg/s2), for vertical cylinder
: Total stiffness between inner body and outer body, including stiffness of spring and equivalent stiffness of generator (kg/s2)
: Outer radius of the cylinder (m)
: Density of water (kg/m3)
: Angle frequency of wave (rad/s)
: Nondimensionalised hydrodynamic heave coefficient of damping
: Nondimensionalised hydrodynamic heave coefficient of added mass
: Acceleration of gravity (m/s2)
: Water surface levitation for wave (m)
: Wave excitation force (N)
: Amplitude of wave levitation that is half of the height from though to crest (m)
: Time variable (s)
Power generated by generator (W).

References

  1. A. F. D. O. Falcão, “Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 899–918, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. U. A. Korde, “On providing a reaction for efficient wave energy absorption by floating devices,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 235–248, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Vantorre, R. Banasiak, and R. Verhoeven, “Modelling of hydraulic performance and wave energy extraction by a point absorber in heave,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 61–72, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Li, Investigation on the performance of the oscillating buoy wave power device [M.S. thesis], Dialian University of Technology, 2005.
  5. M. Yang, Design of float-type wave energy device and research of power characteristics [M.S. thesis], College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, 2010.
  6. F. Zabihian and A. S. Fung, “Review of marine renewable energies: case study of Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2461–2474, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Nunes, D. Valério, P. Beirão, J. S. da Costa, and D. ValÃl’rio, “Modelling and control of a wave energy converter,” Renewable Energy, vol. 36, pp. 1913–1921, 2011.
  8. I. López, J. Andreu, S. Ceballos, et al., “Review of wave energy technologies and the necessary power-equipment,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 27, pp. 413–434, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. L. Haodong and P. Pillay, “A linear generator powered from bridge vibrations for wireless sensors,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Conference 42nd Annual Meeting (IAS '07), pp. 523–529, September 2007. View at Scopus
  10. X. Tang and L. Zuo, “Simulation and experiment validation of simultaneous vibration control and energy harvesting from buildings using tuned mass dampers,” in Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference (ACC '11), pp. 3134–3139, July 2011. View at Scopus
  11. Z. Yuanyuan, Research on some key technique problems of the equipment for harvesting energy from car-vibration [M.S. thesis], Hebei University of Technology, 2009.
  12. R. H. Bracewell, FROG and PS FROG: a study of two reactionless ocean wave energy converters [Ph.D. thesis], Lancaster University, 1990.
  13. A. P. McCabe, A. Bradshaw, J. A. C. Meadowcroft, and G. Aggidis, “Developments in the design of the PS Frog Mk 5 wave energy converter,” Renewable Energy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 141–151, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Bracco, E. Giorcelli, and G. Mattiazzo, “ISWEC: a gyroscopic mechanism for wave power exploitation,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1411–1424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Bracco, E. Giorcelli, G. Mattiazzo, and M. Pastorelli, “Design of a gyroscopic wave energy system,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '11), pp. 3134–3139, November 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Wang, J. Yan, and G. Wang, “Study of disk type corelss permanent magnet synchronous generator applied in ocean current energy system,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS '12), pp. 1–9, October 2012.
  17. J. Guo and Y. Jing, “Design of a spring device with approximately constant elasticity,” Journal of Tianjin Iinstitute of Technology, vol. 16, pp. 46–48.
  18. J. Falnes, Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
  19. D. R. F. Harleman, W. C. Nolan, and V. C. Honsinger, “Dynamic analysis of offshore structures,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Engineering, 1962.
  20. Z. Zhili, Water Wave Thories and Their Applications, Peking Science Press, 2005.