About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 816951, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/816951
Research Article

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Series Cushioning System Made with Expanded Polyethylene and Corrugated Paperboard

Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China

Received 31 July 2013; Accepted 1 September 2013

Academic Editor: Jun Wang

Copyright © 2013 De Gao and Fu-de Lu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Based on the constitutive models of expanded polyethylene (EPE) and C-flute corrugated paperboard (CCP), the drop impact model for expanded polyethylene in series with CCP was established to consider the effect of cushioning action for CCP box. A numerical procedure was adopted for the optimization of the product packaging system by considering the action of the corrugated paperboard box. Then the optimal results were obtained and compared without considering the effect of CCP. Finally, the calculation reliability was proved by the comparison between calculated results and experimental data.

1. Introduction

Package cushioning materials are popularly used to protect some kinds of products. The most commonly used method of designing packaging structure is dynamic cushion curve, namely, the maximum-static stress curve method [1], which shows how a particular packaging material of a given thickness behaves at different impact loading. However, the cushion curves are commonly obtained through abundant experiments that would consume much time and expenditure. In practical examples of cushion packaging, polymeric foams are fruitfully utilized to protect products against shock and drop loading. In order to overcome this drawback, constitutive relationships have been carried out. Zhang et al. [2] established constitutive relationships for expanded polypropylene, expanded polystyrene, and expanded polyurethane considering several factors such as density, strain rate, and environment temperature. Liu and Subhash [3] and Avalle et al. [4] proposed a mathematical model to characterize three regions of common foam. Jeong et al. [5] investigated the strain rate dependent behavior of polyurethane foams and formulated a new constitutive model in order to improve the fit of the experimental data at various strain rates. Gao and Lu [6] explored the constitutive behavior for expanded polyethylene. Because of the environmental advantage and demand, there has been interest in recyclable, reusable, and biodegradable packaging material; Lu and Gao [7] built a phenomenological model for single flute corrugated paperboard. Huang et al. [8] presented a constitutive model for double flute corrugated paperboard considering relative humidity. From a damage boundary curve viewpoint, Wang et al. [9] investigated the impact response of corrugated paperboard, which is the actual application of the three-dimensional shock response spectrum and provided an important method for studying the nonlinear response of coupled packaging systems based on critical components [10, 11]. The dropping damage boundary surface concept as well as the traditional damage boundary concept helps the researcher model the damage potential of shocks to packaged products.

In most cases, corrugated paperboard is used to make the corrugated paperboard box as the containers to store the products, and interpackaging is inserted as cushioning pads within the box [1214]. Because of the cushioning properties of the corrugated paperboard, it can play favorable roles to protect products during storage and transportation, which is often ignored while designing the packaging structure [15].

In this paper, a series of procedures to describe practical protective packaging systems are presented. Firstly, the compression tests were undertaken to determine the constitutive models for expanded polyethylene (EPE) and C-flute corrugated paperboard (short for CCP). Secondly, a drop impact calculation method of EPE in series with CCP was introduced to examine the effects of outer packaging box on the product packaging system. Lastly, an optimization model considering the action of outer box made of corrugated paperboard was established.

2. Compression Constitutive Models of EPE and CCP

The test samples of EPE were made with the cubic dimensions of  mm and the average density 21 kg/m3, and specimens of CCP were cut into  mm with thickness 4.6 mm. The static tests and drop impact test were conducted on the universal machine and drop tower, respectively, to obtain the constitutive model.

The constitutive model of EPE was reported in our previous paper [16] as where , , and are the model parameters to be identified. For the studied cushioning material, the parameters of the static model were solved to be  MPa, ,  Mpa, and  Pas using the iterative least square method. The calculated curve is plotted in Figure 2 as solid line, agreeing well with the experimental data.

Figure 1 shows the static stress and strain curve of CCP measured by the universal machine at compression speed of 2 mm/min. The curve indicates that the compression stress is near linearly proportional to the strain, while the strain is smaller than 0.27, and the peak stress is available at the strain 0.27. As the strain increases from 0.27 towards 0.6, the compression stress decreases slightly, and then it will increase rapidly on account of the CCP starting to be compacted at this time. A constitutive model for CCP was proposed as follows: where () are the model parameters which can be identified by fitting the experimental data into (2), and these parameters were solved as  MPa,  MPa,  MPa,  MPa,  MPa,  MPa, and . The calculated data is shown in Figure 1.

816951.fig.001
Figure 1: Static compression stress and strain curves of CCP.
816951.fig.002
Figure 2: Dynamic compression stress and strain curves of CCP.

In addition, the dynamic compression data and curve were measured for drop impacts with a heavy hammer of 2.1 kg from 30 cm, shown in Figure 2. The dynamic compression curve exhibits similar regularity to the static compression curve. Therefore, it was proposed to characterize the dynamic behavior of the cushioning material by using the following dynamic constitutive model: where () are the same as that of (2); are parameters identified as  s. The calculated dynamic stress-strain curve is described in Figure 2.

3. Series Model of EPE and CCP and Optimization Design

A complete packaging system is composed of product, cushion material, and outer packing box. CCP begins to be deformed when subjected to dynamic compression load and it acts to absorb the energy from drop impact. We established the mechanical model of EPE in series with CCP, shown in Figure 3, for taking into account the effect of outer packaging box. The origin of coordinate was selected at the top of EPE cushion, and the interface between EPE and CCP was used to construct the origin of coordinate to accout for the cushiong effect of CCP.

816951.fig.003
Figure 3: Schematic of product packaging system considering CCP.

Because the masses of the two cushion layers are negligible compared with the product mass, the resistive force from the first cushioning material is the same as that from the second. Based on the above assumption, the dynamic equations of packaging system can be expressed as where is the contact area of the EPE or CCP. The initial condition of the equation is given as

The structure optimization of series system could be designed based on two requirements: response acceleration of the product should be smaller than the allowable value and material consumption should be minimized; the object optimization function of the cushion package series structure was put forward and was shown as falling equations [15] where is the maximum safe acceleration, is safety factor, is the maximum acceleration response, and is the undersurface area of products.

The steps to solve (6) are as follows:(i)give the range of to be , and designate from to , where is the initial value of the area , is the final value of , is the initial value of the thickness , and is the final value of ,(ii)increase from to with step length , and from to with step length to solve (6), and store A and to be feasible solution if ,(iii)finally, obtain the minimum value of function .

4. Results and Experimental Verification

4.1. Effect of Cushion Size on Product Response

Because thickness is constant, area and thickness can be varied. We studied the effect of parameters and on product response from drop impacts. In order to research the effect of cushion size, the maximum acceleration value which considered the action of the CCP was compared with maximum acceleration that did not consider the paperboard effect. We defined acceleration as standard value because it was solved under the practical environment (taking into accout cushioning effect of CCP) and then relative error can be expressed as

Figure 4(a) shows the relation between , , and under conditions of  kg and  m2, and the contour lines of relative error are presented in Figure 4(b). It is clear that the relative error of the upper left-hand corner is smaller than 5%, meaning the cushion characteristic of this packaging system is dependent on CCP. But the effect of CCP is noticeable in the lower right-hand corner, for example, the value can be up to 142%, while  m and  m. Figure 5(a) illustrates the compression deformation of cushion materials with respect to time under  m and  m during impact compression. We can find that the deformation of CCP is almost zero by comparison with EPE, so the packaging system uses EPE to absorb energy during drop impact. Yet Figure 5(b) demonstrates that the CCP begins to deform rapidly at time of 0.0053 s, so the packaging systems are dependent on EPE and CCP to achieve the function of package cushioning.

fig4
Figure 4: Relations between , , and (a). Contour lines of (b).
fig5
Figure 5: Deformations of cushion materials at (a)  m and  m and (b)  m and  m.
4.2. Cushion Optimization Design

In Section 4.1, we studied the effect of given area and thickness on the cushion characteristics of packaging system. Given some requirements, this section introduces optimization design of cushion structure considering the effect of paperboard. There is a product with its mass  kg, safe acceleration  g, and undersurface area  m2, dropping from the height  m on the packaging cushion system, which is divided into two categories, considering the influence of CCP and not considering the effect of that. The safe factor is 1 : 1 and satisfies the need of optimization for the cushion structure.

Table 1 shows that the cushion structure optimization results in two categories, where denotes the volume of EPE when paperboard is not considered.

tab1
Table 1: Optimization results of cushion structure.

We calculated the relative error that is equal to 24.4% between the two categories under the above conditions. In order to investigate the effect of outer box deeply, we calculated presented in Figure 6 under the conditions of  m and  g. The values of are higher than 10%, even 40%, when drop height is 0.4 m and is 150 g.

816951.fig.006
Figure 6: Relation between , , and .

5. Conclusions

The parameters of constitutive relations of EPE and CCP were obtained by experimental studies and some identifying techniques for mathematical expressions were put forward. Drop impact model of product that uses EPE as cushion material in series with CCP was constructed, and the series optimization model was proposed on the basis of impact model considering the two requirements that one is; response acceleration of the product should be smaller than the allowable value, and the other is that material consumption should be minimized. The following conclusions can be drawn:(1)CCP acts with a smaller cushioning effect under thicker and higher , but the effect becomes noticeable under thinner and lower (Figure 4),(2)at certain drop height and safe acceleration, the optimization structures of packaging system were calculated considering or not considering the effect of CCP. Difference between the consumption of the two categories was significant (Figure 4). So it will avoid or reduce overuse of package materials if the cushioning effect of outer CCP box is considered.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Twelfth National Five-Year Science and Technology Projects (nos. 2011BAD24B01 and 2012BAD32B02).

References

  1. M. A. Sek, M. Minett, V. Rouillard, and B. Bruscella, “A new method for the determination of cushion curves,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 249–255, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Zhang, N. Kikuchi, V. Li, A. Yee, and G. Nusholtz, “Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 369–386, 1998. View at Scopus
  3. Q. Liu and G. Subhash, “A phenomenological constitutive model for foams under large deformations,” Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 463–473, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Avalle, G. Belingardi, and A. Ibba, “Mechanical models of cellular solids: parameters identification from experimental tests,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Y. Jeong, S. S. Chon, and M. B. Munshi, “A constitutive model for polyurethane foam with strain rate sensitivity,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 2033–2038, 2012.
  6. D. Gao and F.-D. Lu, “Optimization design of MDOF package cushioning system made of polyethylene,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 69–72, 2012. View at Scopus
  7. F.-D. Lu and D. Gao, “Cushion model and its application of C-flute corrugated paperboard,” Journal of Functional Materials, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 39–41, 2012. View at Scopus
  8. D. Huang, D. Gao, and F. Lu, “The constitutive modeling of double-B flute corrugated board,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 101-102, pp. 1147–1150, 2012. View at Scopus
  9. J. Wang, Z. W. Wang, F. Duan, et al., “Dropping shock responseof corrugated paperboard cushioning packaging system,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 336–340, 2013.
  10. J. Wang, F. Duan, J. Jiang, et al., “Dropping damage evaluationfor a hyperbolic tangent cushioning system with a criticalcomponent,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1417–1421, 2012.
  11. J. Wang, Z.-W. Wang, L.-X. Lu, Y. Zhu, and Y.-G. Wang, “Three-dimensional shock spectrum of critical component for nonlinear packaging system,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 437–445, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Sek, V. Rouillard, H. Tarash, and S. Crawford, “Enhancement of cushioning performance with poperboard crumple inserts,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 273–278, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Garcia-Romeu-Martinez, M. A. Sek, and V. A. Cloquell-Ballester, “Effect of initial pre-compression of corrugated paperboard cushions on shock attenuation characteristics in repetitive impacts,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 323–334, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Guo, W. Xu, Y. Fu, and H. Wang, “Dynamic shock cushioning characteristics and vibration transmissibility of X-PLY corrugated paperboard,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 525–535, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. D. Lu, W. M. Tao, and D. Gao, “Impact response of series cushioning system and structure optimization analysis,” Journal of Zhejiang University, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1773–1777, 2012.
  16. F. D. Lu, W. M. Tao, and D. Gao, “Virtual mass method for solution of dynamic response of composite cushion packaging system,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2013.