Research Article
Improving TIGGE Precipitation Forecasts Using an SVR Ensemble Approach in the Huaihe River Basin
Table 4
The three rates of the forecasts obtained using different ensemble methods in the Xixian catchment during the training period.
| Lead time (days) | EM | BREM | LR | SVR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR |
| 1 | 60.78 | 34.97 | 4.25 | 70.59 | 17.97 | 11.44 | 67.97 | 24.51 | 7.52 | 91.18 | 4.58 | 4.25 | 2 | 66.01 | 27.78 | 6.21 | 72.22 | 18.95 | 8.82 | 68.95 | 22.88 | 8.17 | 87.58 | 7.84 | 4.58 | 3 | 62.42 | 31.70 | 5.88 | 69.93 | 21.24 | 8.82 | 66.67 | 24.18 | 9.15 | 79.41 | 13.40 | 7.19 | 4 | 54.58 | 35.95 | 9.48 | 66.01 | 23.20 | 10.78 | 60.13 | 28.76 | 11.11 | 90.52 | 3.92 | 5.56 | 5 | 54.58 | 34.97 | 10.46 | 62.75 | 25.16 | 12.09 | 51.96 | 37.91 | 10.13 | 88.89 | 5.23 | 5.88 | 6 | 51.96 | 37.58 | 10.46 | 62.42 | 26.14 | 11.44 | 16.67 | 74.84 | 8.50 | 84.64 | 6.86 | 8.50 | 7 | 50.00 | 38.24 | 11.76 | 62.09 | 25.82 | 12.09 | 14.38 | 76.80 | 8.82 | 84.64 | 7.19 | 8.17 |
|
|