Research Article
Improving TIGGE Precipitation Forecasts Using an SVR Ensemble Approach in the Huaihe River Basin
Table 5
The three rates of the forecasts obtained using different ensemble methods in the Xixian catchment during the verification period.
| Lead time (days) | EM | BREM | LR | SVR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR | HR | FAR | MAR |
| 1 | 67.97 | 22.88 | 9.15 | 78.43 | 7.19 | 14.38 | 68.63 | 18.95 | 12.42 | 81.70 | 10.46 | 7.84 | 2 | 67.97 | 24.18 | 7.84 | 74.51 | 16.99 | 8.50 | 68.63 | 20.26 | 11.11 | 73.20 | 14.38 | 12.42 | 3 | 52.94 | 37.91 | 9.15 | 66.01 | 24.18 | 9.80 | 58.82 | 27.45 | 13.73 | 71.90 | 18.30 | 9.80 | 4 | 56.86 | 33.33 | 9.80 | 66.67 | 21.57 | 11.76 | 59.48 | 26.80 | 13.73 | 77.12 | 11.11 | 11.76 | 5 | 54.25 | 34.64 | 11.11 | 60.78 | 26.14 | 13.07 | 52.94 | 32.03 | 15.03 | 73.86 | 15.69 | 10.46 | 6 | 50.98 | 34.64 | 14.38 | 63.40 | 21.57 | 15.03 | 7.84 | 74.51 | 17.65 | 75.82 | 12.42 | 11.76 | 7 | 47.06 | 36.60 | 16.34 | 57.52 | 24.84 | 17.65 | 15.69 | 69.28 | 15.03 | 71.90 | 12.42 | 15.69 |
|
|