- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Advances in Mathematical Physics

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 421685, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/421685

## An Alpha-Beta Phase Diagram Representation of the Zeros and Properties of the Mittag-Leffler Function

Department of Physics, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

Received 8 May 2013; Accepted 25 June 2013

Academic Editor: Dumitru Baleanu

Copyright © 2013 John W. Hanneken et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A significant advance in characterizing the nature of the zeros and organizing the Mittag-Leffler functions into phases according to their behavior is presented. Regions have been identified in the domain of and where the Mittag-Leffler functions have not only the same type of zeros but also exhibit similar functional behavior, and this permits the establishment of an - phase diagram.

#### 1. Introduction

The Mittag-Leffler (ML) function defined by is a generalization of the exponential function and plays a fundamental role in the theory of fractional differential equations with numerous applications in physics. Consequently, books devoted to the subject of fractional differential equations (i.e., Podlubny [1], Magin [2], Kilbas et al. [3], and Mainardi [4]) all contain sections on the Mittag-Leffler functions. Despite the inherent importance of Mittag-Leffler functions in fractional differential equations, their behaviour and types of zeros have not been fully characterized. This work resolves this delinquency by identifying regions in the domain of and where the Mittag-Leffler functions exhibit similar behaviour. In this work, is restricted to real numbers.

While Mittag-Leffler functions in general exhibit a diverse range of behaviors, ML functions which have the same types of zeros also exhibit many other similar properties. Hence, it is logical to organize the ML functions with similar types of zeros and similar properties into regions of the parameter space (, ) (restricted to positive real numbers in this work) resulting in a - “phase diagram” for the Mittag-Leffler functions. Information extracted from a review of the literature on the theory of the zeros of ML functions together with the numerical results of this work yields the first depiction of the - phase diagram for the Mittag-Leffler functions shown in Figure 1 for the range . Seven major regions or phases have been identified and descriptively labeled by an ordered pair of symbols where the first symbol of the pair indicates the number of real zeros attributed to the ML function in that phase [i.e., none (0), finite (), or infinite ()] and the second symbol of the pair refers to the number of complex zeros attributed to the Mittag-Leffler functions in that same phase.

Specifically, the seven phases are regions where the ML functions have (1) a finite number of real zeros and an infinite number of complex zeros , (2) one real zero and an infinite number of complex zeros , (3) an infinite number of real zeros and no complex zeros , (4) an infinite number of real zeros and a finite number of complex zeros , and (5) a special point where has no zeros at all . The remaining two phases both have no real zeros and an infinite number of complex zeros , but exhibit different functional behaviors depending on the value of and thus are denoted as (6) for the region and (7) for the region . It is interesting to note that although not excluded theoretically, the phase does not seem to exist in the range considered here . Theoretical considerations show that the phases , , and are to be excluded. After some theoretical arguments which are applicable to the zeros of all Mittag-Leffler functions, each phase will be discussed separately with the corresponding supporting literature references. Examples will be provided for the typical behavior of the ML functions belonging to each of these phases.

#### 2. Zeros of Theory

It follows from Hadamard’s factorization theory that an entire function of fractional order has infinitely many zeros (Ahlfors [5]). The Mittag-Leffler function given by (1) is an entire function of order (Gorenflo and Mainardi [6]). Consequently, all ML functions will have an infinite number of zeros with the possible exception of when is an integer (i.e., when ). Note that Hadamard’s statement says nothing about the number of zeros when 1/ is an integer. In these cases, there may be no zeros, a finite number of zeros, or an infinite number of zeros. However, Sedletski [7, 8] has shown that with the exception of the Mittag-Leffler functions have an infinite number of zeros for . Since all terms in (1) are positive for positive , the Mittag-Leffler functions have no real zeros for . In addition, all complex zeros occur as pairs of complex conjugates (Gorenflo et al. [9]). A systematic description of the various phases follows.

#### 3. Phase

The ML function is equivalent to the exponential function and is the only Mittag-Leffler function which has no zeros (Sedletski [7]) and thus is just a single point in the phase diagram. The fact that does not have an infinite number of zeros is consistent with Hadamard’s statement since is an integer.

#### 4. Phase

This phase extends from and with different behaviors on the boundaries as follows: the ML functions whose parameters lie on the vertical dotted line at which separates the phase from belong to the phase (with the single exception of which belongs to —see Section 8 for details), while the ML functions whose parameters lie on the dotted line belong to the phase. Figure 2 shows a typical Mittag-Leffler function in this phase.

The function is positive for positive , and as , the function crosses the negative -axis only once and asymptotically approaches zero from below. This is evident from the asymptotic expansion of given by Podlubny [1]: In this phase and , thus and is negative and as , is negative and thus approaches zero from below the negative -axis. Theory confirms the fact that each in this phase has only one real negative simple zero (Popov and Sedletski [10]). The fact that each ML function (except for ) has an infinite number of zeros for requires that each ML function in this phase has an infinite number of complex zeros since each function has only one real zero.

#### 5. Phase

This phase extends for , from with the line separating the phase from , and Mittag-Leffler functions on the line belong to the phase . The reason ML functions on the vertical line are not in this phase will be discussed in detail in the next section. Figure 3 shows the graph of a typical Mittag-Leffler function in the phase .

The function is positive for positive and remains positive while asymptotically approaching the negative real axis as and thus has no real zeros. This is evident by applying (2) with , is then positive and as is positive and thus approaches zero from above the negative real axis. For , the asymptotic expansion of as is given by Podlubny [1]: For , is negative, and as is positive and this function also approaches zero from above the negative real axis. The behaviour of the Mittag-Leffler function in this phase is confirmed by the theoretical work of Schneider [11] and Miller and Samko [12, 13] who proved that for and , is a complete monotonic nonnegative function on the negative -axis. Furthermore, Aleroev and Aleroeva [14] have proven that all zeros of are complex for . Since the Mittag-Leffler functions in this phase have no real zeros, then they must have an infinite number of complex zeros.

#### 6. Phase

This phase extends from to the phase boundary separating phase from . This latter phase boundary does not appear to be a simple function and will be examined in detail in the discussion of phase . All Mittag-Leffler functions in phase are characterized by . Figure 4 shows a typical Mittag-Leffler function in this phase.

As with phase , the Mittag-Leffler function is positive for positive and remains positive while asymptotically approaching the negative real axis as and thus has no real zeros. However, the Mittag-Leffler function in phase exhibits a fundamentally different functional behaviour from the Mittag-Leffler functions in phase . This can be understood by recognizing that Mittag-Leffler functions for which can be decomposed into two parts [15] given by where Thus, Mittag-Leffler functions for which are composed of a function which asymptotically approaches the negative axis as superimposed on an oscillatory function [15]. For Mittag-Leffler functions in which , there exists the following recursion relation: This permits representing any Mittag-Leffler function with in terms of a Mittag-Leffler function with , which in turn can then be represented by (5). For example, using the recursion relation with , can be calculated from as follows: As with the previous example, any Mittag-Leffler function in phase can be represented in terms of a Mitttag-Leffler function which can be calculated using (5). Consequently, although not always apparent, inherent in all Mittag-Leffler functions in phase is the oscillatory behaviour of in (5). Figure 5 shows a Mittag-Leffler function in phase in which this oscillatory behaviour is clearly evident.

The fact that is zero for [15] is why the Mittag-Leffler functions of phase exhibit no oscillatory behaviour and why phases and are fundamentally different phases. Although is zero for , it is instructive to ask if is ever equal to zero when ≥ 1. Since is in the cosine argument, for a fixed and , can only be zero if is zero. This limits the possibilities to the vertical line whereby which is zero when . Thus, at these isolated points , the oscillatory nature of is absent. Consequently, for , these points belong to phase and all other points on the vertical line belong to phase as indicated by the arrow in Figure 1. Similarly, for , the point belongs to phase . To highlight this distinction, these special points are shown as dark points in Figure 1. The fact that, according to Schneider [11] and Miller and Samko [12, 13], ML functions on the line with are complete monotonic nonnegative functions on the negative -axis simply means that in this case the function in (5) dominates and does not permit the oscillatory nature of to be manifested.

For , the phase includes all Mittag-Leffler functions above the phase boundary line but not those on the line. This last fact will be discussed in detail in the following section. Mittag-Leffler functions on the vertical boundary line separating phase from for belong to phase as indicated by the arrow in Figure 1. This is confirmed by the theoretical work of Popov and Sedletski [10] who show that has no real zeros for . With no real zeros, each ML function in this phase must have an infinite number of complex zeros.

#### 7. Phase

This phase extends from and from to the phase boundary line in Figure 1. Figure 6 shows the graph of a typical Mittag-Leffler function belonging to this phase.

The function is positive for positive and as , the function oscillates crossing the negative -axis a finite number of times before asymptotically approaching zero. This general behavior applies to all Mittag-Leffler functions in this phase. However, the Mittag-Leffler functions within this phase differ with respect to how they asymptotically approach zero. Some approach from above the negative axis while others approach from below. Those Mittag-Leffler functions that approach from below must have crossed the -axis an odd number of times. For example, approaches from below for and thus has an odd number of negative real zeros (Wiman [16], Gorenflo and Mainardi [15]). This is evident from (2) since and is negative for , therefore is negative as . Similarly, for approaches zero from below and has on odd number of negative real zeros. This is evident from (3) since is positive for and thus is negative as . Those Mittag-Leffler functions that approach zero from above the negative real axis must have crossed the -axis an even number of times. For example, for approaches zero from above. This is evident from (2) since and is positive for , therefore is positive as and has an even number of negative real zeros. With only a finite number of real zeros, each ML function in this phase must have an infinite number of complex zeros.

Consequently, the phase can be subdivided into regions where the Mittag-Leffler function has either an even or an odd number of real zeros. There are two regions where the Mittag-Leffler function has an even number of real zeros, and these two regions will be referred to as . There is one region where the Mittag-Leffler function has an odd number of real zeros, and it will be referred to as . Phase has been extensively mapped by the authors and is shown in Figure 7. The regions and will be discussed in more detail in the next two sections.

#### 8. Region

This region, which extends from , is bounded below by the line and is bounded above by the line as shown in Figure 8. Depicted in Figure 8 are the lines separating the various subphases where the Mittag-Leffler function has zeros. Lines begin on the line curl around and end at the point . Each subsequent line is asymptotically closer to the line as it approaches the point . The number of subphases drawn in Figure 8 was determined by when there was no clear separation distinguishing consecutive subphases. The line separating subphase from is also drawn for perspective.

Points on the boundary lines separating consecutive subphases can be determined numerically as accurately as desired, but no exact values are known (other than the point ). Two points on each curve will be given as reference values which are accurate to 11 significant digits. Points on the line where the boundary line separates subphase from subphase for are given in Table 3(a). Additional reference values are given in Table 3(b) which lists points on the horizontal line where the boundary line separates subphase from subphase for . These reference values have been investigated by Hanneken et al. [17] who published a partial table including values of up to . The values of are recorded such that the Mittag-Leffler function with that value of and will be in subphase whereas by adding one digit to the least significant digit of the corresponding Mittag-Leffler function will then be in subphase .

It should be noted that subphase within region must be distinguished from phase to which it is adjacent on the phase diagram. The graphs of Mittag-Leffler functions in both subphase and phase cross the -axis only once and asymptotically approach the negative -axis from below as . However, the Mittag-Leffler functions in subphase exhibit a fundamentally different functional behaviour from the Mittag-Leffler functions in phase . Since for all Mittag-Leffler functions in both phase and subphase , the decomposition into the functions and in (5) is valid. However, in phase where the Mittag-Leffler functions are entirely described by the function , and the oscillatory function is absent. This fundamental difference requires subphase be distinguished from phase . Consequently, subphase will be denoted as ( for subphase) as indicated in Figure 8. This is the only subphase which requires a special notation. All the points on the line for belong to subphase with one exception. The point , belongs to phase and not to subphase as discussed in detail in Section 6.

#### 9. Region

Region appears both above and below region on the phase diagram as shown in Figure 7. Although separated in phase space, the two regions of are fundamentally the same in that the Mittag-Leffler functions in both regions have similar behaviour. The lower region, which extends from , is bounded below by the line and is bounded above by the line as shown in Figure 9. Depicted in Figure 9 are the lines separating the various subphases where the Mittag-Leffler function has zeros. Lines begin on the line curl around and end on the line . The number of subphases drawn in Figure 7 was determined by when there was no clear separation distinguishing consecutive subphases. The line separating subphase from is also drawn for perspective. Points on the boundary lines separating consecutive subphases can be determined numerically as accurately as desired, but no exact values are known. Two points on each curve will be given as reference values which are accurate to 11 significant digits. Points on the line where the boundary line separates subphase from subphase for are given in Table 3(c). Additional reference values are given in Table 3(d) which lists points on the horizontal line where the boundary line separates subphase from subphase for . Note that the tabulated values in Tables 3(a) and 3(d) are related. This is because and consequently all zeros of are also zeros of except that has an additional zero at . Thus, whereas has an odd number of zeros, the added zero gives an even number of zeros.

The other portion of the phase diagram in the phase extends from and is bounded below by the line and bounded above by the to phase boundary line as shown in Figure 10. Depicted in Figure 10 are the lines separating the various subphases where the Mittag-Leffler function has zeros. The boundary lines begin at the point , and end at the point . Each subsequent line is asymptotically closer to the line as it approaches the point . The number of subphases drawn in Figure 8 was determined by when there was no clear separation distinguishing consecutive subphases. The line separating subphase from is also drawn for perspective. Points on the boundary lines separating the consecutive subphases can be determined numerically as accurately as desired, but no exact values are known other than the two end points. An additional point on each curve will be given as reference values which are accurate to 11 significant digits. Points on the line = 2 where the boundary line separates subphase from subphase for are given in Table 3(e).

As shown in Figure 10, the subphase is immediately adjacent to the boundary line separating the from the phase. The Mittag-Leffler function in subphase is positive for positive and as the function crosses the negative -axis reaching a minimum value below the -axis and then crosses the negative -axis a second time and asymptotically approaches zero from above the negative -axis as . For a fixed , increasing raises the minimum value upward toward the -axis causing the separation between the two zeros to decrease until the minimum value is on the -axis and the two zeros have coalesced into one real zero with a double multiplicity. This is illustrated in Figure 11 with the Mittag-Leffler function with . For just less than 2.34513, the function has two zeros centered around and increasing to *≈*2.34513 results in one real zero with a double multiplicity. A further increase in yields a function with no real zeros which oscillates as it asymptotically approaches which is characteristic of a function in phase as discussed earlier.

The value of above which the function has no real zeros delineates the boundary between the phases and for , and Table 1 lists these approximate values for various values of (see the discussion of phase for the methodology in the determination of the values for ).

A cubic equation was found to be an approximate fit to the boundary line for . The maximum deviation of the value of from Table 1 compared to that calculated from (8) is ±0.00153 at ; however, for the maximum deviation is ±0.0002. Although the points () on the phase boundary have been given to 6 significant digits in Table 1, they can be determined to much greater accuracy. In particular, for the special cases whenever and/or are integer, these more accurately determined values can be used as reference points on the boundary and are given in Table 2.

Although the curve extends to higher , it is limited to = 3 in this investigation. With the exception of and , the points which constitute the boundary line are indeterminate. For example, for , has two real zeros and an infinite number of complex zeros and belongs to the phase . Whereas for , has no real zeros and an infinite number of complex zeros and belongs to the phase . Consequently, the point on the boundary line at which separates the phases and is in the range . Although this range can be made narrower (see Table 2), the exact point that separates the phases is most likely indeterminate. Consequently, it is meaningless to discuss Mittag-Leffler functions on this phase boundary (with the exception of the two points known exactly: and , ). It must be noted that all approximate values of in Tables 1 and 2 correspond to Mittag-Leffler functions in phase for and in phase for and by adding one digit to the least significant digit of the function appears on the opposite side of the boundary line in phase for or phase for . While the opposite is true for the approximate values of in Table 2 which are in either phase or initially and after adding one digit to the least significant digit of are in phase or .

It should be noted that this phase boundary line was numerically determined first by Hanneken et al. [18] in the first attempt at an alpha-beta phase diagram. This present work is more complete including a phase not originally present and includes all the subphases in . The recent work of Duan et al. [19] shows this phase boundary line accurately for and approximately for but divides the entire - phase space into only two phases and the description of his F phase having no real zeros is incorrect.

#### 10. Phase

This phase extends from and from to the boundary line shown in Figure 1. Figure 12 shows the graph of a typical Mittag-Leffler function in this phase. The function is positive for positive , and as , the function oscillates with increasing amplitude crossing the negative -axis an infinite number of times.

It has been shown (i.e., Dzhrbashyan [20] and Djrbashian [21]) that all zeros of the function for are negative, real, and simple. This was later extended by Ostrovskii and Peresyolkova [22] to include . The point , was not included because the zeros of are not simple but have a multiplicity of 2. Nevertheless it is still true that the zeros of are negative and real. For > 3, it has been shown (Popov and Sedletski [10]) that has no real zeros and thus belongs to phase . Thus Mittag-Leffler functions on the line for belong to the phase as indicated by the arrow in Figure 1.

There is considerable theoretical work searching for all pairs () such that the zeros of the Mittag-Leffler functions are negative, real, and simple (i.e., Popov [23–26], Popov and Sedletski [10], and Ostrovskii and Peresyolkova [22]). For example, Popov [25] showed that for and all zeros of are negative, real, and simple. Although this covers the majority of phase the upper limit on is more restrictive than (8) predicts. However, the work of Popov and others is also more restrictive requiring the zeros to be simple. The phases proposed in Figure 1 are only concerned with whether the zeros are real or complex. The general properties attributed to the Mittag-Leffler functions in each phase hold true regardless of whether the zeros are simple or multiples.

Although the phase diagram in Figure 1 is restricted to , it is conjectured that phase extends to based on the theoretical work of Popov and the others listed above. Also supporting this hypothesis is the work of Wiman [16], Pólya [27], and Ostrovskii and Peresyokkova [22] who have shown that all zeros of for are real, negative, and simple. In addition, Popov [26] has shown that all zeros of the function are real, negative, and simple for and that all zeros of are real, negative, and simple.

#### 11. Phase

This phase extends from and for above the phase boundary line given approximately by (8). Figure 13 shows a typical Mittag-Leffler function in this phase.

The function is positive for positive and as the function oscillates with growing amplitude crossing the negative real axis an infinite number of times. The Mittag-Leffler functions in phase differ from those in phase in that the functions in phase / exhibit a finite number of oscillations whose relative minima are above the negative -axis, whereas for functions in phase , the relative minima for all oscillations are below the negative -axis (see Figure 12). For fixed , and incrementally above the phase boundary line, the relative minimum in the oscillation nearest no longer lies below the negative -axis but is now above the negative -axis and thus the function has lost two real zeros and gained two complex zeros (one and its complex conjugate). The phase boundary occurs at the value of when this relative minimum rests on the negative -axis. As is increased further, the relative minimum of the second oscillation nearest also occurs above the negative -axis (shown in Figure 13) admitting two more complex zeros for a total of 4 complex zeros and an infinite number of real zeros. This process continues as is increased; each time the relative minimum of an oscillation moves above the negative -axis the function loses two real zeros and gains two complex zeros. This phase has been extensively mapped by the authors and is shown in Figure 14. Reference values on the subphase boundary lines are given in Table 4.

Note that all Mittag-Leffler functions in this phase just above the boundary line have 2 complex zeros and thus this region is listed as . Since each of these regions all has the same general behavior, they are considered as one major phase with an infinite number of subphases. An interesting observation from Figure 14 is that the phase can never be achieved but is only approached for and as becomes incrementally small.

#### 12. Summary

The depiction of the - phase diagram for the Mittag-Leffler functions with real arguments is represented by Figure 1 with subphases shown in more detail in Figures 7, 8, 9, 10, and 14. Each phase represents a region where have not only the same type of zeros but also exhibit similar functional behavior. This represents a major step forward in characterizing the nature of the zeros and organizing the Mittag-Leffler functions according to their behavior. For complex arguments, the reader is referred to the numerical calculations for in the complex plane by Hilfer and Seybold [28]. Their results are consistent with the present work where the efforts overlap.

#### References

- I. Podlubny,
*Fractional Differential Equations*, vol. 198 of*Mathematics in Science and Engineering*, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1999. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - R. L. Magin,
*Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering*, Begell House Publishers, Redding, Conn, USA, 2006. - A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo,
*Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations*, vol. 204 of*North-Holland Mathematics Studies*, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - F. Mainardi,
*Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity*, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - L. V. Ahlfors,
*Complex Analysis*, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1966. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi, “Fractional calculus: integral and differential equations of fractional order,” in
*Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics*, A. Carpenteri and F. Mainardi, Eds., vol. 378 of*CISM Courses and Lectures*, pp. 223–276, Springer, Vienna, Austria, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - A. M. Sedletski, “Asymptotic formulas for zeros of functions of Mittag-Leffler type,”
*Analysis Mathematica*, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 117–132, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - A. M. Sedletski, “Nonasymptotic properties of the roots of a function of Mittag-Leffler type,”
*Matematicheskie Zametki*, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 405–420, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - R. Gorenflo, Yu. Luchko, and S. V. Rogozin, “Mittag-Leffler type functions: notes on growth properties and distribution of zeros,” A97-04, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, Freie Universitat, Berlin, Germany, 1997.
- A. Yu. Popov and A. M. Sedletski, “Distribution of the zeros of the Mittag-Leffler function,”
*Doklady Mathematics*, vol. 67, pp. 336–339, 2003. View at Google Scholar - W. R. Schneider, “Completely monotone generalized Mittag-Leffler functions,”
*Expositiones Mathematicae*, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - K. S. Miller and S. G. Samko, “A note on the complete monotonicity of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function,”
*Real Analysis Exchange*, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 753–755, 1997/98. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - K. S. Miller and S. G. Samko, “Completely monotonic functions,”
*Integral Transforms and Special Functions*, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 389–402, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - T. S. Aleroev and H. T. Aleroeva, “A problem on the zeros of the Mittag-Leffler function and the spectrum of a fractional-order differential operator,”
*Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations*, vol. 25, pp. 1–18, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi, “Fractional oscillations and Mittag-Leffler functions,” in
*Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Recent Advances in Applied Mathematics (RAAM '96)*, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 1996. - A. Wiman, “Über die Nullstellen der Funktionen E
_{α}(x),”*Acta Mathematica*, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 217–234, 1905. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - J. W. Hanneken, D. M. Vaught, and B. N. N. Achar, “Enumeration of the real zeros of the Mittag-Leffler function E
_{α}(x), $1<\alpha <2$,” in*Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering*, J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal, and J. A. T. Machado, Eds., pp. 15–26, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. W. Hanneken, B. N. N. Achar, D. M. Vaught, S. T. Spencer, and T. R. Ensley, “An alpha-beta phase diagram representation of the zeros and properties of the Mittag-Leffler function,” in
*Proceedings of the International Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications (FDA '10)*, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain, October 2010. - J. S. Duan, Z. Wang, Y. L. Liu, and X. Qiu, “Eigenvalue problems for fractional ordinary differential equations,”
*Chaos, Solitons & Fractals*, vol. 46, pp. 46–53, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - M. M. Dzhrbashyan, “Interpolation and spectral expansions associated with differential operators of fractional order,”
*Soviet Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis*, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–116, 1984. View at Google Scholar - M. M. Djrbashian,
*Harmonic Analysis and Boundary Value Problems in the Complex Domain*, vol. 65 of*Operator Theory: Advances and Applications*, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - I. V. Ostrovskii and I. N. Peresyolkova, “Nonasymptotic results on distribution of zeros of the function E
_{ρ}(z,*μ*),”*Analysis Mathematica*, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 283–296, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - A. Y. Popov, “On the Ostrovskii-Peresyolkova conjecture about zeros of the Mittag-Leffler functions,”
*Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics*, supplement 1, pp. S167–S182, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - A. Y. Popov and A. M. Sedletski, “Distribution of the zeros of the Mittag-Leffler function,”
*Doklady Mathematics*, vol. 67, pp. 336–339, 2003. View at Google Scholar - A. Y. Popov, “On zeros of Mittag-Leffler functions with parameter $\rho LTHEXA1/2$,”
*Analysis Mathematica*, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 207–246, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - A. Y. Popov, “On zeros of a certain family of Mittag-Leffler functions,”
*Journal of Mathematical Sciences*, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 4228–4231, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - G. Pólya, “Bemerkung über die Mittag-Lefflerschen Funktionen,”
*Tôhoku Mathematical Journal*, vol. 19, pp. 241–248, 1921. View at Google Scholar - R. Hilfer and H. J. Seybold, “Computation of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function and its inverse in the complex plane,”
*Integral Transforms and Special Functions*, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 637–652, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet