Table 1: Comparison between the SQLM values and the results of Bachok et al. [15].

(SQLM) [15]

11−0.21389757−0.2138
21−0.46299891−0.4629
31−0.71756481−0.7175
1−1−0.06319955−0.0631
12 −0.92599783−0.9259